Plainview Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 51.8 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.79 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice and comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for Quality of Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's surgical wound was assessed, and wound care orders were received from the hospital upon admission to the facility. Resident #1 had a post-surgery check up on 9/3/24, 18 days after admission and the bulky wound dressing from the surgery was still covering the wound and was dried to his leg but the incision was not infected. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's surgical wound was assessed, and wound care orders were received from the hospital upon admission to the facility. Resident #2 had a post-surgery check up on 9/3/24, 13 days after admission and the bulky wound dressing from the surgery was still covering the wound and was soaking wet. No…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the freezer, refrigerator, and pantry items were properly stored, labeled, and dated.This failure could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation of the prep area in the kitchen on 06/29/26 at 9:25 AM revealed the following:1. (3) clear bins containing individual cereal bowls were not labeled or dated. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 06/29/26 at 9:27 AM revealed the following:1. (1) box of vegetables, no label or date. 2. (1) bag that contained half of a cut lemon in a foam bowl, no label or date.3. (4) bags of fresh grapes, open to air, and 1 bag contained moldy grapes.4. (1) tray of fruit cups, covered, no label, and the date was unreadable.5. (1) box of cupcakes, not sealed, no label or date. 6. (1) box containing tortillas, no label or date. Observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #2 and #3), and 1 of 2 staff members observed for infection control. LVN C failed to ensure infection control with wrist blood pressure cuff and did not clean it between use of residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's catheter bag was not dragging on the floor. C.N.A. E failed to ensure infection control by not changing gloves prior to starting pericare for Resident #3. C.N.A. F failed to ensure infection control by not changing glovers prior to catheter care for Resident #3. C.N.A. G failed to ensure infection control by not changing gloves prior to starting pericare for Resident #2. This deficient practice could put residents at risk for increased infections. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that meet professional standards of quality and that included measurable objectives and time frames for 1 of 11 (Residents #3) Residents reviewed for care plans.A. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's daily use of compression socks had been care planned. There was no documentation in the care plan of measurable objectives, interventions, or timeframes for how staff would meet this need.This failure to accurately develop and implement a care plan could result in staff not being aware of critical treatment-related risks and monitoring needs, placing residents at risk for delayed treatment and failure to provide necessary care and services. Findings include:Record review of Resident #3 's face sheet printed 06/29/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of embolism ( a traveling mass of undissolved matter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for physician orders for treatments. The facility failed to follow physician orders and apply Compression socks as ordered for Resident # 3. The failure could affect residents currently residing in the facility resulting in not receiving needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for injury and/or deterioration in their condition. Findings include:Record review of Resident #3 's face sheet printed 06/29/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of embolism ( a traveling mass of undissolved matter such as a blood clot ) deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities bilateral (blood clot in deep vein of legs), fluid overload (when body retains too much fluids), acute on chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (decompensation that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the governing body of the facility had appointed an administrator, who was licensed by the state, was responsible for the management of the facility, and was accountable the to the governing body for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for administration. The facility had not had an administrator from 07/16/2025 to 01/07/2026 This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life and quality of care due to lack of staff oversight and monitoring of care.The findings included: Record review of the former Administrator's employee record titled Profiles dated 11/20/2025 revealed he was hired on 02/01/2018 with a termination date of 07/16/2025. During an interview on 1/07/2026 at 05:56 AM the AIT reported she (AIT) had completed her administrator training and tested but she did not pass the test the first time. She (AIT) was planning on retesting. The AIT reported that the facility was actively looking for an interim administrator and has had several applications. The facility has one current applicant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the governing body of the facility had appointed an administrator, who is licensed by the state, to be responsible for the management of the facility and report to the governing body. The facility had not had an administrator since 07/16/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life and quality of care due to lack of staff oversight and monitoring of care for all 50 residents at the facility. The findings included: Record review of the former Administrator's employee record titled Profiles dated 11/20/2025 revealed he was hired on 02/01/2018 with a termination date of 07/16/2025. During an interview on 11/20/25 at 6:48 AM, an entrance conference was conducted with the AIT who stated she took the test and failed and the facility, at this time, did not have a licensed ADM. She stated the former ADM had been terminated on 07/16/25. The AIT stated that corporate wanted her to take the position of ADM as soon as she passed the ADM exam. During an interview on 11/20/25 at 5:31…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the governing body of the facility had appointed an administrator, who is licensed by the state, to be responsible for the management of the facility and report to the governing body. The facility had not had an administrator since 07/16/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life and quality of care due to a lack of staff oversight and monitoring of care. The findings included: During an interview on 09/04/2025 at 9:32 AM, an entrance conference was conducted with the BOM who stated she was the AIT and acting as ADM for the facility. She stated that the former ADM had been terminated. During an interview on 09/04/2025 at 2:04 PM, the DON stated that the facility did not have a full-time administrator. She stated that she was not exactly sure when the last administrator was terminated, but she thought around the 20th of July. The DON stated the AIT took the administrator role, but she was not licensed and still in training. During a follow-up interview on 09/04/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchens when they failed to: A. Ensure kitchen staff used proper hand washing and sanitation procedures when handling food. This failure could cause decreased meal satisfaction and decreased meal consumption due to using unsanitary practices in the facility's only kitchen and could affect all residents in the facility that receive meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen food prep activities on 4/30/25 from 11:15 a.m. to 12:35 p.m. revealed the following: In an observation and interview on 4/30/25 at 11:40 a.m., [NAME] I was observed in the kitchen with gloved hands, chopping meat for lunch using a spoon to chop the meat. [NAME] I pushed meat off the bowl of the spoon with her gloved hands. [NAME] I did not wash her hands. [NAME] I took off her gloves and applied new gloves from her pocket. [NAME] I began touching the meat with her gloved hand, picked up the meat and put the chopped meat in the metal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 3 of 3 medication carts (NE Hall, NW Hall, and South side Hall) and 1 of 12 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for medication storage. -Medication cart for NW Hall revealed Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray 50mcg with no open date on the bottle or resident identifying information. -Breo Ellipta had a date of 06/11/2025, with no resident identifying information. -Medication cart for NE Hall had a pill in a medication cup in the top draw of the medication cart. -Medication cart for NE hall had 1 unidentified pill loose in the bottom of the medication cart drawers. -Medication cart for NE hall had 1 loose Protonix pill in the bottom of the medication cart drawers. -Medication cart for NE hall had Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray 50mcg, for Resident # 15, bottle did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 12 residents (Resident #15, #24, #26, #27, #31, and Resident #36) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that facility staff performed hand hygiene appropriately during medication preparation, medication administration and incontinent care. This failure could place the residents at an increased risk for potentially exposing them to viral infections, secondary infections, tissue breakdown, communicable diseases and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings included: During an observation on 04/30/25 at 11:00 AM Resident #27 was being assisted to the restroom by CNA F who did not don any PPE. Resident #27 was on EBP due to having a wound. During an interview on 04/30/25 at 11:08 AM CNA F, stated he didn't know if Resident # 27 was on EBP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $19,190 — penalty dated 2024-09-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX