Runningwater Draw Care Center INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 65.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from neglect. On 5/15/24 after lunch, CNA B performed a 1-person transfer of Resident #1, who was a 2-person transfer. The transfer resulted in CNA B and Resident #1 falling to the floor, causing the fracture of Resident #1's right femur. CNA B did not report the fall. CNA C, who was in the room with CNA B at the time of the incident, did not report the fall until approximately 7 hours after the inappropriate transfer and fall occurred. This failure could place residents at risk of major injury due to neglect in their care. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 5/15/24 at approximately 1:30PM and ended on 5/16/24 at 9:53AM. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. Findings included: Record review of admission Notes revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving neglect are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the event, if the resident sustains serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for Resident #1 within 2 hours of the event. CNA C did not report a fall with potential injury until approximately 7 hours after the inappropriate transfer and fall occured. CNA B did not report the fall. This failure could place residents at risk of not having incidents of neglect reported and investigated in a timely manner and delay in proper treatment of injury. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 5/15/24 at approximately 1:30PM and ended on 5/16/24 at 9:53AM. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. Findings included: Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accidents and hazards, as possible, and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision to prevent accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was assisted x 2 staff for all transfers and movement between surfaces. CNA B transferred Resident #1 independently which resulted in CNA B and Resident #1 falling to the floor. As a result of the fall, Resident #1 suffered a fractured right leg. This failure could place residents at risk for falls with serious injuries. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 5/15/24 at approximately 1:30PM and ended on 5/16/24 at 9:53AM. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. Findings included: Record review of admission Notes revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (Kitchen #1) reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated, freezer and pantry food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were monitored and logged per their policy.These failures place residents at risk for food borne illness.Findings included:During an observation of the refrigerator on 05/05/2026 at 9:44 AM, revealed the following:Five small glasses with orange colored liquid, open to air and had no label.One plate with two pancakes, open to air; the tinfoil covering was off the plate.During an observation of the pantry area on 05/05/2026 at 9:49 AM, revealed the following:One bag of small marshmallows opened to air; several marshmallows had hardened.One bag of crisp cereal, 1/4 empty, sealed, but had no open date.One clear plastic bag of crackers not labeled or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 2 (Resident #35 and #43) of 17 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #35 had a DNR in her record that had no date of when the notary witnessed Resident #35 sign the document. Resident #43 had a DNR in her record that had no information for the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives' wishes.Findings included: Resident #35: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet printed [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral aneurysm (a ballooning or weakening area of an artery in the brain), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart dose not pump blood as well as it should),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 (Resident #2) of 17 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #2 for the use of a restraint. This failure could place residents at risk not receiving appropriate care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed 05/06/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dislocation of left shoulder joint, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe due to airways and air sacs in the lungs are damaged and narrowed), anxiety disorder (worry, fear, or nervousness becomes so strong it affects everyday life), and edema (swelling caused by too much fluid collecting in the body's tissues). Record review of Resident #2's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/13/26, revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #30 and #42) of 17 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to address the use of halo bedrails in Resident #30 and Resident #42's care plans. This failure could result in residents not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included: Resident #30: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 05/05/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a group of thinking and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #16) of 4 residents observed for infection control. -Resident #16 had her catheter bag on the floor for 3 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene.Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet printed 05/06/2026 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and calculus of kidney with calculus of ureter (the presence of solid, crystal-like deposits within the kidney that have moved into and become lodged in the ureter). Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings Include: Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 02/25/2025 at 9:50 AM revealed the following: 1. 1 ziplock bag with a square yellow substance no label, no date. 2. 1 open bag of turkey breast lunch meat in a ziplock bag, no open date, no received date. 3. 1 bag of turkey breast lunch meat no received date. 4. 1 ziplock bag of small round meat no label, no date. Observation of the walk-in pantry on 02/25/2025 at 10:00 AM revealed the following: 5. 2 lb. bag of opened toasted oats cereal in a white basket, no open date, no received date on packaging. Observation of walk-in freezer on 02/25/2025 at 10:13 AM revealed the following: 6. 1 box of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature, and the expiration date when applicable on 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. - Medication cart for Side B revealed a Breo Ellipta inhaler for Resident #8 with no open date on inhaler. - Medication cart for Side A revealed a Novolin R insulin bottle for Resident #10 with no open date on bottle. - Refrigerator in medication room was below 36 degrees for 2 days. Refrigerator contained insulins for the following residents: *Resident #2 had 1 unopened box for Tesiba flex touch *Resident #2 had 2 bottles Novolin R *Resident #5 had 2 flex pen boxes Novolin 70/30 *Resident #5 had 1 bottle Novolin R *Resident #10 had 3 KwikPen boxes for Basaglar *Resident #10 had 2 bottles of Humulin R *Resident #10 had 4 bottles of Novolin R *Resident #15 had 3 bottles of Novolin R *Resident #15 had 2 bottles of Humulin 70/30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #45) of 15 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to prevent LVN B from referring to Resident #45's table in the dining room as the feeder table. The facility failed to prevent labelling 10-12 residents at the center table in the dining room as Feed/Assist on a large whiteboard diagram on the wall of the dining room. These failures could negatively impact the self-esteem, self-worth, and identity of residents who need assistance with eating. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #45's admission record dated 02/25/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinsonism (conditions that affect the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (Resident #214) of 15 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an admission MDS on Resident #214 within 14 calendar days after admission date of 02/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met due to lack of information. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #214's admission record dated 02/25/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition resulting from not enough oxygen in the tissues of the body) and melena (dark, tarry stool). Record review of Resident #214's EHR revealed an admission MDS with ARD of 02/19/25 which was not competed. It was noted to be in progress. Record review of Resident #214's care plan revealed it was initiated on 02/19/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #36) of 15 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to remove diagnoses of Wound Infection (other than foot) from Resident #11 and Resident #36's MDS' when said diagnoses were inactive. This failure could lead to residents receiving unnecessary care or not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's admission record dated 02/26/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (a bacterial or fungal infection confined to a specific are of the skin and the layer of tissue directly beneath it resulting in inflammation, redness, warmth, swelling, pain), psoriasis (chronic skin condition characterized by raised, red, scaly patches of skin called plaques), pruritus (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,672 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,672 — penalty dated 2024-05-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in TX