No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage House Of Marshall Health & Rehabilitation

5915 Elysian Fields Road, Marshall, TX 75672 · For profit - Individual · 125 certified beds · (903) 935-6700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$67,706 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $67,706 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-26)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (92%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
815 S Washington Ave · (903) 927-6680 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
207 East End Boulevard N · (903) 938-3096 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4202 Victory Dr · (903) 938-2834 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1156 Warren Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4424 Marks Hill Rd · (903) 935-2611

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.4%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%0.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.0%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.0%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.142.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.362.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 38.7–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.3–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.2–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
91.7%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 92% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-29)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure treatment and services was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #38) 1. The facility failed to appropriately assess Resident #38's skin and wounds after readmission from 06/20/24 through 06/23/24. A new wound to the right lateral glute was identified by the facility on 06/24/24 when it was a Stage III pressure injury (a full thickness loss of skin extending to the subcutaneous tissue). 2. The facility failed to follow previous wound care recommendations from the wound care physician for wounds to the sacrum and left foot for Resident #38 from 06/20/24 through 06/23/24. 3. The facility failed to provide appropriate skin and wound care after readmission on [DATE] through 06/23/24. 4. The facility failed to notify the Dietician of Resident #38's wounds. 5. The facility failed to order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to dignity and respect by regarding financial matters by not providing necessary assistance with a Medicaid application for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #22) of 4 residents resulting in delayed eligibility and a coverage gap.The facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with dignity and respect regarding financial matters by not providing necessary assistance with a Medicaid application, resulting in delayed eligibility and a coverage gap for Resident #11 and Resident #22.These failures compromised the resident's right of personal dignity and self-determination. The findings included: Record review of an undated facesheet revealed Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent, severe sadness, low mood, or loss of interest in activities lasting at least two weeks), bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer the injectable Repatha (a prescription-strength, injectable used to significantly lower bad [LDL-low density lipoprotein] cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke) for Resident #32 on 01/26/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications.Findings include: Record review of Resident #32's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #32 had diagnoses which included CVA (stroke, occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a vessel ruptures, causing brain tissue damage), hemiplegia (form of paralysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed the comprehensive person-centered care plan for a proper transfer on 11/10/25 with Resident #1. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of injury, not receiving the necessary care and services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs.Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the notice to residents when changes in coverage were made to items and services covered by Medicare as soon as is reasonably possible was provided to 2 of 3 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #39) reviewed for Medicare services. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #15 at least 2 days before the end of Medicare Part A coverage.2. The facility failed to notify Resident #15 with a complete Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form before the end of Medicare Part A coverage.3. The facility failed to notify Resident #39 and/or his representative in writing of potential non-coverage due to the end of Medicare Part A coverage. These failures could affect residents who use skilled services and could place them at risk of not being aware of changes to provided services.Findings included: 1. Record Review of a face sheet, dated 07/29/22, revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids was maintained consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for parenteral fluids central venous lines (a thin, flexible tube that's inserted into a large vein to provide access to the circulatory system. The facility failed to change a midline catheter (a type of central venous line) dressing according to facility protocol for Resident #76. Resident #76 midline catheter dressing change was due on 7/25/25 and was not changed until 7/27/25. This failure could place residents with central venous lines at risk of an infection and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #76’s face sheet dated 7/27/25 indicated a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #76 had diagnoses including cellulitis (is a bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of right and left lower limb, extended spectrum beta lactamase…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) The facility failed to provide care to Resident #1 in a respectful manner on 4/4/25. The facility failed to provide care to Resident #2 in a respectful manner within the last three months. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/8/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses including vascular dementia (is a type of dementia caused by impaired blood flow to the brain, leading to damage and eventual loss of brain cells), mild, with agitation (a state of being agitated, feeling restless, anxious, or worried,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from misappropriation of property, and exploitation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #3's Promethazine-Dextromethorphan (is commonly used to reduce coughing and other symptoms from allergies or common cold) on 2/25/25. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 2/25/25 and ended on 2/27/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began on 4/8/25. This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of physician ordered medications which could result in residents not having medications/treatments available and a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 4/8/25 indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 8 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Confidential Staff C failed to report to the Administrator CNA B allegedly called Resident #4 pissy and smelly. Confidential Staff C said the incident had happened within the last 3-6 months. This failure to report could place the residents at risk for further abuse which could result in psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 4/9/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of routine drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 4 resident's reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident's #1, #2, #3, and #4) 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A reconciled Resident #1's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (controlled medication used for pain) on the individual control drug record after it was given on 01/28/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A reconciled Resident #2's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (controlled medication used for pain) on the individual control drug record after it was given on 01/28/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN A reconciled Resident #3's Tylenol #3 (controlled medication used for pain) and lorazepam (controlled medication used for anxiety) on the MAR and the individual control drug record after it was given on 01/28/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident and life in the facility and be able to demonstrate their response and rationale for the response for 7 of 7 anonymous residents (AR) reviewed for grievances. (AR#1-AR#7) The facility failed to follow-up and monitor previous grievances to resolve resident concerns for AR#1-AR#7. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the right to voice their concerns and grievances to be followed-up on in a timely manner. Findings include: Record review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 3/1/2024, reflected .ice passes are not consistent .aids standing in hallway talking about personal matters .staff have been in-serviced Record review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 5/1/2024, reflected .only get shower on Tuesdays .states aids will enter room, turn off the call light say they will be back and never return . Findings reflected .No concerns voiced. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 16 resident reviewed (Residents #30, #36, #45 and #212) for assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's diagnosis of anxiety was coded on her MDS. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's dialysis (is a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) status was coded on his MDS. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's vision impairment was reflected on his MDS. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #212's fall on 04/03/24 was coded on her MDS. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 06/24/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old, female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (is a brain disorder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #36, Resident #212, and Resident #112) 1. The facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed and documented on Resident #36 and Resident #212's dialysis communication forms. 2. The facility failed to document Resident #112's dialysis communications. These failures could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 06/25/24, indicated Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old, male and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 05/02/24 with diagnosis including end stage renal disease (is the final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function has declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 1 of 16 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents #45) The facility failed to keep, in stock, medications for Resident #45. Resident #45 did not receive Levetiracetam (is a medicine used to treat epilepsy (seizures)), Hydrochlorothiazide (is commonly used to treat high blood pressure), or Scopolamine patch (helps prevent nausea and vomiting) on 06/04/24, 06/05/24 and 06/06/24. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 06/24/24, indicated resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old, male and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 11/28/23 with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain tissue), hypertensive crisis (a sudden, severe increase in blood pressure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 resident reviewed for infection control. (Resident #46 and Resident #50) The facility failed to isolate Resident #46 and Resident #50 after urine cultures (test checks urine for germs (microorganisms) that cause infections) revealed ESBL (enzymes break down and destroy some commonly used antibiotics) in their urine. This failure could place residents at risk for being exposed to health complications and infectious diseases. Find included: 1. Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated 06/26/24, indicated Resident #46 was a [AGE] year-old, female and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 12/06/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (means you have mild to moderate loss of kidney function) and Type 2 diabetes (a condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #31 and Resident #212) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 and Resident #212 were given a NOMNC (is a notice that indicates when your care is set to end from a home health agency, skilled nursing facility, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, or hospice) when discharged from skilled services prior to his covered days being exhausted. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 and Resident #212 were given a SNF ABN (is document that informs a Medicare beneficiary that Medicare will no longer pay for skilled services) when discharged from skilled services at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program under Medicaid for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for PASRR screenings. The facility failed to conduct an accurate PASRR Level 1 and 2 screening for Resident #23. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate services, depression, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralysis on the right side of the body due to damage to the brain or spinal cord) , Type II Diabetes (group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) , Acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood) and PTSD (a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness and intellectual disabilities were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #32 and #58) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that: 1. The facility failed to coordinate with the Local Intellectual/Developmental Disability and/or Local Mental Health Authority (Local Authority) to ensure an accurate PASRR Level I Evaluation and a PASRR Level II Evaluations were conducted for Resident #32 who had a serious mental illness. 2. The facility failed to coordinate with the Local Intellectual/Developmental Disability and/or Local Mental Health Authority (Local Authority) to ensure an accurate PASRR Level I Evaluation and a PASRR Level II Evaluations were conducted for Resident #58 who had developmental disability and a mental illness. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for each resident that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality of care for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #163 and #213) reviewed for baseline care plans. 1. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan with Resident #163 and Resident #213 within 48 hours of admission. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #213 or Resident #213's RP, a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #163's face sheet, dated 06/26/2024, reflected an 86- year-old- female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #163 had diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm. An irregular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45 care plan was implemented when the resident did not have his abdominal binder (is a wide compression belt that encircles your abdomen) over his PEG feeding tube (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; is a tube inserted surgically into the stomach through the abdominal wall) on 06/24/24 which was a care plan intervention. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and cause residents not to receive needed services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 06/24/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay that included, but was not limited to diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for discharge summaries. The facility failed to ensure Resident #61 had a discharge summary. This failure could place residents at risk for interruption of care after discharge, receiving the wrong care after discharge, and rehospitalization after discharge. Findings include: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 06/26/2024, reflected Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #61 had diagnoses which included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (uncontrolled nervousness). Record review of Resident #61's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for quality of life. (Resident #213) The facility failed to remove Resident #213's unwanted facial hair. This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #213's face sheet, dated 06/25/24, indicated Resident #213 was an [AGE] year-old, female and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior). Record review of the MDS assessment indicated Resident #213 was admitted to the facility less than 21 days ago. No MDS for Resident #213 was completed prior to exit. Record review of a care plan, dated 06/24/24, indicated Resident #213…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #54, Resident #16, Resident #52) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to distribute Residents #54, #16, and #52 protective smoking aprons. Residents #54, #16, and #52 were observed smoking without a protective smoking apron on 06/24/2024 at the 9:00 a.m., smoke break. This failure could place residents at the facility who smoked at risk for contributing to burns or serious injuries. Findings Included: 1.Record review of Resident #54's undated face sheet revealed he was a 63- year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure (your heart can not supply enough blood to meet your body's needs), tremors( nervous system condition, also known as a neurological condition, that causes involuntary and rhythmic shaking), and psychosis (condition of the mind or psyche…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services, and an indwelling catheter is not used unless there is valid medical justification for catheterization and the catheter is discontinued as soon as clinically warranted for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #213) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN L placed an order by MD K, to consult MD J, a local urologist (is a doctor who specializes in diagnosing and treating diseases of the urinary system), about removal of Resident #213 indwelling catheter and bladder retraining. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN L successfully contact MD J's office to for consultation of removal of Resident #213 indwelling catheter and possible bladder retraining. These failures could place residents who had urinary catheters at risk of not receiving care needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #213's face sheet, dated 06/25/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (a medication used in excessive doses and including duplicate therapy or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring, or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #30) The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 antibiotic was discontinued after her urine culture (checks urine for germs (microorganisms) that cause infections) results showed no organism growth. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections (happens when germs like bacteria and fungi develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them). Findings include: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for 1 (Resident #4) of 16 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 4's prn lorazepam was discontinued or reviewed by a physician to extend usage after 14 days. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #45) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Residents #45 received his prescribed Levetiracetam (is a medicine used to treat epilepsy (seizures)) as scheduled for 06/05/24 and 06/06/24. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 06/24/24, indicated resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old, male and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 11/28/23 with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain tissue) and convulsions (a condition in which muscles contract and relax quickly and cause uncontrolled shaking of the body). Record review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/05/24, indicated Resident #45 was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to suspend an alleged perpetrator immediately following an accusation of abuse. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to report the allegations of abuse timely. The findings included: Record review of the facility's policy and procedure, titled Reporting Abuse and Neglect Policy, revision date March 2018, .'With an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property, the employee will immediately be suspended pending an investigation' .'The facility administrator or designee will report to HHSC all incidents that meet the criteria of Provider Letter 19-17 .a. If the allegations involve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #1's abuse allegation within 24 hours to the state agency. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: Resident #2 was transferred with only (1) staff member using a mechanical hydraulic lift by CNA D causing her foley catheter to become dislodged spilling urine on the resident and causing pain to Resident #2 by not supporting her right fractured leg that was non-weight bearing on 06/10/2024. This failure could place residents who are transferred by mechanical hydraulic lift at risk for avoidable accidents and could result in a decline in physical condition. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 06/12/2024, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of fracture of right tibia (broken bone in the lower part of right leg), pneumonia (lung infection), and urinary retention (inability to empty the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Pharmaceutical Services that accuratly ensured the facility met the needs of each Resident for 1 of 29 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #1) 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed the facility's policy to reconcile medications for Resident #1 when admitted on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B followed the facility's policy to reconcile medications for Resident #1 when discharging on 09/26/23. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversion and misuse of medication. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's on face sheet dated 05/25/24 showed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Mycoplasma Pneumonia (Walking Pneumonia), Sepsis (Infection), Hypertension (High blood pressure), and Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 4 (Severe). Resident #1 was discharged on 09/26/23. Review of Resident #1's physician orders dated 05/25/24 showed on 09/23/23 Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to demonstrate a response and rationale for resident council concerns and requests for 9 of 9 residents in a confidential interview. The facility did not provide a response or rationale to the resident council on their concerns regarding employee cell phone usage, privacy in the shower area, call lights being answered timely, laundry smelling of urine after being laundered, and the dining area not being cleaned between meals. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs met, diminished resident rights, and diminished feelings of self-worth. Findings include: In a confidential interview on 05/09/2023 at 10:05 a.m. nine alert and oriented residents stated there were recurring concerns discussed in Resident Council meetings with no resolution provided to the group regarding their concerns. The residents stated the recurring concerns were: Staff using cell phones in resident care areas and while performing care No shower curtain in the 200-hall shower Call lights not being answered for greater than 1 hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental and psychosocial needs; and, services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 7 (Residents #06, #07, #11, #15, #26, #33, and #48) of 16 residents reviewed for care plans. 1.The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #07's falls. 2.The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #15's PASRR diagnoses and goals. 3.The facility failed to follow a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #26 by not monitoring or properly documenting skin changes. 4. The facility failed to implement Resident #6 and Resident #11's intervention of provide oxygen per MD order 5. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #33's CAAs such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #50). The facility failed to properly store Resident #50's respiratory equipment. The facility failed to clean the oxygen concentrator filter of Resident #6, Resident #11, and Resident #50. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (is a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), atelectasis (is a complete or partial collapse of the entire lung or area (lobe) of the lung), and shortness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 4 of 16 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents #6, #11, #16, and #42) The facility failed to keep in stock all medications for Resident #6, #11, #16, and #42. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration and cause Resident #11 and #42 increased pain. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including convulsions (are rapid, involuntary muscle contractions that cause uncontrollable shaking and limb movement) and atherosclerotic heart disease (is a common condition that develops when a sticky substance called plaque builds up inside your arteries). Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate the use of an antibiotic for 5 of 8 residents reviewed antibiotic use. (Resident #27, Resident #28, Resident #33, Resident #40, Resident #214) The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, Resident #40, and Resident #214 had lab work to support use of antibiotics. The facility failed to ensure physician order had diagnosis to support antibiotic therapy for Resident # 27, Resident #28, Resident #33, and Resident #40. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 received the appropriate antibiotic to treat his urinary tract infection. These failures could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #07 and Resident #36) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to provide a shower curtain for Residents #07 and #36 while bathing in a multi-stall shower room while being observed by CNAs. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: 1.Record review of a face sheet for Resident #07 dated 05/11/2023, indicated Resident #07 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal), kyphosis (a spinal disorder in which an excessive curve of the spine results in an abnormal rounding of the upper back), and hypoglycemia (a condition in which your blood sugar (glucose) level is lower than the standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 2 of 13 residents ( Resident #35, Resident #38) reviewed for resident rights . The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #35 prior to administering Lorazepam (is used to treat anxiety disorders) The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #38 prior to administering Seroquel (is an antipsychotic medication that treats several kinds of mental health conditions including schizophrenia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #50, and Resident #54) reviewed for beneficiary notice. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50, and Resident #54 were given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. This failure could place the residents who were discharged at risk of not having knowledge of changes to services in a timely manner to allow the resident or their representative the option of appealing the denial of services. Findings: Record review of facility face sheet dated 05/11/2023 indicated Resident # 50 an [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to be free from abuse for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. (Resident #6, Resident #47) The facility failed to ensure Resident #6, and Resident #47 did not experience abuse from CNA M. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (is a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and muscle weakness. The face sheet revealed Resident #6 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] A. Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was understood and understood others. The MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately or not later than 24 hours for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Resident #26 sustained an injury of unknown source that was not reported timely as required. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect . Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/10/23 revealed Resident #26 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord (central nervous system). In multiple sclerosis, the immune system attacks the protective sheath (myelin) that covers nerve fibers and causes communication problems between your brain and the rest of your body), high blood pressure, and convulsions (seizures). Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident quarterly (every 3 months) using the MDS (minimum data set) form specified by the state and approved by CMS for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 51, and Resident # 52) reviewed for quarterly assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents # 51, and # 52 had a quarterly MDS assessment completed within 3 months from the previous assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving inappropriate care for their conditions. Findings: Record review of facility face sheet dated 05/11/2023 indicated Resident #51 an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), depression (mood disorder), anxiety (mental disorder). Record review of Resident #51's medical record revealed a quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 12/28/2022 and was completed and submitted on 01/09/2023. Resident #51 has not had another MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #11 and Resident #44). 1. The facility did not provide a summary of the baseline care plan to Resident #11. 2. The facility failed to address Resident #11's social service needs and resident preference for being notified of updates to plan of care 3. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #44. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #11 a was [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (is a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #35 and #38) reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. 1. The facility failed to clarify PRN use of Lorazepam (antianxiety) for Resident #35 and Resident #38 after pharmacist recommendations on 03/07/23. 2. The facility failed to clarify Resident #38's diagnosis and rationale for antipsychotic use after pharmacist recommendation on 03/07/23. 3. The facility failed to confirm correct diagnosis was included on the Form 3713 Antipsychotic consent for Resident #38 after pharmacist recommendation on 03/07/23. These failures could place residents at risk from maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and could place them at risk for adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings include: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/09/23 revealed Resident #35 was [AGE] year-old female admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #35, Resident #38) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis or indication of use for Resident #38's Seroquel (antipsychotic). The facility failed to limit Resident #35's and Resident #38's Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) prn medications to 14 days and the prescribing practitioner did not provide a rationale for extended use. These failures could put residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/09/23 revealed Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the resident received education on the influenza and the pneumococcal immunizations of 2 of 16 residents (Residents #6, Resident #11) reviewed for immunizations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received education on influenza and the pneumococcal immunization. The facility failed to offer and administer the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination to Resident #6. The facility failed to offer and administer the pneumococcal vaccination to Resident #11. These failures could place residents at risk for contracting a viral disease and cause respiratory complications, and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 05/08/23 revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (is a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-26 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who completed a training course approved by the State for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for quality of life. The facility did not ensure the Activity Director was qualified to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving a program of activities that meets their assessed activity needs. Findings include: Record review of a Personnel File Review Sheet, undated, indicated .Activity Director .no licensed activity director . Record review of a copy of an email provided by the ADM, given on 06/24/24, indicated .APN Credentialing Center .date paid June 04, 2024 .1xAPNCC Competency Exam . A posted note was attached to the email which stated .NCAD is scheduled to take her test next week for activity director certification . During an interview on 06/24/24 at 4:30 p.m., the ADM said the new company took over June 1st,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure within 14 days after a facility completed a resident's assessment, a facility must transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data, to the CMS System for 16 of 46 residents (Residents #25, #53, #162, #113, #5, #212, #115, # 20, # 117, #9, # 12, # 31, # 52, # 114, #112, and # 10) records reviewed for transmitted MDS records. The facility failed to ensure the MDS assessments were electronically transmitted as required for: Resident #25's discharge assessment dated [DATE] and entry record dated 05/28/2024. Resident #53's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE]. Resident # 162's discharge assessment dated [DATE] and entry record dated 06/04/2024. Resident #113's entry record dated 06/04/2024. Resident #5's quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. Resident #212's discharge assessment dated [DATE]. Resident #115's entry record dated 06/06/2024. Resident #20's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE]. Resident #117's discharge assessment dated [DATE]. Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-05-11 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete MDS assessment was transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #49, and Resident #53) reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility did not ensure Resident #49's quarterly MDS assessment and Resident #53's annual comprehensive MDS assessment were transmitted within 14 days of completion. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having records completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. The findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 05/09/2023, revealed Resident #49 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of transient cerebral ischemic attack (stroke), hemiplegia (unable to move right side), altered mental status. Record review of Resident #49's quarterly assessment reference date of 2/25/2023, reflected the RN signed the assessment as completed on 3/1/23, and it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$67,706 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $67,706 — penalty dated 2024-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
THURMAN, LINDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2022
SOUTHWEST LTC MARSHALL LTDOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2017
LINDSEY, LYNNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 9%Other / private 30%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,795per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$253per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next