The Heights Of Magnolia
150 Corporate Woods Drive, Magnolia, TX 77354 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (346) 220-0070 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the storage of drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 2 (hall 500 and 600 carts) of 8 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. -Two of the facility's medication carts, hall 500 and 600, were not kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it. This failure could place residents at risk for accessing and ingesting other residents medications resulting in adverse drug events. The findings included: Observation on 06/10/26 at 1:59 a.m. revealed there were two medication carts located toward the entrance of hall 500 (cart number not located). One medication cart was for hall 500 and the other one was for hall 600. Both medication carts were unlocked, unattended, and not under direct supervision. During an interview on 06/10/26 at 2:06 a.m., Agency Nurse A said it was the first time she had picked up a shift at the facility. She said she was assigned to halls 500 and 600 and their medication carts. She said when she walked away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs for each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 received Diflucan Oral Tablet daily as prescribed by the physician.This failure could place residents at risk for adverse health conditionsFindings include:Record review of Resident #49's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included reduced mobility, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, dementia (decline affecting memory), lack of coordination (the ability to integrate bodily movements effectively), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side (severe weakness or total paralysis on the left side of the body), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/01/2015 |
| TOUCHSTONE STRATEGIES - MC3 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2025 |
| BLAKE, JORDAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| CASTILLO, LYNNEA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2026 |
| SEHLKE, BRYON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2025 |
| AEGIS THERAPIES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| CARVAJAL PHARMACY LTC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| NUTRITIOUS LIFESTYLES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| PLANTE & MORAN PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2025 |
| TOUCHSTONE REALTY - MC3 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| TRIDENT HEALTH SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| BOENING, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/13/2020 |
| CAMPBELL, LESLIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2020 |
| FELLBAUM, ERNEST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| OOMMEN, BIJU | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| STUDER, STANLEY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| ZUROVEC, DARRELL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.