Eden Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 97.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident environments remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for 2-person mechanical lift transfers. The facility failed to ensure CNA A transferred Resident #1 on 01/19/2025 with a mechanical lift per her [NAME] (Notes for CNAs to access in PCC to provide a quick overview of the resident's needs) and her comprehensive plan of care plan. CNA A transferred Resident #1 with a gait belt by herself which resulted in a displaced fracture of her right humeral neck (bone at top of arm that connects to ligament (tough fibrous connective tissue) of shoulder). An Immediate Jeopardy was identified as past noncompliance on 5/21/2025. The IJ began on 1/19/25 and ended on 1/20/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could put residents at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as was for 1 of 14 Residents (#16) reviewed for mechanical soft diet needs and supervision. 1.The facility failed to follow the Speech Language Pathologist's (SLP) recommendations to grind meat for Resident #16's mechanical soft diet, served Resident #16 a ham sandwich, with 2 slices of ham lunch meat, each doubled in half; Resident was found shortly after unresponsive, received Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), was sent to the hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) where she died due to a Difficult airway with lots of debris as quoted by the physician. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/23/2024. While the IJ was removed on 06/27/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with risk for harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for infection prevention measures. CNA A provided care for Resident #1 who had a need for an indwelling urinary catheter and was under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control measure in nursing homes requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents at risk of spreading multidrug-resistant organisms) and did not wear any Personal Protection Equipment (PPE). This failure could place residents at risk for infections. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1s admission record, dated 4/30/2026, revealed an admission date of 1/1/2026 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (a long-term, progressive condition where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #91 and Resident #117) and in 1 of 1 oxygen storage rooms reviewed for respiratory care. 1. Resident #91's nasal cannulas for oxygen and BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) mask were not covered in a plastic bag when they were not used on 03/17/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #117's oxygen concentrator was set to 2 to 3 liters per minute as ordered by the physician on 03/17/2026 and 03/18/2026. 3. Stored oxygen was not separated -1 oxygen cylinder that was empty was in the full area. 1 oxygen cylinder that was empty was in the full side. This failure could place residents at risk of illness, respiratory complications and accidents. The findings included:3. Observation on 3/18/2026 at 9:19 AM in the oxygen cylinder room, revealed 15 oxygen tanks. There was 1 oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 out of 2 medication rooms (500-hall medication room), 2 out of 5 medication carts (500-hall B nursing cart and 500-hall A nursing cart), and 2 of 7 residents (Residents #52 and #155) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. There was one box of refresh plus eye drop lubricant 50 vials that expired 01/2026 found inside the 500-hall medication room on 03/18/2026. 2. There was one bottle of Mucinex 600 mg guaifenesin extended-release that expired 12/09/2025 found inside the 500-hall B nursing cart on 03/18/2026. 3. There was one insulin lispro injection pen of Resident #52 that was opened on 02/09/2026 found inside the 500-hall A nursing cart on 03/18/2026. 4. MA-I took Resident #55's blood pressure and failed to notify the charge nurse of the low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #105) and the facility failed to safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use for 1 of 4 halls (hall#8000), reviewed for Administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #105's wound care physician visits and notes were documented in the resident's EHR prior to or after the resident's discharge on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Medical Records room/Staff break room was closed and kept private and secure. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate follow up care, decreased continuity of care, and loss or unauthorized use of their medical records.The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #105's face sheet dated 3/17/26 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #117) who were observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light which had been placed on Resident #117's oxygen concentrator was within reach for Resident #117. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being able to call for help as needed.The findings included: Record review of Resident #117's face sheet, dated 03/17/2026, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: carcinoma (cancer) in situation of anus and anal canal, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and history of falling.Record review of Resident #117's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/03/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to and the facility promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident for 1 of 8 (Resident #136) residents in that:Resident #136 was not able to eat in her room, which was her preference.This failure could affects the residents' ability to live a dignified life at facility.The findings: .Record review of Resident #136's admission Record dated 3/18/2026 reflected that she was admitted on [DATE], re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks the protective myelin sheath surrounding nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord, disrupting communication between the brain and the rest of the body), dysarthria following other cerebrovascular disease (motor speech disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #156) out of 26 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Resident #156's toilet seat was dirty with feces, and staff did not flush feces inside the toilet. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe.The findings were: Record review of Resident #156's face sheet, dated 03/20/2026, revealed the resident was an 88-years-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of muscle weakness, Parkinson's disease (progressive movement disorder of nervous system), and depression (lowering of a person's mood). Record review of Resident #156's admission MDS assessment, dated on 03/20/2026, revealed the MDS assessment was still in progress because the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #156's baseline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 1 of 8 (Resident #94) residents in that:Resident #94's MDS was not accurate and did not reflect her indwelling catheter.This failure could affect all residents and staff could not know how to provide care to residents.Findings:Record review of Resident #94's admission Record dated 3/20/2026 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (refers to what happens when an injury or disease interrupts the electrical signals between your nervous system and bladder function). Record review of Resident #94's consolidated orders for March 2026 revealed she had an order for indwelling foley catheter 16 French (tubing size) for diagnosis of urine retention every shift. May use leg bag while up during day.Record review of Resident #94's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was not marked for have an indwelling catheter.Record review of Resident #94's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #64) of 5 residents reviewed for incontinence care. When CNA-A was providing incontinent and indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #64 on 03/19/2026, the CNA did not clean the resident's left buttock area. These failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #64's face sheet, dated 03/20/2026, revealed the resident was a 91-years-old male, originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of spondylosis (the natural progression of degenerative changes in the spine that occur with aging), weakness, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. for 1 of 3 (Bluebonnet Hall unit pantry) unit pantries in that:The unit pantry refrigerator was out of range temperature; and the apple juice container was not labeled or dated.This could affect residents that used the unit pantry and place residents at risk for food borne illnesses. The Findings:Observation on 3/18/2026 at 9:13 AM in the Bluebonnet Hall unit pantry revealed the refrigerator temperature was at 42 degrees Fahrenheit. The apple juice container was half full and was not dated or labeled.Observation on 3/18/2026 at 10:18 AM in the Bluebonnet Hall unit pantry revealed the refrigerator temperature was 42 degrees Fahrenheit. The apple juice container was half full and was not dated or labeled.Interview on 3/18/2026 at 10:22 AM with RN E confirmed the Bluebonnet Hall unit pantry refrigerator was at a temperature of 45 Degrees Fahrenheit. RN E stated if refrigerator unit was higher than 42 degrees Fahrenheit, it could cause food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,130 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $22,925 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
• $22,205 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-01 for 19 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX