Ashton Medical Lodge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 89.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 131.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopements for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #1. As a result, Resident #1 eloped from the facility at night along a highway and was located approximately 2 hours later in 44° Fahrenheit weather after he had fallen into a wet drainage ditch. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses including hypothermia. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 01/04/24 at 3:02 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/05/24 at 6:28 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure placed all residents that are an elopement risk at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 4 nurse medication carts reviewed for medication storage and for 2 of 4 nurse medication carts (hall 1 cart and hall 4 cart) observed for medications stored and properly labeled. LVN A failed to ensure her nurse medication cart was secured when it was left unattended on [DATE]. The hall one nurse medication cart had one insulin pen that belonged to Resident #100 that had been opened but not dated when it was placed into use. This these failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion and could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. Findings included: Unlocked and unattended medication cart. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 09:55 AM the nurse medication cart for hall 5 was seen unlocked and unattended for at least 10 minutes. The cart was parked in the hallway and there were no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for transfers. CNA H and CNA I performed an incorrect two-person transfer on Resident #64 on 4/6/26. This failure could place residents who required assistance during transfers at risk of pain and injury. Findings included:Record review of Resident #64's admission Record, dated 4/8/26, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, arthritis, weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #64's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 2/6/26, revealed:She had a BIMS score of 3 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment)She needed substantial assistance with transfers. Review of Resident #64's Care Plan, last updated 4/6/26, revealedFocus: Resident requires assistance with late loss ADL's and use of wheelchair for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (Resident #16) of two reviewed for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG-a tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach for the purpose of administering liquid nutrition and medications) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications and aspiration. LVN E failed to check PEG tube placement by auscultating (Listening with stethoscope) and checking for residual prior to administering Resident #16's medication as ordered by the physician. This failure placed residents who had a PEG tube at risk for complications, aspiration, and pneumonia. Findings include.Record review of Resident #16's admission record dated 04/07/2026 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of gastrostomy status (Gastrostomy status indicates that a person has a surgically placed tube providing direct access to the stomach for nutrition, hydration, or medication). She was [AGE] years of age.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for respiratory care in that: Residents #51's oxygen nasal cannula tube was not bagged when not in use. This failure could place the residents at risk of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #51's admission record, dated 04/09/2026, indicated she was admitted to the facility on -05/10/2024 with diagnoses of lack of coordination and muscle weakness. She was [AGE] years of age. Review of Resident #51's physician order report dated 04/09/2026 indicated in part: Oxygen - continuously = Oxygen at 2L/PM via nasal cannula continuously. Check every shift. Check O2 sats Q shift and keep O2 at or greater than 92% Record O2 sats every shift. every shift related to heart failure. Review of Resident #51's care plan revised on 04/02/2026 indicated in part: The resident is at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 resident reviewed for expired medications. The hall four nurse medication cart had one insulin pen that belonged to Resident #8 that had expired. This these failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion and could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. Findings included:Review of Resident #8's admission record dated 04/08/2026 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes type 2. He was [AGE] years of age. Review of the current care plan for Resident #8, last reviewed/revised: 06/12/2025, revealed in part: The resident had diabetes. Humalog KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously before meals for diabetes. Review of Resident #8's physician orders dated 04/08/2026. Humalog KwikPen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse was provided for 1 (Resident #1) of 15 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from abuse on 4.24.25 when Resident #1 was handled roughly by CNA A. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, intimidation, fear, agitation, and psychological harm. Findings included: Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 1.24.22 with diagnoses of lack of coordination, urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident #1's quarterly BIMS status was completed on 4.9.25 with a score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of CPS report dated 4.24.25 indicated PRIMARY CONCERNS: Today was 04/24/2025, MF contacted LA. MF stated NR was being aggressive CL. MF took off CLs shirt aggressively and grabbed her by the waste and was placed on the bed making a sound. NR was able to observe the incident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #3), reviewed for drug diversion. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of an unknown number of Resident #3's Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 1MG/0.5ML (Controlled Substance requiring double lock and count every shift) on 08/03/2024 from the medication cart that was never found. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation, and could result in increased pain, and poor quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 10.31.23 with the diagnoses of fracture of sacrum, pressure ulcer of sacral region, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Resident #3's quarterly BIMS status was completed on 4.28.25 with a score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan last revised 10.20.24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated, for 1 (Resident #4) of 8 residents reviewed for investigating alleged verbal abuse. On Tuesday 4.15.25 Resident #4 reported that she was hit by an employee at night. The Facility did not investigate the allegation of physical abuse. The failure could place residents at risk for abuse. The findings included: Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 10.30.20 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, hypertension, dementia, and chronic pain. Resident #4's quarterly BIMS status was completed on 4.28.25 with a score of 7, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of facilities incident report dated 4.15.25 at 9:00 pm indicated: Resident states that she was hit by an employee last night. She was unable to give a name or description of an alleged perpetrator. During an interview of Resident #4 on 5.15.25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. -The facility failed to keep a plastic bottle of barbeque sauce free of dried drippings around sides of the bottle. -The facility failed to keep spice bottles completely sealed. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 02/04/2025 at 09:05, with the Dietary Manager during the initial tour in the kitchen, revealed the following:, The food preparation area by the food warmer revealed: -16 plastic bottles of spices stored on metal shelves directly above the food preparation area of which 5 spice bottles had opened tops. The refrigerator revealed the following: -A plastic bottle of barbecue sauce had dry dripping running down the side of the neck of the bottle. Interview with the Dietary Director on 02/06/25 at 12:56 PM revealed that staff were trained to close all containers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for the residents during lunch service observation. -The Director of Rehabilitation did not don gloves or properly disinfect resident's bodily fluids observed on the floor of the main dining room. This failure could place the residents at risk for communicable diseases or viruses. The findings included: In an observation on 02/04/25 at 12:28 PM, a resident was observed spitting on the floor and the facility's Director of Rehabilitation moved the resident to another table. He was then observed using a paper towel without gloves to wipe a resident's spit on the floor next to the dining room table with other residents present and eating their lunch. The Director of Rehab was observed cleaning the area with new paper towels and without gloves. He was observed using the same paper towel to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,397 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-12-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $543K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX