Treemont Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 44.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, dispensing, receiving, and administering of medications for 1 of 12 (Resident #7) residents reviewed for pharmacy services.- The facility failed to administer Resident #7's Vancomycin HCl Intravenous Solution (antibiotic) 500 MG/100ML and Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium (antibiotic) Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 3g (2g-1g) GM on 5/6/26.These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefit of the medication and/or worsening health concerns.Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of RLQ open wound of abdominal wall (wound to right lower stomach), surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system (needing help after surgery on the urinary system), peripheral vascular angioplasty with implant and graft (bad circulation to the lower extremities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0694 — pattern
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 (Resident #55) residents reviewed for intravenous fluids.-The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 's subclavian central line's dry dressing was changed every 5 to 7 days per facility policies and procedures, including orders for monitoring the site. The nurse did not maintain sterile technique while changing subclavian central line dressing on 12/3/25,This deficient practice could place residents at risk of serious harm, injury or death by exposing residents to infections in the blood stream and serious illness.Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 12/03/2025 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His medical diagnoses included hyperlipidemia( high fat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 35% based on 11 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 4 of 9 residents (Residents #5, #23, #53 and #55) and 2 of 4 staff (MA A, MA B and LVN C) reviewed for medication errors.1. The facility failed to ensure MA A administered Magnesium Oxide (used as a dietary supplement to address magnesium deficiency and as an antacid to relieve heart burn and indigestion). It was initialed as given on 12/1/2025 to Resident #53.2. The facility failed to ensure MA A administered Arginald Powder (used to support wound healing, particularly for chronic and slow-to-heal wounds). It was initialed as given on 12/1/2025 to Resident #5.3. The facility failed to ensure MA B administered Acyclovir (used to treat and prevent infection caused by the herpes virus, cold sores, shingles and chickenpox) with food and extra fluid. It was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen and 5 of 12 residents reviewed for food procurement.-The facility failed to ensure leftover foods were not stored past used by date.-The facility provided food trays containing a hamburger that was at 68 Fahrenheit and spaghetti with meat sauce at 63.2 Fahrenheit and the chef salad was at 63 Fahrenheit.These failures have the potential to place all residents who ate food prepared by the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and disease. Observation of the facility 's kitchen on 12/05/25 between 7:00 am and 8:30 am with the dietary manager revealed the following:-Observed a pan of leftover gravy with used by date 11-26-25.-Observed a pan of leftover Italian gravy with used by date 11-26-25.-Observed a pan of leftover potato casserole with a used by date 11-30-25.Observation on 12/02/2025 at 1:21pm of the three food sample trays brought in conference room, the following temperatures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with incontinent bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for incontinent care. -The facility failed to ensure CNA A put on a gown and changed gloves and cleaned Resident #55's scrotum and buttocks before putting on a clean brief during Foley catheter and incontinent care on 12/2/25. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet dated 12/03/2025 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His medical diagnoses included esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis( Gastric reflux), hyperlipidemia( high fat blood), unspecified, acute embolism and thrombosis ( when a blood clot (thrombus) forms and stays put in a blood vessel, blocking flow,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needs respiratory care, including tracheotomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of two residents reviewed for tracheotomy care (Resident #32). -The facility failed to ensure LVN B used sterile technique during tracheotomy care and suctioning, did not clean around trach site, and did not remove inner canula to clean for Resident #32. - This failure could place residents with a tracheotomy requiring suctioning at risk for respiratory infections, hospitalizations, and a decline in their quality of life. Record review of Resident #32's face sheet dated 12/2/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate (Prostate cancer), essential (primary) hypertension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administration of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #42) of 7 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. -Resident #42's Tylenol was delivered on 12/02/2025 at 9:45a.m. when the physician's order said to administer it at 8:00a.m. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects from their medications as intended by the prescribing physician order.Record review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 12/02/2025, she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including dementia (declining brain function related to thinking and judgement that is severe enough to impact daily life without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance), generalized anxiety disorder (excessive fear and worry), muscle wasting and atrophy of the left and right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to send to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing medication irregularity the pharmacist identified during review for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for medication review.-The facility failed to act on Pharmacist's recommendation for Resident #23 's Baclofen. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reaction related to taking medications.Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 12/1/25, reflected a 72 -years -old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included long term (current) drug therapy, muscle wasting and atrophy in right and left thigh, muscle weakness, insomnia, muscle wasting and atrophy, major depressive disorder, constipation, vitamin d deficiency, difficulty in walking, displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left tibia (fracture of the lower leg bone), displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left fibula (fracture of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #23) of 9 residents reviewed for pharmacy services.-MA A did not administer Carvedilol (medication used to help your heart by lowering blood pressure) with meals to Resident #23 as ordered by the physician on 12/2/25.This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reaction related to taking medications not ordered by the physician. Findings included:Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 12/1/25, reflected a 72 -years -old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included long term (current) drug therapy and unspecified dementia ( declining brain function( memory , thinking ,judgement) severe enough to impact daily life without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance.Record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/3/25, reflected a BIMS score of 14 out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for Food and Nutrition Services.-The facility dumpster lids and doors were not secured.This failure could place residents at risk of infection and a decreased home-like environment from pests and rodents. Observation on 12/05/2025 at 8:45 a.m., revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the lot behind the dietary department had a commercial -size dumpster 3/4 full of garbage and the door was wide open.In an interview with the dietary food manager on 12/05/2025 at 9:20 a.m., with the dietary food manager, he stated that the dumpster doors must be closed to keep vermin, pests, and insects out of the dumpster from entering the facility. He also stated that he will in service dietary staff, nursing, housekeeping and maintenance that the dumpster door was to be closed for proper sanitation and residents' safety. In an interview with the DON and the Administrator on 12/02/2025 at 5:00p.m., the Administrator said the dumpster should not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX