Community Care Center of Hondo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: Resident #1 eloped on 11/3/2024 out of facility and was across a 35 per mile street, at store near gas pumps, near a highway, that was 40 miles per hour. On 11/2/2024 Resident #1 attempted to elope, before a nurse stopped Resident #1 from going outside. An IJ was identified on 4/25/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 4/25/2025 at 6:41 PM. While the IJ was removed on 4/26/2025 at 7:53 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not an immediate jeopardy due to facility's need to evaluate the plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injury or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility was free of pests for 5 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #5, and #6), in that: 1. The facility failed ensure Resident #1's room was free from flies. Resident #1 was hospitalized on [DATE] for maggot infestation around the tracheostomy and acute on chronic respiratory failure. Resident #1's stoma was suctioned around the trach until it was cleared of all maggots. A bronchoscopy was performed and cleared clots. Resident #1 was admitted to ICU for continued mechanical ventilation. 2. Resident #3, and Resident #5 had a flies in their room as they ate their breakfast and lunch tray on 11/10/2023. 3. Resident #6 had a fly on his shirt while he was eating his noon meal in the dining room on 11/11/2023. 4. Flies were observed in the hallway on A Wing and B Wing on 11/13/2023. An IJ was identified on 11/12/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:59 p.m While the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect, in that: The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from having maggots in his tracheostomy site, who was hospitalized on [DATE] for maggot infestation around the tracheostomy and acute on chronic respiratory failure. Resident #1's stoma was suctioned around the trach until it was cleared of all maggots. A bronchoscopy was performed and cleared clots. Resident #1 was admitted to ICU for continued mechanical ventilation. An IJ was identified on 11/12/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:59 p.m While the IJ was removed on 11/14/2023 at 3:18 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolation and severity of actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm due to facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-12 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility or the resident through a means other than a postal service for 2 of 8 residents (confidential residents) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure staff distributed mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life.The findings included: During a confidential resident group meeting on 9/10/25 at 10:00 a.m., 2 of 8 members from the group meeting stated they did not receive mail on Saturdays because the Front Office Staff didn't work on Saturdays. The residents stated since the front office was locked, the mail delivered on Saturday was held in the front office and did not get delivered until the following Monday. Residents stated, the BOM collected the mail, sorted it, and then gave the mail to the Activity Director who then delivered the mail with the help…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for ten of ten residents (Residents #4, #15, #19, #25, #27, #29, #33, #34, #36 and #37) reviewed for food and nutrition services.The facility failed to ensure the glazed lemon cake served for the lunch meal on 09/09/2025 was pureed to the correct consistency as required for Residents #4, #15, #19, #25, #27, #29, #33, #34, #36 and #37 who were ordered a pureed diet.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of choking, poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #19 had diagnoses which included peripheral autonomic neuropathy (a condition that affects the nerves that control involuntary bodily functions, such as digestion, heart rate, sweating, and urination); vascular dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident rooms for 4 of 35 multiple occupancy resident rooms (#A5, #A6, #A9, and #A11) reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure rooms #A5, #A6, #A9, and #A11, which were multiple occupancy resident rooms, provided a minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of inadequate space for activities of daily living in their rooms.The findings included:Observation on 9/10/25 at 4:55 p.m. revealed the measurement of rooms designated for three residents were as follows:- room #A5 measured 216.8 sq. ft. (72.6 sq. ft. per resident) with two residents residing in the room- room #A6 measured 220.4 sq. ft. (73.3 sq. ft. per resident) with no residents residing in the room- room #A9 measured 228.7 sq. ft. (76.2 sq. ft. per resident) with one resident residing in the room - room #A11 measured 226 sq. ft. (75.3 sq. ft. per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect in a manner and environment that enhances his and her quality of life for 1 (Resident #2) of 8 residents reviewed, in that: CNA C referred to Resident #2's brief during catheter care as a diaper.The facility failed to ensure RN B provided privacy to Resident #1 when performing tracheostomy care (a surgical opening made through the front of the neck into the windpipe used to help a person breathe when the normal route through the mouth, nose, or throat is blocked or impaired). This deficient practice could affect residents at the facility who receive assistance with care and could place them at-risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and low self-esteem. The findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #2's admission record, dated 9/17/25, revealed an initial admission date of 11/24/23 and a readmission date of 11/25/24 with diagnoses that included pneumonia (an infection that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive) for 1 (Resident #4) of 8 residents reviewed for right to formulate advance directive. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's OOH DNR was incomplete and not able to be used in emergency situations. This failure could affect any residents who have medical records and could result in misinformation about professional care provided.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypo-osmolality (lower than normal concentration of solutes in the blood) and hyponatremia (low sodium levels), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle loss), muscle weakness, wedge compression fracture of T7-T8 (thoracic region- part of the body surrounded by the ribs, located between the neck and the waist)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #1 and #19) reviewed for accuracy.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/25/25 accurately reflected the resident's use of insulin.2. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #19's dental status on the resident's annual assessment dated [DATE].These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity (extremely overweight), hyperlipidemia (abnormally high levels of fat in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, and chronic kidney failure (long term condition in which the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals, and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for oxygen therapy:Resident #1's oxygen concentrator filter was covered in a thick white/gray substance.This failure could affect residents who received respiratory therapy and put them at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (mental health condition characterized by a persistent and intense feeling of sadness or loss of interest in activities), pneumonia (infection of the lungs that causes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 medication carts (A wing medication cart) and 1 of 2 medication (B wing) storage rooms reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's metolazone (diuretic that treats fluid retention) had a change direction sticker placed on the package. 2. The facility failed to ensure the B wing emergency cart did not contain expired supplies. These deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion.1. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders, dated [DATE], revealed an order for metolazone oral tablet 5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Thursday related to heart failure, with an order date of [DATE], a start date of [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevent and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #21 and Resident #41) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure RN B wore gloves when picking up Resident #21's urostomy tube (surgical procedure that creates an opening, stoma, in the abdominal wall to divert urine away from the bladder and drains into a collection bag) off the floor.The facility failed to ensure RN B wore proper PPE while providing wound care to Resident #41.These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 9/9/25 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included gross hematuria…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service. -Container of Thick-it had a scoop stored inside container -Two 5-gallon clear food storage containers with dry cereal did not have a label and was not dated. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illnesses. Findings were: Observation of the facilities kitchen on 08/13/2024 at 9:08 AM revealed a clear container labeled Thick-it contained a scoop in it. Observation of the facility's dry storage in the kitchen on 08/15/2024 at 11:18 AM revealed two clear 5-gallon food storage containers each filled with dry cereal were unlabeled and not dated. Interview with Dietary Manager on 08/15/2024 at 11:48 AM revealed the containers with dry cereal were filled that day and she forgot to label the container. Dietary Manager stated it was the responsibility of all staff to label foods when they are opened. Dietary Manager stated by not labeling open foods it increased the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,096 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $11,403 — penalty dated 2025-04-26
• $7,693 — penalty dated 2023-11-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX