Jacinto Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 75 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision for 1 of 5 residents (CR #1) reviewed for accidents. CR #1 eloped from the facility on 03/23/2025 while in the secured unit, through the window. CR #1 was found at a previous residence on 03/24/2025 and refused to return to the facility. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/23/2025 and ended on 03/24/2025. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation, began on 10/14/2025. This failure could place the residents with exit seeking behaviors at risk for injury or death. Findings included:Record review of CR #1's previous facility note text, dated 01/01/2025 stated staff went to the resident's room and noted the window was open in the secured unit, resident was not found in the room. Staff immediately initiated their elopement protocol.Record review of CR #1's previous facility note text, dated 01/01/2025 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers, promote healing, and to prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #3) of 18 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. - The facility failed to perform adequate skin assessments to identify pressure injuries for Resident #3, who was non-ambulatory and wheelchair bound. - The facility failed to identify and treat Resident #3's stage 2 (wound goes through skin and looks like a blister or ulcer but does not go through deep tissues ) and stage 3 (wound goes through deep tissue and fat but does not expose bone) pressure injuries. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 9/4/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/4/2023 at 1:00pm. While the IJ was removed on 9/7/2023 at 2:10pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of isolated due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest, practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 18 residents reviewed for Administration. - The Administrator failed to ensure nursing staff were performing weekly skin assessments on Resident #3 and other residents at the facility, causing Resident #3 to get facility acquired Stage 2 (wounds extends through skin and looks like a blister or ulcer but does not extend through deeper tissue) and Stage 3 (wound extends through deep tissue and fat but does not expose bone) pressure wounds. - The Administrator failed to ensure staff were performing showers and daily hygiene care on Resident #3 and other residents at the facility, causing Resident #3 to go a week without a shower which can cause skin breakdown. - The Administrator failed to ensure wounds were being identified and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by providing care including assessing, evaluating, planning and implementing resident care plans and responding to resident's needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to ensure that skin assessments were completed completely and correctly for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening skin conditions or infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/28/26, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia following cerebral infarction (inability to comprehend or communicate following a stroke) and anemia (deficiency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 13 %, based on 4 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #59, Resident #58) and one of five staff (MA V) observed during medication administration.1. MA V failed to administer Resident #59's Gabapentin 100 mg (used in treatment for neuropathy) and Pentoxifylline Extended Release 400 mg (used in treatment for peripheral vascular disease) according to physician orders, the medication was administered over one hour after the prescribed time. 2. MA V failed to administer Gabapentin 100 mg to Resident #59 from Resident #59's own supply of medications. MA V administered a Gabapentin capsule taken from a supply belonging to CR #10.3. MA V failed to administer Resident #48's Divalproex sodium Delayed Release 125 mg (used in treatment for bipolar disorder) according to physician orders, the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 9 of 12 resident rooms and public areas reviewed for environment.1. The facility failed to ensure the floors were clean and not tacky, in the hallways where the following resident rooms were located: 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 222, 223 and 224.2. The facility failed to ensure the floor in the public restroom was clean and not tacky.These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Observation on 02/18/26 at 1:00 PM revealed the hallway floors were tacky where the occupied rooms numbered: 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 222, 223 and 224. The restroom used by staff and visitors had brown/black splatters on the walls and baseboards. The floor had black spots and was tacky when stepped on.In a telephone interview on 02/19/26 at 8:22 AM, the RP for CR #6 stated overall the facility was not clean, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for foot care.The facility failed to obtain treatment orders and monitor the status of Resident #1's skin impairment to her toe. The facility failed to monitor and document the blood-tinged gauze present on Resident #1's toe on 2/17/26-2/18/26.This failure could result place residents at risk of in discomfort and/or infection.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 2/19/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that happens when you have constant high blood sugar), reduced mobility, mild cognitive impairment, pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs), and heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for tube feeding.The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 received her enteral feeding, Jevity 1.5, at the rate assigned by the MD on 2/17/26 and 2/18/26.This failure could result in weight loss and dehydration.Findings include: Record review of Resident #12's admission record, dated 2/18/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (occurs when there is a deficiency of protein and calories in the diet), anemia (a blood disorder that affects red blood cells and oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable and failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of three medication carts (Medication Aide Cart 2-Front) reviewed for medication storage.1. The facility failed to keep residents' eye drop medications in their original containers/packaging. There was one box of Simbrinza 1%/0.2% (an eye drop used to treat glaucoma and high eye pressure) that had two resident name labels.2. The facility failed to label and identify the specific resident for whom the Artificial Tears-lubricant eye drops (designed for multiple administrations) were prescribed. These failures could place residents at risk of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen pantry and refrigerator located in the kitchen area that was reviewed for food procurement. The facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator were properly identified and dated when opened. The facility failed to train staff in identifying the importance of the sanitizing strips. The facility failed to discard expired food items found in the refrigerator. The facility failed to clean and sanitize the kitchen. The facility failed to repair a malfunctioning dishwasher temperature, resulting in inaccurate readings and the inability to verify proper sanitation of dishes. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness, disease, and hospitalization.Findings include:Observation of the facility's kitchen and interview with the Dietary Supervisor on 02/17/26 between 8:45 AM and 9:30 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and the maintenance services necessary to maintain a clean, sanitary, safe, and comfortable environment for 7 of 10 resident rooms (Rooms #215, #216, #309, #311, #312, #313, and #314) reviewed for the environment. This failure could affect the health, safety and the dignity of the residents and other residents in the facility. Findings include: On 1/22/2026 at 9:05 a.m., an observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted. The bed was observed to be positioned close to a torn window blind. The floor of the room was observed to have thick, dark, dirty stains along the edges and corners. The walls were observed to be in poor condition with paint visibly peeling off in multiple areas. On 1/22/2026 at 9:08 a.m., an observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted. The floor of the room was observed to be dirty and sticky, dirty stains along the edges and corners. The walls were observed to be in poor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0912 — isolated
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident for 2 of 6 multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms #311 and #314) reviewed for room size.Rooms #311 and #314 did not have the required 80 square feet per resident.These failures could place residents at risk of reduced living space and could affect their activities of daily living (ADLs).The findings were:Record review of Form 3740 Bed Classifications, signed by the Administrator on 1/15/26, revealed rooms #311, #312, #313, #314, #315, and #316 was classified to have 3 resident beds in each room.In an interview on 1/21/26 at 1:02 p.m., the Administrator said she did not have documentation to show that 3 beds were allowed in the room. She said the corporate office informed her in the past that they did not need a waiver. In an observation on 1/21/26 at 2:12 p.m., the Maintenance Director measured rooms #311 and #314 in the secure unit. Room size measurements were as follows:1. room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 1 of 3 hallways, (Hall 200), conference room, and Resident #1 and #2's shared room. The facility had live flies in the room of Resident #1 and #2 located on Hall 200. The facility had live gnats in and outside the conference room located on Hall 200. This failure has the potential to place residents at risk for disease and a decline in their physical health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a principal diagnosis of Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known psychological condition (when an individual exhibits psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, or disorganized thinking, but the underlying cause is not attributable to substance use or a known physiological condition). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$59,867 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-10-30
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $47,392 — penalty dated 2023-09-07
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-07 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX