No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

McCamey Convalescent Center

2500 Hwy 305 S, McCamey, TX 79752 · Government - Hospital district · 30 certified beds · (432) 652-8628 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (432) 652-8628 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Dec 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2500 Highway · (432) 652-4010 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
111 E 5th St · (432) 652-4220 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
224 E 6th St · (432) 652-8881 · Call to confirm hours
Park
300 E 11th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.8%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.8%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.9%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.7%9.6%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.982.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days7.352.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 27.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition for 1 kitchen of 1 reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher worked. This failure could place residents at risk of malfunctioning equipment being used for their service/care.The findings included: Interview on 10/14/25 at 9:52 AM the FSS stated the dishwasher went out two months ago. The FSS stated that the facility was getting new quotes. The FSS stated maintenance fixed the dishwasher by replacing the booster heater. The FSS stated then the booster heater went out and had water spraying continuously and the dishwasher went out - it smoked and sparked and sounded like gunshots. The FSS stated that the kitchen was not functioning without it. The FSS said currently the staff washed everything through the 3-compartment sink. The FSS stated they (the kitchen) were waiting for maintenance to get quotes. The FSS stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 13 residents (Resident #3, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #11, and Resident #15) reviewed for accurate care plans.Resident #3, #6, #7, and #15's care plan did not address their current code status. Resident #6 and #11's Care Plan did not address ADL Status Resident #11's Care Plan did not address wander guard use. Resident #11's Care Plan did not address her choice of Authorized Electronic Monitoring. These failures could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met, injury, not receiving necessary services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: RESIDENT #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 out of 1 med rooms reviewed for medication storage and 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart and refrigerator in the medication room did not contain expired medications and unlabeled medications. These failures could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions.Findings included: Observation on 10/15/25 at 11:30 AM revealed the medication cart had the following expired medications: 1. Coreg 6.25mg expired 7/30/2025 (Medication to treat high blood pressure).2. Celexa 40mg expired on 4/26/2024 (Medication to treat depression).This same observation also revealed a medication bottle with no label. Written in black ink on the bottle, it said Celexa 40mg cut in half. Observation on 10/15/2025 at 11:45 AM revealed the refrigerator in the Medication room had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #9) reviewed for infection control in that:CNA A failed to wash or sanitize her hands after removing her soiled gloves and then putting on a new pair of gloves when she provided peri-care for Resident #9. CNA C and CNA D failed to wash or sanitize their hands after removing their soiled gloves and then putting on a new pair of gloves when they provided peri-care for Resident #9. The facility ADON failed to use PPE while performing wound care on Resident #6 These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include: Resident #9. Record review of Resident #9's admission record dated 10/15/2025 revealed she was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience for 1 (Resident #27) of 2 residents reviewed for chemical restraints.The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's Seroquel 200mg at bedtime (atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat several mental health conditions by balancing the levels of dopamine and serotonin in the brain) was only used to treat as indicated for use. The facility failed to ensure that documentation in Resident #27's was done in the clinical record. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's had documentation on a rationale for the continued provision of the medication. The facility failed to ensure residents who receive psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure injuries for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 6 received care and services to meet professional standards of practice to heal his pressure ulcer. Resident #6 did not receive wound care to prevent the spread of infection. The findings included: Review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated [DATE] revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unstageable pressure ulcer (unable to assess the wound due to hidden tissue) of the sacral area (base of the spine above the buttocks); stage IV pressure ulcer (a wound that has exposed bone, tendon, or muscle often including tunneling or undermining of the surrounding skin) of the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents observed for oxygen management. 1esident #15's oxygen nasal cannula and tube were not covered in a bag when it was not being used. The facility failed to ensure there was oxygen in use sign posted outside Resident #15's room. This failure could affect residents who required respiratory care and place them at risk of not having their needs met.The findings included: Record review of Resident #15's admission record, dated 10/15/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and dependence of supplemental oxygen. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #15's order summary report dated 10/14/2025 revealed May use O2 at 2-4 liters per minute via N/C as needed for as needed for low O2 Sat to maintain O2 Sat above 90%. with a start date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 3 of 13 residents (#4, #5, #6) reviewed for privacy. 1. CMA F failed to protect Resident #4's record by not locking the screen of her laptop, while CMA F was in a resident's room administering medication. 2. CMA G failed to protect Resident #5's record by not locking the screen of her laptop when going to the restroom. 3. CMA G failed to protect Resident #6's record by not locking the screen of her laptop while in a room checking vital signs. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: 1. An observation 12/29/24 at 9:20 a.m. revealed an open laptop on the facility's medication cart, outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The screen was not locked and displayed Resident #4's information. CMA F was in a resident's room administering medication. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 4 of 5 (Residents # 116, 122, 126, and 127) reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 116, 122, 126, and 127's indwelling catheter were secured to prevent pulling or tugging. The failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, urethral trauma, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #116's admission Record, dated 12/29/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (blocked urinary tract due to swollen prostate). Review of Resident #116's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed: He had a mental status score of 9 of 15 with signs of delirium including inattention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 ( #116 and #122) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNAs A, C, D and E use PPE during urinary catheter care performed for Residents #116 and #122 as the residents were on EBP precautions. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: NO EBP PRECAUTIONS Review of Resident #116's admission Record, dated 12/29/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (blocked urinary tract due to swollen prostate). Review of Resident #116's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed: He had a mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Residents #12 and #127) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's and #127's nasal cannula was properly stored when not in use. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's admission Record, dated 12/30/24, revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pleural effusion (lungs clogged with mucous). Review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/26/24, revealed: He had a mental status score of 8 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). He had shortness of breath upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that expired foods were discarded. This failure could affect residents who received meals prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included: Observation on 11/07/23 at 09:15 AM, of the kitchen refrigerator revealed: 1, 28-ounce bottle of [NAME] Yellow Mustard with a best by date of 7/21/23 1, 24-ounce bottle of Young Guns Flame Roasted Salsa with a best by date of 1/9/23 1, 32-ounce bottle of Food Club Lemon Juice from concentrate with a best by date of 7/11/23 1, 64-ounce bottle of Food Club Prune Juice unsweetened from concentrate with a best by date of 7/11/23 1, 5-pound container of Mollys California Style Pasta Salad with an expiration date of 10/4/23 21, 8-ounce cartons of Hormel Nectar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Licensed Nursing coverage for 1 of 3 months reviewed for RN coverage. (April 2023), (May 2023), and (June 2023). The facility did not have the required 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage during the month of April 2023 (April 29th). This failure could place residents at risk for not having their nursing care and medical needs met. Findings included: Review of PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, with a run date of 11/01/2023 revealed Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day was triggered for the fiscal year Quarter 3 2023 (April 1 - June 30). The infraction dates were 04/01 (SA); 04/07 (FR); 04/09 (SU); 04/16 (SU); 04/23 (SU); 04/29 (SA); 05/06 (SA); 06/03 (SA); 06/17 (SA), 06/25 (SU). Record review of the April 2023 schedule/time sheets indicated an RN only worked 4.5 hours on Sunday 04/09/2023. Time sheets indicate 24-hour licensed nursing coverage for Saturday 04/01/2023, Friday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. LVN A failed to sanitize the treatment cart prior to putting down a barrier to prevent cross contamination. LVN A failed to sanitize scissors prior to wound care and after they became contaminated after wound care for Resident #9 prior to placing them back into the treatment cart. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet indicated she was [AGE] years old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, pneumonia, essential hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, vitamin D deficiency. Record review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 45E761. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next