No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fallbrook Rehabilitation and Care Center

10851 Crescent Moon Dr., Houston, TX 77064 · Government - Hospital district · 202 certified beds · (281) 955-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)6 immediate-jeopardy citations$83,678 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $83,678 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10851 Crescent Moon Dr · (281) 955-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10680 Jones Rd Ste 500 · (281) 890-9922 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10521 Jones Rd · (832) 688-5215 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Harvest Meadows Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
10640 Jones Rd · (281) 970-3854

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.1%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.2%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.9%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.3%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.8%88.0%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

30.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF30.7%CMS range 14.5–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.4–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
59.7%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 62.6 residents a day — about 31% occupied, or roughly 139 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-11)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-02-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to provide safe care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nursing services (Resident #1).The facility failed to ensure CNA G implemented safe transfer measures on 02/13/2026 at 4:00 a.m. when she attached the lift sling to the handling strap, instead of the sling attachment loop. Resident #1 experienced a fall and sustained a fractured clavicle during a mechanical lift transfer. The DON was unable to demonstrate proper mechanical lift transfer technique or clearly explain required safety measures.The facility was unable to provide documentation verifying that CNA G, CNA A, CNA B, or other direct care staff had demonstrated competency in mechanical lift transfers prior to performing resident care.On 02/23/2026 at 2:11p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/25/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure CNA G implemented safe transfer measures on 02/13/2026 at 4:00 a.m. when she attached the lift sling to the handling strap, instead of the sling attachment loop. Resident #1 experienced a fall and sustained a fractured clavicle during a mechanical lift transfer. On 02/22/2024 at 8:22p.m. an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/25/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of at a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place resident at risk of not receiving appropriate supervision leading to injuries, hospitalization, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (CR #1) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. -On 09/14/25, CNA A failed to tell Nurse A specifically what was wrong with CR #1. Nurse A failed to assess or provide medical care for CR #1 for approximately two hours, after CNA A asked her to check on CR #1 around 6:30 p.m. CNA A called 911 on 09/14/25 around 8:46 p.m. after CR #1 was noted to have a fever of 103 F, nausea/vomiting, doubled over with pain of 10/10, and was grayish in color. CR #1 was diagnosed at the hospital with fever, left heel wound infection, complicated UTI, and AKI. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/07/25. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:05 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 10/09/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and resident's choice for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) reviewed for Quality of Care. 1.The facility failed to call emergency services and have Resident #1 immediately transferred to the hospital, on 08/09/25 when she experienced a change in condition at 11:30 a.m., including a blood pressure reading of 203/98 and a change in mental status. The facility failed to monitor Resident #1 after the change in condition was noted and used a non-emergency ambulance service, which resulted in a delay in her receiving emergency care until after 1:13 p.m., approximately one hour and 51 minutes after her initial change in condition. Resident #1 was noted to have a blood glucose level of 44 upon arrival to the hospital and was treated for Hypoglycemia (a condition in which the body's blood sugar level goes below the standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for free of accidents, hazards, supervision, and devices., in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 who the facility staff knew he was at risk for fall and update fall precaution interventions after several falls resulting in injuries to the head. An IJ was identified on 02/09/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:15 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 02/11/24 at 12:50 p.m., with the Administrator, DVP and DVP Clinical. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not an immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility staff had not been trained on identifying residents at risk for fall, preventions, and interventions, and modification and care plan falls. This failure could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services in that: - The facility failed to administer IV antibiotic as ordered by the physician when Resident #1's insurance did not cover the cost for resident to receive the ordered IV antibiotic therapy (Amphotericin B and Avycaz) to treat unresolved infections for 5 days. -The facility failed to review Resident #1's Physician orders and MAR to ensure that all medications were being administered according to physician's orders. An IJ was identified on 8/4/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/4/23 at 5:03 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 8/8/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for harm that is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for 1 of 5 residents (CR#1) reviewed for ADL Care.The facility failed to ensure CR#1 was free from neglect when she was told to poop in her diaper and left to sit in her feces for 2 hours.This failure could place residents at risk of developing skin associated wounds needing continued medical assistance.FindingsRecord review of CR#1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 3/30/2026. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of type 2 (obtained later in life) Diabetes with hyperosmolarity (body doesn't make enough insulin in the body); legally blind (unable to see), dependence on renal dialysis (treatment for people with failing kidneys), hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of CR#1's Baseline Care Plan dated 3/28/26 revealed the following:Focus: Resident Has an ADL self-care performance deficit dash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Resident #28 who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 (Resident #28) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL's and quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was provided incontinent care in a timely manner, which resulted in decreased skin integrity. This failure affected one resident (Resident #28) and placed residents requiring assistance with incontinent care at risk of not have the assistance with personal care which could cause pain, skin breakdown, lack of dignity and low self-esteem. Findings: Record review of the facility face sheet revealed that Resident #28 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body (hypoxia)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #28) of 5 residents reviewed quality of care and skin . The facility failed to assess, report, and obtain new physician orders due to a change in resident #28's skin condition of the perineal (private area of a patient) groin and buttock to the physician. This failure affected one resident (Resident #28) out of 4 residents reviewed for skin issues and had the potential to place residents at risk skin break down, infection and discomfort. Findings included: Record review of the facility face sheet revealed that Resident #28 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body (hypoxia) or when you have too much carbon dioxide in your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-12-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the residents clinical condition demonstrated that it was not possible, or the resident's preferences indicated otherwise for one of six residents (Resident #36) reviewed for weight loss and nutrition. The facility failed to identify early, assess and modify interventions consistent with Resident #36's significant weight loss on 12/06/2022. The facility failed to notify the physician as appropriate in evaluating and managing Resident #36's significant weight loss on 12/06/2022. These failures could place the residents at risk of health complication related to nutritional and hydration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: difficulty swallowing, diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide services and make reasonable accommodations to meet the Residents needs and preferences, for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life (CR#1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed. Resident rights Facility failed to ensure nursing staff responded to resident call lights within a reasonable time frame. Interviews were CR #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 revealed their call lights frequently went unanswered for up to one hour or longer.This should practice had the potential to place residents at risk for unmet needs, including delays in receiving assistance with medical care in the event of an emergency.Findings include:Record review of CR#1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 3/30/2026. CR#1 had diagnoses of type 2 (obtained later in life) Diabetes with hyperosmolarity (body doesn't make enough insulin in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for care plans .The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #6's need for an escort to appointments.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and interventions to meet their needs. Findings include :Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had medical diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (mild, with agitation) (declining brain function related to thinking and judgement that is severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for adequate supervision and accident hazards.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had an escort to a clinic visit on 12/31/2025 at 2:30 PM.This failure could place residents at risk of injury and lack of support during off-site visits. Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (mild, with agitation) (declining brain function related to thinking and judgement that is severe enough to impact daily life without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #68) of 5 residents reviewed for accurate records.-The facility failed to document showers for Resident #6 on 12/30/2025, 1/1/2026, 1/3/2026, 1/6/2026, 1/6/2026, 1/10/2026 and 1/13/2026.-The facility failed to upload documents or have progress notes related to Resident #6's clinic visit on 12/31/2025.This failure could put residents at risk of changes in condition such as skin injury or breakdowns not being detected and treated and resident progress not being tracked. Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (mild, with agitation) (declining brain function related to thinking and judgement that is severe enough to impact daily life without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who was dependent on assistance for activities of daily living, received necessary and timely care and services, including repositioning, incontinence care, and bathing, in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #1).On 01/13/2026, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received repositioning, incontinence care, or a scheduled bed bath.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving timely hygiene care and demonstrated inadequate oversight of staff responsibilities related to activities of daily living.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/03/2026, reflected the resident was a 57 -year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate oxygenation of the blood), morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (having a body mass index of 40 or higher)., paralytic syndrome…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured for 3 of 5 medication carts (MC #1, MC #2, and MC #3) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure MC #1, MC #2 and MC #3 were locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included:During an observation on 11/18/2025 at 4:39p.m., revealed MC #1 and MC #2, was on the wall across from the nurses' station, and unlocked. The nurse was going through medication on both medication carts when she walked off and went down the hall and into a resident's room. When the LVN A walked off she left three blister packs of medication on top of MC #1. She also left MC #1 and MC #2 unlocked while a resident was sitting next to MC #1. MC #1 and MC#2 both contained residents' prescription drugs, over the counter medications like Tylenol Ibuprofen, and vitamins, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (CR #1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. - Nurse A did not immediately notify CR #1's physician when he had a change in condition and was sent out to the hospital via 911 on 09/14/25. -Nurse A did not notify CR #1's family member/RP/emergency contact when he had a change in condition and was transported to the hospital on [DATE]. The failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and required notifications being made when there is a change in their condition. Findings included: Record review of CR #1's admission Record, dated 09/16/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a dignified existence and maintain good grooming at resident request in a timely manner for two out of four residents (Resident#2 and Resident #1) reviewed residents rights. The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for Resident #2 and Resident #1 and it affected the resident's feelings. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and reduced feelings of self-worth Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included morbid (severe) obesity (A BMI of 40 plus), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and need assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/28/25, revealed a BIMS score of 14 of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of 4 residents (Resident#2 and Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for Resident #2 and Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and reduced feelings of self-worth.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included morbid (severe) obesity (A BMI of 40 plus), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and need assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/28/25, revealed a BIMS score of 14 of 15, which indicated intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA L and CNA D properly cleaned Resident #1 during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included morbid (severe) obesity (A BMI of 40 plus), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral infraction (brain attack caused by a blockage in a blood vessel). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/31/25, revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA L and CNA T followed appropriate infection control, hand hygiene and PPE procedure during incontinent care for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which include morbid (severe), obesity (A BMI of 40 plus), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral infraction (brain attack caused by a blockage in a blood vessel). Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, and toilet and bathing facilities for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for call light systems. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1' s call light was properly functioning. These failures could place residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included morbid (severe) obesity (A BMI of 40 plus), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral infraction (brain attack caused by a blockage in a blood vessel). Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #21and Resident #31) reviewed for ADLs. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #21was provided personal grooming (dry patches and flaky skin) by facility staff. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was provided personal grooming (brown substance in the resident fingernails) by facility staff. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the assistance needed for daily care and services. Findings included: RESIDENT #21 Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 04/09/225 revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the on 02/17/25. Resident #21 diagnosis included: cerebral infraction (blockage in blood vessel stops blood flow to the brain), hypertension (force of blood against the walls of the arteries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #31 and Resident #14) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure EBP sign was posted on Resident #31 door and ensure PPE was set up at the residents door. The facility failed to ensure clean uncovered linen cart with linens was not stored in Resident # 14 room. These failures could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 04/10/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the on 03/05/25. Resident #31 diagnosis included: end stage renal disease (kidneys have stopped working well enough to support the body), hypertension (force of blood against the walls of the arteries is consistently too high), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and coronary artery disease (arteries that supply blood to the heart become…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences reviewed for accommodation of needs. for one resident (Resident #28) of 15 residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's call light was within reach of the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Observation and interview on 4/8/25 at 10:18 AM revealed Resident #28's call light was under his dresser on the right side of his bed. Resident #28 was observed lying in bed, he said that he just woke up and his leg hurts. The surveyor asked him to press his call-light for assistance and he said he did not even know he had a call-light. Surveyors searched for the call-light which was found under the dresser. The DON came to assist, he removed the call-light from beneath the dresser and attached the call-light to Resident #28's blanket. Resident #28 pressed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy during care, for 1(Resident # 777) of 6 residents reviewed for privacy, in that: -LVN F failed to lock her computer during medication pass on 04/09/25, leaving Resident #777's medical records disclosed on the hallway. This failure could place resident at risk for economic harm, embarrassment, and not maintaining their individual autonomy and individuality. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 777's face sheet dated 04/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 777 diagnoses included the following: staphylococcal (bacteria) arthritis (swelling or tenderness in one or more joints causing pain or stiffness) of the right knee, chronic pain, anemia (low count of red blood cells {cells that carry oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body}), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, and kidney disease stage 3 (moderate loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline admission care plan for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #45 and Resident #31 ) reviewed for baseline care plans in that: -The facility failed to develop a 48-hour baseline care plan with goals, interventions, treatments, and psychosocial needs addressed in a resident specific care plan for Resident #45. - The facility failed to develop a 48-hour baseline care plan with goals, interventions, treatments, and psychosocial needs addressed in a resident specific care plan for Resident #31. This failure could affect new admissions residents reviewed for 48-hour baseline care plans of not having their individual, medical, functional, and psychosocial needs identified and cause a physical or psychosocial decline in health. Findings included: Resident #45 Record review or Resident #45's admission record dated 4/11/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included hemiplegia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #53, Resident #31) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #53's status of hospice were a focus area in the resident's comprehensive care plan and no intervention was in place. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 status on ADL care were a focus area in the resident's comprehensive plan and intervention was in place. This deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Resident #53 Record review of Resident #53's facility admission Record dated 4/10/25 revealed that Resident #53 was a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (Resident #158) of 6 residents reviewed for range of motion. -Resident #158 did not receive preventive care measures to prevent further contractures of the resident's hands. This failure placed resident at risk for impaired skin integrity, of further decline and decrease in their quality of life and quality of care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #158's face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included the following: bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows and elevated energy), seizures, quadriplegia (loss of function in arms legs that could include the chest, abdomen, pelvis, and back). Record review of Resident #158's annual MDS dated [DATE] reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for accident hazards, in that: The facility failed to ensure there was no unattended container micro - kill germicidal wipes on top of the housekeeper's cart in 100 hall. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of an accidental injury. The findings were: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the on 02/15/25. Resident #45 diagnosis included: hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body), hypertension (force of blood against the walls of the arteries is consistently too high), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and diabetes mellitus (body cannot regulate blood sugar levels properly). Record review of Resident #45's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS of 13 indicating intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 (Resident #17, Resident #158) of 6 residents reviewed for catheters, as evidenced by: -Resident #17 did not have a STATLOCK to secure Foley catheter. -Resident #158 did not have a STATLOCK to secure Foley catheter. These failures placed the residents at risk of their Foley catheters getting dislodged, unwanted pain, trauma, infections, and decreasing their quality of life. Findings included: Resident # 158 Record review of Resident #158's face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included the following: acute (illness that develops quickly) and chronic (lasting for a long time) respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of oxygen to sustain bodily functions), neuromuscular (affecting the nerves controlling the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored properly in accordance with professional standards of practice in one of two medication rooms (Hall 100), reviewed for labeling and storage of drugs and biologicals, in that: -Medication room on hall 100 had expired medications. These failures placed residents on Hall 100 at risk of receiving expired medications and adverse reactions. Findings Include: Observation on 04/09/25 at 7:15AM on Hall 100 medication storage room revealed there were 3 expired hydrocortisone acetate 25mg suppositories. The expiration date on the medication was dated 03/2025. Interview on 04/09/25 at 7:25AM with LVN H said it was the DON that was supposed to be checking the medication rooms for any expired medications. LVN H said if a resident is administered an expired medication, it placed the resident at risk of not receiving the full intended dose of the medication or it could place the resident at risk for unwanted adverse side effects. Interview on 04/09/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 out of 3 dumpsters, dumpster A. -On 4/8/2024 at 8:08am, one of the facility's dumpster was observed with no lid attached or on it and was a quarter full. This failure has the potential to affect 54 residents in the facility, staff, and visitors by placing them at risk for infection and a decreased quality of life due to having an exterior environment which could attract pests, rodents and other animals. Findings included: Observation on 4/8/25 at 8:08am, Surveyor A and [NAME] A observed the facility dumpster area, which was in the lot behind the dietary department. The facility stand-alone dumpster was not covered. The lid was detached and placed on the side next to the dumpster. Observation on 4/9/25 at 8:47am, the right lid to the same dumpster was open. It was marked in white chalk 4/09. Interview with [NAME] A on 4/8/25 at 8:08am, she said she did not know why the dumpster was open. [NAME] A said that not closing the lids could attract rodents because of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 1 (CR #1) of 7 residents reviewed for controlled drugs in that: -The facility failed to appropriately store CR #1's Norco oral tablet 5-325mg (Hydrocodone -Acetaminophen- medication classified as a schedule II drug (high potential for addiction and abuse) used to treat pain and also used as a cough suppressant) in the DON's office under double lock when CR #1 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility 06/21/24. It was discovered on 06/29/24 that the medication was missing after CR #1 requested pain medication. -The facility Nursing staff failed to have completed signatures on their Controlled Drugs-Count Record for the month of June 2024 regarding 7am oncoming nurse and 7pm off going nurse for 6/18/24, 6/20/24, 6/24/24, 6/25/24, and 6/28/24. This failure could place residents at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #16 Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 02/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 12/23/23 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), hypoxia (a condition in which the human body tissues are not oxygenated sufficiently to maintain adequate homeostasis), muscle weakness (generalized), seizures( sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain), familial dysautonomia ( a nervous system disorder that disrupts autonomic body processes), bipolar disorder ( mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy) unspecified, aphasia ( unable to speak), tracheostomy( a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea( windpipe) from outside the neck), tachycardia ( a heart rate over 100 beats a Minute), gastrostomy( a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as a G-tube).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent decrease in range of motion for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #16) reviewed range of motion. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #16, with contractures to both hands, was wearing a hand rolls on both hands and off load bilateral heels. as care planned and ordered by the physician. - This failure could place resident at risk for further contractures of the hands and fingers, pain, and a decrease in quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 02/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 12/23/23 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), hypoxia (a condition in which the human body tissues are not oxygenated sufficiently to maintain adequate homeostasis), muscle weakness (generalized),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents who are incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents ( Resident #16 and Resident #89) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: CNA B did not separate Resident #16's labia to clean during incontinent, clean arround the buttocks and did not perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove changes throughout the care CNA A did not separate Resident # 89's labia to clean during incontinent, clean arround the buttock and did not perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove changes throughout the care. This deficient practice could affect residents who received perineal care( the skin in between your genital and your anus) and place them at-risk of increased urinary tract infections due to improper care. The findings included: Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 02/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care and services was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for respiratory therapy in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident # 6's concentrator filter was not covered with a substantial amount of dust. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of respiratory complications. Findings include: Record review Resident #6's face sheet dated 01/03/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), aphasia(a language disorder caused by damage in a specific area of the brain that controls language expression), hypertension (blood vessels have persistently raised pressure) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(group of diseases that cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 4 medication carts (skilled unit MA cart, 300 hall nurse cart, and 200 hall nurse cart) reviewed for medication storage. - The 300-hall nurse's cart contained an opened fluticasone propionate nasal spray with no discard date. Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% was not in the complete original packet. A box of quality choice original eyelid cleansing wipes did not have a visible expiration date. -The 200-hall nurse's cart contained a box of quality choice original eyelid cleansing wipes without a visible expiration date. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions. Findings included: During observation and interview on 02/07/24 at 4:40 p.m., the 300-hall nursing cart with RN B revealed a bottle of fluticasone propionate nasal spray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #16 and #89) reviewed for infection control. 1.CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene appropriately while providing incontinent care for Resident #16 by not changing gloves and washing hands. 2.CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene appropriately while providing incontinent care for Resident #89 by not changing gloves and washing hands. These failures could place residents at risk for transmission of diseases and organisms. The findings included: Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 02/06/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 12/23/23 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), hypoxia (a condition in which the human body tissues are not oxygenated sufficiently to maintain adequate homeostasis), muscle weakness (generalized),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: 1. Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not correctly assess his diagnoses. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care treatments, and interventions due to inaccurate records. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1 admission record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), unspecified, acute respiratory failure (impairment exchange between gas and lungs) with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen), type 2 diabetes (body not producing enough insulin) mellitus (excess amount of sugar passing through blood and urine) without complications, essential (primary) hypertension (elevated blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure Resident #64's care plan addressed her pain management, her high risk for developing pressure ulcers, or her developement of a pressure ulcer. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately list Resident #1's C. auris diagogois for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for isolation precuasion: 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's C. auris diagnosis. This failure could place the census of 56 residents at risk for unmet care needs. Finding include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), unspecified, acute respiratory failure (impairment exchange between gas and lungs) with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen), type 2 diabetes (body not producing enough insulin) mellitus (excess amount of sugar passing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: 1. Resident #1's Facesheet dated 08/18/2023 did not correctly assess his diagnoses. 2. Resident #1's Diagnosis dated 08/18/2023 did not correctly assess his diagnoses. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care treatments, and interventions due to inaccurate records. Finding include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), unspecified, acute respiratory failure (impairment exchange between gas and lungs) with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen), type 2 diabetes (body not producing enough insulin) mellitus (excess amount of sugar passing through blood and urine)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 resident reviewed for infection control in that: Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) failed to properly remove her gown and wash or sanitize her hands when moving from a dirty area to a clean area after she had changed the gastrostomy tube (g-tube) feeding machine tubing and pulling back the resident's sheet for Resident #1 who was on the isolation precaution. This deficient practice could place 5 residents at risk for cross contamination and/or spread of infection. Finding include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 residents of 20 residents (Resident #10, #49, #19 and #7), reviewed for environment, in that: The facility failed to maintain an ambient air temperature range of 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit in the 300 hallway, the dining room and in resident rooms. The failure could place residents at risk of loss of body heat and of a decrease in quality of life. Findings included: Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: stroke, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder, thyroid disorder, hypertension, obesity, psychosis, manic episode, mood disorder, paralysis of limbs, nerve damage, edema, diabetes, GERD and BPH. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. He required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1 ) and 4 of 4 medication storage areas (100 Hall Med Cart 1, 200 Hall Med Cart 1, 200 Hall Med Room, and 300 Hall Med Cart #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to ensure the medication carts and med rooms did not include expired insulin for Resident #3, Resident #14, Resident #41, Resident #100 and Resident #105 - LVN D administered Heparin ( a blood thinner) to Resident #1 that had no open date. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications and/or adverse reactions to medications. Findings Included Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 09/06/22 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9 percent based on 3 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 3 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #11); and 3 of 5 staff (LVN A, LVN B and LVN D ) reviewed for medication errors. - LVN D failed to ensure medication administered to Resident #1 had a Physician's order. - LVN A failed to administer the correct eye drop to Resident #2. - LVN B failed to administer the correct multivitamin to Resident #11. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings included: Error #1 An observation on 12/13/22 at 08:53 AM revealed, LVN D preparing medication for administration to Resident #1 via G-tube, she prepared the solid medications and poured 15 ml of Chlorohexidine 0.12% in individual cops and entered into the resident's room. After administering the medications via G-tube to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with professional principles and stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 4 of 4 medication carts. (100 Hall Nursing Cart 1 , 200 Hall Med Cart 1 ,300 Hall Nursing Cart 1 and 300 Hall Med Cart 2) and 1 of 2 Medication Rooms (200 Hall Medication Room) reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the 100 Hall Nursing Cart did not contain inappropriately labeled insulin, and pudding without an open date - The facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall Med Cart 1 was locked when not in use and did not contain medications without an open dates and prescription medications without pharmacy labeling - The facility failed to ensure the 300 Hall Med Cart 1 was locked when not in use and did not contain insulin without an open date. - The facility failed to ensure the 300 Hall Med Cart 2 did not contain insulin without an open date. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 17 Residents (Resident #24) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: -Resident #24's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] did not accurately assess his absence of natural teeth. -This failure could affect residents at the facility who had been assessed and place them at risk of not receiving the proper care and services due to inaccurate assessments. Findings Include: Resident #24 Record review of Resident #24's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] years old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Peripheral Vascular Disease(slow and progressive circulation disorder), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(inflammatory lung disease), Cerebral Infarction(ischemic stroke), Hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol), Hypothyroidism, Hypertension(high blood pressure), Unspecified Atrial Flutter(heart rhythm disorder), Hemiplegia (lack of control in one side of the body), Acquired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they coordinated with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a newly diagnosed mental disorder received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for PASSR. The facility failed to complete and submit an accurate PASRR Level 1 for Resident #10 when he was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This failure could place residents who had a positive PASRR Level 1 or residents with a diagnosis of mental illness at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #10's PASRR Level 1 Screening dated 01/14/2020 completed by the facility revealed Section C was answered No for mental illness, intellectual disability and developmental disability. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #38) of 20 residents reviewed for care plan in that: The facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for activities for Resident #38. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life leading to a variety of emotional and physical problems/issues. Findings included: Record review of resident #38's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosis was dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), behavioral disturbances, and mood disorders with major depression (depression is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the required committee members for 1 of 2 quarters reviewed for committee attendance, in that: The infection preventionist was not present for QAPI meetings from May 2022 to August 2022. This failure could place residents at risk of infections. Findings included: Record review of the QAPI Committee sign-in sheets revealed the IP never signed in for their meetings from May 2022 - August 2022. In an interview on 12/16/22 at 3:29PM, the Administrator stated the IP was hired as an IP staff in the month of February 2022. When asked if she was required to be present for the meetings, she said she would need to check the policy to see what it said. In an interview on 12/16/22 at 3:35PM the HR staff stated the IP was their only staff with an IP certification and she was hired this year. Record review of the QAPI meeting notes from May, June, July, August of 2022 revealed during those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$83,678 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $19,610 — penalty dated 2026-04-29
  • $18,060 — penalty dated 2026-02-27
  • $46,008 — penalty dated 2024-02-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-17 for 24 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2024
CRESCENT MOON DR CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
HISCOX, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
MILLER, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2024
VAKIL, RUPESHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-91.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$183K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 7%Other / private 20%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $183K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$466per resident / day
operating cost
$14,172per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$243per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455815. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next