No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pinecrest Retirement Community

1302 Tom Temple Drive, Lufkin, TX 75904 · Non profit - Corporation · 51 certified beds · (936) 634-1054 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (936) 634-1054 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
116 Christie St · (903) 592-6000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 S Timberland Dr · (936) 632-2260 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2106 S First St · (936) 255-1026 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Kiwanis Park Dr · (936) 633-0250 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.9%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.8%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.8%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.7%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission38.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.7%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.302.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.802.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 223 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.6%CMS range 53.4–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.3–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified31.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.9%CMS range 6.3–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
1.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
11.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 43.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-08)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #26, Resident #4, and Resident #8) and 4 of 7 staff (CNA H, LVN C and CNA F, and CNA G) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA H followed infection control measures during dining service on 7/06/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA H properly handled soiled linens and clothing for Resident # 26 on 7/06/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA H properly cleaned Resident #26's soiled wheelchair cushion on 7/06/2026.The facility failed to ensure LVN C properly cleaned a glucometer (used to check blood sugars) or use a barrier for her supplies when she checked the blood sugar of Resident #4 on 7/7/2026.The facility failed to ensure CNA F and CNA G followed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (The Arbors) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to remove expired influenza vaccines from the refrigerator in the medication room in The Arbors on 7/7/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for the unsafe administration of medications, not receiving prescribed doses of ordered medications and not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.Findings include:During an observation on 7/7/2026 at 10:41 am, LVN A was in the medication room for The Arbors. The refrigerator revealed (3) boxes of influenza vaccine for 2025-2026 lot #AX615A that expired 6/30/2026.During an interview on 7/7/2026 at 10:41 am, LVN A said the nurses were responsible for checking the medication rooms and should be done daily. She said she was not aware the medication room had flu vaccines that were expired. She said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 4 (Residents #42) residents reviewed for thickened liquid diets.The facility failed to ensure Resident #42 was not served thin liquids on 7/06/2026.This failure could place residents who received thickened liquid diets at risk of difficulty swallowing, possibly resulting in choking. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #42's facility face sheet, dated 07/06/2026, indicated Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE], with diagnosis of Dysphasia (difficulty with swallowing).Record review of Resident #42's admission MDS assessment, dated 06/08/2026, revealed a BIMS score of 14 that indicated Resident #42 had intact cognition. He required assistance with his ADLs.Record review of Resident #42's comprehensive care plan, dated 6/16/2026, indicated Resident #42 required a therapeutic diet related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 5 staff (CNA A and CNA B) reviewed for competent nursing care.The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B were able to demonstrate competency in the skill of hand hygiene when they failed to perform hand hygiene and change their gloves during incontinent care provided to Resident #8 on 2/18/2026.These deficient practices affect residents who depend on nursing care and could place residents at risk for infection and harm.The findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #8 dated 2/18/2026 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of chronic systolic heart failure (the heart's inability to pump effectively), anemia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B followed contact precautions, changed their gloves, and did not touch clean items with dirty gloves when incontinent care was provided to Resident #8 on 2/18/2026.These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #8 dated 2/18/2026 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of chronic systolic heart failure (the heart's inability to pump effectively), anemia (decreased red blood cell production), and osteoporosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 main facility kitchen and 3 of 3 satellite kitchens (HC Arbor, HC Woodlands, Rehab). The dietary staff did not accurately test and log the dish machine for hot water sanitizing on 06/01/25 and the morning of 06/02/25. DA B served food without taking the holding temperatures on the rehab unit. Cook C did not take holding temperatures in the main kitchen on the foil covered plates and on any of the alternate food items. DA D served food whose temperatures were below appropriate holding temperatures on HC Arbor. She did not take temperatures on all 4 foil covered plates with food items. DA D used gloved hands to serve rolls, French fries, chicken strips, and onion rings after handling other items in the satellite kitchen on HC Arbor. DA E did not take holding temperatures on the alternate food items on HC Woodlands before serving. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's main kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. The soda drink dispenser had undated (date when opened) and expired soda syrup concentrates connected and available to be served. The freezer had open to air, improperly labeled and expired foods. This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/29/2024 at 09:20 am of the drink dispenser, 6 containers of concentrated soda syrup connected to dispenser had no opened date documented. Container of concentrated lemon soda expired 3/20/2024, container of concentrated root beer expired 4/18/2024, and a container of diet coke expired 09/10/2023. All three containers were connected to the dispenser and available to serve. The Dining Director said he had worked at the facility for two months and he was responsible for ensuring all expired items were discarded. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 3 of 28 dietary staff (Dietary Staff D, E and F) reviewed for reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility did not ensure Dietary Staff D, E and F had a current food handlers' certificate while working in the facility's kitchen on 04/29/24 to 05/01/2024. This failure could place all residents who consumed food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: Record review of 28 Dietary Staff food handlers' certificates indicated Dietary Staff D hire date 06/09/2022, Dietary Staff E hire date 10/29/2021 and Dietary Staff F hire date 10/01/2020 did not have a food handler's certificate. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 08:40 am, the Dining Director said that the three dietary employees did not have a current certificate. He said he had spoken with all three employees on 05/01/24, and they had informed him that they had no current food handler's certification .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #6) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility incorrectly coded Resident #6 as having restraints on her MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 4/29/2024 for Resident #6 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses s of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that affect activities of daily life), anemia (low red blood cells that carry oxygen in the body), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 indicated she had severe impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 00. She required substantial/maximal assistance to partial/moderate assistance with ADL's. She was always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #196) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission on Resident #196 and provide a care plan summary to the resident or representative. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving correct and/or necessary care/treatment. Findings: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 4/30/2024 indicated Resident # 196 was a [AGE] year old male and admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of aftercare for femur fracture (broken upper leg). Record review of a baseline care plan indicated Resident # 196 was admitted on [DATE] and the baseline care plan was not completed until 4/18/2024 and the family was not provided a summary of the baseline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #37) On 4/04/2024 CNA G failed to ensure a safe transfer by leaving Resident #37 standing in the sit to stand lift unattended and left the room to retrieve supplies and Resident #37 fell. This failure could place residents who required supervision at risk of injury or accidents and hospitalization. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #37's face sheet dated 4/29/2024 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: urinary tract infection, history of falling, muscle weakness, and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). Record review of the significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 had clear speech and makes self-understood. Resident #37's BIMS was 03 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #37 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 2 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #9). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #9 did not contain expired cheese sticks, prune juice, or nutritional shakes. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 4/30/2024 revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: scoliosis (a sideways curve of the spine), chronic pain, and anemia (low red blood cells). Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9's BIMS was 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #9's care plan dated 11/08/2022 indicated: Elder chooses to have a refrigerator in his room and is able to monitor the temperature and cleanliness daily with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #6) and 1 of 8 staff (CNA A) reviewed for infection control. CNA A did not sanitize/wash hands between glove changes when providing incontinent care on 4/29/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for exposure to and transmission of diseases and infections. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 4/29/2024 for Resident #6 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that affect activities of daily life), anemia (low red blood cells that carry oxygen in the body), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/1992
MRC PINECRESTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/19/2007
THE ALDERSGATE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 11/30/2004
BAGGETT, ALYCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/26/2012
BESSER, ALICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
BROWN, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/13/2020
CONGER, DALEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/21/2020
GILTS, KIPIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2020
KING, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
KOERNER, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/21/2020
MALONE-WARDLEY, ROMONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
MORGAN, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2017
SIMMONS, EDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
WATSON, FRANKIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/12/2021
WILLIAMSON, BILLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2004
WOODWARD, WALTERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
BUNCH, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2013
CURRIE, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2025
STEPHENS, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/07/2015
FOUST, HEATHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/15/2020
PARTIN, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/18/2018
PIERCE, HANNAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2015
THOMAS, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-137.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$815K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 22%Other / private 68%

This home reported $815K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$958per resident / day
operating cost
$29,108per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next