Avir at San Antonio
50 Briggs Ave., San Antonio, TX 78224 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (210) 921-0184 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,494 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.4% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.9% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.48 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 34.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.8–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 34.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 8.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.8–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 94.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.07 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.73 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.06 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #9 and #63) reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. Resident #9 was observed with her own smoking paraphernalia which included a lighter (a self-contained ignition source used to lite cigarettes) and was observed smoking on the facility property without supervision and or at the assigned agreed upon times for supervised smoking. 2. Resident #106 was discovered with smoking paraphernalia which included a lighter and cigarettes, and was actively smoking, while receiving oxygen therapy, in his bathroom twice, once on 8/12/2025 and again on 8/21/2025. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 6/13/2025 and ended on 8/25/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure provided food was prepared in the proper form to meet residents needs for 1 of 6 residents reviewed, (Resident #1), reviewed for food form. On 7/21/24 the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was given the correct physician-ordered diet texture of a meal which led to choking. An IJ was identified on 07/22/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:07 pm. While the IJ was removed on 07/26/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of choking, decline in health and death. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record documented a [AGE] year-old female first admitted to facility on 09/26/06 with latest admission on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1's room) of 12 resident rooms reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to ensure there were no pests in Resident #1's room on 9/5/25.This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm due to diminished quality of life and/or physical harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 9/20/25, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Muscle Weakness, Polyneuropathies (disorder affecting multiple peripheral nerves, causing damage/dysfunction), and history of other diseases of the nervous system and sense organs] .Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition.Record review of Resident #1's Progress Notes revealed: 9/5/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 and Resident #5.The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #3, and #4 had a completed comprehensive care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services needed to meet individualized needs.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 05/08/26 documented an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 04/20/26. Diagnoses included sepsis, unspecified organism (a life-threatening emergency condition where the body has a severe systemic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours for 1 of 1 provider investigation reports reviewed for freedom of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident within 2 hours of the incident occurring on 2/20/26. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse.The findings include: Record review of the provider investigation report dated 02/27/2026 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation that stated the incident occurred on 02/20/2026 at 9:30am and was reported to HHS on 02/20/2026 at 12:30pm. During an interview on 05/07/2026 at 6:07 p.m., the ADM stated they were in charge of reports made to HHS and that alleged abuse needs to be reported within 2 hours. The ADM confirmed they submitted the provider investigation report, regarding the resident-to-resident altercation, to the state after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have the comprehensive care plan reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #7's care plan after a change in behavior. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and treatment.The findings include: Record review of Resident #7's admission sheet dated 05/05/2026 documented a [AGE] year-old male with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with early onset (progressive memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes). Record review of Resident #7's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 9 of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of a provider investigation report dated 02/27/2026 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation involving Resident #7 that stated the incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 (Resident #6) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not have medication in their room. These failures could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission sheet dated 05/05/2026 documented a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent unspecified (mood disorder characterized by repeated episodes of depression without specifying severity or particular features). Record review of Resident #6's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Record review of Resident #6's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #6) for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing were not touching the floor These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.The findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission sheet dated 05/05/2026 documented a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent unspecified (mood disorder characterized by repeated episodes of depression without specifying severity or particular features). Record review of Resident #6's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition and revealed Resident #6 had an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to review and revise Resident #1's comprehensive care plan after the resident's quarterly assessment dated [DATE] and annual assessment dated [DATE].This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care to meet their physical, psychosocial and functional needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, accessed on 12/18/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again 08/22/2025 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with early onset (a progressive disease, where dementia symptoms gradually worsen over a number of years), vascular dementia (a common form of dementia caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events resulted in serious bodily injury for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting.The facility failed to report to the state survey agency that Resident #1 sustained an injury as a result of ants in her bed on 9/5/25.This failure could place residents at risk for neglect, diminished quality of life, physical, and/or psychosocial harm.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 9/20/25, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Muscle Weakness, Polyneuropathies (disorder affecting multiple peripheral nerves, causing damage/dysfunction), and history of other diseases of the nervous system and sense organs.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from chemical restraints not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #60) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 received a gradual dose reduction for anti-psychotic medication, Zyprexa. This deficient practice could affect any resident receiving medications and could result in adverse effects and ultimately a decline in physical condition.The findings were:Review of Resident #60's face sheet dated 8/30/35 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, Mood disorder due to known physiological condition with mixed features and Generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #60's History and Physical, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #9 and #63) reviewed for allegations of neglect. 1. Resident #9 was observed with her own smoking paraphernalia which included a lighter (a self-contained ignition source used to light cigarettes) and was observed smoking on the facility property without supervision and or at the assigned agreed upon times for supervised smoking.2. Resident #63 was discovered with smoking paraphernalia which included a lighter and cigarettes, and was actively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #91 and Resident #106) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. 1. Facility staff failed to identify, respond, and act upon Resident #91's critical lab, glucose (blood sugar) level of 40 received on 8/14/25. 2. Facility staff failed to follow Resident #106's transferring physicians orders for eye patch/assistance, monitoring for potential adverse reactions to medications, and his physician's prescribed lab orders. These deficient practices could affect any resident and could contribute to the decline of the resident's health statuses. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #91's face sheet, dated 8/28/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0773 — patternProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges for 1 (Resident #91) of 16 residents whose medical records were reviewed for lab work. Facility staff failed to identify, respond, and act upon Resident #91's critical lab, glucose (blood sugar) level of 40 received on 8/14/25. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to the decline of the resident's health statuses. The findings were:Record review of Resident #91's face sheet, dated 8/28/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) without complications and Major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild ( pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities). Record review of Resident #91's admission MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for disposal of garbage. The facility's dumpster presented with 1 30-gallon bag of trash besides the garbage dumpster and scattered garbage surrounding the dumpster area. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced health status and degraded morale. The findings included: During an observation on 8/28/2025 at 10:13 AM revealed the facility's dumpster concrete pad had a large steel dumpster with the sliding doors opened. Further observation revealed a 30-gallon plastic bag filled with garbage on the concrete besides the dumpster. Further review revealed scattered trash surrounding the dumpster. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:22 AM the HK manager stated the dumpster was utilized by the dietary staff, nursing staff, and the housekeeping staff. The HK manager stated the expectation for the staff was for all trash to be placed in the dumpster and for the dumpster doors to be closed when not in use. The HK manager stated the surrounding area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status (that is, a deterioration in health status, (status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #91) whose records were reviewed. LVN W failed to notify Resident #91's physician on 8/14/25 when he received a critical lab reflecting Resident #91's blood sugar was 40. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment and a decline in the resident's physical condition. The findings were:Review of Resident #91's face sheet, dated 8/28/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) without complications and Major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild (pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure in normally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #76) whose MDS records were reviewed.MDS Coordinator/LVN T failed to include in Resident #76's MDS assessment that she had lost weight in the last 6 months. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services as needed.The findings were:Record review of Resident #76's face sheet, dated 8/30/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet and other lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #76's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS score was 12 of 15 reflective of moderate cognitive impairment and she was dependent on staff for all ADL's. Further review revealed it did not reflect she had lost weight during July 2025. Record review of Resident #76's Care Plan, dated 7/16/25, revealed she had a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of a resident's admission and failed to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to, initial goals based on admission and physician orders for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #104), reviewed for comprehensive resident centered care plans. Resident #104's baseline care plan dated 8/23/25 did not include her diagnoses, contact isolation for MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus bacteria) to her wound, and did not have interventions and goals for 5 of 5 days during the survey period. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their individualized needed care and services.The findings were: Record review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 6 Residents (Resident #76 and Resident #91) reviewed for care plans . The facility failed to include in Resident #76's comprehensive care plan that she had a self-performance deficit, and she was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.The facility failed to include in Resident #91's comprehensive care plan that he had diabetes mellitus and received insulin on a regular basis. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services as needed. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #76's face sheet, dated 8/30/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #54) whose records were reviewed. Nursing staff failed to apply a splint on Resident #54's right arm/wrist as tolerated for a right-hand contracture for 5 days, during the survey process. This deficient practice could affect residents with range of motion deficits and could contribute and result in a resident's decrease in their range of motion. The findings were: Review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 8/30/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular dementia (describing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to your brain), moderate, withoutbehavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for expired foods. The facility stored 13, 46 ounce, containers of thickened orange juice which were expired by 17 days. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included:During an observation on 8/26/2025 at 9:15 AM revealed the facility's kitchen pantry stored 13 46 oz. containers of thickened orange with manufactures labeling which included, best if used by [DATE]. During an interview on 8/26/2025 at 9:18 AM [NAME] G stated the thickened orange juice was stored in the pantry and was available for residents. The cook stated all staff were responsible for reviewing foods for expiration dates. The cook reviewed the thickened orange juice and stated the juice was expired and should not be stored and available for service. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #30), reviewed for infection control, in that: Resident #30 was provided high contact care and transferred from her bed to her wheelchair without the use of the appropriate EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) on 8/27/25. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination. The findings were: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 8/27/25 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. Resident #30's diagnoses included Sacral spina bifida with hydrocephalus (a neural tube defect where the spinal column doesn't close completely, and buildup of excess cerebrospinal fluid in the brain), colostomy status (surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all necessary information, including a resident's discharge summary or a 30-day written discharge notice was completed to ensure a safe and effective transition of care for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for safe transfer or discharge. 1. The facility failed to provide a notification of transfer notice in written form and in a manner that Resident #1 and Resident #1's RP/POA could understand prior to Resident discharge on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to record the reasons for the transfer in Resident #1's medical record when discharged on 05/16/2025. 3. The facility failed to provide a 30-day written notice of transfer to Resident #1 and to the facility's ombudsman prior to Resident #1's discharged from the facility on 05/16/2025. This failure could result in residents experiencing psychosocial harm (feelings of anger and sadness) due to inappropriate discharges and placed residents at risk of being discharged without alternate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) reviewed for accurate assessments: Resident #2's BIMS & PHQ assessment dated [DATE] were completed during the time when resident was hospitalized , and resident interview was not completed. Resident #3's BIMS & PHQ assessments dated 10/15/2024 were completed during the time when resident was hospitalized , and resident interview was not completed. Resident #4's BIMS & PHQ assessments dated 03/03/2025 were completed during the time when resident was hospitalized , and resident interview was not completed. Resident #5's BIMS & PHQ assessments dated 03/31/2025 were completed during the time when resident was hospitalized , and resident interview was not completed. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate assessments due to completing assessments without resident interview. The findings included: Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 (Residents #6-12) of 9 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to implement the required elements for transmission based precautions, including signage and readily available PPE, for Residents #6-11. 2. The facility failed to don appropriate PPE while performing an invasive procedure on Resident #12. These failures could cause the spread of infection and illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included dementia (a progress disorder that impairs the thought processes, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and decision-making); colostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen for output of stool) status; viral hepatitis C (a viral infection causing liver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (100/200 hall crash cart) out of 2 crash carts and 1 (Resident #18) out of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. 1. Facility night nurses did not initial on the crash cart supply verification sheet after checking supplies inside the 100/200 hall crash cart on 04/08/2025, 04/09/2025, 04/10/2025, 04/16/2025, 04/17/2025, and 04/18/2025. 2. Facility medication aide-C did not document exact times when she administered Resident #18's medications on the resident's medication administration record. This failure placed residents at risk for missed treatment and medications which could result in decline in heal and well-being. Findings included: 1. Observation on 05/06/2025 at 4:00 p.m. revealed there were two crash carts located at the 100/200 hall nursing station and 300/400 hall nursing station, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received wound care on 3/18/2025 and 3/19/2025 when the Treatment Nurse failed to re-approach or assess the reason for a refusal to complete wound care throughout the shift and failed to pass along to the next shift when a dressing change was refused on 3/18/2025. In addition, the Treatment Nurse failed to attempt wound care the following day which resulted in missed wound care on 3/18/2025 and 3/19/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received wound care on 3/18/2025 when the Treatment Nurse failed to attempt wound care multiple times and failed to pass along to the next shift when Resident #4 missed wound care on 3/18/2025. These deficient practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #50, Resident #74 and Resident #138) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 had an order for bed rails and was care planned for the rails on her bed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 care plan reflected he had a catheter. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #138 care plan reflected he had a catheter. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #50's admission record, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails for 3 residents of 8 residents (Resident #16, Resident #50, and Resident #138) reviewed for use of side or bed rails in that: The facility did not ensure Resident #16, #50, and #138 were assessed for risk of entrapment from bed rails before they were installed and did not have a signed informed consent from his responsible party for the bed rails. This failure could affect residents who use bed or side rails as enablers and could result in entrapment. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #16's admission record, dated 7/25/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] and with diagnoses including myocardial infarction, dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis, major depressive disorder recurrent severe without psychotic features, seizures, and need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 62.96%, based on 17 errors out of 27 opportunities which involved 3 of 8 residents (Resident #16, Resident #63 and Resident #79) reviewed for medication administration and medication errors. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received her medications on time. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 received her medications on time and received her bumetanide (used to reduce extra fluid in the body (edema) caused by conditions such as heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease) as ordered. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79 received his medications on time. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #16's admission record, dated 7/25/24, revealed a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one laundry room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to properly dispose and maintain the lint accumulation in the facility dryers in a timely manner. This failure could put residents at risk for an unsafe and unsanitary environment. Findings included: Observation on 7/25/24 at 10:50 AM of facility's laundry room revealed there were three (3) dryers that were in use at that time. Observation of the lint collector area beneath two (2) dryers revealed a layer of thick lint about 1 inch thick accumulated on the top of lint trap and some lint at the bottom of the dryers. Interview on 7/25/24 at 11:50 AM with the laundry aide stated there was no laundry log for tracking cleaning the laundry lint traps. The [NAME] aide stated she last cleaned the lint traps at 6:00 a.m. that morning. The Laundry aide stated she is supposed to clean them after every two loads,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an assessment which accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #52 and #138) reviewed for assessments. 1. The facility failed to indicate Resident #138 had an indwelling catheter on their MDS. 2. The facility failed to indicate Resident #52 was receiving Dialysis and oxygen services on her MDS. These failures could result in inadequate care due to an incomplete assessment of the residents' physical status. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #138's face sheet dated 7/23/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, unspecified hydronephrosis, acute kidney injury, and acute cystitis with hematuria. Record review of Resident #138's care plan, revised 07/16/2024, revealed the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to bowel incontinence with interventions to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C of this part to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #8 and Resident #35). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening indicating diagnoses of mental illness and refer the residents to the state local authority for an evaluation. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening indicating diagnoses of mental illness and refer the resident to the state local authority for an evaluation. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #8's admission record, dated 7/23/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 2 of 8 Residents (Resident #68 and Resident #71) whose records were reviewed. 1. Resident #68's Care Plan was not updated after his significant change MDS reflected he was dependent on staff for ADL care. 2. Resident #71's Care Plan was not updated after he experienced a change of condition and developed a venous ulcer to his left shin. These deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to Residents not receiving the care and services they needed. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #68's face sheet, dated 7/25/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral infarction (Stroke), unspecified and Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unspecified, Review of Resident #68's significant change MDS assessment, dated 5/14/24, revealed Resident #68 was dependent on staff for all ADL care. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #69) whose records were reviewed for falls. CNA E and CNA F failed to use a gait belt properly by applying a gait belt over Resident #69's breast instead of around her waistline during a bed to wheelchair transfer. LVN G failed to use a gait belt while transferring Resident #69 from the wheelchair to the bed. These deficient practices could affect any residents who required assistance with transfers and could contribute to an avoidable fall/injury. The findings were: Review of Resident 69's face sheet, dated 7/25/24 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia with other behavior disturbance, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Congestive Heart Failure. Review of Resident #69's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was unable to complete the BIMS assessment; was dependent on staff for sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 resident (Resident #74's and #138) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's catheter was off the floor and protect from potential contaminants on the floor and from staff stepping on the catheter bag and tubing. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #138 had physician orders to care for his catheter and daily care was performed and documented. This deficient practice could place residents with in dwelling urinary catheters at-risk for urinary tract infections and/or pain. The findings were: 1. Record Review of Resident #74's admission record, dated 7/26/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required. The Dietary Manager (DM) did not have the appropriate certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This deficient practice could place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. The findings included: Record review of the DM's personnel file revealed the hire date for the DM was 10/02/23. Further review of this personnel file, which included the DM's resume, did not reveal the DM was: (A) A certified dietary manager; or (B) A certified food service manager; or (C) Had similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #138) reviewed for hospice services, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's most recent Physician Certification of Terminal Illness and Hospice election form were completed and part of the hospice documents. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #138's Physician Certification of Terminal Illness was completed, the most recent plan of care was available at the facility, and hospice physician orders were available and at the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 2 of 8 residents care (Resident #74 and Resident #81) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's fall mat was clean. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E performed hand hygiene between glove changes while administering Resident #81's bolus tube feeding. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infections. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #74's admission record, dated 7/26/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, urinary tract infection, need for assistance with personal care, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 nutrition rooms (South Hall nutrition room) reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: The facility failed to remove expired food from the South Hall nutrition room. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illnesses. The findings included: Observation on 5/31/23 at 3:22 PM revealed 1 jar of peanut butter dated EXP 08/17/21, 1 box of snack chips dated SELL BY [DATE], 3 sodas dated [DATE], an additional 2 bags of potato chips each dated 1 [DATE], a bag of cookies dated [DATE], and an additional food container dated [DATE] within the cabinets of the nourishment room by the nurse's station in the south hall. Interview on 5/31/23 at 3:29 PM, the DON stated the responsibility of the nourishment rooms was shared between nursing and dietary where the refrigerators, daily snacks being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-08-30 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had reports with respect to any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respecting the facility during the 3 preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility, available for any individual to review upon request. The facility failed to ensure all survey results for the previous 3 years were available in the survey binder for residents and their family or legal representative or legal representative to examine. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a violation of their rights. The findings were:Observation and interview on 8/29/25 at 10:07 AM revealed 7 unsampled residents attended the resident council meeting. Interview with the 7 unsampled residents revealed they did not know where to review the survey results. They did not know where they were located. Observation and record review on 8/29/25 at 12:09 PM in the facility lobby revealed a survey sign by the timeclock stating the survey binder with survey results was in the first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations interviews and record reviews and in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to ensure their medical records were maintained complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 92 of 92 residents reviewed for readily accessible and systematically organized medical records. On July 31st, 2025, the facility stopped using an electronic medical record database and began using paper charts to provide care for their residents and on 8/26/2025 the facility had a disorganized and decentralized medical records for their census of 92 residents. These failures could have potentially placed residents at risk for harm by disorganized and decentralized medical records. The findings included:The findings included: During an interview on 8/26/2025 at 10:00 the Administrator, the DON, and the ADON stated their census was 92 and currently the facility was using paper charts related to the facility's change over from the previous electronic medical record database platform to a new medical record database platform.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-30 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify and send a copy of the residents' discharge notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when the facility transferred or discharged a resident under any circumstances for 1 of 6 months (July 2025) reviewed for discharge notices. The BOM failed to provide a copy of a list of residents who were discharged from the facility during July 2025 to the State Ombudsman. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided their right to discuss their options with the State Ombudsman. The findings were:Review of the facility transfer/discharge log from January 2025 through July 2025 revealed the list of residents transferred during July 2025 was not available as part of the notices that were sent to the State Ombudsman. Interview on 8/29/25 at 3:31 PM with the facility State Ombudsman stated she received discharges notice through June 2025 but had not received the discharge notices for July 2025. She also stated she had not received discharge notices for any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,494 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-08-30
- $11,180 — penalty dated 2025-08-30
- $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $441K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455713. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.