Crown Point Health Suites

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 550 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 288 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.29 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.28 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 who was exit seeking on the night of 04/14/25 around 11:00 PM and the morning of 04/15/25 before 8 AM and then eloped (via motorized w/c) from the facility to a local church (.17 miles) the afternoon of 04/15/25 at 2:20 PM. Staff were unaware of Resident #1's elopements when the facility was notified by a Community Member via telephone on 04/15/25 at 2:39 PM that the resident was at a church. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5/08/25 at 4:53 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 5/08/24 at 6:38 PM and approved on 05/09/25 at 9:55 AM. While the IJ was removed on 05/08/25 at 11:48 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a at a scope of no actual harm and a severity of a potential for more than minimal harm that was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to residents and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances for 10 of 10 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 10 of 10 confidential residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure. The facility failed to provide information in regards to who the facility Grievance Officer was and their contact information. The facility failed to educate residents on how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings include: In interviews and record review during an undisclosed date and time, 10 of 10 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. Residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in facility 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator (x1), and freezer (x1), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to ensure the iced tea machine's outer surface was free from dirt and stains. 3) The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator and freezer outer handle surface were free from greasy stains. 4) The facility failed to ensure the faucets were free from corrosion. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. The findings included: During kitchen tour observations on 04/08/2026 that began at 10:01 a.m. and concluded at 10:56 a.m., revealed the following: Iced tea machine, located inside the kitchen's beverage station, had dirt and stains. Faucets, on the dish/pot washing area, had corrosion. Reach-in refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessments resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) to avoid duplicate test and effort for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASARR screening, in that: Resident #1 did not have an accurate and updated PASRR Level 1 assessment reflecting a diagnosis of mental illness. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (the narrowing or blockage of blood vessels outside the heart and brain), and a medical history of psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition (a mental state where hallucinations or delusions are directly caused by a physical illness), vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a change in the residents physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify the resident representative for Resident #1 regarding a fall on 09/29/25. This failure could affect the residents by causing their representatives to be unaware of changes in a Resident's condition. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/03/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of left leg below knee, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive patterns revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents in that: 1. MA failed to ensure medications for Resident #1 were secured when she left Resident #1's medications in a cup on the bedside table unattended. This failure could place residents at risk for harm and result in drug diversion due to medications not being properly secured. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition where the heart's left ventricle doesn't relax properly between beats, making it difficult to fill with blood), unspecified atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm disorder where the heart's upper chambers (atria) beat chaotically and irregularly) and chronic kidney disease (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 3 of 19 residents (Resident #18, Resident #136, and Resident #145) reviewed for resident rights in that: 1. CNA D and CNA E provided peri care for Resident #18 and failed to close the blinds. 2. The facility failed to provide a privacy cover for Resident #136's urinary catheter bag. 3. CNA A failed to provide full privacy while assisting Resident #145 to the toilet. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: Resident #136 Record review of the admission record for Resident #136, dated 02/05/25, revealed an 87--year-old female admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical records for 14 of 14 resident was reviewed for privacy (Resident #25 and 12 residents listed in the 24-hour report book, Resident#7, #8, #10, #11, #15, #36, #44, #56, #58, #186, #187, #188). 1. CNA F failed to protect residents personal care information by leaving the 24-hour report book open on a table in the hallway on Emerald Hall. 2. MA B failed to protect Resident #25 name and medication information by writing the resident's information on a sticky note and dropping it in the living area on Emerald Hall. These failures could place residents at risk of having medical information personal, or care instructions exposed to others and misuse of personal information. Findings Included: Resident #25: Record review of an admission Record for Resident #25 showed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 5/1/2024 with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 4 of 4 kitchens (Kitchen A, Kitchen B, Kitchen C, and Kitchen D) reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to keep drawer and oven handles clean in Kitchen A. 2) The facility failed to keep refrigerator and freezer handles clean in Kitchen A and Kitchen C. 3) The facility failed to keep the microwave clean in Kitchen B. 4) The facility failed to properly store food refrigerator and freezer in Kitchen A and Kitchen B. 5) The facility failed to keep the ice machines clean in Kitchen A and Kitchen D. 6) The facility failed to properly store plates and bowls in Kitchen A and Kitchen C. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings include: Observation during a kitchen tour in Kitchen A on 02/03/25 at beginning at 10:27 AM revealed 2 freezer handles, 2 fridge handles, 3 storage drawer handles and 2 oven handles that had dry, sticky…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 6 of 16 residents (Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #52, Resident #65, Resident #145, and Resident #299) and 7 of 7 staff (RN A, LVN B, CNA A, CNA B, CNA C, and MA A, reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN B failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing wound care for Resident #12. 2. RN A failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing wound care for Resident #13. 3. MA A failed to sanitize hands between residents during medication administration for Resident #65 and Resident #52. 4. CNA A failed to wear the proper PPE when providing direct care to Resident #145 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). 5. CNA B and CNA C failed to follow policy and procedure for handwashing while providing peri care for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder or had a urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #136) reviewed for incontinence care in that: The facility failed to position Resident #136's catheter tubing in a manner to prevent infections. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased risk of urinary tract infections. Findings include: Record review of the admission record for Resident #136, dated 02/05/25, revealed an 87--year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: acute respiratory failure (breathing problems), influenza due to identified novel influenza a virus (flu infection), and retention of urine (condition that makes it hard to empty bladder). Record review of Resident #136's order summary report, dated 02/03/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-09
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-07 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX