Avir at Killeen
5000 Thayer Dr, Killeen, TX 76549 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (254) 221-6380 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $65,560 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 44.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.4% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.4%CMS range 32.4–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.3%CMS range 9.7–19.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 5.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 55.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 4.9–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.50 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 96.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not exit the facility without staff's knowledge and ambulate approximately 100 yards down their driveway to a busy street with a speed limit of 65 MPH on 05/25/25. The facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable on how to properly secure the doors using the door security box located at 2 of 2 nurses' stations (both the skilled nursing and long-term care sides of the facility). Staff were identified by ADON B pressing the door release button with a key emblem instead of the round door secure button resulting in the doors not being secured. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/25/25. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 05:10 PM. While the IJ was removed on 06/26/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was safe from sexual abuse. On 02/27/24, Resident #1 alleged she was sexually assaulted, facility staff transferred her to the hospital, and hospital staff took a sexual assault exam. On 04/16/24, the sexual assault exam results showed a presence of semen in Resident #1's brief and on and in her vagina. An IJ was identified on 05/10/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:24 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 05/13/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, psychosocial harm, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 6 (room [ROOM NUMBER], 504, 506, 701, 707, and 801) of 38 resident room sinks and 1 (600 Hall Shower) of 2 resident shower rooms reviewed for hot water in the facility's 500 - 800 hallways. The facility failed to maintain resident use hot water at safe and comfortable temperatures (between 100-110). Resident use hot water was not reliably controlled and ranged from between 117.1 F and 145.0 F in reviewed locations. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 03/12/2024. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/2024 the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern due to staff needing more time to monitor the plan of removal for effectiveness. This failure could place residents at risk for sustaining scalding injuries when using resident-use / resident accessible hot water.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed for neglect in that: The facility failed to provide goods and services to Resident #1 that are necessary to ensuring Resident #1's bed wheels were locked on 10/16/23. Resident #1, who the facility knew was legally blind, rolled out of bed and fell on the ground. Resident #1 was transported by emergency medical services to the hospital on [DATE]. Hospital x-rays revealed Resident #1 had a intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. An IJ was identified on 11/10/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:38 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/11/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of actual harm that was not immediate jeopardy because of the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accidents and hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 11 residents reviewed for falls in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's bed wheels were locked on 10/16/23. Resident #1, who was legally blind, rolled out of bed and fell on the ground. Resident #1 was transported by emergency medical services to the hospital on [DATE]. Hospital x-rays revealed Resident #1 had a intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. 2. The facility failed to investigate and determine who unlocked Resident #1's bed. 3. The facility failed to train staff on how and when to unlock and lock residents' beds. 4. The facility failed to maintain a policy and procedure for how and when to unlock and lock residents' beds. 5. The facility failed to provide oversight to ensure staff were locking residents' beds. An IJ was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from abuse for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and #2 were protected from verbal abuse including verbally aggressive behavior, such as cursing, insulting, and intimidation from Residents #3 and #4. Residents #1 and #2 suffered continual negative psychosocial outcomes including fear, anxiety, feelings of hopelessness, and withdrawal from former social patterns. An IJ was identified on 10/20/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 9:57 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/21/23 at 10:48 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate to resident health or safety due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. The failure placed all residents in the facility at risk for verbal abuse, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to identify Resident #1 had been cheeking or pocketing his medication during medication pass on multiple occassions without staff kowledge and it is unknown if Resident #1 took any of the pills. An IJ was identified on 08/15/2023 . While the IJ was removed on 08/16/2023 at 7:45 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy at a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice placed residents at risk to from suffer serious harm, serious impairment, or death from drug, alcohol interactions, and prescription narcotic pain medication interaction. Findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess and put treatment orders in place when Resident #1 developed a rash under her abdominal fold causing her excruciating pain. These failures placed residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new skin integrity issues, deterioration in existing skin integrity, infection, and pain. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dermatitis (skin conditions), type II diabetes, reduced mobility, morbid obesity, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/26/24, reflected a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-08-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for pain, in that: The facility failed to provide effective pain management for Resident #2 who had dental abscesses by running out of her prescription pain medicine which caused her to have pain for 3 days and limited her enjoyment of food. This failure placed residents at risk for prolonged and unnecessary pain and suffering, decreased mobility, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, weakness, stroke, pain unspecified, and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). Review of Resident #2's MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, reflected a BIMS of 9 , indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Section J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review. The facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a comfortable interior for 3 of 16 Residents (Resident #6, Resident #21, and Resident #35) who were reviewed for a home-like environment. The facility failed to ensure that the walls of Residents #6, #21, and #35 rooms were free of scuff marks and paint damage.The deficient practice could place residents at risk of a clean and comfortable home-like environment Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #6's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, including Active primary, progressive, multiple sclerosis, dysphasia, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the score of 12, reflecting she had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 was functional and able to perform some of her ADLs. Review of Resident #6's care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #11) reviewed for PASARR Level I screenings. 1. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASARR Level 1 screening for Resident #11 and Resident #12. The PASARR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) with an onset was present upon Resident #12 and Resident #11's admission. 2. The facility did not complete a 1012 form to update Resident #12 and Resident #11's PASARR Level 1 with the new diagnosis. These failures could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASARR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Resident #12Record review of Resident #12's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #81 and Resident #67) reviewed for PASARR Level I screenings. 1. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASARR Level 1 screening for Resident #81 and Resident #67. The PASARR Level 1 screening indicated a negative level 1 despite the resident had a diagnosis prior to the PASARR being completed. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASARR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Resident #81Record review of Resident #81's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and depression. Record review of Resident #81's care plan dated 06/24/2025 revealed that Resident#81 was at risk for depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food Service safety, for one of one kitchen reviewed for food storage. The facility failed to label and date food correctly. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. The findings include: An Observation on 06/09/2026 at 6:50 AM of the walk-in refrigerator revealed the following: Cubed raw potatoes in a Ziploc bag with an open date 6/3/2026 and no use-by date. Chicken tenders in a Ziploc bag with no open date and no use-by date Daily milkshake in a serving jug with an open date of 6/8/2026 with no use-by date. An observation on 06/09/2026 at 6:55 AM of the walk-in freezer revealed the following: Sugar cookies in a Ziploc bag with an open date of 5/19/2026 and no use-by date. An observation on 6/9/2026 at 6:59 AM of the pantry revealed the following: Black Eyed Peas in a Ziploc bag with an open date of 5/24/2026 with no use-by date. Fritos chips and a Ziploc bag with no open date or use by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with ADL care and repositioned timely per Resident #1's care plan The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was assisted with ADLs timely. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3 was assisted with incontinent care timely. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of not receiving services or care, diminishing quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myoneural disorder (conditions that impair the communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for hygiene. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and Resident #2 were provided with care and services for hygiene. This failure could place residents at risk for poor self-esteem, infections, socialization, ADL decline and diminished quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/31/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted into the facility on 2/1/2026 with an initial admission date of 2/22/2023. Resident #1 was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus with circulatory complications (various cardiovascular issues that can arise due to poorly managed diabetes, significantly increasing the risk of serious health problems), acute combined systolic (congestive) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food and drink that is palatable, attractive, safe and appetizing temperature for residents in the 1 kitchen of 1. The facility failed to ensure residents received food that tasted good. The facility failed to ensure residents did not receive cold food. The facility failed to prepare enough food to ensure all residents received the meals offered. These failures could place residents on regular diet and puree diet at risk of receiving inadequate diet that could affect their health and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: Observation on 3/31/2026 at 11:30 am, the Surveyor entered the kitchen and observed staff preparing meal trays for residents in the facility. The Surveyor asked the [NAME] where the temperatures were, she had taken prior to beginning to prepare lunch trays, and she said she had not gotten around to writing them down, but she remembered them for all the meals. The Surveyor observed the lunch meal for the of 3/31/2026 was beef stroganoff over egg noodles, green beans with pimento,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility nurse did not provide wound care to Resident #1 on 03/28/2026 as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/31/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted into the facility on 2/1/2026 with an initial admission date of 2/22/2023. Resident #1 was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus with circulatory complications (various cardiovascular issues that can arise due to poorly managed diabetes, significantly increasing the risk of serious health problems), acute combined systolic (congestive) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 1 of 4 medication carts, and 1of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart located at nursing station 2 did not contain loose pills and a cup with a pill. The facility failed to ensure an expired cartridge of Humalog, best by 12/25/2024, was removed from the med room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and adverse effects of medications due to incorrect labeling.The findings included:On 03/05/26 at 1:02 PM an observation of the medication rooms refrigerator revealed an expired Humalog 100 units/ML cartridge. Dated 12/26/24 for a Resident #1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/6/2026 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmission 6/17/2025 with diagnoses of major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 1 of 4 medication carts, and 1of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart located at nursing station 2 did not contain a cup with a pill. The facility failed to ensure an expired cartridge of Humalog, best by 12/25/2024, was removed from the med room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and adverse effects of medications due to incorrect labeling.The findings included:On 03/05/26 at 1:02 PM an observation of the medication rooms refrigerator revealed an expired Humalog 100 units/ML cartridge. Dated 12/26/24 for a Resident #1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/6/2026 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmission 6/17/2025 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect are reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to ensure that CNA A reported allegation of abuse immediately, but no later than 24 hours to the ADM when Resident #1 reported that her roommate slapped her on her thigh to CNA A.This failure could result in continued abuse or neglect of residents, injury, and/or psychosocial harm.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/26/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, cerebral infarction (stroke) , monoplegia of upper limb (paralysis of arm), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and lack of coordination.Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #2 care plan on 12/28/2025 after they received orders from the nurse practitioner in regard to his rash.This failure could place residents at risk of getting insufficient care and having personal needs not met and could result in diminished physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/29/2025 reflected that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation (a sudden, significant worsening of a person's COPD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one of four residents (Resident# 1) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to provide Resident #1 showers consistent on her shower days who were physically impaired.This failure could place ADL dependent residents at risk of experiencing embarrassment from odors, infection, and skin breakdown.Findings included:Record review of shower schedule from electronic records revealed the following:Resident #1- was scheduled for Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays on the 2pm-10pm shift for December 2025. The following dates revealed the resident received showers:12/2/2025 at 17:31 pm12/4/2025 at 23:22 pm12/6/2025 at 22:39 pm12:8/2025 at 4:08 am12/9/2025 at 23:46 am12/11/2025 at 22:43 pm12/13/2025 at 15:20 pm and 22:19 pm12/17/2025 at 00:01 am and 17:59 pm12/18/2025 at 4:07…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for Resident #2 reviewed for misappropriation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was protected from the AC accessing her bank account, leading to 4 unauthorized transactions totaling $10,250 from Resident #2's account between 10-18-2025 and 10-29-2025. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life, property misappropriation, and financial hardship.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record , dated 12-03-2025, indicated an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of cerebral infarction, unspecified (blood flow to the brain disrupted due to issues with the arteries that supply it), and secondary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease Resident #2 was her own responsible party, Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11-05-2025, revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 12 ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 2 (Residents #63 and #65) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking. The facility failed on 9/2/2025 to ensure that Residents #63 and #65 did not smoke without supervision and did not keep their personal cigarettes and lighters in their rooms, as per facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment and injury. Findings include: Observation on 9/02/2025 at 11:19 AM revealed Resident #63 was observed in the designated smoking area for the facility, with a cigarette in her hand, smoking. There was no staff supervision in the smoking area at the time Resident #63 was smoking. There were no unsafe behaviors, and she did not have injuries from smoking. There is no evidence that she has been injured while smoking unsupervised. The resident did not say that they had been burned or injured while smoking cigarettes unsupervised. In an interview on 9/02/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences for one of seven residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accommodation of needs, in that:The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 had his call light in reach on 8/8/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of injury, for not receiving timely care and nursing interventions.