No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Matador Health And Rehabilitation Center

805 Harrison St, Matador, TX 79244 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (806) 347-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (806) 347-1000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
710 W Main St · (806) 725-7100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
603 Bailey Ave · (325) 352-0204 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
109 Scotch St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.7%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.9%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.7%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.7%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.922.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.552.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.2–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.6–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.411.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 24.6 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for anti-psychotic drugs were limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident beyond 14 days for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for freedom of abuse, in that:The facility failed to stop a psychotropic medication, Lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication), which was ordered for Resident #2 to be administered PRN after 14 days without the physician's authorization. Resident #2 was administered 12 additional doses without a physician's order.The deficient practice placed residents at risk of being chemically restrained, sedated, and altered mental status.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, major depressive disorder, other specified disorders of brain, acute respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety.1. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled and dated.2. The facility failed to discard expired food items.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included:On 09/23/25 at 10:36 AM an observation of the reach-in refrigerator revealed: Individual jelly packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date Individual butter packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date Individual ranch dressing packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date Individual sour cream packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date Individual ketchup packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date Individual mustard packets in rectangular plastic tub with no label or date On 09/23/25 at 10:38 AM an observation of the walk-In refrigerator revealed: small steam table pan with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #24) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to include Resident #24's AVAPS machine in her care plan.This failure could lead to residents not receiving needed care and/or receiving improper care/treatment.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #24's admission record dated 09/24/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, heart failure and respiratory failure.Record review of Resident #24's MDS front sheet in the EHR revealed her last annual MDS had an ARD of 12/27/24.Record review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #8) of 12 residents reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received O2 via NC at the rate of 2-3 lpm as ordered by her physician.This failure could place residents who receive oxygen at an increased risk of hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood), pulmonary oxygen toxicity (damage to the lung lining tissues and air sacs), hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood, decreasing the oxygen supply to vital organs), and shortness of breath.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #8's admission record dated 09/23/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for clinical records (Resident #1) in that: The facility failed to conduct a fall risk assessment for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of increased falls. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face sheet, dated 02/13/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness in one leg, arm or side) the left dominant side following cerebrovascular disease (stroke), anemia and hypertension. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/04/2025, revealed he had a BIMS of 12 out of 15, which indicated he had mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include the accurate dispensing and administering of drugs to meet the needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician orders. The facility failed to accurately enter physician orders for Seroquel(anti-psychotic medication) and Trazodone(insomnia medication) for Resident #1. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as prescribed and/or deterioration in their condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/28/24 revealed an [AGE] year old male was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was sent to the hospital and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Alzheimer's disease(memory loss), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery(narrowing of arteries), vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance(breakdown of thought process), psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure the designated Dietary Manager completed the required dietary managers certification course or had any other qualifying credentials. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of foodborne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met. The findings include: Record review of the personnel file for the Dietary Manager revealed she was hired on 10/31/23 as a cook. There was no documentation in the personnel file that indicated that she had completed the required training for Dietary Manager and was a Certified Dietary Manager. Record review of the facility's Dietician documentation revealed that the Dietician was contracted and not full-time. In an interview on 8/12/24 at 10:15 am, the DM stated she was hired as a cook in the kitchen and had been the DM for about 2 months. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served reflected the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for all residents when the facility failed to ensure menus were followed all residents for 1 of 2 meals observed. 1. The facility did not serve a biscuit or any bread products to any residents for the lunch meal on 8/12/24 as directed by the menu. These failures could place all residents who received food from the kitchen, at risk for decreased meal satisfaction, potential weight loss due to poor meal intake, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decline in health status, Findings included: Record review of the diet spreadsheet, approved by the facility Dietitian, for Lunch- Monday 8/12/24, Week 1, revealed residents were to receive: honey garlic chicken thighs, cheesy rice, steamed broccoli, strawberry shortcake and 1 biscuit. In an observation on 8/12/24 at 11:55 am, [NAME] A was observed plating and serving lunch. There were no rolls or biscuits on the serving line and no biscuits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure stored food was properly labeled, dated, and contained. B. Ensure general cleanliness was maintained. C. Ensure all food service staff used proper hand hygiene and use of gloves during meal preparation. D. Ensure temperatures were taken at the beginning of the meal service. E. Ensure substitution list, cleaning list and temperature logs were utilized. These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: Observations on 8/12/24 at 10:25 am, on initial kitchen rounds of the pantry revealed: 1. Crumbs in the bin holding chips 2. 5 bags of cereal, no label or date, not in original box. 3. A bin holding powdered milk was sticky and grimy to the touch. The lid was not secured. 4. Trash, food packets and crumbs were observed in the floor of the pantry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a periodic comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 3 of 14 residents (Residents #7, #9, and #20) whose records were reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessments for Resident #7, #9, and #20 every 3 months. This failure could place residents at risk for not getting an accurate assessment and could result in lack of care. Findings include: Resident #7 Record review of Resident #7 face sheet dated 8-13-2024 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), convulsions (a sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body caused by involuntary contraction of the muscles and associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident's representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for 4 (Residents #5, #13, #24, and #25) of 14 residents reviewed for bedrails. The facility failed to inform Residents #5, #13, #24, and #25 or their representatives of the use of bed rails and obtain consent for the use of bed rails. This failure could place all residents with bed rails at risk for injuries such as abrasion, fractures, and entrapment. Finding include: Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility originally on 6-8-2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), polyosteoarthritis (a type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down), chronic respiratory failure (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 18 days out of 31 (05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23,06/24/23) 07/6/24, 07/13/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 08/03/24, 8/10/24 and 8/11/24 ) days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had RN coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week for the following days: 05/4/24, 05/5/24, 05/11/24, 05/18/24, 05/19/24, 05/25/24, 05/26/24, 06/23/24, 06/29/24, 06/30/24, 07/04/24, 07/6/24, 07/13/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 08/03/24, 8/10/24 and 8/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk for inconsistency in care and services. Findings include: Record review of the facility's employee roster undated revealed there were five RN's employed at the facility. Record Review of time sheet provided by the Administrator for the time period 05/01/24-08/11/24 revealed the following dates did not have RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day for the following days: 05/4/24, 05/5/24, 05/11/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #31) whose records were reviewed for assessments. Resident #31 was on CPAP therapy while in the facility and it was not addressed in his MDS. This failure to ensure comprehensive and accurate assessments could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving correct care and services. Finding include: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 8-12-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), atrial fibrillation(an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), obstructive sleep apnea…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to perform preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability prior to admission for 2 (Resident #18 and #20) of 16 residents reviewed for preadmission screenings. A. The facility failed to perform a PASRR for Resident #18 until 4 months after admission. B. The facility failed to perform a PASRR for Resident #20 until 2 months after admission. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #18's admission record dated 08/13/24 revealed Resident #18 was an 81year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to dementia ( a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety ( a feeling of worry, nervousness or unease), depression (a mood disorder that affects how a person thinks feels and acts) and anemia( a condition in which the blood does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #31) of 14 Residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to include a care plan for Resident #31's smoking. This failure could affect residents in the facility receiving care per comprehensive person-centered care plans resulting in resident not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Finding include: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 8-12-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), atrial fibrillation(an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when applicable on 1 (Hall 100 and half of Hall 300) of 2 medication carts reviewed. Two Loose pills found in the medication drawers of the medication cart for Hall 100 and half of Hall 300. This failure could result in residents not receiving an accurate dose of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. Findings include: Observation and interview on 08/12/24 at 11:07 AM revealed 2 loose pills in the bottom of medication drawer in medication cart for Hall 100 and half of Hall 300. LVN B was able to identify the pills, the red pill was identified as Plavix. The yellow pill was identified as Bethanechol Chloride unsure who the medications belonged to. Interview on 08/12/24 at 11:16 AM with LVN B revealed that a negative outcome for having lose medications in the medication carts would be that the medication could be mistaken for something else. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection in 1 of 1 dining rooms. -CNA C failed to perform hand hygiene before assisting Resident #32 with eating. This failure had the potential to affects residents in the facility by exposing them to care that could lead to the spread of viral infections, secondary infections, communicable diseases, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings include: Observation on 08/12/24 at 12:18 PM revealed CNA C playing with hair while waiting on Residents food to be delivered to table in the dining room. Observation on 08/12/24 at 12:24pm revealed CNA C playing with hair again and no hand hygiene was performed before touching Resident #32's napkin or silverware to assist Resident #32 with eating her lunch meal. Interview on 08/12/24 at 02:40 PM CNA C revealed that a negative outcome from playing with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 8 out of 30 (05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23, and 06/24/23) days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had RN coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week for the following days: 05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23, and 06/24/23 This failure could place residents at risk for inconsistency in care and services. Findings include: Record review of the facility's employee roster undated revealed there were three RN's employed at the facility. Record Review of time sheet provided by the Administrator for the time period 05/28/23-06/25/23 revealed the following dates did not have RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day for the following days: 05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23, and 06/24/23. During an interview on 06/27/23 at 12:30 PM with the Administrator, she stated the DON and Administrator were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for thefacility's only kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure the designated Dietary Manager completed the required dietary managers certification course or had any other qualifying credentials. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of foodborne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met. The findings include: Record review of the personnel file for the Dietary Manager revealed a document titled Change In Status. The document stated, Date of change, 5/29/23 and stated that the Dietary Manager's position in housekeeping had now been changed to the Dietary Supervisor. The document was signed 5/30/23 by the Dietary Manager. Further record review of the personnel file for the Dietary Manager revealed a listing of education. There was nothing listed in the area titled Vocational or trade training. The Former Employers listed revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff used pasteurized eggs in under cooked egg dishes (soft cooked/sunny side up/over easy eggs), 2) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff stored foods in a manner to prevent contamination, 3) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff maintained adequate chlorine sanitizer levels in the low temperature dish machine. 4) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff ensured food contact surfaces were clean, 5) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff performed sanitary handwashing between the handling of soiled and clean food equipment during dishwashing, 6) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff used good hygienic practices (personal foods in food storage and prep areas), 7) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff stored personal items in a manner to prevent contamination of food contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 4 of 14 resident rooms (102, 205, 207, and 301); in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure that the resident call system at bedside could not be cancelled from the nurse's station (Rooms 102, 205, 207, and 301). 2. The facility further failed to ensure that the call system accurately indicated the location of the registered call (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services. The findings include: On 6/26/23 at 9:10 AM, an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The call system at the B bed was activated (dome light illuminated and audible sound emitted) and a voice came over the call system intercom and stated that someone would come to the room shortly. After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail promptly on Saturdays, in that: Resident mail was delivered and available at the facility's US Post Office mailbox on Saturday's but was not delivered to residents until Monday. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in their psychosocial well-being and not receiving important mail in a timely manner. The findings include: During a confidential Resident Council meeting interviews, 8 of 8 residents stated they had not seen any mail deliveries on Saturday's. One resident stated the staff go to the post office and pick up mail. On 6/26/23 at 3:58 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator regarding mail delivery in the facility. She stated the DON picked up the mail every weekday from the US post office and passes it out. The post office building is open on Saturday, but the window service was not. The mailboxes were accessible, and the facility had a mailbox there. She added that if items were delivered to the physical address, the staff get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-27 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 4 of 13 residents (Residents #4, #6, #7, #13) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that: Resident #4 did not have an accurate PASRR Level 1 assessment when she had a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis. Resident #6 did not have an accurate PASRR Level 1 assessment when she had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Resident #7 did not have an accurate PASRR Level 1 assessment when she had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Resident #13 did not have an accurate PASRR Level 1 assessment when she had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. These failures could place residents with an inaccurate PASRR Level 1 evaluation at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings were: Resident #4 Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 6/25/23 for Resident #4 revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed and reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy for residents, for (Residents #5, 12, 17 and 26), in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure residents received consistent serving sizes as called for on the menu and approved by the Dietician during 2 meal observations. 2. The facility failed to ensure diet guidance for all diets ordered was represented on the diet spreadsheet and had Dietician approval. These failures could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss, hunger, unwanted weight gain, and metabolic imbalances. The findings include: During the confidential Resident Council Meeting interviews, three of eight residents voiced concerns related to the menus. Residents stated that the menus that were posted were not always what they were served. During individual confidential interviews, one of seven residents voice concerns with the menu. The resident stated that sometimes the dietary staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #3, #7, and #18) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: Residents #3, #7 and #18 were listed as a DNR but had a OOH-DNR forms that were incorrectly filled out or missing required information. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their end of life wishes honored and incomplete records. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed an [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral palsy (affects a person's ability to move, maintain balance and posture). The face sheet also revealed under the advance directive section - ADC: Do not resuscitate - DNR. Record review of Resident #3's physician's order summary dated [DATE] revealed the following order: ADC: Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for 1 of 13 residents (Residents #19) reviewed for care plans as follows: Resident #19 did not have a care plan for ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their Individualized needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 06/25/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old-female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoseis to include atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), hypertension (high blood pressure), atherosclerotic heart disease (narrowing of the arteries), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and repeated falls. Record review of Resident #19's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed: Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status score revealed a score of 14, which indicated the Resident #19's cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 resident with a urinary catheter (Resident #27); in that: The facility failed to ensure catheter related physician's orders were followed and failed to position the catheter drainage bag and tubing in a manner that promoted gravity flow and prevented infections. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. The findings include: Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 6/25/23 for female Resident #27 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy (obstruction of urine flow disorder), chronic pulmonary embolism (lung clotting disorder), Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (mental disorder), and aphasia following cerebral infarction (communication disorder following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer, based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem, and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #5) on a therapeutic diet, in that: The facility failed to provide Residents #5 with her physician ordered 2g sodium therapeutic diet for 3 of 3 meals (6/25/23 Supper and 6/26/23 - Lunch and Supper). The Dietary staff were not aware of the diet and were serving the resident foods that were high in sodium. This failure could place residents at risk for hunger, weight loss, and chemical imbalances. The findings include: Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 6/25/23, for female Resident #5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of, essential, primary hypertension (high blood pressure), edema (fluid retention), unspecified, unspecified systolic (congestive), heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on a comprehensive assessment, that PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days and could not be renewed, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of the medication for blank of blank residents on psychoactive medication's (Resident #1), in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 had orders for psychotropic medications (lorazepam (brand name Ativan)) that did not contain PRN orders beyond 14 days without a start date and reassessment. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and adverse drug reactions. The findings include: Resident #1 Record review of the Order Summary Report for female Resident #1 dated 6/25/23 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of heart failure (heart disorder), generalized anxiety disorder (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 meals observe for 2 of 2 residents with orders for puréed diet (Residents #1 and 24); in that: The facility failed to provide food that was in a form to meet resident needs, 2 of 2 meals observed (6/26/23 - Lunch and Supper) for 2 of 2 residents with the orders for puréed diets (Residents #1 and 24). This failure could place residence at risk of decreased food intake and choking. The findings include: Resident #1 Record review of the Order Summary Report for female Resident #1 dated 6/25/23 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses of heart failure, unspecified, dysphasia, oropharyngeal phase, unspecified (swallowing disorder), macular degeneration (vision deficit), and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (Protein deficient nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2018
JG SNF REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
NEAL, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
WHITTEN, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
HOLCOMB, HOLLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/29/2021
STRATTON, EMILEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/18/2018
MATADOR SENIOR CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/21/2025
ALLEY, STEVEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
MOELLER, JORDANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 13%Other / private 22%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$233per resident / day
operating cost
$7,084per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$231per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676389. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next