No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at San Knoll

5757 N. Knoll, San Antonio, TX 78240 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (210) 699-8535 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$27,710 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $27,710 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5757 N Knoll · (210) 699-8535 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8602 Huebner Rd · (210) 691-0174 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5500 Babcock Rd · (210) 444-9882 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Babcock Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.4%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.1%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%88.0%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.912.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.432.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.8–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
75.0%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 72 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for adequate supervision in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received supervision during mealtimes to prevent choking or aspiration. An IJ was identified on 4/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:19 PM. While the IJ was removed on 04/14/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a severity of potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of choking, weight loss, decline in health, and death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and to provide care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes, maintains, or enhances his or her quality of life 2 of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide a dignified and respectful dining experience for Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 6/10/2026 during feeding assistance by standing in front of them. This failure could result in the loss of dignity of residents and decreased quality of life. The findings included: During an observation on 6/10/2026 at 1:09 PM, two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) were observed being fed by CNA A and LVN B at the nurse's station. CNA A was standing in front of Resident #1 who was seated in a chair. LVN B was standing in front of Resident #2 who was seated in a chair. During an interview on 6/10/2026 at 1:32 PM, CNA A said feeding assistance was a part of his daily responsibilities. He said that he received training on assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 8 (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received respect and dignity when CNA F was observed using the word exorcist via electronic monitoring. This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm, feeling disrespected or uncomfortable, decreased self-esteem, impaired quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 5/18/26, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (a gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, cramping, bloating, diarrhea and/or constipation) , Malignant Neoplasm (Uncontrollable cell growth that destroy body tissue) of left ovary, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had the right to secure and confidential personal and clinical records for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for Privacy and Confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure resident clinical information was not discussed in other resident rooms and/or during electronic monitoring for Resident #9. This failure could result in residents' personal information being exposed to unauthorized individuals.Findings included: Record review on 5/19/26 of resident electronic monitoring video, dated 5/10/26 at 6:06 pm, revealed CNA F was giving report to CNA C about Resident #1 and Resident #9 in Resident #1's room, while the resident was in the room and the resident's electronic monitoring was active. During an interview on 5/19/26 at 9:07 a.m., CNA F said she was not aware if she had discussed resident information in resident rooms, adding if that were the case numbers were used instead of resident names. CNA F further stated she was currently unfamiliar with the residents' names and used case numbers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The facility failed to ensure transfers performed using a mechanical lift were completed by two staff members as per facility policy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of falls and or accidents causing injuries.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 5/18/26, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (a gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, cramping, bloating, diarrhea and/or constipation) , Malignant Neoplasm (Uncontrollable cell growth that destroy body tissue) of left ovary, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions) , Dementia (group of thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 4 medication carts (MC #1 and MC#2) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure that MC #1 and MC #2 in public areas were locked on 5/19/26. This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings included: During observation on 5/19/26 at 4:50 a.m., MC #1 was observed to be unlocked and unattended on the Rosewood hall, medication bottles and medication blister packs were noted in the drawers of the medication cart. During an interview with LVN B on 5/19/26 at 4:52 a.m., she said the medication cart was not supposed to be unlocked because residents could access the medications. During observation on 5/19/26 at 7:20 a.m., MC #2 was observed to be unlocked and unattended on the Brentwood Hall, medication bottles and medication blister…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to clean towels for showers for 4 of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #10 and Resident #12) reviewed for available linen. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #12 had clean towels available to them to shower.This failure could lead to residents feeling neglected, infection control concerns, and emotional well-being.The findings include:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/22/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male that admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Morbid Obesity (a chronic, complex disease defined by a body mass index of 40 or higher, or 35 or higher with serious obesity-related comorbidities); Psychoactive Substance Abuse; and Major Depressive Disorder (serious mental health condition characterized by persistent, severe low mood, loss of interest in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #12) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #12 regularly obtained showers, per resident rights. This failure could place residents at risk for altered social experiences, minimized emotional well-being, and infection control issues.The findings include:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/22/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old-male that admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Morbid Obesity (a chronic, complex disease defined by a body mass index of 40 or higher, or 35 or higher with serious obesity-related comorbidities); Psychoactive Substance Abuse; and Major Depressive Disorder (serious mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability, attractiveness, and appetizing foods. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for residents related to cold, soggy shrimp and warm coleslaw. The temperature of the items on the meal tray were not within regulated safety guidelines to ensure residents are not exposed to hazardous bacterial growth.This failure could place residents at risk of a decrease in food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss.The findings included:During confidential resident interviews at an undisclosed date and time, multiple residents in a hallway stated that they ate in their rooms for meals and the food was always cold. Residents lived on two different halls and wanted to remian anonymous.Durning an observation on 04/22/2026 at 11:27 am, CNA A was pushing a meal tray cart down the 100 hall with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 halls (100 and 200 halls) for room trays and 1 of 1dining room reviewed, in that:1. On 04/22/2026, the facility failed to ensure CNA A sanitized her hands between resident meal trays while passing out room trays for 2 of 2 halls.2. On 04/22/2026, the facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized her hands between resident trays in the dining room while checking trays for accuracy and passing out trays for staff to deliver to tables for 12 of 23 residents.3. On 4/23/2026, the facility failed to ensure CNA A sanitized her hands between resident meal trays while passing out room trays for 2 of 2 halls.4. On 04/23/2026, facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized her hands between resident trays in the dining room while checking trays for accuracy and passing out trays for staff to deliver to tables for 10 of 25 residents. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and the spread of infection.The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that they established and maintained identical policies and practices regarding transfer, discharge and the provision of services under the State plan for all residents regardless of payment source as well as failing to ensure the residents were free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his or her rights and to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights as required for 1(Resident #2) of 1 residents reviewed.The facility failed to allow and assist Resident #2 to exercise his right to discharge from the facility to an outside provider per his request.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's rights to be free from interference from the facility were respected.This failure placed Resident #2 at risk of low self-esteem, increase in depression symptoms, breakthrough of repeat suicidal ideation and embarrassment due to facility's accusation of resident not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's respect and dignity for 5 of 19 residents observed in dining room. The facility failed to provide a dignified and respectful dining experience for each resident in the dining room by allowing residents to watch their tablemates eat or be fed, and/or have their meals placed in front of them but they were not able to feed themselves due to physical or mental handicaps for extended periods of time. This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment, low self-esteem, anxiety, or potential weight loss.The findings include:During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 12:10 pm, the surveyor observed a plate of food in front of an unknown resident in dining room. The resident appeared to need assistance to eat. The food was uncovered in front of resident until 12:22 pm when a staff member sat down next to resident to feed them. CNA D confirmed resident needed feeding assistance.During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 12:17 pm, the surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had successfully completed a State-approved training course for feeding assistance before feeding resident who required staff to feed them for 3 of 7 unknown residents in the dining room over 3-day period of observations.The facility did not ensure that the Administrator and the Medical Records clerk completed a state approved training course for feeding assistance before assisting residents to eat.This failure could place residents who require assistance with eating at risk of aspiration and choking.Findings include:During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 12:10pm, the surveyor observed the MR clerk assisting an unknown resident to eat. Unknown resident appeared to have bilateral upper extremities weakness and contractures. CNA D confirmed unknown resident needed feeding assistance.During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 12:10 pm, the surveyor observed the ADMIN assisting an unknown resident to eat. Unknown resident was sitting upright in specialized chair. Unknown resident did not make any effort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 (hall 100 exit door) exit doors reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. The facility failed the ensure the exit door alarm on hall 100 was not turned off where 14 of 47 residents resided. This failure could place residents who are exit seeking at risk for elopement and possible injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident List Report, dated 03/07/2026, revealed the facility had 14 residents located on 100 hall and a total of 47 residents. During an observation on 03/07/2026 from 11:55 a.m. to 12:49 p.m. hall 100 was observed to have two staff members working in the hallway and four (4) resident room doors open with two (2) residents in beds and two (2) residents in their wheelchairs. The residents observed were not self-ambulating (walking on their own) or moving their wheelchairs on their own. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) and 1 of 1 staff (LPN A) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LPN A wore appropriate PPE for EBP during wound care for Resident #1 on 03/07/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 03/07/2026, reflected Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old. Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report, dated 03/07/2026, reflected Resident #1 diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a condition when blood supply to a part of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to people and services inside and outside the facility for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was checked on frequently and kept clean and dignified. This failure could affect residents who have incontinence and unsanitary behaviors and could result in diminished self-esteem.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness (reduction in strength in one or more muscles, making it harder to move or perform tasks), major depressive disorder (serious mood disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment to receiving treatment and support for daily living safety for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for safe and clean environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room which had urine and feces on the sticky floor was cleaned as required to provide a safe and clean environment. This failure could affect residents who have incontinence and unsanitary behaviors and could result in disease spread and accidents. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness (reduction in strength in one or more muscles, making it harder to move or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 residents (Resident #1 and #2) of 10 residents reviewed for neglect and misappropriation. 1. The facility failed to report Resident #1's missing Tramadol and Tylenol #3 while he was out on leave on Thanksgiving to the ADM who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #2 that reflected she had a colostomy and required monitoring and care. This facility failure could affect residents who require care in the facility and could result in missed or inappropriate care.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), acute pain due to trauma (sudden or urgent pain that occurs as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 resident (Resident #4) of 5 residents reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was provided with a smoking apron during a smoke break. This facility failure could affect residents who smoke at the facility and could result in injury and harm.The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's electronic face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: benign neoplasm of parotid gland (non-cancerous tumor), vascular dementia (caused by conditions such as stroke, resulting in problems with memory, thinking and behavior), and mild intellectual disabilities (general learning disability). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected he could understand and be understood. He scored 13 of 15 on his BIMS which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Tramadol and Tylenol #3 were accounted for when he left to go out on pass on Thanksgiving (11/27/2025). This facility failure could affect residents who take narcotics for pain and could result in misappropriation of medications or drug diversion.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 12/16/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is insufficient oxygen delivery to the tissues leading to low oxygen in the blood), muscle weakness (lack of muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain, an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had EBP implemented when she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a stage 4 wound to her coccyx which required treatment and dressing. This facility failure could affect residents with wounds and could result in cross contamination and infection of an MDRO.The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), acute pain due to trauma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services and equipment to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is unavoidable for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for motorized wheelchairs. The facility failed to obtain Resident #1's motorized wheelchair's specifications, to assess and ensure Resident #1 had a wheelchair that met his weight capacity for at least 3 months. This violation could place residents at risk of utilizing an unsuitable motorized wheelchair and contribute to unsafe mobility. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/24/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified, unspecified lack of coordination, adult morbid (severe) obesity due to excess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure:each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #2) whose records were reviewed. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #2's bed was in the lowest position and staff provided Resident #2 with adequate supervision. This violation could place residents at risk for experiencing avoidable falls. The findings were:Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/26/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a progressive neurocognitive disorder characterized by the accumulation of Lewy bodies in the brain, leading to cognitive decline, movement issues, and various other symptoms), psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (a psychotic disorder characterized by the presence of delusions that arise as a direct consequence of a known physiological condition),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe sanitary, and comfortable environment for 6 of 10 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8 and Resident #10) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure residents who lived on the 300/400 hallway of the facility received showers in a room that was free of potentially infectious debrisThe facility failed to ensure Resident #4, and Resident #6 were screened for tuberculosis prior to or upon admission to the facility and annually.These failures could cause the spread of infections from one resident to another, leading to sickness and a decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 11/18/2025 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #3 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for accommodations of needs.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had the proper Bariatric bed and overhead trapeze to facilitate self-positioning, self-transfer and bed safety.This failure could cause residents to lose independent functioning as related to Activities of Daily Living, loss of dignity, and overall well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 11/19/2025 reflected Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #6 had a diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in muscle tissues); Muscle Weakness (Generalized); Difficulty in Walking, Not Elsewhere Classified; Unspecified Lack of Coordination, Mild Intermittent Asthma,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of another resident.The facility failed to ensure door access to residents after 8:00PM daily for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for visitation rights.This failure could lead to reduced communication and contact between residents, families and others, resident isolation and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 11/19/2025 revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase (swallowing difficulties due to neurological or muscular impairments), Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Vascular Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reasonable access to the use of a telephone and a place in the facility where calls can be made without being overheard.The facility failed to protect and facilitate residents' right to communicate with individuals and entities within and external to the facility, including reasonable access to a telephone, for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #10) reviewed for Resident Rights.Resident #4 had a personal cell phone but was unable to use it due to decline in visual impairment.Resident #10 did not have a personal cell phone and the only means of outside communication was through a facility-provided telephone.These failures could lead to reduced communication and contact between residents, families and others, resident isolation, and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #4's admission record dated 11/19/2025 revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old female who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for smoking safety.The facility failed to ensure that a resident did not keep cigarettes and a lighter in their personal possession.This failure could lead to risk of injury, potential fire incidents and a decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/18/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation; other persistent atrial fibrillation; cough, unspecified; other hereditary and idiopathic neuropathies; other muscle spasm, and insomnia, unspecified. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 1 of 10 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for Diet Meets the Needs of Each Resident.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received the prescribed therapeutic diet.This failure could place residents at risk of their nutritional needs not being met. Findings included:Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 11/19/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident #6 had a diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in muscle tissues); Muscle Weakness (Generalized); Difficulty in Walking, Not Elsewhere Classified; Unspecified Lack of Coordination, Mild Intermittent Asthma, Uncomplicated; Pain in Right Shoulder; Age-related Osteoporosis without Current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #23, Resident #9, Resident #37 and Resident #17) reviewed for accidents and hazards: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 did not have a disposable razor at the bedside.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 did not have a pair of large nail clippers in her room.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 did not have a pair of large nail clippers and a disposable razor in her room.4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 did not have a pair of scissors at the bedside.These failures could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 7/22/25 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 8 residents (Resident #15, #18, #31, #19, #17 and #9) reviewed for infection control.1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A sanitized the blood pressure cuff when obtaining Resident #15, Resident #18, and Resident #31's blood pressure. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A wore gloves when applying a lidocaine patch to Resident #18's lower back. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized the blood pressure cuff when obtaining Resident #19, and Resident #17's blood pressure. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN C wore a gown while administering a bolus of water to Resident #9's feeding tube who was on EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) on 7/23/25.These deficient practices could affect residents who require assistance and treatments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for informed consent.The facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication consent was included in the medical record for Resident #39's Olanzepine (an atypical antipsychotic medication).This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care/treatment without consent and knowledge of adverse side effects.The findings included: Review of Resident #39’s face sheet with an original date of 12/23/24 and a readmission date of 4/2/25, documented a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Paranoid Schizophrenia (a mental health disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves with symptoms that include delusions and auditory hallucinations), and Celiac Disease (a disorder that causes a reaction in your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) received services in the facility reviewed for reasonable accommodation of resident needs related to call lights. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #2. This deficient practice could affect any resident and place them at risk of not being able to ask for help as needed.The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: catatonic disorder (person experiences significant disruptions in movement and behavior), Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of parathyroid gland (growth in the parathyroid gland), Sick sinus syndrome (heart's natural pacemaker doesn't work properly). Record review of Resident #2's MDS assessment, dated 05/07/2025, revealed the resident's BIMS score was 99, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment further revealed Resident #2 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for enteral feeding:The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's feeding formula and water containers were labeled with the appropriate identifiers and did not discard the feeding containers after the feeding was completed.This deficient practice could place residents who received enteral nutrition at risk of infection, and bloating discomfort.The findings included:Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 7/21/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nausea, aphasia (medical condition that affects a persons' ability to communicate) following cerebral infarct (a type of stroke that prevents blood flow to a part of the brain), dysphagia(condition that involves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the discharge of Resident #1 was documented in the EMR for one resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with a 30-day discharge notice when he was sent to the hospital for a change in condition and the facility refused to take him back. Documentation of discharge was not present in Resident #1's EMR to include physician's orders or a discharge summary. This failure could affect residents who go to the hospital for a change in condition and result in an unsafe discharge. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 06/25/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue) of other cite, unstageable (depth of wound could not be determined), neurogenic bladder (condition where nerve damage disrupts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2), reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 1. Facility failed to report incident of suspected abuse from Monday 04/12/2025 when Resident #1 stated she had been fondled by man. 2. Facility failed to report an incident of suspected physical abuse from Monday 04/12/2025 when Resident #2 stated he had been hit by a female resident. These failures could put the residents at risk of abuse, allegations of abuse not being reported immediately, and could result in physical and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence all allegations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated and documented for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. 1. The Facility failed to ensure an allegation of Resident #1 being fondled by a man was thoroughly investigated. 2. The Facility failed to ensure an allegation of Resident #2 having been hit by a female resident was thoroughly investigated. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/21/2025, revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and the latest admission being 04/02/2025 with diagnoses which included: muscle weakness (generalized), cognitive communication deficit, and paranoid schizophrenia .( subtype of schizophrenia characterized by prominent symptoms of paranoia, including delusions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1 room) of 4 resident reviewed for resident rights, in that: A pile of yellow liquid was seen on the restroom floor of Resident #1's room. This failure could result in physical and psychosocial harm due to diminished quality of life and increased risk for falls. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/06/23, noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Depression, Anxiety, Tremor, Lack of Coordination, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breath), Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficult with communication caused by an impairment in cognitive processes), Unsteadiness on Feet, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Seizures, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 1 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart 2), reviewed for security, in that, An unassigned medication cart was unattended and unlocked with medication blister packs inside of the medication cart. This failure placed residents at risk for harm by misappropriation of property of their medications. The findings included: During an observation on 01/23/2025 at 10:51 AM, it was revealed that a medication cart near the nurses' station at the corner of the 100 and 200 hallways, was unattended and unlocked. The medication cart was observed to have the lock button unengaged and unlocked. During an interview and observation on 01/23/2025 at 11:08 AM, LVN A stated he was not assigned to the med cart and was not sure why it was unlocked. LVN A stated that the medication cart should have been locked and that he had not gone into the med cart that day. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for 1 of 1 dietary manager reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager as required. This failure could place residents who consumed food prepared by staff in the kitchen at increased risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. The findings were: Record Review of the Employee Service List, undated, revealed the Dietary Manager with an initial hire date of 06/17/21. During an interview with the Human Resources Director on 06/06/24 at 10:00a.m., she stated she was not aware the Dietary Director had to have completed a certified Dietary manager course. She stated she along with the Administrator would have been responsible for ensuring the department heads met their certification requirements. During an interview on 06/6/24 at 10:15a.m., the Dietary Manager revealed she had not taken the Dietary Manager Certification course and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. A plastic bag of cheese in the refrigerator was not labeled or dated. 2. A plastic bag of beets in the refrigerator was not labeled or dated. 3-A one gallon plastic container of pudding was not labeled or dated 4. The temperature gauge on the dish machine in the dish room was not working as the temperature reading would not advance on the gauge. 5. Snacks in the Nourishment Rooms were not labeled or dated. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals and snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness from improper infection control, from a lack of food label date monitoring, from a lack of equipment maintenance, and improper sanitation in the kitchen area. The findings included: Observation on 06/04/24 from 9:10 am to 9:40 am, during the kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager revealed the following: a. There was a plastic bag of cheese in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to secure a resident's bathroom ceiling fan, replace a resident's bedroom light, fix a resident's window blinds, repair a penetration in a resident's bedroom wall, replace a hallway ceiling panel cover, repair water discoloration marks around a hallway ceiling vent, fix a section of resident hallway floor molding, and replace the light bulbs in a hallway ceiling light unit. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. The findings included: During an observation on 06/4/24 from 10:20 a.m. to 11:10 a.m. revealed the following the following: 1. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a bathroom ceiling fan which measured approximately 1 foot in diameter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 facility in that: 1. Numerous gnats were observed in a resident room on the 200 hall. 2. Numerous flies were observed on the 200 hall. 3. Observed a cockroach in the conference room This deficient practice could place residents at risk of residing in an environment with pests. The findings were: 1. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 9:34 a.m. revealed the presence of numerous flies on the 200 hall. 2. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 9:39 a.m. revealed the presence of gnats in and around residents' room in the 200 hall. 3. Observation on 06/05/2024 at 3:21 pm revealed the presence of a cockroach in the conference room. Records review revealed that the pest control company had been to the facility twice in May 2024 to treat for ants and insects. During an Interview on 06/06/2024 at 1:14 pm with the Administrator stated the maintenance person for the facility quit on 06/04/2024. He stated the facility should not have pests. He stated the facility does have a contract with a pest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #48's anti-coagulant medication use. This failure could have placed residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #48's face sheet, dated 6/26/24, revealed an admission date of 2/06/2024 with diagnosis that included: unspecified dementia ( a condition in which a person can experience memory loss, poor judgement, and confusion), anxiety disorder( a condition in which there are strong feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear), and chronic pain syndrome( a condition in which pain can last for weeks or longer). Record review of Resident's #48's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 4 of 5 Resident's (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2's bathroom from having a black substance caked over the interior of the toilet bowl and the air conditioning unit was covered in dust. 2. The facility failed to ensure the wall on the back of Resident #3's bed did not have peeling drywall. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's room floor was cleaned near/under furniture and in the closet. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's room floor was cleaned. These failures could affect any resident and place them at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean, homelike environment. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 4/11/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's refusal eating in the dining room for supervision with meals. 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #5's use or refusal to use fall mats. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met. Finding Included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction (a person may be unable to comprehend or unable to formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 resident rooms (Resident #4's room) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's medications were stored properly in the facility. This deficient practice could affect residents who received medications for treatments and could result in less potent or an adverse effects and drug diversion. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of shaft of fibula (lower leg bone that extends from the knee to the outside of the ankle), closed fracture with routine healing, pain, type 2 diabetes (a long-term condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received a mechanical soft diet in the proper consistency. This deficient practice could place residents who received pureed meals at risk of dissatisfaction, poor intake, choking, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction (a person may be unable to comprehend or unable to formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions), contracture right elbow (shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to accommodate residents' food preferences and allergies for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for food preferences and allergies, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's daily dietary form reflected the residents allergy to mushrooms. These failures could cause an allergic reaction, a decrease in resident choices, and diminished interest in meals. The findings were: The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction (a person may be unable to comprehend or unable to formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions), contracture right elbow (shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff, preventing normal movement), contracture right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide drinks, including, water and other liquids, consistent with resident needs and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 Residents observed for meal service. The facility failed to provide water during lunch on 04/10/24 for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for thirst, dehydration, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction (a person may be unable to comprehend or unable to formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions), contracture right elbow (shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff, preventing normal movement), contracture right wrist, hemiplegia (weakness of one entire side of the body) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for special eating equipment and assistance when consuming meals, in that: The dietary staff failed to provide Resident #1 with a divided plate to meet Resident #1's need for assistance with eating. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem. The findings included: . Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/10/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizures, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction (a person may be unable to comprehend or unable to formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions), contracture right elbow (shortening of muscles,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: CNA A failed to separate Resident #44's labia to clean between the labia during incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 04/27/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/24/2023, with diagnoses which included: Atelectasis (collapse or closure of a lung), Bipolar disorder(mental disorder characterized by periods of depression and periods of abnormally elevated mood) and, Guillain-Barre syndrome( rare disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves). Record review of Resident #44's MDS Log revealed there was no completed MDS. Record review of Resident #44's care plan, dated 04/25/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for infection control, in that: CNA A failed to wash or sanitize his hands or change his gloves after touching the bed's remote and head of the bed and before starting incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings include: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 04/27/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/24/2023, with diagnoses which included: Atelectasis (collapse or closure of a lung), Bipolar disorder(mental disorder characterized by periods of depression and periods of abnormally elevated mood) and, Guillain-Barre syndrome( rare disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves). Record review of Resident #44's MDS Log revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-07 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post on a daily basis and at the beginning of each shift information that included the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census for 1 of 1 days (03/07/2026) reviewed for posting of required information. The facility failed to post the required current nurse staffing and census information on 03/07/2026 at the beginning or within two (2) hours of the beginning of shift 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. This failure could place all residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census. The findings included: During an observation on 03/07/2026 at 12:00 p.m., a document labeled [facility name] Daily Staffing for Friday, March 6th, dated 03/06/2026, was posted on a wall of the front lobby. The document included the following information: current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$27,710 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $27,710 — penalty dated 2024-04-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-11 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AZIZ, WESAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
APOLINAR, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/23/2015
CONTRERAS, TERRIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2019
GREGORY, TRISTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 7%Other / private 22%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$246per resident / day
operating cost
$7,470per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$246per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455804. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next