Ralls Nursing Home
1111 Avenue P, Ralls, TX 79357 · For profit - Partnership · 46 certified beds · (806) 253-2596 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607, F0609) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 6 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $303,179 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-14)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 53.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.79 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.75 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.44 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from physical and verbal abuse for Resident #1 when LVN A, CNA B and CNA C forced Resident #1 to leave the dining room and go to bed when they dragged Resident #1 with a blanket to her room.LVN A, CNA B and CNA C made verbal comments about Resident #1 on front of and to Resident #1 mind your own business, calling to find another place for her to live, why haven't they made her move yet.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/19/25 and ended on 01/07/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 01/12/2026.These failures could affect all residents by placing them at risk of abuse, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/13/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of known source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) and the Administrator for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to follow their policy for abuse and neglect when LVN A, CNA B and CNA C failed to report an incident with Resident #1 for 2 days and the ADON and BOM failed to immediately report Resident #1's allegation of abuse to the ADM prior to investigation. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/19/25 and ended on 01/07/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 01/12/2026.These failures could affect all residents by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to the abuse coordinator, the facility Administrator for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to follow their policy for reporting abuse and neglect when LVN A, CNA B and CNA C did not report an incident with Resident #1 for 2 days. LVN A, CNA B and CNA C continued to work with Resident #1 because they failed to report the abuse to the ADM. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/19/25 and ended on 01/07/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 01/12/2026.These failures could affect all residents by placing them at risk of abuse, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from physical and verbal abuse for Resident #1 when LVN D grabbed and pulled Resident #1 from behind the nurse's station, and Resident #1 was observed with redness on 07/13/25, and with bruises to both hands and wrists on 07/14/25. During this incident LVN D said to the resident three times that her daddy was dead. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 07/13/25 and ended on 07/14/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 07/15/25. These failures could affect all residents by placing them at risk of abuse, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/17/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old-female who was originally admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of known source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the State Agency) and the Administrator for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from physical and verbal abuse for Resident #1 when LVN D grabbed and pulled Resident #1 from behind the nurse's station, and Resident #1 was observed with redness on 07/13/25, and with bruises to both hands and wrists on 07/14/25. During this incident LVN D said to the resident three times that her daddy was dead. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IT began on 07/13/25 and ended on 07/14/25. The facility had corrected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to the abuse coordinator, the facility Administrator for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from physical and verbal abuse for Resident #1 on 7/13/25 at 6:07 PM when LVN D grabbed and pulled Resident #1 from behind the nurse's station, and Resident #1 was observed with redness on 07/13/25, and with bruises to both hands and wrists on 07/14/25. During this incident LVN D said to the resident three times that her daddy was dead. LVN D remained working at the facility for 6 hours the remainder shift on 7/13/25 after the incident and had direct contact with Resident #1.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 07/13/25 and ended on 07/14/25. The facility had corrected the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from sexual abuse for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #6) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to put protective measures in place on 05/11/24 to protect Resident #4 from sexual abuse after knowing Resident #2 had displayed inappropriate sexual behavior with Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to put protective measures in place on 06/02/24 to protect Resident #3 in place from sexual abuse after knowing Resident #5 had a history of inappropriate sexual behavior. 3. The facility failed to put protective measures in place on 06/02/24 to protect Resident #6 in place from sexual abuse after knowing Resident #5 had a history of inappropriate sexual behavior. On 06/07/24 at 5:00 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 06/09/24 at 3:30 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #6) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect policy when: 1. The facility failed to investigate the fall incident that occurred with Resident #1 while in the care of CNA E on 05/30/24. CNA E failed to notify the nurse of the fall. Resident #1 sustained a hip fracture. 2. The facility failed to report to the state agency and investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 05/10/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #3. 3. The facility failed to report to the state agency and investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 05/11/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #4. 4. The facility failed to notify Family Member C of the inappropriate sexual incident that involved Resident #3. 5. The facility failed to report to the state agency and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 (Residents #1) residents reviewed for adequate supervision and prevention of accidents. The facility staff (Administrator and DON) failed to adequately address Resident #2's ongoing behavior of entering Resident #1's room. The facility (Administrator and DON) failed to address resident #2's ongoing physical and verbal behavior with appropriate interventions. These failures to put supervision measures in place could result in harm to Resident #2 and the remaining residents in the facility. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/08/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Cerebral infarction (stroke), major depressive disorder, anxiety (increased feelings of fear,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure of 5 of 8 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) were free from misappropriation of personal property.The facility did not prevent RN D from taking residents #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6's personal property. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life and distrust for the staff.Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 01/14/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to facility on 01/13/25 with diagnosis that included bilateral hearing loss (reduction of hearing ability to both ears), paraplegia (paralysis affecting the lower half of the body), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness, loss of interest in daily activities), anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent, excessive fear and worry), age-related cataract of the left eye (clouding of the eye's natural lens), and bilateral optic atrophy (damage to the visual pathway).Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1), reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free of significant medication errors when MA B administered Tegretol 200mg (prescribed for seizures, bipolar disorder, and nerve pain), Lipitor 40mg (prescribed to lower cholesterol), Baclofen10mg (muscle relaxer), Metoprolol 25mg (prescribed to lower blood pressure), Neurontin 300mg (prescribed for seizures and nerve pain), Quetiapine Fumarate 200mg (medication prescribed for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia) to Resident #1 on 10/13/25, when these medications were prescribed to another resident. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reaction related to taking medications not ordered by the physician.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for residents' monthly council meetings for 14 of 35 confidential residents who were reviewed for resident council.The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for residents' monthly council meetings for 14 of 35 confidential residents who were reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings include: Observation of the dining room on 9/15/25 revealed multiple staff and residents coming in and out of the dining room while the Resident Council meeting was in session. In a confidential group interview on 9/15/25 14 alert and orientated residents, who attended resident council, stated resident council was always held in the dining room. They stated staff came in and out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 14 of 35 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure 14 confidential residents were provided, the Grievance Procedure, information in regard to who the facilities' grievance officer was, their contact information, and how to file an anonymous grievance. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 14 of 35 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure 14 confidential residents were provided, the Grievance Procedure, information in regard to who the facilities' grievance officer was, their contact information, and how to file an anonymous grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the use of the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 3 of 30 days (8/30/2025, 9/4/2025, and 9/13/2025) reviewed for RN coverage.- The facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week on 8/30/2025, 9/4/2025, and 9/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not having adequate qualified personnel in case of a health crisis. Findings include:Record review of facility document titled Punch details- Report, revealed on 8/30/2025 the facility had RN coverage for 3.5 hours. On 9/4/2025 the facility had RN coverage for 7.02 hours. On 9/13/2025 the facility did not have any documented RN coverage. During an interview on 9/16/2025 at 12:29pm with the DON she stated she was responsible for ensuring the facility had RN coverage. She stated one of those days, the RN for that day was delayed at the airport and was unable to provide coverage for the rest of the day. She stated on 9/13/2025 she had been sick…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to ensure frozen pork was not stored above ready-to-eat foods in the freezer. The facility failed to ensure the window seal directly above the kitchen sink was free of dirt build-up and grime.The facility failed to ensure a container of ice used to prepare drinks for lunch, did not have a scoop stored inside of it.The facility failed to ensure all condiments had expiration or use-by dates. The facility failed to ensure a cleaning schedule was followed and monitored. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk of food contamination and food borne illness.Findings included: During the initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 09/14/25 at 11:20 AM the following were revealed: *Two packages of uncooked pork loin stored in a kitchen freezer above ready-to-eat and prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion, if the events that cause the suspicion result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the suspicion do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 16 (Resident # 37) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect.- The facility did not report to the State Agency when Resident #37, was found unresponsive and not breathing in her room on 8/3/2025. On 8/9/2025 the DON was made aware that EMS reported food in Resident #37 airway, as a possible cause for Resident #37's medical emergency. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect and eliminate the opportunity for a timely investigation by the State Agency. Findings include: Record review of Resident #37s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #32) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A utilized proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #32. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. The findings include: Record review of Resident #32's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE]. Resident #32 had a medical history of malignant neoplasm of prostate (an abnormal growth of tissue that can spread into nearby tissues and other parts of the body), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), and atrial fibrillation (a common type of irregular heart rhythm). Record review of Resident #32's quarterly MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, on facility grounds in 1 of 2 parking lots (front entrance parking lot) in that: The facility failed to ensure the trash was emptied into the dumpster for five hours. This failure could attract unwanted pests and cause the facility to have an unsightly appearance. The findings included: On 8/19/24 at 9:45 AM, an observation was made of a trashcan located near the front entrance in the front parking lot. The trashcan was observed to be full of trash which prevented the lid from closing. The trash items observed were Styrofoam food containers and cups, fast food bags, and other miscellaneous trash. On 8/19/24 at 12:29 PM, an observation was made of a trashcan located near the front entrance in the front parking lot. The trashcan was observed to be full of trash which prevented the lid from closing. The trash items observed were Styrofoam food containers and cups, fast food bags, and other miscellaneous trash. On 8/19/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the administer of the facility and to other officials including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to report a sexual incident which occurred on 05/10/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to report a sexual incident which occurred on 05/11/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #4. 3. The facility failed to report a sexual incident which occurred on 06/02/24 between Resident #5 and Resident #3. 4. The facility failed to report a sexual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 10 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence that all violations, in response to abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for 6 of 9 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to investigate a fall incident that occurred on 05/30/24 with Resident #1 while in the care of CNA E. 2. The facility failed to investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 05/10/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #3. 3. The facility failed to investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 05/11/24 between Resident #2 and Resident #4. 4. The facility failed to investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 06/02/24 between Resident #5 and Resident #3. 5. The facility failed to investigate a sexual incident that occurred on 06/02/24 between Resident #5 and Resident #6. These failures could place residents at risk of incidents not being thoroughly investigated. The findings included: 1. Findings for the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident representative when there was an incident that involved the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 9 residents reviewed for notifications. The facility failed to notify Resident's #3's representative (Family Member C) that Resident #3 had been involved in an incident of inappropriate sexual behavior that occurred on 05/10/24. This failure could affect residents by causing the resident's family to be unaware of changes in residents' condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 06/05/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), fracture to neck and left femur, anxiety disorder (increased worry), and major depressive disorder (increased sadness). Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to address, resolve and have a prompt resolution of all grievances in accordance with facility policy for 1 of 8 (Resident #1), 1 Family Member (Family Member J) and staff (CNA E). The facility failed to document, resolve, and follow up on grievances related to Resident #2's behavior on behalf of Resident #1. The facility failed to document, resolve, and follow up on grievances related to Resident #2's behavior on behalf of Family Member J. The facility failed to document, resolve, and follow up on grievances related to Resident #2's behavior on behalf of CNA E. This failure had the potential to cause residents, staff and family feelings of helplessness, diminished quality of life and at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/08/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility Staff (Administrator) failed to report the incident that occurred on 03/30/2024 and 04/04/2024 between Resident #1 and Resident #2 to the governing state agency. CNA H &I failed to report allegations of abuse to the abuse coordinator within 2 hours of incident. These failures could place the residents in the facility at risk of lacking timely reporting of incidents, risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of their property by staff members and contribute to further resident abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/08/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebral infarction (stroke), major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plan revisions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan (focus, goals and interventions) was updated to reflect his increasingly ongoing incident of physical and verbal aggressive behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 05/08/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old-male was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dementia (impaired ability to remember), depressive disorder (constant feelings of sadness), mood disorder (emotional deficit), and blindness to the right eye. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed: Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status score revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 4 staff (Dietary [NAME] A and the DM) and 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1) The DM failed to store, serve or process foods in a manner to prevent contamination 2) Dietary [NAME] A and the DM failed to properly wear hair restraints while in the food preparation area. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: On 07/16/23 at 10:52 AM, an observation of a dented can of green peas dated 07/13/23 was in the main pantry room along with the remainder of the canned items. On 07/16/23 at 10:55 AM, during an interview with the DM, she said she was responsible for ensuring that all food stored in the pantry was labeled correctly and that there were no dented cans in the pantry. The DM said she must have missed the dented can and this was why it was in the pantry. She said the staff helps her with the truck delivery, and it depends on the day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-18 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to participate in his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 5 of 15 residents ( Resident #2, Resident #9, Resident #13, Resident #21 and Resident #22) reviewed for resident rights . The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #2 prior to administering Perphenazine (is used to treat intermittent explosive disorder (impulse control disorder)). The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #9 prior to administering Seroquel (is used to treat schizoaffective disorder (false…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident's needs and preferences for 1 of 15 (Resident #24) residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #24's room was in a position which was accessible. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet dated 07/16/23 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis to include unspecified dementia (memory loss), major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 01 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed in section E Resident #24 had physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for care plans as follows: Resident #1's care plan did not accurately reflect his code status: DNR These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their Individualized needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include psychotic disorder (symptoms that affect the mind/ loss of contact with reality). Record review of Resident #13's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed: Section C Brief Interview for Mental Status score revealed a score of 11, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Record review of Resident #13's Order Summary Report dated [DATE] revealed the following: DNR ordered [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 1 of 15 (Resident #24) residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #24. These failures could place residents at risk of decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet dated 07/16/23 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis to include unspecified dementia (memory loss), major depressive disorder, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$303,179 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-01-14
- $12,740 — penalty dated 2026-01-14
- $16,543 — penalty dated 2025-07-18
- $203,177 — penalty dated 2024-06-10
- $62,438 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-12 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RALLS NH OPERATIONS, LTD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| SPORE, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| SSS HOLDINGS LP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| BRITTON, CARL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| CHEBIB, PAUL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| WOLCOTT, ROGER | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/23/2025 |
| BUCHOK, ANDREW | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/13/2025 |
| HOLCOMB, HOLLY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| STRATTON, EMILEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675407. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.