Parkway Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 39.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. -CNA B performed a two person transfer alone using a sit to stand lift instead of a full Hoyer lift when resident was unable to stand on 08/06/24. Resident #1 suffered a right transverse impacted fracture of the proximal humeral metaphysis (broken upper arm) and a right periprosthetic fracture (broken knee bone). -Observation of a Hoyer lift transfer revealed the Hoyer pad/sling was not properly placed under Resident #3's bottom. -CNAs E and F performed a sit to stand transfer for Resident #2 using a cracked footrest and failed to use the calve strap for safety on 08/30/24. On 08/30/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/03/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and records reviewed, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's condition or need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of (Resident 1) of 9 residents reviewed for notify of changes. -LVN A failed to report Resident #1's change in condition to the MD/NP after she fell on [DATE] when CNA B performed a two person transfer alone. Resident #1 suffered a right transverse impacted fracture of the proximal humeral metaphysis (broken upper arm) and a right periprosthetic fracture (broken knee bone). On 09/21/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/24/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-24 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, the facility failed to obtain radiology or other diagnostic services to meet the needs of its residents in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for radiology services. -The facility failed to obtain radiology services for Resident #1 in a timely manner after she fell on [DATE] and bruises appeared on 08/07/24. Resident #1 suffered a right transverse impacted fracture of the proximal humeral metaphysis (broken upper arm) and a right periprosthetic fracture (broken knee bone). On 09/21/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/24/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures could place resident at risk of results in delayed diagnosis, medical treatment, and hospitalization. The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (CR #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision.The facility failed to ensure CNA G did not leave CR #1 unattended on the commode while she went and called LVN M to come and assess CR #1's foley because he was pulling on the foley and had asked CNA G to remove the foley, and he was bleeding from the penial area.This failure increased the risk of injury, hospitalization, and death for residents.Findings included:Record review of CR #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed, a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital. CR #1's diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland), restlessness (inability to remain calm), agitation (behavior like pacing or pulling), atherosclerotic heart disease (artery walls of the heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #28) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed on -Medication Aide A failed to administer Resident #28 acetaminophen (Tylenol) extra strength 500mg every 12hours by mouth (8:00AM & 8:00PM) as ordered by the physician and at the scheduled time. Resident #28's medication was provided 1 hour and 53 minutes late on 05/28/2025. This failure placed resident at risk for unwanted pain and decrease in quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 05/28/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included the following: contusion (injury to soft tissue involving the blood vessels, causing blood to leak into surrounding areas resulting in swelling, pain, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for two Residents (Resident #7 and Resident #28, and Resident #29), of 6 residents observed for care and procedures, in that: The facility failed when MA A failed to sanitize a blood pressure machine prior to and after taking Resident #7, Resident #28, and Resident #29's blood pressure on 05/28/2025. This failure placed residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7 face sheet dated 05/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included: acute kidney failure (sudden loss of kidney function when the kidneys cannot filter waste from the blood)), hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #21, and Resident #135) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Wound Care nurse did not place Resident #21's foley bag on the bed during foley care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 135's foley bag, privacy bag and tubing were not lying on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 04/04/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control), and pressure ulcer of sacral region (wound on a boney area is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and accessed only by authorized personnel for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #22, Resident #3 and Resident#136) reviewed for medication storage in that: Resident #22 had a tube of antifungal cream on the bed side table and did not have an order to self-administer. The facility failed to ensure MA J did not leave Resident #3's rivastigmine 9.5 mg transdermal patch on top of the medication cart unattended. The facility failed to ensure RN G did not leave a bottle of Lantus insulin on top of the nurse's cart unattended. These failures could place residents at risk of loss of their medications, inadequate therapeutic outcomes, or decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 04/4/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included: hypertension (when the pressure in the blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. 1. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were not discarded. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated. 3. The Facility failed to ensure food was safely stored in designated areas at all times. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen and place them at risk of food borne illness and disease. Findings Included: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 04/03/24 at 8:15 AM revealed the following leftover foods found in the walk in refrigerator was not discarded prior to the use by date. 1. A Plastic Container of Pot Roast was dated 3/27/24 with use by date 4/01/24 2. A Plastic Container of Salmon fillet had no label and was not dated. 3. A Plastic Container of Cod fish with used by date 3/31/24 4. A Plastic Container of Beef Steak with used by date 3/29/24 5. A Plastic Container of mixed vegetable with a use by date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for Food and nutrition services. -The facility failed to ensure the dumpster lids and doors were secured. This failure could place residents at risk of infection from improperly disposed garbage. Findings included: Observation on 04-03-24 at 8:45 am, revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the lot behind the dietary department had a commercial -size dumpster ¾ full of garbage and the door was wide open. In an interview on 04-03-24 at 8:45 am, with the Food Service Manager, she stated that the dumpster doors must always be closed to keep vermin, pests, and insects out of the dumpster and from entering the facility. Record review of facility's Nutrition Services Policies and Procedures on waste disposal was not received. Requested copy of Policy & Procedure for Waste Disposal on 4-03-24 from the Food Service Manager, 4-04-24 from the Food Service Manager and on 4-05-24 prior to exit from the Administrator. Facility did not have a copy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #21, Resident #153, and Resident #24) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Wound Care Nurse did not place Resident #21's foley bag on the bed during foley care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Wound care Nurse followed infection control procedure while providing wound care for Resident #21. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 135's foley bag, privacy bag and tubing from lying on the floor. 4. The facility failed to ensure CNA M followed proper infection control procedure while providing incontinent care for Resident # 24. These failures could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 04/04/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #21 had diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7% based on 4 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3, and Resident #22) reviewed for medication errors in that: 1-MA J administered calcium 600 instead of calcium 600 with vitamin D3 600 mg-12.5 mcg to Resident # 3. 2-RN G left a substantial amount of metoprolol tartrate 25 mg tablet in the portion cup after medication was administrated through g tube to Resident #22. These failures could place residents at risk for increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings included: 1 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 04/4/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included: dementia (lack of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning), vitamin deficiency (the condition of a long - term lack…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items that were opened were sealed, labeled and dated . 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were not stored with unexpired foods . 3. The facility failed to ensure equipment was cleaned . 4. The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator were used by the used by dates. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 11/10/2023 between 11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., revealed the following: -In the bakery section of the kitchen were two boxes in the freezer, one with bread rolls and one with biscuits were opened to the air and were not sealed. - In the free-standing refrigerator were shrimp, dated 11/05/2023, to be discarded after 11/25/2023, Mixed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,741 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $45,741 — penalty dated 2024-09-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $798K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX