No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oakmont Guest Care Center

2712 Hurstview Dr, Hurst, TX 76054 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 161 certified beds · (817) 281-6707 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Aug 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$44,732 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Aug 2023
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $44,732 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-31)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
466 Mid Cities Blvd · (817) 625-8818 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
612 Grapevine Hwy · (817) 281-0456 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Tom Thumb0.2 mi
612 Grapevine Hwy · (817) 428-0383 · Call to confirm hours
Park
500 Heneretta Dr · (817) 788-7320 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6649 Precinct Line Rd · (817) 281-3980

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.6%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission40.0%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.1%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.152.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.842.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 5.4–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge19.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay10.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.6–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 107.0 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-10)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (Residents #1) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care. -The facility failed to ensure that Residents #1, who required continuous oxygen therapy, received adequate oxygen when his portable oxygen tank ran out of oxygen while the resident was in the community at an appointment on 10/29/2025. Resident #1 was transported to the local hospital and diagnosed with acute hypoxia (low levels of oxygen) The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/29/25 and ended on 10/30/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began. This failure could place residents who receive oxygen therapy at risk of receiving inadequate oxygen support, which could result in serious harm or death.Findings included:Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #2) of ten residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not elope from the facility. The facility staff did not notice the resident was missing from Saturday, 08/19/23 at approximately 7:40 PM to the following Sunday, 08/20/23 around noon. The resident was located around 6:00 pm 12 miles away from the facility after police became involved and a Silver Alert had been issued. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/22/23. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:03 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/24/23, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to implement and monitor the effectiveness of its corrective systems. This failure could affect residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for one (Resident #2) of ten residents reviewed for neglect policies. The facility failed to ensure their abuse and neglect policy was implemented for Resident #1 when he eloped from the facility. The facility staff did not notice the resident was missing from Saturday, 08/19/23 at approximately 7:40 PM to the following Sunday, 08/20/23 around noon. The resident was located around 6:00 pm 12 miles away from the facility after police became involved and a Silver Alert had been issued. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/22/23. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:03 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/24/23, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and at a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to implement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (Resident #2 and #4) of four residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility staff DA M allowed Resident #2 to leave behind her without ensuring he was not a resident. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not elope from the facility and staff did not notice the resident was missing from Saturday, 08/19/23 at approximately 7:40 PM to the following Sunday, 08/20/23 around noon. 3. The facility staff including MA R, LVN P, LVN Q and CNA B and CNA X failed to check on Resident #2 on the 2-10PM, 10PM-6AM, AND 6AM-2PM shifts from 08/19/23 through 08/20/23 to ensure he was present in the facility. 4. The facility nurses failed to check on Resident #2 every shift per the physician's order to monitor for increased signs and symptoms of exit-seeking and/or wandering on the 10pm-6am shift from 08/19/23 through 08/20/23. 5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from accidents and hazards for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The facility failed to safely transfer Resident #1 and prevent injury during the use of the mechanical Hoyer lift, resulting in a laceration on the forehead on 12/16/23 and back pain on 11/20/23. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents that could lead to injuries such as bruising, skin tears and fractures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated , 10/11/223, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, and his diagnoses included displaced tri malleolar fracture of right lower leg (fracture of the lower leg sections that form ankle joint and help move foot and ankle) and morbid severe obesity (weights are more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure:- food appliances, including the microwave, toaster, and steamer were clean and sanitized; - the kitchen floors were clean and free of dust and debris;- 3 large dry ingredient food containers were clean;- food preparation tables were clean and free of old food residue; - the dishwasher's wash cycle reached 120 degrees Fahrenheit to properly clean and sanitize dishware and utensils; and - all kitchen staff were educated on 03/18/26 regarding the facility's expectations for the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illness.Findings included: Observation on 06/08/26 from 9:15 AM to 9:55 AM in the facility's kitchen revealed: -The inside of the microwave had food stains and residue -The inside of the toaster had food residue, and the outside had food stains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident on one of four medication carts (Hall 700/Hall 800 nurses' medication cart) and 2 of 2 Residents (Residents#10 and #24) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Narcotic Log on the Hall 700/Hall 800 nurses' medication cart were accurate for administration of the narcotic pain medication hydrocodone/acetaminophen for Resident #24 and the narcotic pain medication oxycodone for Resident #10.2. LVN F failed to document the administration of narcotic medications in a correct and timely manner on the MAR and NAR for Residents #10 and #24. These failures could place residents at risk for drug diversion and not receiving the therapeutic dose of medication. Findings included:Record review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of two residents (Resident #4) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure after Resident #4 readmitted to the facility with rhinovirus (a type of virus that is one of the most common causes of the common cold) that physician orders were obtained for the resident to be placed on droplet precautions, which are infection control measures to prevent the spread of infection through respiratory droplets. This failure could place residents at risk for exposure to a contagious disease, infection, and possible hospitalization.Findings included:Record review of Resident #4's admission MDS Assessment, dated 05/28/26, which revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. -On 01/07/26 the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received appropriate treatment to prevent complications of enteral feeding when LVN A did not connect the resident's g-tube to the feeding pump, causing the formula to waste onto the floor for approximately 1.5 hours. This failure could place residents who receive enteral feeding at risk for inadequate nutrition and hydration, which could cause a decline in health.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/07/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type II diabetes (body's inability to control blood sugar levels), gastrostomy status (g-tube placement), dysphagia, pharyngeal phase (difficulty moving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for infection control. 1. MA A, CNA B, and CNA C failed to perform hand hygiene before entering and exiting Resident #1's room on 08/01/25. 2. MA A, CNA B, and CNA C failed to put on PPE recommended for residents on contact precautions on 08/01/25. 3. MA A failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff (reusable medical devices) between residents on 08/01/25.This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected, the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with and not limited to sepsis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for four (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and non-pressure wounds. 1. The facility failed to document skin care was provided for Resident #1 on 05/01/25 and 05/06/25. 2. The facility failed to document wound care was provided for Resident #2 on 05/02/25. 3. The facility failed to document wound care was provided for Resident #3 on 04/24/25 and 05/02/25. 4. The facility failed to document wound care was provided for Resident #4 on 04/27/25, 04/28/25 and 04/29/25. The facility failure could place residents at risk of not receiving wound care, wounds worsening and a lack of oversight of their clinical records by the nursing staff and nursing management. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 2 meals (lunch) reviewed for food meeting residents' needs. The facility failed to prepare and serve pureed turkey tetrazzini as a pudding consistency for residents who required pureed diets during the lunch meal on 04/09/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving meals that meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the lunch menu ticket for 04/09/2025 revealed the menu for the lunch service was Turkey Tetrazzini, Vegetable Medley, Breadstick, Fruit Cup. Observation on 04/09/25 at 11:02 AM revealed the [NAME] prepared turkey tetrazzini with a food processor and then placed it on the steam table. The Dietary Manager did not check the consistency or ensure it was all blended to a pudding smooth consistency. Observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 04/09/25 beginning at 1:05 PM revealed the test tray included the regular textured menu items and the pureed menu items. The Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR Level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility did not refer Resident #13 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when he received a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder. This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated and receive needed PASRR services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 04/10/25 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #13 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder on 03/14/25. Record review of Resident #13's MDS Assessment, dated 04/03/25, reflected the resident had an active diagnosis of depressive disorder, and the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 07. Record review of Resident #13's undated Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fingernails was clean and cut. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Optional State MDS Assessment, dated 03/20/25, reflected the resident was a an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The MDS also reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also reflected diagnoses of Asthma, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), or chronic lung disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, undated, reflected: Focus: Resident exhibits ADL Self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #40) whose drug regimens were reviewed. The facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommended the facility include a diagnosis to the medication order to support therapy for Quetiapine on 10/13/24 and 11/13/24 for Resident #40. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #40's admission Record, dated 04/10/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating no cognitive impairment. Her active diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack/stroke, non-alzheimer's dementia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 had an appropriate diagnosis for her prescribed Seroquel (used to treat depression). This failure could place residents at risk of possible psychotropic medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #40's admission Record, dated 04/10/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/24/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating no cognitive impairment. Her active diagnoses included cerebrovascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by providing foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed ensure foot care, specifically trimming of toenails, was provided for Residents #1. This failure could result in residents developing fungal infections or other podiatric problems. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/30/24, reflected her diagnoses included cirrhosis (severe scarring) of liver, hypertension, pain, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #1 had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan addressed activities of daily living. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individual needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/30/24, reflected her diagnoses included cirrhosis (severe scarring) of liver, hypertension, pain, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure DCH A wore a hair restraint while in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the walk-in cooler, walk-in freezer and dry storage area were properly sealed, labeled and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in cooler maintained an internal temperature below 41 Fahrenheit. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observations of the facility's kitchen on 10/30/24 from 11:19 AM and 11:58 AM revealed the following: - upon entrance, DCH A was observed rolling silverware, near prepared food. DCH A was observed with a hair net on the top half of his hair, the bottom of his hair was not restrained. - an open bag of spaghetti noodles was loosely wrapped in saran wrap in the kitchen's dry storage area. - three half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge notices. The facility failed to notify Resident #1 or her representative in writing of her transfer/discharge to the hospital for behavioral reasons, the reason for the transfer, and the right to appeal and they failed to send a copy of the notice to the ombudsman as soon as practicable of the transfer/discharge. This failure could place residents at risk of being transferred or discharged , and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/04/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0914 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were equipped with privacy curtains the assured full visual privacy for 11 of 53 rooms (Rooms 201, 202, 205, 207, 211, 302, 305, 306, 307, 406, and 409) reviewed for visual privacy. 1. LVN C and CNA D failed to ensure Resident #2 had full visual privacy while providing care. 2. The facility failed to ensure the residents in the A beds in Rooms 201, 202, 205, 207, 211, 302, 305, 306, 307, 406, and 409 had privacy curtains to assure full visual privacy. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to the hallway during cares. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's undated admission Record revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain chemical imbalance), muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. revealed a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. Housekeeper A picked popcorn off the floor and placed it back into Resident #1's bag and was subsequently eaten by Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to pathogens from the floor. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 03/20/24 and ended on 03/21/24. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pelvic fracture, history of falls, and dementia. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 10 indicating mild cognitive impairment. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 12 of 12 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: Observation and interview on 03/19/24 at 10:00 AM during a confidential resident group meeting with 12 residents, revealed the resident council meeting were held once a month in the dining room. The meeting was held in a TV room that was closed off to the staff and private. The residents stated normally the resident council meetings were being held in the dining room, which was an open space and no way to keep staff from walking by or overhearing. The resident further stated they really liked the privacy of the current meeting because they felt like they could speak freely without feeling like they were being overheard by staff.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0635 — pattern
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 (Resident #45) of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain follow-up orders when Resident #45 returned to the facility from the hospital with a splint after she was diagnosed with an elbow fracture. The failure placed residents at risk of not receiving needed treatments to prevent conditions from worsening. Findings included: Review of Resident #45's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), respiratory failure, fracture of lower end of humerus, and acute cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder). Resident #45 had a BIMS of 9, cognition moderately impaired, and was able to be understood and she understood others. Observation and interview on 03/18/24 at 12:40 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #66) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #66 that addressed her use of dentures. 2. The facility failed to update Resident #66's care plan to address changes in diet texture, weight loss, or health shakes at lunch and dinner. 3. The facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed Resident #66's need to have assistance for eating. 4. The facility failed to develop a care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to address Resident #66, hospice services. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet reflected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #66) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10, and Resident #66 had feeding assistance for more than 30 minutes after lunch trays were delivered to their rooms. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care, assistance when needed, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included Huntington's Disease (progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain), Dementia, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, speech and language deficit, contracture of muscle in both left and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weigh or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that was not possible or the resident preferences indicated otherwise for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #66 and Resident #115) reviewed for nutrition status maintenance. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 had a heath shake with lunch and dinner. 2. The facility failed to measure and record Resident #115's body weight, as ordered by the resident's physician, for three weeks in November 2023. These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss, weight gain, nutritional deficit, and adverse health consequences. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #66's face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #42) of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #42 after return from dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate post dialysis care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's, face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #42 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis). Record review of Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/12/24, reflected a BIMS score of 9, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired.The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident on one of three medication carts (Hall 507-708 nurses' cart) and 4 of 4 Residents (Resident #43, #91, #93 and #102) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility failed to ensure the Hall 507-708 nurses medication cart contained accurate narcotic record for Residents #43 and #91. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #93's Bengay Greaseless External Cream 10-15% (Menthol-Methyl Salicylate (Liniments) and one bottle of nicotine lozenges were stored properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #102 took her medications when they were administered, which resulted in the resident saving the medication in her room. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion, delay in medication administration and at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #14 and #98) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review. The facility's Pharmacist Consultant recommended Residents #14 and #98 antipsychotic medication Quetiapine required an additional consent on the Form 3713 to be completed and uploaded to the resident's chart. These failures could place residents on psychotropic medications at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 03/21/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility 04/05/2023.The diagnoses included dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), delusional disorders and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one of 4 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to assist in providing dental services for Resident #66. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, dental pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included Metabolic Encephalopathy (condition in which brain function is disturbed), acute respiratory infection with hypoxia (low oxygen tension in the arterial blood), Anemia (blood disorder), Record review of Resident #66's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 04, which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status indicated she required partial/moderate assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 1 (the lunch meal on 03/19/24) of 4 lunches reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the seven residents (Residents #9, #10, #46, #66, #75, #79, and #159) on a pureed diet were served pureed bread and pureed chicken fried steak during the lunch meal on 03/19/24. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss, hunger, unwanted weight gain, and metabolic imbalances. Findings included: Review of an undated list of residents served a pureed diet revealed the facility had a total of seven residents (Residents #9, #10, #46, #66, #75, #79, and #159) on a pureed diet. Review of the facility's menu for the lunch meal on 03/19/24 reflected country fired steak, cream gravy, garlic mashed potatoes, buttered carrots, dinner roll, cookies and cream mousse. Observation and interview on 03/19/24 at 11:00 AM revealed [NAME] Z was using a food processer to puree cooked chicken nuggets instead of chicken fried steak. [NAME] Z said since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 5 (Administrator, [NAME] Z, Dietary Aide X, Dietary Aide W, and Dietary Aide V) of 5 staff and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: 1. [NAME] Z placed food containers of the lunch meal in the steamtable that contained contaminated water. 2. The Administrator, Dietary Aide X, Dietary Aide W, and Dietary Aide V failed to wear a hair restraint while in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: 1. In a continuous observation on 03/19/24 from 11:08 AM to 11:11 AM of the kitchen's steamtable revealed of the five compartments, the second compartment from the left side had a few inches of brown tinted water in it as well as food particles. [NAME] Z placed a tray of cooked mashed potatoes in the dirty steamtable compartment. [NAME] Z a tray of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #115) of 5 residents reviewed for clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented on Resident #115's October 2023 MAR that he received his medications. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff kept copies of Resident #115's shower sheets from September and October 2023. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #115's face sheet, dated 03/21/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/26/23. His diagnoses included anorexia (an eating disorder characterized by relentless drive for thinness with a fear of gaining body weight associated with self induced behaviors towards thinness), major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of three meals (lunch on 03/19/24) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to prepare food that conserved nutritive value and was at an appetizing taste and temperature for the lunch meal on 03/19/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of poor intake of nutrition, weight loss, and illness. Findings included: Review of an undated list of residents served a pureed diet revealed the facility had a total of seven residents on a pureed diet. Review of the facility's menu for the lunch meal on 03/19/24 reflected country fired steak, cream gravy, garlic mashed potatoes, buttered carrots, dinner roll, cookies and cream mousse. Review of the facility's pureed buttered carrots recipe card, dated 03/21/24, reflected the following: Step #2: Measure number of servings using the regular prepared recipe portion. Drain well to minimize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. 1. The facility failed to date and maintain the integrity of the PICC/CVC line dressing per professional standards for Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C had training on IV administration and IV dressing changes. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for infections and cross-contamination. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's MDS assessment, dated 09/09/23, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and she had severe cognitive impairement with a BIMS score of 7. The resident had diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) and encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain diseases that alters brain function or structure). The MDS did not address the need for IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs were provided for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was placed within his reach. This failure could place dependent residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed on 12/07/23, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis on the right side of the body due to tissue damage to the brain or spinal cord), chronic allergic conjunctivitis (inflammation of the conjunctiva caused by an allergic reaction), and vascular dementia (problem with thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Residents #1 and #6) of ten residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #1's use of an antipsychotic medication-Seroquel, diabetes, insulin use and hospice care. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #6's seizures. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medication and treatments, at each visit and wrote, signed and dated progress notes at each visit for five (Residents #1, #3, #5, #9 and #10) of 10 residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility failed to ensure there were physician progress notes available for Residents #1, #3, #5, #9 and #10 that were signed and dated by the physician(s) for each visit via the physical charts or electronic record. The physicians were, however, consulted about critical lab values and changes in condition. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care as ordered by the physician and a lack of oversight by the physician, which could place the residents at risk of harm and health decline. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter or at the option of the physician, after the initial visit, alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist for four of 10 residents (Residents #1, #5, #9 and #10) reviewed for physician services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 was seen one every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #5, #9 and #10 were seen by the facility's attending physician and/or the physician's extender at least once every 60 days. The physicians were, however, consulted about critical lab values and changes in condition. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate and adequate medical care and a lack of oversight by the physician, which could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible; and Systematically organized for one of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for clinical records documentation. 1. The facility failed to ensure the medication aide accurately documented medication administration in Resident #2's chart. 2. The facility failed to ensure the charge nurse accurately documented monitoring for signs and symptoms of exit seeking, wandering and other prescribed nursing observations for Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications at the prescribed times and outside of their therapeutic time effectiveness; it also placed other nursing staff at risk of being unaware and double dosing a resident with a medication, which could cause negative side effects and indicate a nursing task was completed for a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/RP has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment for one (Resident #2) of ten individuals reviewed for resident and RP rights. Resident #2's RP was not notified or provided any information of a doctor's appointment to which she needed to attend due to the resident having vascular dementia and having recently eloped when he was let out of the facility unknowingly by a staff member. The RP was denied the opportunity to attend the doctor's appointment post-elopement to help be a part of the treatment decisions. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts), vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for one (Resident #2) of one residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to implement an effective discharge plan for Resident #2 that made him and his RP an active partner in the process and prepared him when he was discharged to the [hospital] hospital after an elopement from the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one of ten (Resident #7) residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was administered his prescribed sliding scale insulin on 08/10/23 for 4PM and 9PM med pass when his blood sugar was elevated. This failure could place residents at risk of damage to the nerves, blood vessels and organs, as well as put them at risk of harm due to not following doctor's orders as prescribed. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/11/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #7's active diagnoses included diabetes (high blood glucose-too much sugar in the blood), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and vascular dementia (problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that a resident who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of dementia, was not prescribed an anti-psychotic medication (Seroquel) prior to determining if there were other causes for her behaviors. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was prescribed Seroquel without adequate indications for its use. 3. The facility failed to monitor Resident #1's behaviors after she was prescribed Seroquel to evaluate its effectiveness or ineffectiveness. These failures could place residents at risk for possible adverse side effects (including stroke, heart failure, fast/irregular heartbeat), adverse consequences…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for one of 10 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for laboratory services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's Keppra lab was completed as ordered. The failure could place residents at risk for delays in the provision of treatment for laboratory abnormalities and acute exacerbation of clinical conditions. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/15/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had active diagnoses which included seizure disorder (a sudden alteration of behavior due to a temporary change in the electrical functioning of the brain), hypertension (when the pressure in the blood vessels is too high (140/90 mmHg or higher)), stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow the physician orders to complete follow-up with the surgeon for staple removal for Resident #1's surgical wound. This failure could place residents with wounds at risk for a deterioration in the condition of their wounds or additional wounds. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/19/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, muscle weakness, pain, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #1's discharge MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to obtain clarification of an order for a blood pressure medication to be given at QHS PRN. 2. The facility failed to take Resident #1's blood pressure QHS to determine if the PRN medication was needed. These failures could place residents at risk for illness or injury caused by elevated blood pressure. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report, dated 8/1/2023, revealed as of 5/18/2023 Clonidine 0.1 mg tablet as needed for hypertension, as needed at HS for SBP (top number) >160 or DBP (bottom number) >90. Record review of Resident #1's MAR, dated May 2023, revealed as of 5/18/2023 Clonidine 0.1 mg for elevated blood pressure at HS for systolic > 160 or Diastolic >90. MAR reflected no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs. The facility failed to ensure all foods on Residents #1's lunch tray followed ordered food texture for mechanical soft foods. This failure could place residents at risk of aspiration and weight loss. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/1/2023, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: stroke resulting in limited mobility of the left side, difficulty swallowing and limited ability to speak. Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment, dated 5/10/2023, revealed No BIMS summary score as resident was rarely/never understood. Resident #1 required the assistance of 1 staff member for set up of his meals. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$44,732 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $15,940 — penalty dated 2025-10-31
  • $6,151 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
  • $9,485 — penalty dated 2023-12-07
  • $13,156 — penalty dated 2023-08-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NOCONA HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2024
MEEKINS, GREGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
OAKMONT GUEST CARE CENTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CULP, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GAMBLE, DENNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GAMVEST TEXAS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2020
HUNTZINGER, HOWARDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 6%Other / private 40%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$267per resident / day
operating cost
$8,115per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$263per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455626. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next