Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center
220 E Ash Street, Huntington, TX 75949 · For profit - Partnership · 112 certified beds · (936) 876-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (95%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 34.5% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 7.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 17.1% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 13.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.5% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.48 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.99 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.5%CMS range 27.6–54.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.2–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.2–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.40 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 95% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food stored the kitchen refrigerator was labeled, dated and not expired. 2. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen dry storage area was labeled, dated, and not expired. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.During an observation on 7/15/2025 at 10:15 AM revealed the following: #2 refrigerator contained (2) 46-ounce containers of opened and undated thickened lemon water. #3 refrigerator contained (2) pies with a graham cracker crust and unknown white filling that was opened, unlabeled and undated. #4 Freezer contained (5) bags of French fries that were unlabeled and undated. #5 freezer contained (2) cases of frozen egg products on the bottom shelf which were stored below meat products. The Dry storage area contained (5) 1.5-pound bags of crispy onions with no received date. During an interview on 7/16/2025 at 3:16 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #14) and 3 of 7 staff (CNA D, CNA E and LVN G) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for Resident #3 when providing care on 7/15/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice cooler's scoop compartment on hall 400 did not contain a towel with a black substance on 7/15/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN G washed or sanitized her hands during administration of IV medications to Resident #14 on 7/16/2025.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's facility face sheet, dated 7/16/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 1 of 4 resident hallways (Hallway 100) and the main dining room reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to ensure rooms 101, 103, 106, and 107 did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the floors on 100 hallway did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure the dining room did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life. Findings include: During multiple observations on 7/15/2025 from 4:02 PM to 4:21 PM and on 7/16/2025 from 9:00 AM to 9:15 AM; rooms 101, 103, 106 and 107 the 100 hallway and main dining room were observed with black residue on the floor tiles in the rooms and bathrooms and floors were sticky. There was a buildup of thick black residue at the base boards and around furniture. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility did not notify Resident #52's physician for a significant change in weight. (weight loss of 25.8 pounds in 30 days.) This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician notified of changes resulting in a delay in continuity of care.The findings were: Record review of Resident #52's face sheet, dated 7/16/2025, revealed Resident #52 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), dysphagia (A condition with difficulty in swallowing food or liquid. This may interfere in a person's ability to eat and drink), and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #52's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive MDS assessment within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's mental or physical condition for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to reassess Resident #6 following a hospice admission (specific care for the sick or terminally ill) on 03/24/25.This failure could place residents at risk for not having their individual needs met due to inaccurate assessments.Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 7/16/25 for Resident #6 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of a diagnosis report dated 7/16/25 for Resident #6 indicated her primary diagnosis was senile degeneration of brain (a neurological disorder that is tied to cognitive decline, memory impairment, and changes in behavior).Record review of a comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 indicated a BIMS score of 06, indicating severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #6) reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services).The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had a new level 1 PASSR completed with a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental disorder in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect) and major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional and physical problems).These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASSR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decreased quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #21. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnoses (bipolar disorder) were present upon Resident #21's admission date on 9/27/2024. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs.Findings included: Record review of an admission Record for Resident #21 dated 7/16/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old.Record review of active physician orders for Resident #21 dated 7/16/2025 indicated she had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a mental illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment for 1 of 4 (Resident #6) residents reviewed for care plan revisions.The facility failed to update Resident #6's care plans for hospice status.These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 7/16/25 for Resident #6 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of a diagnosis report dated 7/16/25 for Resident #6 indicated her primary diagnosis was senile degeneration of brain (a neurological disorder that is tied to cognitive decline, memory impairment, and changes in behavior).Record review of a comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 indicated a BIMS score of 06, indicating severely impaired cognition. She was receiving hospice services as a resident in the facility. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #20) reviewed for quality of care.1.The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service for Resident #9 on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure a bottle of peri-wash was not left in Resident #20's room on 7/15/25.This failure could place residents at risk of injuries due to environmental hazards.Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #9's facility face sheet dated 7/16/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male that admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #9's physician's consolidated orders dated 7/16/2025 revealed Resident #9 had a primary diagnosis of sepsis (infection in the body) and used a mechanical lift for all transfers. Record review of Resident #9's comprehensive care plan dated 7/15/2025 revealed Resident #9 had an ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals and preferences for 1 resident (Resident #57) out of 2 residents observed for respiratory therapy.The facility failed to obtain physician orders for Resident #57's Bipap settings he used each night at the facility since his admission on [DATE].This failure could place residents who reside at the facility at risk for inaccurate care and communication of health conditions to other providers.Record review of Resident #57's electronic medical record and face sheet dated 7/16/2025 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin and the deeper tissues beneath the skin), obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorder where breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering for all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 12 months (May 2025).The facility failed to have a licensed pharmacist, 2 facility staff witnesses and sign the drug destruction log during drug destruction occurrence May 22, 2025.These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation and drug diversion.Findings include:Record review of a Drug Destruction record, dated 5/22/25, indicated the attached sheets which contained the controlled substances were initialed only by the consultant pharmacist and contained no witness signatures.During an interview on 7/16/25 at 3:15 PM, the DON said if drugs were not destroyed appropriately and did not have the required witnesses, a drug diversion could happen. She said going forward, she would ensure the witnesses signed the attached sheets appropriately. Record review of the facility's policy titled Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for storage of medications and for 1 of 4 medication carts (Nurse Cart L) reviewed for pharmacy services.1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's 10 ml sterile normal saline prefilled syringe and intravenous site dressing were not kept at the bedside and was unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel or residents on 07/15/25. 2.The facility failed to ensure expired Tresiba (insulin degludec) for Resident #30 was not on the nurse medication cart on 7/16/25. This failure could place residents at risk of unauthorized use of medication, accidental contaminations/use of an unprescribed medication, and adverse effects of medications. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #23's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption for 1 of 2 resident personal refrigerators (Resident #57) reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #57 was clean and contained food items that were labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #57 did not contain expired milk or expired whipped cream. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's electronic medical record and face sheet, dated 7/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin and the deeper tissues beneath the skin), obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation for transfer or discharge by resident's physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to provide a reason for Resident #1's discharge by the resident's physician and the specific resident needs the facility could not meet, the facility's efforts to meet those needs and the specific services the receiving facility would provide to meet the needs of the resident which could not be met at current facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the needed records when transferring care and services and causing a disruption in their care and/or services. Findings included : Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hodgkin lymphoma (a type of cancer that affects the lymphatic system), diabetes, (a condition that affects blood sugar levels), dementia, (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement contained all the required elements for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. The facility did not ensure the arbitration agreement granted the resident or his/her representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing. The facility did not ensure the arbitration agreement allowed the resident or anyone else (e.g., resident's representative) to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees, and representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman. This failure could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues. Findings included: Record review of an undated admission Agreement page 9 titled Arbitration and page 18 titled Dispute Resolution Plan indicated the agreement did not grant the resident or his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement contained all the required elements for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement included provision of a neutral arbitrator. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement contained a section indicating the provision of a convenient venue. These failures could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues. Findings included: Record review of an undated admission Agreement page 9 titled Arbitration and page 18 titled Dispute Resolution Plan indicated the agreement did not ensure the provision of a neutral arbitrator and did not ensure the Arbitration Agreement contained a section indicating the provision of a convenient venue. During an interview on 05/29/24 at 9:17 AM the administrator said that he was responsible for the admission agreements and was not aware of the requirements of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespreadHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policy regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 smoking area reviewed. The facility failed to empty ash trays and keep trash out of the ash trays in the designated smoking area on 5/29/2024. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm and lead to an unsafe smoking environment. The findings included: During an observation on 05/29/24 at 8:25 AM the designated smoking area had 2 ash trays present. One ash tray was overflowing with cigarette butts and the other ash tray had a paper towel that had presence of burn marks . During an interview on 05/29/24 at 8:29 AM HSK A said the maintenance director was responsible for maintaining the smoking area and she would empty the trash. She said that in her training she was taught that residents were to be supervised during the smoke break to ensure they did not put their cigarettes in the trash can or keep a lighter. She said that paper in the ash trays and excessive butts could cause a fire. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #3, #33, and #38) The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service. This deficient practice could result in a loss of quality of life due to injuries. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 5/29/24 for Resident #3 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dysphagia, muscle weakness, and dementia. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 indicated that he had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated that he was cognitively intact Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) indicated that he required substantial/maximal assist for transfers. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 12/30/23 for Resident #3 indicated that he required assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care are provided care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #15, #29, and #1). The facility failed to ensure the external filters of Resident's #15, #29, and #1 oxygen concentrators were free of dust buildup on 5/28/2024. These failures could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections, breathing in dust and allergens, decreased effectiveness of oxygen concentrators, and exacerbation of respiratory distress. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet dated 5/29/2024 for Resident #15 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), Parkinson's disease (a chronic disorder that causes difficulty moving, tremors, and stiffness), COPD (a group of lung disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the only kitchen. Temperature logs for the dishwasher, refrigerator 1, refrigerator 2, freezer 1, and freezer 2 were missing recorded temperatures. This failure could place residents who ate from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 5/28/2024 at 9:20 AM, temperature log located at the dishwashing station with May 2024 on top of page had temperature checks missing from 05/20/2024 thru 05/27/2024. Temperature logs with May 2024 at heading for freezer 1 had recorded temperatures missing for 05/13/2024 thru 05/25/204, freezer 2 missing recorded temperatures for 05/14/2024 thru 05/25/2024, refrigerator 1 recorded temperatures missing for 05/14/2024 thru 05/25/2024, and refrigerator 2 recorded temperatures missing for 05/14/2024 thru 05/27/2024. During a record review of temperature logs dating from January 2024 thru April 2024, no missing recorded temperatures noted. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #116) and 3 of 8 staff (MDS nurse, CNA E, and CNA F) reviewed for infection control. MDS nurse failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during noon meal service on 5/28/2024. CNA E and CNA F failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when they provided foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) care and incontinent care to Resident #116 on 5/28/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: 1.During an observation on 05/28/24 at 12:15 PM the MDS nurse was observed passing lunch trays in the main dining room. She was observed handling resident wheelchairs and other items in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted resident independence and dignity while dining for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed for meal service. (Resident #53). LVN B stood beside Resident #53 while she assisted the residents to eat. This failure could place residents who need assistance with eating at risk for weight loss and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #53 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. She had the following diagnoses: Hyperthyroidism (when the thyroid gland makes too much thyroid hormone), Alzheimer's disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), Anxiety disorder (mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), Chronic Kidney Disease (a condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to properly filter waste), and Hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to obtain physician order and informed consent for Resident #54 before implementing a position change alarm. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of decreased quality of life, injury and being subjected to restraints for purposes of convenience or discipline. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 5/29/24 for Resident #54 indicated that she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia, and kidney failure. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #54 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #32) reviewed for PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had a new level 1 PASSAR completed with a new diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (a mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations) and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that interferes with daily life). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASSAR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decreased quality of life. The findings were: Record review of a face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #48 and #64) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission on Resident # 48 and provide a care plan summary to the resident or representative. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission on Resident # 64 and provide a care plan summary to the resident or representative. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving correct and/or necessary care or treatment. Findings included: 1. Record review of a facility face sheet indicated Resident # 48 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of end stage heart failure. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications from the medication storage room. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications, decreased quality of life, and hospitalization. Findings included: During an observation in the medication room on 5/29/2024 at 12:10 PM with MA C revealed the following: * 2 bottles of enteric coated aspirin with an expiration date of 4/24. During an interview on 5/29/2024 at 12:20 PM, MA C said she had been employed at the facility for 12 years. She said all nursing staff and medication aides were responsible for checking the medications and ensuring there were no expired medications stored in the medication room. She said she checked the medication room when she could. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents interviewed for food temperature and taste. (Resident #168) The facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. Resident #168 complained the food was served cold and did not taste good. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 05/28/2024 at 09:24 AM, Resident #168 said the food was served cold. Resident #168 eats in his room . During an observation on 05/29/2024, of the last meal cart for the residents that dine in their room left the kitchen at 12:55 PM and the test tray was served at 1:01 PM. The regular tray consisted of fettuccine alfredo with chicken, green beans, and mashed potatoes with gravy. The foods were bland and cool. The pork roast was cool and had small amount of chicken present. The green beans and mashed potatoes were cool. All food items were served cool. The dietary manager was present and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for call lights. (Residents #44 & #55). The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's and Resident #55's emergency call lights in the bathroom were reachable from the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 5/29/24 for Resident #44 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and history of falling. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] fore Resident #44 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 9 which indicated that she had moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) indicated that she required supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (nurse cart 100 hall) and the medication storage room reviewed for labeling and storage. 1. The facility failed to remove expired insulin and glucose control solutions (high and low solutions) from the nurse medication cart on hall 100. 2. The facility failed to label and remove expired Tuberculin (TB) testing solution from the medication room refrigerator. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for improper glucose monitoring and could result in residents not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications causing a health decline. Findings include: Record Review of physician order summary dated 3/27/23 reflected Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. Cook D had hair hanging out of the back of her hair net while washing dishes. The inside bin of the ice maker was dirty. Cook E laid the spoon used for stirring the pureed meat, on the three-compartment sink drainboard, then picked it up and continued to use it. These failures could place the residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 03/27/23 at 08:50 a.m., [NAME] D was washing dishes at the dish machine and her hair was hanging out of the back of her hair net. [NAME] D said she had worked at the facility since August 2022 and the previous Dietary Manager had taught her how to wear a hairnet. She said she was not aware her hair was hanging out of her hairnet in the back. She said not keeping her hair in the hairnet could cause hair to fall out into the food. During an observation and interview on 03/27/23 at 9:10 a.m., a paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #14 and #25) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 and Resident #25's care plans accurately reflected residents' PASRR positive status. This deficient practice could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of facility face sheet dated 03/28/2023 indicated Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses iron deficiency anemia (low iron levels in the blood), intellectual disabilities (a condition characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior that originates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure an aerosol can of air freshener was not sitting on the bedside table of Resident #43's room. Label contained the phrase .KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND PETS . This failure could place residents with dementia that may wander at risk of injury by ingestion or inhalation. Findings include: Record review of facility face sheet dated 3/29/23 for Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Parkinson's disease (body tremors), psychotic disorder with hallucinations, generalized anxiety disorder, and osteoporosis (decrease in bone density causing fragile bones). Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #43 revealed that resident should not be interviewed for BIMS score due to rarely or never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #16 and #28) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #16 and #28's nasal cannula tubing on the wheelchair was changed every 7 days and labeled. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of developing respiratory infections and complications. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 03/29/2023, indicated Resident # 16 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, cough, and rash. Record review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 03/29/2023, indicated Resident # 16 required oxygen therapy and was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 14. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for the lunch meal on 03/28/23 reviewed for food form and preparation. The facility failed to ensure the pureed turkey, prepared on 03/28/22 for the noon meal, was pureed to a smooth consistency without grainy, fibrous particles in it. This failure could place residents who received pureed or mechanically chopped meat at risk of consuming foods that could cause choking, decrease meal intake, and not having nutritional needs met. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 03/28/23 at 11:45 a.m., [NAME] E was preparing the pureed meat for the lunch meal. She said she had worked at the facility, this time, for a year and a half. She said the previous DM taught her how to puree. [NAME] E said she had two residents in the facility on a pureed diet, but she pureed extra just in case. She placed the turkey slices in the Robot Coupe and added ¼ cup of chicken broth and processed. She then poured the turkey into a serving pan to place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 3 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #25). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #25 did not contain expired diced peaches and box of coffee creamer singles. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet, dated 3/28/23 revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement and muscle tone or posture), severe intellectual disabilities (noticeable motor impairment, severe damage to, or abnormal development of, their central nervous system, and generally having an IQ range of 20 to 34), and quadriplegia (condition in which both the arms and legs are paralyzed and lose normal motor function). During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 1 of 18 licensed staff (ADON) reviewed for valid nursing licenses. The facility failed to ensure the ADON's nurse license did not expire as of [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by a licensed nurse. The findings include: Record review of a personnel file review for the facility indicated the ADON had been employed at the facility since [DATE] with a LVN nursing license. A copy of the Texas Board of Nursing license verification for ADON indicated her nursing license expired on [DATE]. Record review of a license search on the national licensure and disciplinary database with a report date of [DATE] at 10:34 AM indicated a search of the nursing license for the ADON. The report indicated the ADON's license was delinquent with an expiration date of [DATE]. Record review of the Texas Board of Nursing license verification dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurate, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #17, Resident #28 and Resident #38) reviewed for accurate records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17, Resident #28 and Resident #38's executed (signed by MD and resident representative) Consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic Medication Treatment (Form 3713) was placed in the medical record per facility policy. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and risk to safety. The findings included: Record review of Resident #17's order summary dated 3/27/23 revealed Resident #17 was [AGE] years old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of psychotic disorder (mental illness), anxiety and depression and received the services of Psychiatry. Resident #17 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 stove in the kitchen reviewed for food service. The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in working order. One of six gas stove burners did not light automatically, when the knob was turned. This failure could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk for injury and under cooked food. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 03/27/23 at 9:00 a.m. when the DM, turned the knobs on the gas stove, the front right burner did not light from the pilot. The DM then had to use a striker to light the burner. She said they had a work order out on the stove, that it had been that way for a while. She said the owner was trying to get them a new one. During an interview on 03/28/23 at 2:15 PM, the Maintenance Director said he did not have a work order on the stove prior to 03/27/23 when the DM told him the stove burner didn't light when the knob was turned. He said when the DM told him he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident # 30 and Resident #48) The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 and #48's emergency call light in the bathroom would reach the floor. The call light cord was coiled up in a bundle above the support bar. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record review of a face sheet for Resident # 20 dated 3/29/2023 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (not able to remember, think or make decisions in everyday activities), essential hypertension, and Alzheimer's disease (a disease that destroys memory and thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-03-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS reviewed for administration (Fiscal year 2023 for the first quarter October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022) The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2022. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met. The findings included: Review of the facility's undated staff roster indicated the following: 1 Administrator 2 RN's (included DON) 14 LVN's (included 1 ADON/MDS Coordinator and 1 Treatment nurse) 22 CNA/MA's 1 Maintenance Person 8 Housekeeping/Laundry Personnel 6 Dietary Personnel (included 1 Dietary Manager) 14 Therapy Personnel (Included 1 Director of Rehab) 1 Social Worker 1 Activity Director 1 Administrative Assistant 1 BOM/HR 1 Transportation Person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRYER, SHANNON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 96% | since 01/01/2024 |
| REYNOLDS, JEANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2024 |
| JANUS GP, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.