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face sheet dated 8/8/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure, Obstructive Uropathy (disrupted urine flow) and, Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of admission MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #1 reflected a BIMs of 14 suggesting no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's Care plan dated 8/8/2025 for Resident #1 reflected the focus I am at risk for falls [related to] impaired mobility, with the Intervention: Evaluate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's catheter bag was not laying on the floor on 8/8/2025. This failure could result in the spread of diseases to residents which could result in decreased quality of life, illness, and hospitalization.Findings included: Review of Face sheet dated 8/8/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure, Obstructive Uropathy (disrupted urine flow) and Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 reflected a BIMS score of 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative(s) of the discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for discharge planning. A) 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #1 and Resident #1's RP of Resident #1's discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing, in a language and manner they understand, and at least 30 days before Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 05/25/25 in a facility-initiated discharge to another skilled nursing facility.2. The facility failed to send a copy of the notice to the facility's Ombudsman before Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 05/25/25. B) 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #2 of a reason for his discharge from the facility, an effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three (Resident's #13, 14, 17) of five residents reviewed for oxygen use and storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #13, 14, 17 nebulizer masks were documented when they were changed. This deficient practice could place residents receiving oxygen therapy at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's admission Record, dated 04/16/25, reflected a [AGE] year old female who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus due to underlying condition with Diabetic Neuropathy (a condition that occurs when the body develops insulin resistance and no longer responds effectively to insulin), Rheumatoid Arthritis (an ongoing, called chronic, condition that causes pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 (Resident #63) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to offer language assistance services or interventions to communicate with Resident #63 who had limited English proficiency. These failures affected the residents at risk of a lack of a dignified existence, self-determination, and quality of life Review of Resident #63's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or can't effectively use the insulin it makes) with other diabetic arthropathy (a progressive joint disorder that can occur in individuals with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to keep residents' information secure. This constitutes a failure to protect residents' personal and medical records and violated HIPAA regulations for 1 of 1 laptop. Because of this the facility was in a deficient practice. facility laptop was left open and unattended on a medication cart in the hallway with residents' personal medical information visible to anyone who passed by on 05/17/2025 while the medication aid was in a resident's room. These failures could place residents at risk of having their private information changed or viewed and not kept secure. Findings included: Observation on 05/17/2025, reflected that a staff member left the medication cart laptop open and unsupervised in a resident care area. The laptop screen displayed confidential resident information, accessible to unauthorized individuals. - Interview on 4/17/2025 at 2:37 PM, MA B stated that if the laptop was left open, residents or others could access information on the resident and possibly change the information. MA B said that this would be a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #63) of four residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 received his Acidophilus (bacterium found in the mouth) on 04/11/25, 04/12/25, and two times on 04/15/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, could result in worsening or exacerbation of medical conditions. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or can't effectively use the insulin it makes) with other diabetic arthropathy (a progressive joint disorder that can occur in individuals with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for three of five residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide showers to Residents #3, #4, and #5 in compliance with their shower schedules. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection prevention and control. CNA B failed to don PPE while performing incontinent care for Resident #2 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. CNA B and LVN C failed to perform hand hygiene while performing incontinent care and wound care for Resident #2. LVN C failed to have a clean field for supplies while performing wound care for Resident #2. The facility failed to have a liner in the trash can in Resident #2's room. These failures could place residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dermatitis (skin conditions), type II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 (CNA A) certified nurse assistant reviewed for competent nursing care. The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed the facility policy while providing incontinent care to Resident #1 when she did not perform proper perineal care (the process of washing the genital and anal areas of the body) during a disposable underwear change. The non-compliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The past noncompliance began on 5/31/2024 and ended on 6/02/2024. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began through training, reviews of clinical information, revision of processes, and the QAPI process. The deficient practice placed residents who depend on nursing care at risk for infection, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received her showers as scheduled, received nail care, and received assistance with oral hygiene. The failure placed residents at risk of embarrassment, injury, skin breakdown, and infection. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke that resulted in a necrotic area of the brain), depression, stiffness of joints, muscle wasting and atrophy, and spastic hemiplegia (muscles on one side of the body in a constant state of contraction). Review of the admission MDS assessment for Resident #1 dated 03/22/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to discard of food products that were past the use by date in the dry storage area. The facility failed to discard of a food product that was past the use by date in their double door refrigerator. The facility failed to store boxes off the floor in the walk-in-freezer. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 02/20/2024 at 6:53 AM revealed that the dry food storage area contained the following expired food products on the shelf: 19 twelve-ounce cans of evaporated milk with a displayed use by date of 1/13/24, 5 forty-eight-ounce containers of prune juice dated 5/26/23 with a displayed use by date of 12/15/23, and 1 forty-six-ounce container of prune juice dated 8/20/21 with a displayed use by date of 4/9/22. Observation on 02/20/2024 at 7:04 AM of the facility's walk-in freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life and failed to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for one of one resident council meeting. There was no documentation of the facility's effort to resolve grievances collected at Resident Council meetings on 11/07/2023, 12/12/2023, and 01/09/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of indignity and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident Council Minutes reflected the following with no resolutions or follow-up documented: -11/07/2023: Variety of Brief sizes, Nurses should help CNAs, missing clothing and clean under the beds. -12/12/2023: Call Lights not being answered, Not getting their briefs changed, Staff gossiping in front of residents, Medications are late, not getting showers, eggs and toast not good and second time they have complained about not cleaning under the beds -01/09/2024: CNAs does not return to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment in 1 of 1 resident rooms (Resident #69) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Pod 1 medication storage room) as evidenced by, 1) Resident #69 had feces on his commode, feces-soaked towels on his floor, and brown stains on his bedspread and wheelchair. 2) The Pod 1 medication storage room had loose trash, a box of ostomy bags, and debris and dirt on the floor. The interior of the specimen refrigerator had brown and yellow stains and chunks of brown debris. The freezer section had a large amount of unidentified brown debris. These failures could place all residents in the facility at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean, homelike environment. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #69's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Abscess of bursa (localized collection of pus in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for one resident (Resident #68) out of 18 reviewed for abuse. The facility to failed to ensure a social worker at the facility did not verbally abuse a resident when they yelled at Resident #68 and called him stupid; the incident was witnessed by the ADON, who reported it immediately. The failure could place residents at risk of physical or emotional distress, and injury. Findings include: Review of the Face sheet for Resident #68 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Vascular Dementia, Anxiety, Acute Congestive heart Failure, Major Depressive disorder, Irritable Bowel syndrome, Acute Kidney Failure and Chronic Atrial fibrillation. Review of the annual MDS assessment for Resident #68 dated 10/29/23 reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating normal cognitive abilities. His physical assessment reflected he was independent in performing all his ADLs. He was assessed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 6 of 10 residents (#4, #69, #81, #74, #12, and # 240) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #4, #69, #81, #74, #12, and # 240 were provided assistance with personal hygiene. These failures could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection, and loss of self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with acute exacerbation (group of disease that cause airflow blockage and breathing related problems), Cerebral Infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with blood vessels that supply and can cause death of brain cells), Dementia (a group of thinking and social functions that interferes with daily functioning), and difficulty in walking. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choices of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging interaction in the community for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #6, Resident #36 and Resident #37) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure one-on- one activities for Residents #6, Resident #36 and Resident #37 was provided according to the one-one activity schedule. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in social, mental, psychosocial well-being and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/22/2024, revealed Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #18 and #19) of 4 Residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #18's Nebulizer tubing and mouthpiece, which includes the nebulizing chamber (unit into which liquid medicine is converted into aerosol or mist by the pressurized air pumped through the tubing), were dated, bagged, and replaced every seven (7) days. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #19's Nebulizer tubing and mask were bagged and replaced every seven (7) days. The facility failed to ensure that the oxygen tubing for Resident #19 was dated and replaced every seven (7) days. The facility failed to ensure that the air filter for Resident #19's air concentrator was cleaned and free of debris. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory discomfort, compromise, and infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 5 of 15 residents (Residents #54, #24, #52, #81 and #69) reviewed for call lights. Residents #54, #24, #52, #81 and #69 were observed in their rooms with their call lights not in reach. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #54's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care with diagnoses of Unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), and Unspecified combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure (left and right ventricles of heart are not functioning properly. Blood may back up into the lungs and or the body tissues leading to shortness of breath, fatigue,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capacity for one (Resident #240) of eight residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #240's admission assessment was completed by the 14th day of admission. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #240's Face Sheet, dated 02/22/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, unspecified site (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), lack of coordination ( muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movement) difficulty in walking (inability to walk properly), chronic kidney disease (damage or loss of function in the kidneys), Pneumonia (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within seven days after the comprehensive assessment was required to be completed for one (Resident # 240) of seven resident reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to complete comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #240's needs within seven days after the comprehensive MDS assessments was expected to be completed. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met in a timely manner or diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #240's Face Sheet, dated 02/22/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, unspecified site (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), lack of coordination ( muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movement) difficulty in walking (inability to walk properly),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #29) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess Resident #29 prior to moving resident after a fall from her bed to the floor. This failure placed residents at risk for potential delay in medical intervention, decline in health and a decreased quality of life. Finding included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 02/22/2024, revealed Resident #29 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included repeated falls (older adults which falls more than once a year), dizziness and giddiness (dizziness- a general feeling of being off-balance. Giddiness- feeling that you are your surroundings are moving or spinning), muscle weakness ( when full effort does not produce a normal muscle contraction or movement), wedge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable for 1 (Pod 2 medication storage room) of 2 medication storage rooms, 1 (Pod 2 medication cart) of 1 medication carts and 1 (Pod 2 treatment cart) of 1 nurse treatment carts. The facility failed to ensure three medications (total of 5 bottles) were not past their expiration dates in the Pod 2 medication storage room. The facility failed to ensure two medications were not expired in the Medication Aide cart on Pod 2. The facility failed to ensure one bottle of aspirin was not expired in the nurse treatment cart on Pod 2. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: Observation on 02/21/2024 at 9:00 AM in the Pod 2 medication storage room revealed 2 bottles of Naproxen (pain reliever) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that take into account nonsmoking residents for one of one facility reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to develop a policy to address residents within the facility that were smokers. The facility failed to develop a policy to address smoking materials possessed by residents who are known smokers within the facility. The facility failed to notify residents in writing during admission that it is a no smoking facility and address options for smokers. These failures could place residents at risk for injury, burns, and an unsafe smoking environment. Findings Include: Interview on 02/21/2024 at 8:00 AM, the RN Consultant was requested to provide their policy in reference to smoking. The RN Consultant advised that she did not believe they had one because they are a no smoking facility. Interview on 02/21/2024 at 8:08 AM, the ADMINISTRATOR stated that they do not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: The facility failed to check Resident #1's blood pressure and administer one scheduled blood pressure medication (Hydralazine) as ordered on the morning of 01/17/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, shortness of breath, epilepsy (seizures), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/23/23, reflected a BIMS of 10, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment . Review of Resident #1's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medical chart reflected nursing documentation of his wounds, and that his wounds were accurately reflected on the weekly facility report for the wound care physician; wounds that were present since 06/20/23 appear one week and then are absent another week, then reappear the next week and continued that patter until the time of investigation. This deficient practice could impact all residents with wounds and result in errors in care and treatment due to improper documentation. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic ulcer of the lower leg, depression, brain bleed, and partial paralysis. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-13 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to place most recent survey readily accessible to residents in a place most frequented by residents for 9 of 9 residents reviewed for resident group meeting. The facility failed to have the survey manual readily accessible for the residents to view the surveys. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights to be informed of the facility's survey citation history. Findings included: Observation on 02/20/2024 at 4:05 PM revealed the survey book was not located in the common areas of the facility. There was no sign revealing where the survey book was located. Observation on 02/21/2024 at 8:35 AM revealed the survey book was not located in the common areas of the facility. Observation on 02/21/2024 at 8:45 AM revealed a small sign after 15 minutes of attempting to locate a sign of survey book or the survey book. The sign was located on the corner of the tall receptionist desk was an 8x10 picture frame with sign stated survey results are available for review in the front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$65,560 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $12,428 — penalty dated 2025-06-26
- $8,992 — penalty dated 2024-11-25
- $13,583 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
- $14,730 — penalty dated 2023-11-11
- $15,827 — penalty dated 2023-10-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-12 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676438. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.