Homeplace Manor Healthcare Center
425 SW Ave F, Hamlin, TX 79520 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (325) 576-3643 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 33.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 30.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.38 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 22.4 residents a day — about 37% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 3 employees (RN and DON) reviewed for employability. The facility failed to ensure evidence that the criminal history was checked prior to the DON and RN being hired or having access to the residents. The facility failed to ensure evidence that the Employee Misconduct Registry or Nurse Aide Registry was checked prior to RN being hired or having access to the residents. The failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from someone who was unemployable, which increased the risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for the RN revealed a hire date of 05/06/2026. Further review of the personnel file provided by the BOM reflected the RN had no evidence the facility ran a Criminal History Check prior to her hire date. The BOM provided a document that the RN's criminal history was checked on 05/28/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 Screening for Resident #1. The PASRR Level 1 Screening dated 11/13/25 did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis post-traumatic stress was present upon Resident #1's admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk of not receiving a PASRR Evaluation, individualized care, or special services to meet their needs. Findings included: A record review on 4/25/2026 of the face sheet dated 4/25/2026 revealed Resident #1 admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] year-old female. A record review on 4/25/2026 of Resident #1's Physician Progress note dated 3/18/2026 revealed diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder (persistent, excessive and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and facility services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health care services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who was diagnosed with depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), received the care and services needed in the most appropriate setting, after the resident began to display increased behaviors on 4/15/2026 and requested outpatient psychiatric services. This failure could place a resident with PTSD at risk of not receiving specialized services which would enhance their highest level of functioning and could contribute to residents' decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: A record review on 4/25/2026 of the face sheet dated 4/25/2026 revealed Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to utilize the services of a RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week and designate a RN as a DON on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to ensure an RN worked for 8 consecutive hours for 28 of 79 days reviewed in October and November 2025 until December 18th 2025.The facility failed to designate an RN as a DON on a full-time basis for 2 of 3 months reviewed in October and November 2025 until December 18th 2025.These failures placed all residents at risk for their clinical needs not being met.Findings includedDuring an interview on 12/16/2026 at 10:16 a.m., the AIT stated the facility did not have a DON or RN coverage for eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week.Record review of Monthly Nursing Attendance Calendar for 2025 revealed: RN/DON last date worked was on 11/06/2025. RN/DON hired on 11/04/2025 and her last day worked was on 11/10/2025. 10/01/2025-10/31/2025 had 2 days (10/11/2025 & 10/12/2025) with no RN for 8 consecutive hours. 11/01/2025-11/30/2025 had 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure freezer and refrigerator temperatures were tracked daily2. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure food temperatures were taken before serving. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: During an observation on 12/16/2025 at 9:37 AM of the refrigerator revealed: 1. 1 package of food that resembled corn tortillas was in an unopened package, but not in the original box and did not have a label of what the item was, or the date opened or use by date.2. current temperature showed 33 Fahrenheit. Freezer:1. 3 slices of food item that appeared to be garlic toast in an opened/unsealed package without label of what it was or a date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 14 of 45 employees (AIT, SW, DM, Maint D, ADON, AD, DOR, RN A, LVN B, LVN C, LVN D, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G) reviewed for employability. The facility failed to ensure evidence that the criminal history was checked prior to the AIT, SW, DM, Maint D, ADON, AD, DOR, RN A, LVN B, LVN C, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G being hired or having access to the residents. The facility failed to ensure evidence that the EMR was checked prior to the AIT, AD, DM, Maint D, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G being hired or having access to residents. The facility failed to ensure evidence that the NAR was checked prior to CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G being hired or having access to the residents. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving care from someone who was unemployable, which increased the risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation risk.Findings included Record review of the personnel record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, within 14 days after a facility completes a resident's assessment, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 14 (Residents #1, #4, #5, #7, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #19, #20, #21, #23, and #24) of 24 reviewed for resident assessments, in that: 1. Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/11/2025 and Quarterly MDS's, dated 05/29/2025, 08/26/2025,09/11/2025, and 11/10/2025 were completed but not transmitted to CMS as of 12/18/2025. 2. Resident #4's admission MDS, dated [DATE] and Quarterly MDS's, dated 05/29/2025, 08/26/2025,09/11/2025, and 11/10/2025 were completed but not transmitted to CMS as of 12/18/2025. 3. Resident #5's Entry MDS, dated [DATE], admission MDS dated [DATE] and Quarterly MDS's, dated 06/02/2025, 08/25/2025, and 11/24/2025 were completed but not transmitted to CMS as of 12/18/2025. 4. Resident #7's Entry MDS, dated [DATE], admission MDS dated [DATE], and Quarterly MDS's, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of each CNA at least once every 12 months, for 2 of 3 (CNA F & CNA G) reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to complete annual CNA competency evaluations for CNA F and CNA G, based on the personnel file review results.This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving consistent, appropriate interventions necessary to meet the residents' needs.Findings includedRecord review of the Personnel File Review completed on 12/18/2025, reflected CNA F was hired on 1/09/2023. Further review reflected CNA F did not have a competency evaluation on file. Record review of the Personnel File Review completed on 12/18/2025, reflected CNA G was hired on 8/10/2017. Further review reflected CNA F did not have a competency evaluation on file.During an interview on 12/17/2025 at 2:38 p.m., the BO manager stated she did not have any annual competencies on record for CNA F and CNA G.During an investigation on 12/18/2025 at 9:20 a.m., the RCN stated he would not know where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for 5 (Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #19, Resident #20, and Resident #23) of 5 residents reviewed for hospice services. 1. The facility failed to maintain the required hospice forms and documentation, that included the Hospice Election Form, for Resident #10, Resident #19, and Resident #20 Resident #23 were. 2. The facility failed to have a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, for Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #19, Resident #20, and Resident #23. 3. The facility failed to ensure a staff member was designated to communicate with hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 (CNA-E and CNA-I) staff observed during incontinent care, and the storage of ice scoop for 1 of 1 ice chest reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA E and CNA I performed appropriate hand hygiene during peri-care for Resident #24. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop for the ice chest was stored outside of the ice chest. These failures placed residents of the facility at risk of infection spread from cross contamination of ice in ice chest and improper hand hygiene. Findings includedRecord Review of the Resident #24's electronic face sheet, dated 12/18/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on HIV, restraint reduction and prevention of falls. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H received required HIV training upon hire. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H received required restraint reduction training upon hire.The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H received required prevention of falls training upon hire. These failures could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who had been insufficiently trained on the mode of HIV transmission, HIV prevention, behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for direct care staff all new and existing staff for 8 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on effective communication. The facility failed to ensure communication training was provided to the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of not understanding their total health status and not effectively being provided notice of rights and services both orally and in writing in a manner that the resident understands.Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed required effective communication training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for the SW reflected a hire date of 3/01/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff members were educated on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on resident's rights. The facility failed to ensure that the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on the rights of the resident, and the responsibilities of the facility to properly care for its residents upon hire.This failure could place residents at risk of their rights not being honored by uninformed staff. Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed required resident rights training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for the SW reflected a hire date of 3/01/2025. Further review of personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on (1) activities that constitute ANE and misappropriation of resident property: (2) procedures for reporting incidents of ANE or misappropriation of resident property; (3) dementia management and resident abuse prevention for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and training for dementia management. The facility failed to ensure the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on abuse, neglect and exploitation & dementia management upon hire. These failures could place residents at risk of being abused, neglected, or exploited by uninformed staff and could delay the facility's investigation of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff on the elements and goals of the facility QAPI program for all new and existing staff for 9 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on QAPI. The facility failed to ensure that the AIT, the SW, the AD, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on the facility's QAPI program upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of their quality of care not being improved upon when a known issue had occurred from staff not being informed on the goals and various elements of the QAPI program. Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed QAPI training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for the SW reflected a hire date of 3/01/2025. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include as part of its infection prevention and control program mandatory training that includes the written standards, policies, and procedures for the program for all new and existing staff for 8 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on infection control. The facility failed to ensure the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on infection control upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting facility acquired infections from staff not being informed on proper infection prevention and control practices when performing resident care activities that pertain to that staff member's role.Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed infection control training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for the SW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to include as part of its compliance and ethics program (1) an effective way to communicate the program's standards, policies, and procedures through a training program or in another practical manner which explains the requirements under the program; (2) annual training if the operating organization operates 5 or more facilities for all new and existing staff for 8 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) reviewed for training on compliance and ethics.The facility failed to ensure that the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on compliance and ethics upon hire.This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed of compliance and ethics program due to lack of staff training.Findings includedRecord review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed compliance and ethics training upon hire or while working…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training consistent with the requirements at 483.40 (behavioral health services) and as determined by the facility assessment for 8 of 15 (the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H) staff reviewed for training on behavioral health. The facility failed to ensure that the AIT, the SW, the DM, the DOR, RN A, LVN D, CNA E, and HK H were educated on behavioral health upon hire. This failure could place residents diagnosed with a mental, psychosocial, or substance use disorder at risk of not receiving the care specific to their individual needs.Findings were:Record review of personnel record for the AIT reflected a hire date of 10/17/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the AIT had no evidence she had completed behavioral health training upon hire or while working at the facility.Record review of personnel record for the SW reflected a hire date of 3/01/2025. Further review of personnel record provided by the BO reflected the SW had no evidence he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives to meet resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #15) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of hospice services for Resident #10. 2. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in area of insulin and diabetes for Resident #15. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and not having their needs met.Findings include: Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's electronic face sheet accessed on 12/18/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Alzheimer's disease, fracture of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 1 of 1 lunch meal reviewed. This facility failed to follow the menu when preparing lunch meal on 09/02/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in health status due to inadequate or inappropriate nutritional intake. The findings include: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with Diagnoses that included: Nausea and Vomiting, Dietary Calcium Deficiency, Hypokalemia (low potassium), Vitamin D deficiency, Generalized Anxiety order. Record review of Resident #5's Physician orders dated 09/01/2024 revealed: Regular Diet with regular texture. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: Section C-Cognitive Patterns BIMS score was 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety of 1of 1 kitchens reviewed. The facility failed to ensure items stored in 1 of 1 freezer were properly stored and labeled. The facility failed to ensure current temperature logs of 1 of 1 freezer and 2 of 2 refrigerators were maintained daily. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff (1 of 2) wore hair nets when preparing, serving meals. These failures could place resident that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings include: During an observation on 09/02/2024 at 09:55 AM in the kitchen revealed temperature logs for 1 of 1 freezer and 2 of 2 refrigerators were not up to date. There were no temperature logs for September 2024. During an observation on 09/02/2024 at 09:58 AM dietary staff were not wearing a hair net. During an observation on 09/02/2024 at 10:00 AM revealed in the freezer 1 box of tamales not sealed, dated. One package of what appeared to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training effective communications mandatory training was completed for 7 of 19 employees (DON, DM, MAINT, CNA C, TRNS, COTA, and HSKP F) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by the DON, MAINT, TRNS, and COTA during orientation. The facility did not ensure effective communication training was completed by the DM, CNA C, and HSKP F annually. These failures could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the employee files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed effective communications training during orientation: * DON hire date 06/03/2024; * MAINT, hire date 09/28/2023; * TRNS, hire date 03/27/2024; * COTA, transferred from a sister facility on 08/23/2024 Record review of the employee files revealed no evidence the following staff had completed effective communications training annually: * DM, hire date 08/03/2022; * CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff members were educated on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of the facility to properly care for its residents for 5 of 19 staff (DM, LVN G, HSKP E, TRNS, and HSKP F) reviewed for training requirements in that: The facility failed to ensure five staff which included: DM, LVN G, HSKP E, TRNS, and HSKP F received the required training on resident rights timely. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from staff who were insufficiently trained. The findings included: Record review of the DM's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/03/2022. The file did not contain any record of training on resident's rights. Record review of LVN G's employee file revealed a hire date of 09/04/2023. The file did not contain any record of training on resident's rights. Record review of HSKP E's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/05/2024. The file did not contain any record of training on resident's rights. Record review of TRNS's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/23/2024. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property and dementia management for 2 (DM and HSKP F) of 19 employees reviewed for staff training. The facility failed to have documentation for DM and HSKP F on what constitutes abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and how to report the above. These failures could place residents at risk of injury or harm due to being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of the DM's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/03/2022. The file did not contain any record of training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property. Record review of HSKP F's employee file revealed a hire date of 04/01/2023. The file did not contain any record of training on abuse, neglect, exploitation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program was completed for 3 of 19 staff (DM, HSKP E, and HSKP F) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure five staff which included the DM, HSKP E, or HSKP F received the required training on infection control timely. These failures could place residents at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the DM's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/03/2022. The file did not contain any record of training on infection control. Record review of HSKP E's employee file revealed a hire date of 08/05/2024. The file did not contain any record of training on infection control. Record review of HSKP F's employee file revealed a hire date of 04/01/2023. The file did not contain any record of training on infection control. During an interview on 09/04/24 at 12:32 p.m., the DM stated training was done online. He explained that staff received email notices and group text when trainings were available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care plan and provide a summary of their baseline care plan to residents for 1 (Resident #24) of 14 residents reviewed for care plan completion. 