Parkwood In The Pines

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 104.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual and physical abuse for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent sexual abuse for Resident #1 found crying in her room with Resident #2's hand under her brief in perineal area on 10/8/23. The facility failed to prevent physical abuse for Resident #3 that was hit in the face in his room by Resident #4 and sustained injuries to include a bloody nose, skin tear to left side of nose, and swelling to his left ear on 10/11/23. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 10/08/2023 and ended on 10/12/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for physical harm, psychosocial harm, impaired quality of life in unsafe environment, and further abuse. Findings included: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, revised 10/15/2022,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement policies and procedures to prevent sexual abuse for Resident #1 found crying in her room with Resident #2's hand under her brief in perineal area. The facility failed to implement policies and procedures to prevent physical abuse for Resident #3 that was hit in the face in his room by Resident #4 and sustained injuries to include a bloody nose, skin tear to left side of nose, and swelling to his left ear. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 10/08/2023 and ended on 10/12/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for physical harm, psychosocial harm, impaired quality of life in unsafe environment, and further abuse. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transferred to her bed using a mechanical lift on 10/2/24, causing pain to her right leg. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated current admission record indicated that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 12/16/21, with diagnoses including hemiplegia (describes severe or complete unilateral loss of strength or paralysis) and hemiparesis (refers to weakness in one leg, arm, or side of the face) following cerebral infarction (the most common form of stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting or thinning of muscle mass), type 2 diabetes (condition that results from insufficient production of insulin causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 3 of 6 medication carts (medication cart for halls 400, 500, and 600, nurse cart for odd room numbers on hall 100 and 200, and medication cart for hall 100 and 200) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to remove (1) bottle of expired aspirin 325 mg and (1) box of arginaid powder (medication used to aid in wound healing) and a plastic bag of a white powder without a date from the medication cart for halls 100 and 200 on 4/20/2026.The facility failed to remove (1) box of arginaid powder from the medication cart for halls 400, 500, and 600 on 4/20/2026.The facility failed to remove an expired insulin vial of Humulin R 100 units/ml from the nurse cart for odd room numbers on hall 100 and 200 on 4/20/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for the unsafe administration of medications, not receiving prescribed doses of ordered medications and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for facility's only kitchen reviewed for food storage. The facility did not ensure foods in the freezer and dry storage area were stored, labeled and dated when opened or removed from their original packaging or opened on 4/19/2026. This failure could place residents who received their meals from the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness.Findings included: During an observation in the facility kitchen on 04/19/26 at 9:50 AM, the dry storage area had the following:*a container labeled thickener, the lid was open and off center. *a plastic bag with yellow dry mix dated 4/18/26 but no label of contents.*a plastic bag with opened package labeled brown gravy mix with no open date or use by date.*a container of enchilada sauce with no open or use by date, half of contents missing and manufacturer's label of refrigerate after opening. During an observation in the facility kitchen on 04/19/26 at 10:00 a.m., the freezer had the following:* a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #64)The facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was treated with dignity and respect when the Treatment Nurse failed to provide privacy during wound care on 4/21/26.This failure could place residents at risk for feeling disrespected, a decreased sense of self-worth, and depression. Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 4/19/26 for Resident #64 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (recovery after a displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the left femur - which occurs when the upper part of the femur, just below the hip joint, breaks and the bone fragments are misaligned from their normal position).Record review of Resident #64's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #27) observed for resident environment.The facility failed to ensure the floor in Resident #27's room did not have standing water and was without odors from 4/19/2026-4/21/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #27 dated 4/21/2026 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), malignant neoplasm of lung (lung cancer), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest in doing things), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #27 dated 3/11/2026 indicated he had severe impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 5. He was dependent on staff to transfer from chair to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #64's surgical site was monitored for signs and symptoms of infection each shift while a non-removable dressing was in place from 4/9/26 to 4/20/26.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and treatment and/or decline in their health.Findings include:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 4/19/26 for Resident #64 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (recovery period after a displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the left femur - which occurs when the upper part of the femur, just below the hip joint, breaks and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 facility (3 of 7 mechanical lift slings) reviewed for hazards:The facility failed to remove faded, worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service. This failure could result in a loss of quality of life due to injuries. Findings included:During an interview and observation of the facility laundry on 04/20/2026 2:30 PM the Laundry Supervisor said she washed the lift slings and hung them up to air dry. Three of the seven mechanical lift slings hanging on the wall racks drying in the clean linen area had faded straps, light in color (light gray, light teal and light purple) not bright and vivid colors as the other mechanical lift slings hanging on the rack. One of the mechanical lift slings care label was faded and attached by a few threads of stitching. The Laundry Supervisor said she had new mechanical lift slings and would replace the 3 damaged lift slings. She said she considered the three lift slings still…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 5 (Resident #7) residents observed for urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder that drains into a bag outside of the body) care.LVN D did not provide appropriate catheter care for Resident #7 when she did not use the proper cleaning agent or clean the catheter tubing on 4/21/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for bacterial infections from improper catheter care. Findings include:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #7 dated 4/21/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralyzed on one side of the body), COPD (a group of lung diseases that affect breathing), type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged).Record review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 staff (CNA C and LVN D) and 2 of 5 resident (Resident #5 and Resident #7) reviewed for infection control.1.The facility failed to ensure CNA C washed or sanitized her hands between glove changes and did not touch clean items with dirty gloves when incontinent care was provided to Resident #5 on 4/19/2026.2.The facility failed to ensure LVN D washed or sanitized her hands between gloves changes during urinary catheter care to Resident #7 on 4/21/2026These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings included:1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #5 dated 4/19/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 dining area reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to ensure the dining room ceiling was in good repair and without damage and peeling paint. 2. The facility failed to ensure the dining room lighting and ceiling were free from thick cobwebs and dust. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe.Findings include: During observations on 04/19/26 at 12:00 PM revealed the following:*thick cobwebs and dust were noted to the chandelier and extending to the ceiling in the center of the main dining area located above resident dining tables. an area of loose peeling paint was noted to the ceiling located between center island area of the main dining room and resident dining table. During an interview on 04/21/2026 at 10:30 AM, the Housekeeping Supervisor said she was unsure of who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medical records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician's orders were updated to include the resident was a DNR status and was uploaded in his medical record.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of improper care due to inaccurate medical records.The findings include:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer), hypertensive heart disease (damaged heart muscle due to high blood pressure), anemia (not enough healthy red blood cells in the body) and infection of amputation stump, right lower extremity (infection in the right lower leg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,473 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-10-07
• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-10-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX