No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Plaza At Richardson

1301 Richardson Dr, Richardson, TX 75080 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (972) 759-2180 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (972) 759-2180 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (95%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
375 Municipal Dr · (972) 783-0222 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1565 N Central Expy · (972) 354-5566 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1750 Alma Rd · (214) 258-6108 · Call to confirm hours
Park
525 Malden Dr · (972) 235-8344 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.5%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.6%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.792.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.162.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 63% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.5–17.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
95.3%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 90.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 95% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. Med Aide B failed to ensure Resident #2's 8 AM medications were given on time on 01/07/26 according to facility policy.Med Aide B failed to document Resident #2's 8 AM medications were given late on 01/07/26. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving medications timely and as ordered by physician. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Consolidated Physician Orders dated 01/07/26 reflected diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Resident #2 had the following current medication orders:Order date 03/12/25 with start date 03/13/25 for Dapagliflozin Propanediol Oral Tablet 5 MG (Dapagliflozin Propanediol) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for diabetes.Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Med Aide B performed hand hygiene while administering medication to Resident #1 on 01/07/26. 2. Med Aid B failed to sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff prior to checking Resident #2's blood pressure and prior to putting it in the medication cart. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. Findings included: Observation on 01/07/26 at10:18 AM revealed Med Aide B did not sanitize the wrist blood pressure cuff nor did he wash or sanitize hands prior to checking Resident #2's blood pressure cuff on resident's wrist. Med Aide B put the blood pressure cuff on top of his medication cart. Med Aide B did not wash or sanitize hands prior to administering Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident bedside was adequately equipped to allow all residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that would relay the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for residents' call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's call light was not accessible to the resident and within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in getting assistance and of not having a means of directly contacting staff in an emergency.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, diabetes and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #2 was dependent on staff with ADLs for dressing, hygiene, toileting, bathing, positioning and transfers. Resident #2 was moderately impaired in daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed on 06/24/2025 to ensure the stand-by refrigerator opened food items were dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in refrigerator food items were dated, labeled and securely stored. 3. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer food items were dated and labeled. 4. The facility failed to ensure the dry storage food items were dated and labeled. 5. The facility failed to ensure that canned good food items were free of dents. 6. The facility failed to ensure that dishwashing protocol was followed. 7. The facility failed to ensure that prepared foods were held correctly and maintained safe temperatures. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illnesses and foodborne intoxication. Findings included: Observation on 06/24/2025 at 8:55AM upon entry to the kitchen revealed the following: In the stand-by refrigerator, a carton of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for two of the three hallways reviewed for pest control and the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure Hall 200 and 400 were free of gnat flies. The facility failed to ensure the facility's only kitchen was free of gnat flies. This failure could lead infestation of pests and compromise resident health Findings included: Observation on 06/24/2025 at 8:55AM upon entry to kitchen revealed the following: 2 gnats flying around the hand washing sink. Interview on 06/24/2025 at 9:48AM with the DM revealed that there had been a gnat issue in the kitchen. He stated that pest control is coming and that staff had currently been trying to maintain pest control by pouring bleach down the drains in the kitchen. The DM stated he had put a pest control order in for maintenance. Observation on 06/24/2025 at 9:48AM in hall 200 revealed the following: 1 gnat flying around in room [ROOM NUMBER] 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and to permit only authorized personnel to have access to one medication cart of four medication carts observed for medication security, and for one medication in one of two common areas observed for medication security. 1. The facility failed to keep a dialysis medication cart locked in Resident #40's room. On 6/24/25 at 4:00 pm an unlocked dialysis medication cart containing intravenous medications was observed in Resident #40's room and unlocked dialysis fluids were observed in the room. 2. The facility failed to keep one medication (Advair Diskus) secured in a common area near the nurse's station . On 6/24/25 at 9:06 am an unlocked and unattended Advair Diskus was observed in the common area This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of injury or harm of adverse medication reactions or side effects and placing the facility at risk for possible drug diversion.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's bedroom floor was clean of regurgitated food, on 6/24/2025, after it had been on the floor from 11:50 AM to 2:40 PM. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #52's Face Sheet dated 6-26-2025 indicated a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 9-20-2023 and a re-admission date of 6-13-2025. Resident #52 had a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the brain) and secondary diagnoses of Encephalopathy (any disease or disorder that affects the function or structure of the brain, leading to altered mental status, confusion, or changes in behavior), Malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to must ensure that a resident who is continent of bladder and bowel on admission receives services and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition is or becomes such that continence is not possible to maintain for one (the only medication room) of one medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired gentle female intermittent catheters were removed from the facility's only medication room on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and possible adverse effects. Findings included: In an interview and observation on [DATE] at 09:10 a.m., expired supplies found stored in the medication room included: 75 count - Gentle Cath Female Intermittent Catheters, unopened, manufacturer expiration date of 06-01-24 LVN A was present and stated that the medication room should have been audited for expired supplies by an ADON each day and that all expired supplies should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (the only medication room) of one medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired IV/PICC supplies were removed from the facility's only medication room on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and possible adverse effects. Findings included: In an interview and observation on [DATE] at 09:10 a.m., expired supplies found stored in the medication room included: 1 count - Insyte Autoguard IV Catheter 24 Gauge, unopened, manufacturer expiration date of 08-2018 8 count - Insyte Autoguard IV Catheter 24 Gauge, unopened, manufacturer expiration date 12-01-21 17 count - Insyte Autoguard IV Catheter 20 Gauge, unopened, manufacturer expiration date of 03-01-22 3 count…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for (Resident #65) one of one resident reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene while feeding lunch to Resident #65 on 06/24/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's face sheet, dated 06/25/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date of 09/24/24. Resident #65 had diagnoses of Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (loss of muscle mass and strength), Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (inadequate intake of food), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Hypertensive Heart Disease (a condition where the heart is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting, in that: The facility failed to report the allegation of neglect for Resident #1 to the State Agency within required reporting timeframes. This failure could place residents at risk ongoing abuse or neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/13/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Admitting diagnosis of other fracture of lower end of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine Healing (bone breaks, but there is no break in the skin over the injury; cast change or removal of external or internal fixation device, medication adjustment, other aftercare, and follow-up injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0624 — pattern
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge planning. -The facility failed to provide or document sufficient preparation for an orderly discharge of Resident #1 to a private residence and Resident #2 and Resident #3 to a nursing facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge, which could cause physical and emotional harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/27/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/16/24 with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia (loss of memory and thinking caused by a stroke), depressive episodes (mood disorder), heart disease, cerebral infarction (stroke),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on a resident's discharge goals and allowed the resident to be an active partner in the transition and development of a discharge plan for 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge planning. - The facility failed to prepare and involve Residents #1, #2, and #3 and responsible parties in an effective discharge planning process. This failure could place all residents at risk of not being an active part in their goals and discharge planning process, which could result in an unsafe discharge, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/27/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/16/24 with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia (loss of memory and thinking caused by a stroke), depressive episodes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a Grievance Official who was responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions, and leading any necessary investigations by the facility for 1 of (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for grievances. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Grievance Official was aware of a grievance for Resident #1. The Grievance Official failed to investigate a grievance for Resident #1. The facility's failure could place the residents at risk for concerns not being reported and addressed. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly assessment, dated 07/26/24, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMS score was 3. Her cognitive status was severely impaired. Her diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities that can affect a person's ability to think, remember, and make decisions). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #35) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to obtain the routine scheduled pain medication for Resident #35, who was to receive it every 4 hours, from her hospice company. Resident #35 missed 7 doses of her scheduled pain medication placing her at risk for unnecessary pain. The medications were received after surveyor inquiry. This failure could place residents who require pain medication at risk of suffering pain due to lack of medication availability. Findings included: Record review of Resident #35's admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #35's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed her diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: Observation of the facility's only kitchen on 05/07/24 at 8:37 AM, revealed the following: -1 opened jar of barbeque sauce in dry storage that had instructions to refrigerate after opening, -1 opened and exposed 25-pound bag of brown sugar, -1 plastic cup filled with peaches in the reach-in refrigerator that was covered but was not labeled or dated, -4 tomatoes in the walk-in refrigerator that appeared to be rotten with visible bruising and open holes in the flesh, -1 opened jar of jalapenos in the walk-in refrigerator that had a black substance around the lid and had a written expiration date of 11/2023, -1 opened container of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Resident #42) of six residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42 did not have access to a disposable razor. This failure could place residents at risk of injury or harm, as well as contribute to avoidable accidents. Findings included: Review of Resident #42's Face Sheet, dated 05/09/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #42's MDS Assessment, dated 04/13/24, reflected she had diagnoses including stroke (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). Resident #42 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of five residents (Resident #32) reviewed for infection control. CNA C failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #32 and between resident rooms. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #32's admission Record dated 05/09/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #32's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severe cognitive impairment, he had impaired range of motion of his arm and leg on one side and required maximum assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS Assessment reflected his diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure); peripheral vascular disease or peripheral arterial disease (reduced blood flow to arms and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for two (Residents #25 and #218) of eighteen residents reviewed for resident rights and dignity. 1. The facility failed to treat Resident #218 with dignity and respect during the discharge process from the facility to the resident's home. 2. The ADON failed to ensure Resident #25 was provided with a dignified dining experience, when she stood over him as she was assisting him in eating a lunch meal service. This failure could place residents at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: 1. Review of face sheet dated 05/10/24 documented Resident #218 was a [AGE] year-old female previously admitted on [DATE] and currently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, Anemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse of Resident #1 that occurred on 03/23/24 by CNA A, to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours of being notified. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/28/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (brain disease that causes uncontrollable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurableobjectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents, (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was updated to reflect the resident's diagnosis of prostate cancer. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving adequate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/28/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (brain disease that causes uncontrollable and unintended movements), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty with talking and language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 10 of 10 residents (Resident #5, #17, #24 #27, #34, #42, #46, #43, #45, and #48) reviewed for menus meeting resident needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and residents (Resident #5, #17, #24 #27, #34, #42, #46, #43, #45, and #48) were served pork sausage, scrambled eggs and waffles for breakfast instead of a choice of cereal, bacon, scrambled eggs and toast as indicated on the breakfast menu . 2. The facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and residents (Resident #5, #17, #24 #27, #34, #42, #46, #43, #45, and #48) were served turkey with gravy, green beans, cornbread and frosted orange cake, instead of red beans and sausage, steamed rice, mixed greens, cornbread and frosted orange cake as indicated on the lunch menu . These deficient practices could place residents at risk by contributing to dissatisfaction, poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings were: 1. Record review of the menu matrix, dated September 15, 2022, signed by the registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only (1 of 1) kitchen where all facility food was prepared. The facility failed to ensure food was dated and not expired in their kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 03/20/23 at 9:22AM of the walk in refrigerator in the kitchen revealed 6 bags which contained 12 hamburger buns in each bag with no expiration date, 2 bags of honey wheat bread with no expiration date and 14 bags of hotdog buns with 12 hot dog buns in each bag with no expiration date. Observation on 03/21/23 at 9:30 AM of the walk-in refrigerator revealed 14 bags of hot dog buns, 6 hamburger bun bags and 2 loafs of bread which were not dated with expiration dates. Interview at 9:43 AM on 03/20/23 with the Dietary Manager, who stated today was his first day and he did not know what he had walked into. The Dietary Manager stated it was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan, and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 08 of 10 residents (Residents #5, #17, #27, #34, #42, #43, #45, and #46 ) reviewed for activities. 1. The facility failed to provide activities to residents who resided in the facility. 2. The facility failed to provide activities to residents who resided on the facility's secured unit. These failures could place residents at risk for decline in social and mental psychosocial well-being due to the lack of ongoing activities. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/20/23 revealed no activities took place in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional for one (the Activity Director) of one Activity Director reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to ensure the Activity Director was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for a reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings include: Observation on 3/20/23 revealed no activities took place in the common area or residents rooms between 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM . Observation on 03/21/23 at 2:45 PM revealed no March activity calendar posted in residents' rooms. Observation on 03/21/23 at 3:00 PM revealed no March activity calendar were posted in common areas. Observation on 3/21/23 revealed no activities in common area or resident's rooms took…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, except when waived, they used the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (for 26 days out of 90 days reviewed) and designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis (from 12/11/22 to 1/4/23 and 2/6/23 to 3/8/23). 1. The facility failed to designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis from 12/11/22 to 1/4/23 and 2/6/23 to 3/8/23. 2. The facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse to provide eight consecutive hours of RN coverage, seven days a week for 26 days between 12/01/22 to 03/19/23. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters. Findings include: 1. Record review of an undated and untitled sheet of paper, provided by the RNC, on 03/23/23, reflected the facility had a designated DON on the following dates: - DON Z 9/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for three residents (Residents #40, #37 and #26) of five residents reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. 1. The facility failed to follow-up on a recommendation from the pharmacist regarding Resident #40's PRN psychotropic medications (Haldol [Haloperidol] and Lorazepam). 2. The facility failed to follow-up on a recommendation from the pharmacist regarding Resident #40's medications (lactobacillus, hyoscyamine, and baclofen) that were listed to be given orally although the resident was NPO. 3. The facility failed to follow-up on a recommendation from the pharmacist regarding Resident #37's Depakote and Risperidone when the diagnoses were not approved indications. 4. The facility failed to follow-up on a recommendation from the pharmacist regarding Resident #37's Risperidone and Depakote GDR's that were due. 5. The facility failed to follow-up on a recommendation from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs for three (Residents #40, #37 and #2) of five residents whose records were reviewed for psychotropic drugs, in that: 1. Resident #40 had an order for the antianxiety medication lorazepam as needed on 08/10/22 and the order did not include an end date after 14 days. 2. Resident #40 had an order for the antipsychotic medication haloperidol as needed on 11/08/22 and the order did not include an end date after 14 days. 3. Resident #37 had an order for the antipsychotic medication Risperdal for a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis, which was not an appropriate indication for use. 4. Resident #37 had an order for the anticonvulsant medication Depakote for a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, which was not an appropriate indication for use. 5. Resident #2 had an order for the antianxiety medication lorazepam as needed on 12/06/22 and the order did not include an end date after 14 days. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 27%, based on 18 errors of 66 opportunities, which involved two of six residents (Residents #12 and #14) and 1 of 2 staff observed during medication administration for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure the medications were administered per the physician orders for Residents #12 and #14. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings include: 1. A record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 3/23/23, revealed an admission date of 7/22/19 with diagnoses which included Covid 19, hypertension, pain, anemia, anxiety, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and vitamin D deficiency. A record review of Resident #12's annual MDS assessment, dated 3/5/23, revealed Resident #12 was an [AGE] year-old male with a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for three (Residents #36,#34, and #40) of five residents reviewed for clinical records. 1. The facility failed to document on Resident #36's MAR/NAR that he had received his prescribed medications. 2. The facility failed to document on Resident #34's MAR/NAR that he had received his prescribed medications. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #40's physician's orders for lactobacillus, hyoscyamine, and baclofen were written to be given NPO and not orally. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate medical records that could affect monitoring and medical services provided. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included seizures, osteomyelitis, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility with more than 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one Social Worker reviewed employment , in that: The facility, licensed for 124 beds, did not employ a full-time, qualified social worker since 02/28/23. This deficient practice could result in residents' social service needs not being met. The findings included: Record review of facility's license revealed the facility had a licensed capacity of 124 residents. Record review of the Facility Assessment, last revised 01/28/23, under Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies reflected: 3.1 Identify the type of staff members, other health care professionals, and medical practitioners that are needed to provide support and care for residents .Administration (e.g., Social Services). Review of the facility's employee list revealed the SW's name crossed out with no longer here above that area. Review of the SW's personnel file revealed she was hired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for two (Residents #36 and #16) of eight residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B completed hand hygiene while performing incontinent care for Resident #16. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN U performed hand hygiene while performing wound care for Resident #36. These failures could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included Alzheimer's, difficulty walking, type 2 diabetes, dementia, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #16's most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/04/23, reflected he had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe impaired cognition. The review further reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity for one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for dignity in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's urinary catheter drainage bag had a dignity/privacy cover. This deficient practice affected residents who had indwelling urinary catheters and placed them at risk for dignity. The findings include: Review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included major depressive disorder, retention of urine, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #34's most recent Significant Change in Status MDS assessment, dated 02/27/23, reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #34's care plan did not address the use of a privacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for medication administration in that: The facility failed to ensure medications via feeding tube were not crushed and mixed together when being administered to Resident #40. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dosage and drug diversion. Findings included: Review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, and tachycardia . Review of Resident #40's physician's orders reflected: Enteral Feed Order every shift Isosource 1.5 continuous feed @ 60 ml/hr for 22 hours via g tube. Observation on 03/20/23 at 09:20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to assure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for one (Resident #40) of five residents reviewed for labeling and storage, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's tube feeding formula was labeled with the correct resident's name on it. This deficient practice could affect residents prescribed medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, and tachycardia . Review of Resident #40's physician's orders reflected: Enteral Feed Order every shift Isosource 1.5 continuous feed @ 60 ml/hr for 22 hours via g tube. Observation on 03/20/23 at 10:00 AM of Resident #40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to provide 2 of 10 residents (Resident #45 and #43) reviewed with food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs a physician ordered therapeutic diet. 1. The facility failed to follow Resident #43 physician ordered for no pork. 2. The facility failed to follow Resident #45 dietician ordered mechanical soft texture as ordered by the dietician. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of weight loss or other medical problems. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 03/23/23, revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on 06/2022 with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel.) and gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (occurs when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach) Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-03-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted as required. The facility failed to post the daily staffing information posting from 03/20/23 to 03/22/23. This failure could place the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the daily nurse staffing data and facility census. Findings included: Observation on 03/20/23 at 11:00 AM in the facility revealed there was no daily staffing information posted. Observation on 03/21/23 at 2:20 PM in the facility revealed there was no daily staffing information posted. In an interview on 03/21/23 at 2:32 PM with the DON revealed she was not sure where the daily staffing information was posted and could not find it either. The DON said she found out that no one was posting it and she was not sure whose responsibility it was. The DON said the purpose of the posting was to let everyone know how many staff were working . In an interview on 03/21/23 at 2:35 PM with the RNC revealed the previous staffing coordinator was responsible for posting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/27/2015
BING, ERICIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/01/2022
CASTANEDA, EDMUNDOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/10/2022
CERISE, FREDERICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/27/2015
CRYER, BYRONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/04/2023
FURNISS, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/01/2022
GONZALEZ, REINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/02/2022
HALL, VINCENTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/18/2023
MIGUEZ, RAMONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/11/2020
MINNER, FARIDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/01/2022
PALACIOS, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/01/2018
PETTY, MARJORIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/02/2021
PROCTOR, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/17/2019
SUTTER, LISAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/01/2020
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
RICHARDSON I ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
HASSAN, SYEDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MIRZA, MUHAMMADIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 12%Other / private 15%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$292per resident / day
operating cost
$8,870per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$234per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next