Oasis at Pearland
3400 E. Walnut, Pearland, TX 77581 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (281) 485-2776 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $34,510 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-08)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.1% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 26.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.5%CMS range 26.2–56.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.8–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.0–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 84.7 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse, neglect and exploitation for 2 of 5 (Resident #1 and CR#2) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from sexual abuse when CR #2 told Resident #1 to hold his (CR#2's) penis and touch his body on 3/14/2025. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The PNC IJ began on 03/14/2025 and ended on 3/17/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed all residents in the facility at risk of abuse and neglect that could result in emotional and mental trauma. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission face sheet dated 4/8/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of cerebral palsy (disorder of movement and muscle tone), lobar pneumonia (a type of pneumonia that affects and inflames one or more lung lobes), acute respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 8 of 10 residents (Resident #34, Resident #65, Resident #87, Resident #91, Resident #19, Resident #41, Resident #50 and Resident #59) reviewed for sufficient staffing. -The facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff per the facility assessment, and failed to provide care for residents including blood pressure and blood sugar monitoring, medicaiton administration, repositioning, and incontinent care. - Resident #34, Resident #65, Resident #87, and Resident #91 did not receive their morning and/or afternoon medications. -The facility failed to provide ADL care to residents with bowel/bladder incontinence during the night shift (11pm-7am) on 4/21/24 and 4/22/24. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/24/24. The IJ template was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 4 residents (Residents #34, #65, #87, and #91) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. -Facility staff did not redistribute assignments of residents when one of three nurses assigned to the South Hall called off from her shift. -Resident #34, Resident #65, and Resident #87 did not have their blood glucose levels checked as ordered, which determined if sliding scale insulin was to be administered on 04/22/24. -Resident #34, Resident #65, Resident #87, and Resident #91 did not receive their morning and/or afternoon medications as ordered by their physician on 04/22/24. -Resident #34, Resident #65, and Resident #87 had parameters for administering blood pressure medications. Blood pressures were not documented, and the blood pressure medications were not administered. -Missed medications included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 residents (Residents #34, #65, #87, and #91) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration were free of significant medication errors. -Resident #91 did not receive Coumadin (anticoagulant) as ordered by the physician in the afternoon of 04/22/24, placing him at risk for a blood clot. -Resident #34, Resident #65, and Resident #87 did not have their blood glucose levels checked as ordered, which determined if sliding scale insulin was to be administered on 04/22/24. -Resident #34 did not receive Metoprolol Tartrate (for high blood pressure) as ordered by the physician, and her blood sugar was not checked, resulting in not having blood sugar levels to determine amounts of insulin to be administered. -Resident #65 did not receive a dose of IV antibiotic for a sacral pressure ulcer infection. -Resident #87 did not receive Metoprolol Tartrate as ordered by the physician, and her blood sugar was not checked, resulting in not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent falls for 1 (CR#1) of six residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. - The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and proper bed mobility for CR#1 when the facility wound care doctor and wound care nurse failed to supervise resident while doing wound care causing CR#1 to fall from the bed and hit her head on 7/18/23 and be rushed to the hospital and life flighted to another local hospital by helicopter for an emergency procedure. -The facility failed to care plan and put additional services in place for CR #1 when she had her 1st fall on 7/18/23.CR #1 had a 2nd fall on 10/28/23 causing her additional pain and suffering. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/7/23 at 2:39 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 11/11/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not an Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse and neglect for 1 (CR #50) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. -The facility failed to ensure CR #50, was free from abuse when she was grabbed and hit by CNA F, causing bruising to the face, torso, and left arm. -RN H and CNA G failed to follow appropriate procedure and notify the facility's abuse coordinator and administrator immediately of knowing an incident of abuse involving CR #50 that occurred on 07/19/2022 and reported on 07/25/2022. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/01/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of serious harm from possible abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet for CR #50 dated 02/08/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 08/05/2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 1 (Resident #3) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received Clonazepam 0.5 mg and Phenobarbital 32.4 mg, both medications ordered for seizures, as ordered as evidenced by gaps in administrations on 11/1/25-11/3/25, 11/10/25 and 11/18/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician and risk of seizures (sudden surge of abnormal electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, awareness, or muscle control).Findings included:Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 6/11/26, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (when the lungs fail to deliver enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for dignity.The facility failed to ensure Respiratory Therapist A provided privacy to Resident #1 while providing oral care and tracheostomy (surgically created opening in the windpipe to assist with breathing) suctioning on 6/9/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having the right to a dignified existence maintained.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6/11/26, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition in which the body or a part of the body is deprived of adequate oxygen at the tissue level) and encounter for attention to tracheostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed in accordance with the national guidelines in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed at lunch meal in that: The facility failed to ensure that the menus were followed. This failure could place all residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss and diminished quality of life. Observation on 12/31/2025 at 12:20pm during the lunch service revealed the lunch tray included one egg roll, 3 chicken nuggets, approximately 2 ounces of green beans, banana pudding, juice and water. No bread was observed on the tray. Further observation revealed no posted menu in the dining room and no substitution list. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 12:40pm with the Dietary Manager revealed that the menu was supposed to be posted but she did not get a chance to print it and that was why it was not posted. She said the menu should include fried rice as the starch and she did not know why the fried rice was not included. Record review of the lunch menu for 12/31/2025 revealed Egg roll, fried rice, oriental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident\ resident representative with access to personal and medical records pertaining to him or herself, upon an oral or written request, in the form and format requested by the individual, if it is readily producible in such form and format (including in an electronic form or format when such records are maintained electronically), or, if not, in a readable hard copy form or such other form and format as agreed to by the facility and the individual, within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) for 1of 1 residents (CR#1) reviewed record access.CR #1 and her representative were not provided with requested medical records. This failure had the potential to prevent residents from obtaining medical services needed to maintain their health.Record review of Resident CR#1's Face Sheet, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 4 of 93 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 107, 140, and 146) reviewed for environment.- The facility failed to have clean water, and the water was brown when the faucet was turned on, in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].- The facility failed to have water pressure, and the water barely came out of the faucet, in Rooms 106, 107, 140 and 146.These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.The findings included:In an observation on 9/21/25 at 12:24pm, the faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER] was turned on and brown water came out for several minutes. The water pressure was also very low, and the water barely trickled out of the faucet.In an observation on 9/21/25 at 12:29pm, the faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER] was turned on and brown water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs.- The facility failed to provide scheduled showers, three times a week to Resident #1 for the weeks of 8/25/25-8/30/25, 9/1/25-9/6/25, and 9/15/25-9/20/25.This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection, and reduced feelings of self-worth.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of complete paraplegia (unable to move arms or legs), type 2 diabetes (body does not produce insulin or resists it), heart failure (heart does not pump effectively), stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacrum (pressure ulcer of the tailbone that exposes bone, tendon, or muscle), neurogenic bowel (nerve damage disrupts normal bowel function), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the Center for Medicaid/Medicare System (CMS) System for 1 of 3 closed records (CR #83) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) transmission. CR #83's discharge MDS assessment was not completed and transmitted within 14 days of CR's discharges. This failure could place residents at-risk of not having their assessment and care plan completed timely, which could result in denial of services and or payment for services. Findings Include: Record review of CR #83's Face sheet dated 06/12/25 revealed a 63-years old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included but were not limited to Acquired absence of left leg below knee, infection, homelessness, iron deficiency anemia, peripheral vascular disease (Slow and progressive disorder of the blood vessels), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (Insulin resistance and elevated blood sugar level), unspecified open wound, right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with Pre-admission and Resident Review program (PASRR) (Screening process for individuals with mental illness or intellectual/developmental disabilities) under Medicaid and initiate services within 20 days after the date that the services are agreed upon in the Interdisciplinary Team meeting( IDT) (meeting with professionals from various disciplines to discuss resident needs and develop a comprehensive care plan), to ensure that individuals with intellectual developmental disabilities receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting for 1 of 18 residents (Resident#35) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to complete and submit therapy evaluations for Habilitative services for PT, and OT services agreed upon in an IDT meeting on 08/15/2025 addressing Resident #35's needs. This failure could affect residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities requiring PASRR services at risk of a delay in or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Midodrine (a blood pressure (BP) medication given to elevate hypotension (low blood pressure) was administered as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving desired therapeutic outcomes, increased side effects, or a decline in health. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #86's undated face sheet, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Cerebral Infarction (blood flow to a part of the brain is blocked, leading to tissue damage or death), End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidney lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids) and Anoxic brain damage (When the brain is completely deprived of oxygen). Record review of a Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #80) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed appropriate infection control and hand hygiene procedure during incontinent care for Resident #80 on 06/10/2025. The failure could place the resident at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #80's face sheet dated 06/12/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs cannot properly exchange gases, causing abnormal levels of carbon dioxide and/or oxygen in the arteries), Aphasia (language disorder that affects the ability to communicate) following Cerebral infarction (condition where blood flow to the brain is blocked, leading to brain tissue damage or death). Record review of Resident #80's admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents (CR #3) were admitted with physician orders for immediate care, in that: The facility failed to have physician's orders that indicated CR #3's need for dressing to healing tracheostomy. This failure places residents with medical needs at risk for a decrease in their quality of care. Findings included: Record review of CR #3's face sheet, dated 08/25/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with anoxic (without oxygen) brain damage and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of oxygen). Record review of CR #3's care plan, not dated, revealed no mentioning of resident's trach status or post trach status. Record review of CR #3's MAR, dated 08/25/2024, revealed there were no orders for trach site care. Record review of CR #3's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected resident was not documented to receive tracheostomy care. Record review of CR #3's nurses notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for environment. 1-The facility did not have an adequate supply of linen as multiple rooms #103, #108, #109, #117, #124, #125 were observed with no sheets on the beds. 2-The facility did not have linen readily available to meet residents' needs. This failure could cause residents to have skin breakdown, infections and dignity issues. Findings included: Observation of resident rooms on 6/27/2024 at 11:02am, revealed #103, #108, #109, #117, #124, #125 revealed there were no sheets on the beds. Observation on 6/27/2024, and 6/28/2024 of supply carts on Dove, Swan and Flamingo halls did not have sheets on the cart. Record review of linen order placed on 6/24/24 revealed 5 dozen of flat sheets were ordered. Further review of linen order revealed on 4/1/2024 25 dozen of towels, 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality for one (Resident #1) of six residents observed for pleasure feedings. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's received pleasure feeding as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss and further decline in health status. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission face sheet revealed he was [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included volvulus (twisting or knotting of the gastrointestinal tract), constipation (difficult having a bowel movement), vascular disorder of mail genital organs (disorder that affect the blood flow of the penis), unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (lack of protein and calories to meet nutritional need), cerebral palsy(abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #9) reviewed for sufficient staffing. -The facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff per the facility assessment and failed to provide repositioning for Resident #1 and Resident. -The facility failed to provide Incontinent care to Residents #1 and Resident #2 and Resident #9. with bowel/bladder incontinence on 6/27/2024 and 6/28/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of their needs not being met, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity. Findings Included: Record review of the facility assessment tool dated April 2024 through April 2025 revealed Staffing plans is was based on your population and their needs for care and support, facility general approach to staffing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for of the 1 (Dove Hall) of 4 halls for residents who receive room trays from the facility's kitchen. The facility did not maintain proper temperatures for room service trays for lunch on Dove hall. These failures could affect all residents who eat in their rooms and residents who received pureed meals by placing them at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 6/27/24 at 12:42pm, Dove hall food trays were in a warmer. Two plates observed inside that were covered with saran wrap. The food warmer was opened. There were no doors. In an interview on 6/27/2024 at 4:32pm, Resident #8 stated the food was cold and it was probably because his hall was served last every day. He said they do not have closed food warmer but the CNA's are serving them when they can. He said they only have one CNA on his hall, and this could be the issue why the food was cold. He said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. (1) The facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated. (2) The facility failed to ensure that equipment was cleaned. (3) The facility failed to ensure that the dish machine sanitizer was working properly. (4) The facility failed to ensure that staff were properly trained to do they duties. (5) The facility failed to ensure that food on the steam was at the correct holding temperature. (6) The facility failed to ensure staff maintained proper hygienic practices. (7) The facility failed to ensure refrigerator maintain 41 degrees or below. These failures could place residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: In an interview with Dietary Aide B on 6/27/24 at 11:35am, she said she had to do dishes with very little cleaning material. She said they usually purchase from Company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest, practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #9 ) reviewed for facility administration in that: -The facility Administrator and DON failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staff to ensure timely incontinent care and/or repositioning were provided for (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #9). -The facility Administrator failed to ensure the facility had adequate linen, towels, briefs and wipes to care for the facility residents in a timely manner. -The facility DON failed to supervise CNAs to ensure they were providing timely incontinent care and repositioning as ordered. This failure could place all residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk of having skin breakdown, infection, and loss of dignity.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, 1 resident (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure sores received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. 1-Resident #3 had a large pressure sore that was not properly dressed. 2-The Charge Nurse and Treatment Nurse were not aware that the dressing was not on the wound. 3-The facility had no documentation of measurements of the pressure sore since admission. The failure placed this resident at risk for worsening of the pressure ulcer and/or possible infection. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record (copied 07/02/24) for Resident #3 reflected she was [AGE] years old, and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, pressure induced deep tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to competently care for residents during day-to-day and emergency operations for 1 of 1 facility in that: -The Facility Assessment Tool was not completed. This failure could affect residents by not having the necessary resources to ensure appropriate care is provided. Findings included: Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool revealed read in part: .Date(s) of assessment or update 1/16/2024. Date(s) assessment reviewed with QAA/QAPI committee 1/23/2024. Disclaimer: Use of this tool is not mandated by the CMS, or does it ensure regulatory compliance 12/13/2022. Facility Assessment Tool reviewed had previous Administrator and DON listed. Further review of the facility assessment revealed the assessment was missing the following: Resident profile, Services and care offered, and facility resources needed. Record review and interview on 4/24/24 at 2:10 p.m., with the Corporate RN. Surveyors reviewed the facility assessment presented by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 11 of 11 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. -The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: Interview on 4/23/24 at 10:11a.m., Activities Director stated that Resident Council was held in the dining room. When asked if it was private, she stated that she could post a sign and request staff to stay out of that area. Observation of Dining room on 4/24/24 at 11:00a.m., revealed multiple staff, visitors (nursing students), dietary staff, Maintenance director and other residents (using vending machine) going in and out of the dining room from both sides. Observation and interview on 4/24/24 at 11:10 a.m., during a confidential resident group meeting with 11 residents, revealed the resident council meeting were held once a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. -The facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. This failure could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen and interview on 04/23/2024 between 8:22a.m., and 9:10 a.m., with [NAME] A revealed the following: Refrigerator: A clear container with Puree pumpkin pudding dated 4/18/24 with no used by date. A clear gallon sized zip log bag with Salad mix dated 4/18/24 with no used by date. A clear gallon sized zip log bag with Croissants dated 4/10/24 with no used by date. A clear gallon sized zip log bag with bagels dated 4/8/24 with no used by date. A clear gallon sized zip log bag with pancakes dated 4/4/24 with no used by date. The Condiment refrigerator or Cook's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 5residents (Resident #58) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for antipsychotic medication, Olanzapine was administered to Resident #58. The failure affected residents who received psychoactive medications without informed consents and placed them at risk of receiving treatments without informed consent. Findings include: Record review of Resident #58's face sheet dated 02/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), anxiety disorder (group of mental illnesses characterized by intense anxiety and fear). Record review of the comprehensive MDS assessment revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not given unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis or indication for the use of Resident #58's Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication used to treat severe agitation associated with certain mental/mood conditions schizophrenia, bipolar mania). The facility's failure could place residents at risk for psychotropic medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, dependence on unnecessary medications; and could increase the risk of death in older adults with mental health problems related to dementia. Findings include: Record review of Resident #58 's face sheet dated 02/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for infection. -The facility failed to ensure CNA I performed hand hygiene during incontinent care on Resident #19. This failure could lead to the spread of infection to residents, resident illness, and/or resident distress. Finding include: Record review of the admission sheet (undated) for Resident #19 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), other abnormalities of gait and mobility (weakness of the hip and lower extremity muscles commonly cause gait disturbances) and other lack of coordination (impaired balance or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning was provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. -RT A did not utilize a pulse-ox to monitor Resident #1's tolerance of the suctioning procedure. -RT A did not hyper-oxygenate Resident #1 prior to suctioning. -RT A contaminated a sterile field and required surveyor intervention to have her obtain a new sterile field. -RT A did not wear a sterile glove when she picked up the inner cannula and inserted it into the trachea. -RT A was not able to determine the difference between a sterile glove and a clean glove. The deficient practice placed Resident #1 at risk for respiratory infection and respiratory distress. Findings include: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #1 (dated 04/03/2024) revealed she was [AGE] years…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medications errorsfor for 2 of (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for medications errors. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's medications were given as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's, medication Metoprolol for high blood pressure was given as ordered by the physician. This failure placed all resident who received medications at risk of not getting their medications as ordered which could result in resident not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medication including increased pain, blood pressure and decreased quality of life. Findings included. Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission face sheet dated 11/7/2023 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/21/2023. His diagnoses included essential hypertension (high blood pressure),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 6 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #1 and Resident #2 October 2023 MAR's and TAR's did not reflect documentation for medication and treatment done. Resident #1 and Resident #2 October 2023 nurse's notes did not why document reasons when medications were not given and why blood pressure medication was given. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. Findings Included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission face sheet dated 11/07/2023 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/20/2022. Resident #1's diagnoses included essential hypertension(high blood pressure), End…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan included all care areas triggered on the assessment. This failure could place all residents at risk of not receiving proper care to develop and improve their mental, physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings included. Record review of Resident #2's admission face sheet dated 11/07/2023 revealed Resident # 2 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included acute kidney failure (decreased kidney function), fever (temperature over 100 degrees) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) anemia (having lower than normal healthy red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of medications errors for (Resident #1) 1 of 6 residents' records reviewed of the MAR. Facility staff failed to follow the physician's orders for administering a narcotic (Norco) medication to R#1. This failure placed residents risk for not receiving the medications as ordered by the physician, which could cause excessive diarrhea. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who entered the facility on 9/12/23 and re-entry dated 9/28/23. Record Review of Resident #1 Annual MDS dated 9.21.23 revealed a BIMS score of 10 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment). Record Review of Resident #1 Care Plan dated 9/28/2023 revealed diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure (respiratory failure ), hypoxia or hypercapnia (low oxygen levels in blood and/or tissues), pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs), tracheostomy(a procedure to help air and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident physician and notify the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical mental or psychological status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of change of condition. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's responsible party when there was lesion to the resident's nose which resulted in an open area on the nose bridge. This failure placed residents at risk of not being aware of any changes in their conditions and could result in the decline of the residents' health and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include diabetes type 11 (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure) Cerebrovascular, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) pain, iron deficiency anemia, hiatal hernia, GI Bleed traumatic brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a resident assessment within the required time frame for 5 of 7 (CR #24, CR #60, CR #90, CR #94, and CR #96) discharged residents reviewed for data encoding and transmission in that: - The Facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS for CR #24, CR #60, CR #90, CR #94, and CR #96. - The facility failed to complete an accurate discharge assessment for CR #24's death. This failure could place discharged residents at risk of not having their assessments transmitted timely. Findings included: CR #24 Record review of CR# 24's admission record dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE], re-admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE] as death in the facility. CR #24 admitted with diagnoses that included asthma (a respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing), muscle wasting and atrophy (Muscle wasting; Wasting; Atrophy of the muscles. Muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to correctly complete Level 1 assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for two (Resident #9 and Resident #14) of seven residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to correctly complete a Level I PASRR Evaluation for Resident #9 and Resident #14. This failure could affect residents with a diagnosis of mental illness and could result in these residents not receiving needed services and or specialized care. Findings included: Resident #9 Record review of Resident #9's undated admission face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (disturbed, confused, and disrupted patterns of thought), generalized anxiety disorder and Parkinson's Disease. Record review of Resident #9's annual MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2022. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. The findings included: Review of the facility's staff roster, undated indicated the following: 1 Administrator 9 RNs (included DON and 1 ADON) 27 LVNs (included 1 MDS Coordinator and 1 Treatment Nurse) 67 CNA/MA's 3 Maintenance Personnel 11 Housekeeping/Laundry Personnel 13 Dietary Personnel (included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation were made, to the administrator of the facility, other officials, including the State Survey Agency (SSA), for 1 (CR #50) of 7 resident reviewed for reporting. -RN H and CNA G failed to report an incident of abuse involving CR #50 to the facility's abuse coordinator and administrator immediately of knowing the abuse occurred on 07/19/2022. -The facility failed to report an incident to the SSA, Health and Human Service Commission (HHSC) immediately but not later than 24 hours of an incident of abuse on 07/19/2022 involving CR #50. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse by the facility not reporting such incidents to the Administrator and SSA within the mandated timeframes. Findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for care plans, in that: -Resident #14 did not have a care plan until 25 days after she admitted . -Resident #14 did not have a baseline care plan to address her psychotropic medication use. These failures could affect all newly admitted residents to the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving the care and services for health promotion and continuity of care. Findings included: Resident #14 Record review of Resident #14's admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life), unspecified mood (affective) disorder (mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment, for 1 Residents (Resident #14) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #14 within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the required person-centered care. The findings were: Resident #14 Record review of Resident #14's undated admission Record revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He diagnoses included major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life), unspecified mood (affective) disorder (mental disorder characterized by a disturbance in mood which is abnormally depressed or elated), generalized anxiety disorder (mental condition characterized by excessive fear of or apprehension about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 dumpsters (dumpster A) reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility failed to ensure the dumpster lid and door were secured. This failure could result in providing harborage and breeding areas for insects, rodents and other pests which could infest the facility. Findings included: An observation on 2/7/23 at 8:24 am., revealed 2 commercial-sized trash dumpsters with 2 lids on each dumpster, which were in the lot behind the dietary department. 1 (dumpster A) of the commercial-sized dumpsters had the right lid open, with garbage inside of it. Interview and observation on 2/7/23 at 8:24 am, with the Dietary Manager, she said that the dumpster lids must always be closed, to prevent infestation of pest and contamination. She said that the dumpsters were shared with all departments and all staff were responsible for making sure the dumpsters are always closed and monitoring. Interview on 2/7/23 at 10:00 am., with the Administrator, she said that the facility does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 4 halls (South Hall) reviewed for call systems. The facility failed to install a functioning call light system for Resident #10's room. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care and services, increased falls, excessive wait times, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Finding included: Resident #10 Record review of the face sheet for Resident#10 dated 02/09/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] in room [ROOM NUMBER]. His diagnoses included sepsis, type diabetes mellites, acute kidney failure, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and right knee infective bursitis (inflammation of the knee). Record review of Resident#10's undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$34,510 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-04-08
- $11,855 — penalty dated 2024-04-04
- $14,374 — penalty dated 2023-09-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/08/2023 |
| RUFF, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/08/2023 |
| OASIS AT PEARLAND LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/08/2023 |
| LAPIN, ZACHARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/08/2023 |
| ODOM, SHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HIRSCH, NISSON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| HIRSCH, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| PROBST, SETH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| MOUGOURIS, TASO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/08/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675557. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.