Lytle Nursing Home
15366 Oak St, Lytle, TX 78052 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (830) 772-3557 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $55,904 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-27)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.07 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 45.2 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.84 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's nephrostomy tube was removed as soon as medically possible. Resident #45 was first documented to have a kidney stone requiring a nephrostomy tube (an opening between the kidney and the skin. A nephrostomy tube is a thin plastic tube that is passed from the back, through the skin and then through the kidney, to the point where the urine collects) and needed to see a urologist on 09/2023. Resident #45 was scheduled for surgery on 04/09/24 but the surgery was canceled due to an insurance issue the facility did not properly follow up on the insurance requirements. The facility failed to follow up with the Resident's Physician and rescheduling the surgery. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician, when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that was, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) and a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #45) who was reviewed for a decline in status, in that: The facility failed to ensure the Physician/Medical Director for Resident #45 was notified when the resident was sent to the hospital ER on at least 15 occasions for complications of his nephrostomy tube. Resident #45 was first documented to have a kidney stone requiring a nephrostomy tube (an opening between the kidney and the skin. A nephrostomy tube is a thin plastic tube that is passed from the back, through the skin and then through the kidney, to the point where the urine collects) and needed to see a urologist on 09/2023. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed electronically submit to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS, for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) reporting to CMS. The facility's Business Office Manager and the Administrator failed to report the January, February, and March 2025 PBJ data to the CMS. This failure could place residents at risk for neglect.The findings included. A record review of the facility's census for the months of January, February, and March 2025 revealed an average census of 40 residents. A record review of the facility's CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 7/9/2025, revealed, FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) . This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered (e.g., requires follow-up during the survey).Metric Result DefinitionFailed to Submit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the storage of all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 1 of 43 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for medication storage. The DON failed to secure Resident #10's, 30 pills of trazadone 50mg (a drug used to treat depression), when the pills were left unattended and unsecured on the nurse's station desk for 2 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of the drugs prescribed.The findings included: A record review of Resident #10's admission record dated 7/17/2025 revealed an admission date of 8/12/2022 with diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder and depression. A record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for LTC and assessed with a BIMS Score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and or distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for professional standards for food service safety, in that: 1. The snack cart had expired thickened tea available for serving to residents and sandwiches without labels. 2. One gallon of unidentified juice dated 06/30/2025 was located in walk-in cooler, unknown if that was the open date, prepared date or use by date. 3. Pantry items were improperly stored on the floor without the use of a pallet to include 1 case of canned [NAME] Pasado beans, 1 case of canned pie filling, 1 case of oatmeal cream pies, 1 case of dill pickle relish, 1 case of quaker oats, 1 case of yellow frying corn. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 7/15/2025 at 4:30 PM of the facility's pantry room revealed a wheeled snack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 laundry facilities reviewed for safe operating clothing washers and dryers. The facility was licensed for 70 residents and had 2 commercial washers for which only 1 was operational and had 2 commercial dryers for which only 1 was operational. These failures could place residents at risk for not having adequate hygiene and laundry services. The findings included: A record review of the facility's license revealed the facility was licensed to care for 70 residents. During an observation and interview on 7/16/2025 at 4:14 PM revealed the facility's laundry department. The Laundry department had 2 commercial washers and 2 commercial dryers. One of the commercial washers was labeled with a paper sign DO NOT USE. One of the commercial dryers was labeled with a paper sign DO NOT USE. The Maintenance Director stated he had been employed as the Maintenance Director for the past year and a half and the washer was broken before he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 3 of 3 residents [Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident 8] reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to invite and include the input of Resident #3, Resident #6, Resident #8 and/or their representatives in the care plan conference meetings. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the interventions, treatments, and care necessary for the resident to reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by not involving the resident and/or the residents' representative in the care plan conference meetings. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet (undated) revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Face sheet did not identify a Responsible Party. Diagnoses include cerebral atherosclerosis (a condition where the arteries in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident for using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for timely assessments, in that:1. Resident #3's last Quarterly MDS was completed 3/14/25 and the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was opened but not completed and transmitted.2. Resident #16's last Quarterly MDS was completed 9/5/24, and no additional MDS had been initiated. This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary, complete, or correct care due to lack of current information. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet (undated) revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses include cerebral atherosclerosis (a condition where the arteries in the brain become thickened and hardened), vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), Diabetes Type II (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), Hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any significant medication errors, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for significant medication administration errors. LVN A intended to administer Resident #37's Lacosamide, a medication used to control seizures, by crushing the medication contrary to the physician's orders and the pharmacist's recommendations. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.The findings included: A record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet dated 1/15/2025 revealed an admission date of 3/17/2023 with diagnoses which included seizures (a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain. It can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness.) A record review of Resident #37's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a record of resident's activity assessments for 2 of 2 [Resident #3, Resident #16] residents reviewed for accuracy of records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #16 had quarterly evaluations and assessments for activities. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in quality of life and poor psychosocial well-being due to not identifying resident's activity preferences and needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #3's face sheet (undated) revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses include cerebral atherosclerosis (a condition where the arteries in the brain become thickened and hardened), vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), Diabetes Type II (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), Hypertension (high blood pressure), psychosis (mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), seizures (uncontrolled jerking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay. The resident has the right to, and the facility must make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 46 of 46 residents. 1. The facility failed to have a grievance process in place to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights. 2. The facility failed to have an established greivance policy to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the residents' rights. These failures could affect all residents and could result in residents/families not having their grievances resolved timely. Findings Included: Record review revealed there was no Grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, and to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 3 of 14 Residents (Resident #7, Resident #46 and Resident #200) whose records were reviewed for reportable allegations of abuse. *The facility failed to report the results of the investigation for 2 self-reported incidents involving Resident #7 and #46 by not completing Form 3613 A and sending it to the State Agency within 5 days. *Resident #200 had an unwitnessed fall on 5/4/24 and sustained a golf sized hematoma to her head. The ADM did not report it as an injury of unknown origin. These deficient practices could result in an incomplete investigation being conducted leaving residents vulnerable to further incidents causing injuries and or abuse. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #7) reviewed for care plan revisions. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect she had a left hand contracture. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect she was on Hospice services, was receiving oxygen and was receiving wound care. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #4's annual assessment, dated 6/2/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-27 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medication and treatments, at each visit and wrote, signed and dated progress notes at each visit for 7 of 14 Residents (Resident #4, Resident #7, Resident #15, Resident #17, Resident #40, Resident #45 and Resident 200) reviewed for physician visits. The facility failed to ensure resident orders were signed by a physician, physician progress notes were available for Residents, were signed and dated by the physician(s) for each visit via the physical charts, and residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, then at least once every 60 days thereafter. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care per physician orders and required oversight by the physician and could place the residents at risk for harm and overall physical health decline. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are-accurately documented for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #15, Resident #45, and Resident #200) reviewed for accurate medical records in that: 1. The facility failed to document Resident #15's refusal to attend medical appointments. 2. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed documentation for Resident #45's nephrostomy care in March and April of 2024. The facility failed to completed medication consent forms for Resident #45. 3. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff wrote a progress note reflecting when and what hospital Resident #200 was sent to after she fell on 5/4/24. These deficient practices could affect residents who have medical records and could result in misinformation about professional care provided. The findings included: 1. a. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN A used sanitized scissors, followed hand hygiene, and followed procedure for sterile technique while providing nephrostomy care to Resident #45. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 11/06/23, revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diffuse traumatic brain injury with LOC of unspecified duration ( a brain injury that affects multiple areas of the brain. It is caused by the shearing of the brain's long connecting nerve fibers (axons) when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 3 resident shower rooms (B Hallway) observed for resident environment. The facility failed to ensure the B hallway bathroom was clean. There was a black substance on the bathroom tile, a foul smell, and broken tiles on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsafe and unsanitary environment. The Findings included: During an observation and interview on 5/25/24 at 5:43 p.m. the B hallway shower had a strong odor of sulfur, the floor and shower wall had black stops all over it, approximately half foot hole in the shower floor with white cloudy water, and the trim plate was missing around the shower faucet. The DON stated she could not smell the bathroom. The DON stated she would not want her family to have to use that shower. The DON stated residents who were prone to infection and did not have their feet covered could get an infection from using the shower in that condition. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct an initial comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capacity including the resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident 200) reviewed for assessments. The MDS Coordinator failed to complete Resident #200's comprehensive assessment within 14 days after admission, 4/23/24 This deficient practice could affect newly admitted residents and result in residents not receiving the care and services as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #200's face sheet, dated 5/23/24, revealed she was admitted into the facility on 4/23/24 with diagnoses including Fragile X Chromosome (genetic condition inherited from parents which results in various developmental problems like intellectual disabilities and cognitive impairment) and Severe Intellectual Disabilities. Review of Resident #200's admission nursing assessment, dated 4/23/24, revealed Resident #200 had severe cognitive impairment, she was never understood and did not understand others, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflect the resident's status for 1 of 5 Resident's (Resident #4) whose records were reviewed for assessments. The MDS Coordinator failed to code that Resident #4 had a limited range of motion on her upper extremity related to left hand contracture for two, 2 assessment periods, 6/2/23 and 2/15/24 This deficient practice could affect residents and contribute to the resident's not receiving the necessary care and services as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #4's annual assessment, dated 6/2/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension (high blood pressure and Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that causes memory loss, thinking problems and behavior changes). Further review revealed Resident #4's limited range of motion of her upper extremity related to left hand contracture was not coded. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with possible serious mental disorder or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #45) whose records were reviewed for mental disorders. The facility failed to refer Resident #45 for a PASARR evaluation based on mental disorder diagnoses including bipolar disorder and anxiety. The facility failed to refer Resident #45 for a PASARR evaluation based on mental disorder diagnoses including manic depression (bipolar disease), anxiety and depression. This deficient practice could affect residents with a mental illness and contribute to a delay in services needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 11/06/23, revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diffuse traumatic brain injury with LOC of unspecified duration, cerebral infarction, hypertension secondary to other renal disorders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #7) reviewed for skin integrity. LVN H failed to use adequate hand hygiene during wound care; failed to clarify the order for wound care and failed to follow the order provided by Hospice services for Resident #7's wound on her left great toe. These deficient practices could affect residents who required pressure ulcer treatment and contribute to wounds becoming infected preventing the wounds from healing. The findings were: Review of Resident #7's face sheet, undated, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (long-term condition that happens when your heart cannot pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), Hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #7) whose record was reviewed for oxygen therapy. Nursing staff failed to clean Resident #7's filter on the oxygen concentrator; it had a layer of lint covering the entire outside of the filter. This deficient practice could affect residents receiving oxygen therapy and could contribute to an upper respiratory infection and a resident's decline in physical health. The findings were: Review of Resident #7's face sheet, undated, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (long-term condition that happens when your heart can ' t pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Arthritis (joint disorder). Review of Resident #7's annual MDS assessment, dated 3/6/24, revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified and provided orders for a resident's immediate care and needs for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #49 and Resident #200) reviewed for physician orders. The facility failed to ensure the Physician personally signed the initial admission orders for Resident #49 and Resident #200. This failure could affect the residents in the facility by placing them at risk for not receiving physician care for their immediate needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #49's face sheet dated [DATE] was an [AGE] year old female admitted to facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur (the bone that connects in the hip joint), Alzheimer's disease, and severe persistent asthma with status asthmaticus (severe asthma unresponsive to courses of therapy such as inhaled albuterol). Record review of admission Orders dated [DATE] revealed they were signed by a Nurse Practitioner. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 2 (LVN A and LVN H) nurses reviewed for competent nursing care. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed facility policy while providing nephrostomy care to Resident #45 when she used contaminated equipment, did not use sterile gloves, and contaminated her hands. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN H was aware of how to calibrate a glucometer and ensured the glucometer she used to check residents blood glucose daily was calibrated. These deficient practices affect residents who depend on nursing care and could place residents at risk for injury, infection, and harm. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 11/06/23, revealed Resident #45 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs without adequate indications for its use for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #17) whose record were reviewed for drug regimen. Nursing staff did not obtain a consent from Resident #17's family representative for the use of Depakote (anticonvulsant) used for mood disorder and did not indicate the medication classification on the consent form. These deficient practices could affect residents who received medications for mood disorder and could contribute to the use of unnecessary medications. The findings were: Review of Resident #17's face sheet, undated, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Mood disorder due to known physiological condition. Further review revealed Resident #17 had a family representative who served as his responsible party. Review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/10/24 revealed his BIMS was 11 out of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 2 supply storage rooms (C hall and nursing supply room) reviewed for storage of drugs. 1 The facility failed to ensure the nurse supply room patient nourishment refrigerator did not contain staff food, expired products, unlabeled food products, and unsealed food products. 2. The facility failed to ensure the crash cart did not contain expired products. 3. The facility failed to ensure C hall medication cart did not contain loose pills and expired medications in it This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. The findings were: 1. During an observation and interview on 5/24/24 at 10:35 a.m. revealed a refrigerator in the nursing supply room that contained unlabeled food container with a tan color food, a half empty liter of soda, condiment bottles with no labels, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet, in the appropriate form as prescribed by a physician for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15) observed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to provide Resident #15 a mechanical soft diet, as ordered by the physician. This failure could affect residents with physician orders for therapeutic diets and could result in consumption of inappropriate textured food items which could cause choking or aspiration and a decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute cerebrovascular insufficiency, major depressive disorder, chronic disease of tonsils and adenoids, other disorders of teeth and supporting structures, and hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, Record review of Resident #15's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/29/24, indicated Resident #15's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and implement written policies and procedures for feedback, data collections systems, and monitoring, including adverse event monitoring. The facility did not have a QAPI plan, policies or procedures in place for program systematic analysis and systemic action. This deficient practice could affect all residents' overall quality of life and quality of care they received as a result of not having systems in place to improve direct care nursing staff provided. The findings were: Interview on 05/24/24 at 02:24 PM with the DON revealed they had a Quality Assurance Committee but did not have a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program because they did not utilize PIPS (Performance Improvement Projects. She stated they did not have a written plan, policies or procedures in place. The DON stated all department heads along with the MD met once a month to discuss effective systems in the facility. She stated direct care staff was not involved in the process. She stated they did not complete written comparative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to submit NFSS forms timely for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving specialized services in a timely manner. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 11/06/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia, pain, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bradycardia (slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 12/01/2023, reflected a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, date initiated 08/30/2023, revealed Resident #1's was PASRR positive and was entitled to services recommended by PASRR with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Resident #1's comprehensive care plan did not address refusal for select PASRR services. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed and accessible to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 11/06/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia, pain, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bradycardia (slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: Resident #1 and Resident #2 comprehensive care plan was not accessible to all staff in the medical records system. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 11/06/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia, pain, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bradycardia (slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 12/01/2023, reflected a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #2's admission record, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which were complete and accurate for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility did not document in Resident #1's medical record that resident suffered a second fall in early September 2023. This failure could place residents at risk of not having accurate medical records and could create confusion in services provided or needed to be provided. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/03/23, and EMR (electronic medical record) revealed a 53-year- old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: (current) diabetes 2, nausea with vomiting, unspecified; other: hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness one side of the body), and cerebral infarction (stoke). Resident #1's Advanced Directive was Full Code. RP (responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-22 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan which includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #27, Resident #31, and Resident #52) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #27, Resident #31, and Resident #52. This failure could affect newly admitted residents and place them at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to ensure their immediate care needs are met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life), unspecified severity, low vision (vision loss that cannot be corrected by medical or surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 7 of 15 residents (Residents #1, #3, #8, #10, #13, #27, #31, and #56) reviewed for care plans in that: 1. Resident #1's diagnosis of schizophrenia was not addressed in the care plan. 2. Resident #3 received pain medications with pain not addressed in the care plan. 3. Resident #8's care plan goals and interventions were contradictory and not individualized. 4. Resident #10's diagnosis for schizophrenia was not addressed in the care plan. 5. Resident #13's care plan did not address the use of bilateral prosthesis. 6. Resident #27's received skeletal muscle relaxant with muscle spasms/pain not addressed in care plan. 7. Resident #31's care plan did not address Resident #31 being a smoker. 8. Resident # 56's care plan did not address the need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for call light: Resident # 1's call light was not placed within reach of her . This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident's #1's face sheet, undated, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Schizophrenia] (a serious mental condition of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation).[ rheumatoid arthritis] (is an autoimmune and inflammatory disease, which means that your immune system attacks healthy cells in your body by mistake, causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident status for 1 (Resident #56) of 15 residents reviewed for assessments in that: Resident #56's thick nectar liquids were not reflected on the MDS. This failure could affect residents at the facility who had been assessed and could contribute to inadequate care. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 56's face sheet, undated, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included [cerebral infarction] (the pathologic process that results in an area tissue in the brain that is disrupted blood supply); [dysphagia] takes more time and effort to move food or liquid from your mouth to your stomach);[ hyperlipidemia] (high cholesterol, means too many lipids in your blood). Record review of Resident # 56's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 99, suggesting the resident could not complete the interview. Record review of physicians' orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on in Interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASARR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicate testing and effort for 2 of 15 resident's ( Resident #1 and Resident #10), reviewed for PASARR in that : 1. Resident #1 had a serious mental disorder that was not referred for level II review. 2. Resident #10 had a serious mental disorder and was not referred for level II review. This failure could place residents with serious mental disorders by not receiving support services. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, undated, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Schizophrenia] (a serious mental condition of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #51) who were reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care, in that: a. Resident #51's indwelling urinary catheter (suprapubic urinary catheter) tubing touched the floor. b. Resident #51's catheter anchor was not placed on the leg These failures could affect residents with indwelling urinary catheters and place them at risk of urinary tract infections. The findings were: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, undated, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Benign prostatic hyperplasia] (is also called an enlarged prostate; symptoms include blocking urine flow from the bladder). [Hyperthyroidism] (happens when the thyroid gland makes too much thyroid hormone symptoms include weight loss, hand tremors, and rapid or irregular heartbeat).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 3 of 35 double occupancy resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) with at least 80 square feet per resident in that: Rooms 27, 28 and 34 did not have the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This failure could affect residents placed in these multiple occupancy rooms by reducing their living space. The findings included: Observation on 03/21/2023 by life safety code revealed the following measurements of resident room dimensions for the room size waiver: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 157.34 square feet and 78.67 square feet per resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 156.79 square feet and 78.40 square feet per resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 141.94 square feet and 70.97 square feet per resident. Review of the Bed Classifications form 3740, dated 03/20/2023 revealed each room had two beds. room [ROOM NUMBER]a was occupied, room [ROOM NUMBER]b…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, and smoking safety for 1 (Resident's #31) of 6 residents reviewed did not have their smoking assessment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was assessed for safe smoking per the facility policy. This failure could affect smoking residents and could result in harm if policies were not followed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), generalized anxiety, and hyperlipidemia (blood has too many lipids (or fats), such as cholesterol and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-27 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility for 4 of 7 survey days. Facility staff failed to ensure the survey binder was available 4 of 7 survey days in the lobby per the sign posted at the facility entrance. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in the violation of residents' rights to read the survey results. Findings included: Interview on 5/22/24 at 3:00 PM with Resident's #35, #40, #29, #28 and #19 stated they did not know where staff kept the binder with the survey results. Observation and interview on 5/24/24 at 4:30 PM with the ADM revealed the survey binder was supposed to be in the lobby. He looked for it in the file sleeve mounted on the wall. He stated it was not available and asked the ADON about the survey binder. The ADON provided the ADM with the binder and stated it was in on her desk and did not know what she was supposed to do with it Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment for the past 3 years to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations and review and update the assessment at least annually. The Facility Assessment had not been completed or updated since 2021. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs going unmet and result in a lack of services provided by the facility to competently care for all residents. The findings included: During an interview and record review with the Administrator on 05/26/24 at 1:47 PM, the Administrator acknowledged that a Facility Assessment had not been conducted since his arrival in September of 2023. The ADM found a notebook in the Administrator's office titled Facility Assessment. It contained a very basic facility assessment form which was completed in 2019, 2020 and 2021. The last facility assessment was completed in 2021.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-27 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide 4 of 35 double occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 27, 28, 34 and 35) with at least 80 square feet per resident in that: Rooms 27, 28,34 and 35 did not have the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This failure could affect residents placed in these multiple occupancy rooms by reducing their living space. The findings included: Observation on 05/21/24 by life safety code revealed the following measurements of resident room dimensions for the room size waiver: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 157.34 square feet and 78.67 square feet per resident. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 156.79 square feet and 78.40 square feet per resident. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two-person room) had a total of 141.94 square feet and 70.97 square feet per resident. 4, room [ROOM NUMBER] (two person room) had a total of 159.25 square feet and 79.62 square feet per resident. Review of the Bed Classifications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$55,904 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $55,904 — penalty dated 2024-05-27
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-27 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABRANJOR HEALTH CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/16/2008 |
| MCCASKILL, DONALD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/18/2008 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $352K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675295. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.