No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at La Grange

457 N. Main Street, La Grange, TX 78945 · Government - Hospital district · 98 certified beds · (979) 968-5865 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (979) 968-5865 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
657 E Travis St Ste C · (512) 477-6341 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
110 E Travis St · (979) 968-5835 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
102 W Travis St · (979) 250-2559 · Call to confirm hours
Park
155 W Colorado St · (979) 968-5600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.802.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.652.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.79U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 5.7–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
70.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that drugs are stored in locked compartments and only authorized persons have access for 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included:Observation on 05/26/2026 at 10:49 a.m., revealed the locking mechanism protruding outward (indicated the medication cart was unlocked) on Medication Cart #1 near the nurses desk. The drawers of the medication cart were facing toward the entrance to 300 hall. There were no nurses or staff near Medication Cart #1. During an interview LVN A on 05/26/2026 at 11:05 a.m., she said she had been trained on medication storage. LVN A stated the person assigned to a medication cart was responsible for locking the medication cart. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 13 of 64 days (first quarter of 2026) reviewed in that: The facility failed to ensure they had a RN on duty daily for 13 days of the 64 days in the first quarter from 01/2026 through 03/2026.This deficient practice placed residents at risk of missing nursing assessments, resident supervision, and skilled nursing treatment. Findings included:Review of the facility's RN staffing hours for the months of January, February, and March of 2026 revealed no RN hours for the following days: 01/11/2026 (SU); 01/24/2026 (SA); 01/25/2026 (SU); 02/01 (SU); 02/07 (SA); 02/08 (SU); 02/14 (SA); 02/15 (SU); 02/16 (MO); 02/21 (SA); 02/22 (SU); 02/28 (SA); 03/01 (SU).During an interview with the ADON on 03/05/2026 at 10:03 a.m., it was revealed she had been doing the nursing schedule. She said the policy for RN coverage was facility did not have an RN on staff all the time because the NP came in the facility frequently. She said an RN was supposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during the survey for five of five residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide the Resident Council with a private meeting area to conduct their meetings. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: A confidential group interview and observation in facility dining room were conducted on 3/04/2026 at 2:00 PM with five residents. During this confidential group interview the meeting was interrupted by facility staff three times within a thirty-minute time span. Three of the residents stated the interruptions sometimes occur during Resident Council meetings, because the meetings are held in the dining room.Interview conducted with ACTD on 3/03/2026 at 1:48 PM. The ACTD stated that the Resident Council Meeting can be held privately in the dining room. She reported that she had signs that would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for two of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident #8 and Resident #27) A) The facility failed to ensure the ADON followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #8's unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI) right heel pressure ulcer (is a full-thickness injury whose depth cannot be determined because the wound bed is obscured by necrotic tissue, slough, or eschar) on 03/04/2026 when she failed to clean the unstageable pressure ulcer in a manner that did not contaminate the wound. She further failed to apply the dressing to the wound as to not cause unnecessary pressure, or trap air and moisture which could hinder the healing process. B) The facility failed to ensure the ADON followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #27's Stage III coccyx pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of five residents (Resident #8 and Resident #27) reviewed for infection control practices. A) The facility failed to ensure the ADON followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #8's unstageable right heel pressure ulcer on 03/04/2026 when she failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care, set up a clean wound dressing field without cross contamination, use enhanced barrier precautions on a chronic wound per facility policy, or use a cleaning technique on the pressure ulcer that did not cross contaminate the pressure ulcer. B) The facility failed to ensure the ADON followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #27's Stage III coccyx pressure ulcer on 03/04/2026 when she failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 facility for 42 residents reviewed for pests.The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pests in the dining room.This failure could place residents at risk of increased exposure to pests and vector-borne diseases and infections.Observation on 03/03/2026, at 9:21 AM this Surveyor observed 2 large size dead cockroaches in a silver pan behind the ice machine in the dining area.Observation on 03/04/2026, at 11:52 AM this Surveyor observed 2 large size dead cockroaches in a silver pan behind the ice machine in the dining area.During confidential interviews between 03/3/2026 and 03/05/2026, residents complained about roaches they observed throughout the facility (no specific dates/times provided).During an interview with HSK Dir, on 3/04/2026, at 3:17 PM, he stated the pest control company comes out every 60 days or as needed for problems that occur. Also, he stated the building…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of medications used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate expiration dates to preserve their integrity for medications stored, and to store medications properly to prevent deterioration for one of three medicaiton carts reviewed. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the 200 hall medication cart. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications or contaminated medication.Findings Included: Observation on 03/04/2026 at 11:34 AM revealed the facility Unit 2 Medication cart with a bottle of Benadryl expired on 01/2026, a bottle of Meclizine expired on 01/2026, and a bottle of normal saline eye drops expired 05/2025. In an interview on 03/04/2026 at 11:36 AM MA B stated the bottle medication Benadryl, Meclizine and normal saline on the 200 hall cart were expired and should not have been on the cart. MA B stated everyone who works on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a need for an in and out catheter and a foley catheter for 1 (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for physician notification. 'The facility failed to notify Resident #1's provider of the need for in and out catheter and for a foley catheter on 12/21/2025.This failure could result in decreased continuity of care, and a delay in needed treatment and services. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/13/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, stage 3B ( kidneys had moderate to severe damage, filtering blood at 30-44% of normal, indicated by an eGFR of 30-44 ml/min, requiring closer management to slow progression, with potential symptoms such as: swelling, fatigue, or changes in urination, and increased risk of complications of blood pressure), gout due to renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, a resident based on comprehensive assessment of a resident, that the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had orders for in and out catheter and a foley catheter when resident began retaining urine on 12/21/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care, harm, or injuries. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/13/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, stage 3B ( kidneys had moderate to severe damage, filtering blood at 30-44% of normal, indicated by an eGFR of 30-44 ml/min, requiring closer management to slow progression, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 medication carts ( Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, residents or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the-counter medications. Findings include:Observation on 01/13/2026 at 8:35 AM revealed medication cart #1 was unlocked against the wall near the entrance to the dining room. The back of the cart was against the wall with the drawers facing the hallway. The locking mechanism was protruding outward on the medication cart. The State Surveyor opened the drawers and captured photos. The nurse responsible (RN A) for the medication cart was in the dining room passing out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 emergency food storage room reviewed for kitchen and food sanitation. 1. The facility failed to dispose of a bag labeled lunch meat with a manufacture expiration date of 11/23/24. 2. The facility failed to safely store all food items to prevent contamination or spoilage; a bag of pancakes and a bag of waffles were each in a torn bag exposed in the freezer on 12/10/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed handwashing procedures on 12/10/2024. 4. The facility failed to ensure 8 gallons of expired water (expired 04/04/24) in emergency storage were cycled out and removed and 3 additional separate damaged gallons of water removed. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/10/24 at 09:03 AM the following were observed: - Reach in refrigerator contained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 resident reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #34 diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) potential triggers were identified, and care planned. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #34 received psychiatric services based on his current diagnosis to evaluate and plan for his care needs. This failure could place residents at increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 12/12/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of other schizoaffective disorder (mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality of records. The facility failed to protect the personal healthcare information of Resident #37 which was visible on a computer screen in the hallway while LVN A went into his room to preform wound care on 12/11/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. Findings included: Review of Resident #37's face sheet dated 12/12/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses acute kidney failure (A condition when an abrupt reduction in kidneys' ability to filter waste products occurs within a few hours or a few days. Symptoms include legs swelling and fatigue.), Hypertension (High pressure in the arteries (vessels that carry blood from the heart to the rest of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) assessments reviewed for PASARR evaluations. The facility failed to refer Resident #9 to the appropriate, State-designated authority when she was diagnosed 09/27/23 with psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition and psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to know physiological condition. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary PASARR mental health services, causing a decline in mental health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 12/12/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 09/19/23 with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the treatment / nurse cart was locked while unattended by LVN A on 12/11/2024. This failure could have resulted in harm due to unauthorized access to medications, biologicals, and needles. Findings included: Observation on 12/11/2024 at 11:25 AM LVN A left the treatment/ nurse cart unlocked and unattended outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] while she performed wound care. In an interview on 12/11/2024 at 11:30 AM LVN A stated she did forget to lock her cart. LVN A stated the cart should have been locked to prevent residents from getting in the cart and having had access to harmful items, like medications and needles. She stated as the nurse/ treatment cart the cart had treatment supplies and medications. In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 9:34 AM the DON stated she expected staff to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers wound care. (Resident #37). The facility failed to ensure the LVN A followed standard precautions during wound care on 12/11/2024 for Resident #37's stage II right buttock pressure ulcer when she failed to set up a clean field for treatment supplies, used a cleaning technique on the pressure ulcer that did not cross contaminate the pressure ulcer or prevent the pressure ulcer once cleaned from becoming re-contaminated. These failures could place residents at risk for developing wound infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #37's face sheet dated 12/12/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 3 (Resident #19, Resident #32, and Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19, Resident #32, and Resident #36 had call lights within their reach. These failures placed residents at risk of not having their needs met. Findings included: A record review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 10/12/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (symptoms affecting memory and thinking), muscle weakness, bipolar disorder (mental disorder), age-related debility (weakness), hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle loss), unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and lack of coordination. A record review of Resident #19's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels for 7 (Resident #1 and six anonymous residents) of 8 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 did not upset other residents in the dining room with his yelling and behaviors during meals. This failure place residents at risk of not having comfortable sound levels. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/12/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, angina (chest pain), Alzheimer's disease (neurodegenerative disease), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness and osteoporosis (skeletal disorder). A record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. A record review of Resident #1's care plan last revised on 10/10/2023 reflected he had moderately impaired hearing. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-03-05 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide bedrooms that measured at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 12 of 30 resident rooms (Rooms 202, 204, 207,401,403,407,501,503,504,507,509, and 510) reviewed for environment.The facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms rooms, 202, 204, 207,401,403,407,501,503,504,507,509, and 510 measured at least 80 square feet per resident.This failure could place residents at risk by limiting the amount of resident care equipment and personal belongings that could be accommodated in the resident's room. This may restrict the resident's' ability to move about the room freely and could negatively affect the residents' quality of life.The findings include: Observations conducted on 3/3/25 during the initial pool screening beginning at 8:55 AM revealed 12 resident rooms did not have the required amount of living space for each resident.Interview conducted with ADM on 3/03/2026 at 3:43 PM, she stated that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-12-12 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 49 of 49 resident rooms met the required square footage in that: All forty-nine resident rooms were less than the required space of eighty square feet in multiple resident rooms or 100 square feet for single resident rooms. This included rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608. This failure could restrict the amount of resident care equipment and residents' personal effects that could be accommodated in these resident rooms, limit the ability of the residents to move about the room, and decrease residents' quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 12/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Administrator stated they had requested a waiver for room size in the past, she did not have a physical copy, and the facility would request a waiver again. A record review of the facility's CMS form 2567 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-12 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 49 of 49 resident rooms met the required square footage in that: All 49 resident rooms were less than the required space of 80 square feet in multiple resident rooms or 100 square feet for single resident rooms. This included rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608. This failure could restrict the amount of resident care equipment and residents' personal effects that could be accommodated in these resident rooms, limit the ability of the residents to move about the room, and decrease residents' quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 10/12/2023 at 12:16 p.m., the Administrator stated they had requested a waiver for room size in the past, she did not have a physical copy, and the facility would request a waiver again. A record review of the facility's CMS form 2567 dated 9/26/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2017
FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/19/2007
NOELL, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
RAJ, HANSIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 10%Other / private 34%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$246per resident / day
operating cost
$7,482per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$244per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675277. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next