1. The facility failed to complete Resident #24's baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #24 a summary of their baseline care plan after completion. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's electronic face sheet dated 09/04/2024 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: BIMS score of 09 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a performance review of each CNA at least once every 12 months, for 1 of 3 (CNA C) reviewed for annual competency evaluations. The facility failed to complete annual CNA competency evaluations for CNA C, based on the personnel file review results. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving consistent, appropriate interventions necessary to meet the residents' needs. Findings included: Record review of the Personnel File Review completed on 09/04/2024, indicated CNA B, did not have a competency evaluation on file. The Personnel File Review indicated CNA B's date of hire was 03/27/2023. During an interview on 09/04/2024 at 2:25 p.m., the CRN stated the DON was responsible for conducting and documenting nursing training and staff performance reviews. She stated the effect on residents would depend the topic of the review and impact on the quality of care and life for the resident. The CRN explained the facility had recently changed from paper records to electronic records and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN), for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 3 of 12 months (October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023) reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure that an RN worked 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for the months of October 2023, November 2023, and December 2023 (Saturday's and Sunday's) for a total of 22 days. This failure could place the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff. Findings include: Record review of the CMS' PBJ Staffing Data Report, (payroll-based journal nurse staffing and non-nurse staffing datasets provide information submitted by nursing homes including rehabilitation services on a quarterly basis) FY Quarter 1, 2024 (October 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023), run date 05/29/2024, revealed no evidence of RN coverage for Saturday's and Sunday's for the months of October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control practice. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) A failed to perform hand hygiene and change her gloves at the appropriate times while providing incontinence care for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Finding include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/30/24, revealed the resident was a 91- year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diarrhea, rash, and other nonspecific skin eruptions, and need for personal care. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/01/24, revealed Resident #1 required moderate assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL)) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week or designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis. The facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day. The facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis. These failures placed all residents at risk of their clinical needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of PBJ report ran 07/11/23 for Fiscal Year Quarter 2 (January 1,2023 to March 31, 2023) revealed no RN coverage for 01/01 (SU); 01/02 (MO); 01/03 (TU); 01/04 (WE); 01/05 (TH); 01/06 (FR); 01/07 (SA); 01/08 (SU); 01/09 (MO); 01/10 (TU); 01/11 (WE); 01/12 (TH); 01/13 (FR); 01/14 (SA); 01/15 (SU); 01/16 (MO); 01/17 (TU); 01/18 (WE); 01/19 (TH); 01/20 (FR); 01/21 (SA); 01/22 (SU); 01/23 (MO); 01/24 (TU); 01/25 (WE); 01/26 (TH); 01/27 (FR); 01/28 (SA);…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to appropriately label, date, seal/close items stored in pantry, refrigerator, and freezer. The failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness from food contamination. Findings include: During an observation in the facility's only kitchen on 07/24/2023 from 09:40 AM to 10:15 AM revealed the following: Four containers of spices on a shelf had lids open to air: Lemon pepper, sea salt, garlic powder, ground cumin. One 32-oz open bag of cheese sauce mix half full, folded over once and with no date of when opened One 32-oz open bag of potato flakes with no date of when opened One 1 lb. 8 oz bag of fried onions with no date of when opened One 5 lb. white cake mix was open to air with no date of when opened One 5 lb. bag of devil's food cake mix, half full, wrapped in clear plastic with no date of when opened One 5 lb. bag of blueberry muffin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 6 of 13 Residents (Residents #1, # 12, #19, #22, #24, #25) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that; The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan without conducting a care plan conference within 7 days of Resident #1's comprehensive assessment on 07/11/2023. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan without conducting a care plan conference within 7 days of Resident #12's comprehensive assessment on 06/30/2023. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan without conducting a care plan conference within 7 days of Resident #19's comprehensive assessment on 07/01/2023. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan without conducting a care plan conference within 7 days of Resident #22's comprehensive assessment on 07/11/2023. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 6 of 7 months reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility failed to maintain a system to monitor antibiotic use during the months of January 2023 through June 2023. These failures placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Findings included: Record review of Facility Infection Control Log for January 2023 through July 2023 revealed facility maps with color coded rooms and the legend revealed the color to coordinate with the type of infection. There was also a page for each month that included each resident order for that corresponding month of a resident with an abx. There was no tracking form for the months of January 2023 through June 2023 that included if a resident had a lab completed before starting an abx, if they met/didn't meet the McGreers criteria for abx therapy, or if the infections were facility or community acquired. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-18 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional for 1 of 1 activity director (AD) reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to ensure the AD, hired on 9/29/2025, was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements.This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings includedRecord review of the AD's employee file revealed the AD was hired on 9/29/2025, as the activity director. Further review revealed no evidence of certification or training as a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements.During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 8:14 a.m., the RDO stated he expected all staff to have appropriate education and certification for their roles. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-04 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representative of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility including any plans of correction without identifying information about complainants or residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the three preceding years of any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations with plan of correction were posted for residents, family members, and visitors to review without identifying information about complainants or residents. The failure placed residents and their family members and representatives at risk for violation of the right to review the findings from State surveys and investigations conducted in the facility without asking to review the reports. Findings included: During an observation on 09/03/2024 at 2:03 PM, the last survey results dated 07/27/2023 were in a binder outside of ADMN's office. No plan of corrections was observed with survey, certifications, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0579 — widespreadProvide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to post, in an area of the facility that is readily available to residents, employees, and visitors five of 33 postings. The facility failed to display the Facility admission Policy, a description of the protection of personal funds, how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and how to receive funds for previous payments covered by such benefits. This failure could affect all residents who reside in the facility by placing them at risk of incomplete or inaccurate information. Findings included: During observations on 07/24/2023 from 10:35 AM to 01:00 PM during initial tour of the facility revealed there were no postings explaining the facility admission policy, how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and how to receive funds for previous payments covered by such benefits or a description of the protection of personal funds, and the facility's policies on restraints and involuntary seclusion. During an interview on 07/27/2023 at 10:10 AM, the ADM stated he was unable to locate the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for QAPI. The facility failed to maintain documentation of QAPI meetings prior to February of 2023. This failure placed residents at risk of maintaining and improving safety and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of QAPI meetings revealed: Facility had maintained QAPI meeting minutes from 02/2023 to 07/2023. No previous meeting documentation was available. During an interview on 07/25/23 at 10:30AM with ADM and RRN, ADM said he had been scouring the ADM office for evidence of previous QAPI meetings with no success. He said he became the ADM in March of 2023. RRN said the former ADM had been an AIT during the Covid-19 pandemic and it had been revealed that she had not been trained sufficiently and did not maintain records as she should have. During an interview on 07/25/23 at 1:30PM with ADM, he said that he was unable to locate any other QAPI documented meetings prior to Feb of 23. He said he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-07-27 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility for 1 of 1facility reviewed for the surety bond. The facility failed to have a surety bond that exceeded the average balance of the trust fund. This failure placed residents at risk of a loss of personal funds. Findings included: Record review of facility Surety Bond signed 03/18/22 was the amount of $10,000. Record review of Monthly Statements of Trust Funds for April 2023 to June 2023 revealed: Statement date 04/30/23 revealed a low balance of $12, 538.91 and a high balance on 04/12/23 of $17,961.59. Statement date 05/31/23 revealed a low balance of $12,810.41 and a high balance on 05/05/23 of $19,289.37. Statement date 06/30/23 revealed a low balance of $13,209.42 and a high balance on 06/05/23 of $18,257.56. During an interview with Adm on 07/27/23 at 12:26PM, he said that the surety bond was to ensure the safety of resident's personal funds in the trust fund. The surety bond was supposed to exceed the balance of the trust fund in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-07-27 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot of usable living space per resident in 8 multiple occupancy resident rooms (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) of 31 rooms reviewed for room classification. The rooms measured less than the 80 square feet of usable living space per resident in multiple occupancy resident rooms. This failure could impede the ability of residents to live in these rooms. Findings included: Record review of state form 3740 labeled Bed Classification dated 07/27/23 revealed Rooms 16-23 (8 rooms) as double occupancy Medicare certified resident rooms. During an interview on 07/27/23 at 12:26PM, with ADM, he said they could not successfully make the rooms 16-23 available as resident rooms within 24 hours. In their current state, they were not able to be 80 sq feet per person for the 8 rooms that were double occupancy. He said he could make the ADM office as a temporary office to put all offices together but would probably have to establish a couple of the rooms down another hall as offices as well. ADM said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- GHC HAMLIN OPERATIONS, LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHC HAMLIN OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/01/2025 |
| GHC OPERATIONS HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2025 |
| ANDERSON, JENNIFER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2025 |
| EVANS, LEON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2025 |
| GHC LTC MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| HUFF, LARRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WHITE, CHAD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.