Sage Park San Antonio

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 283 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.86 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 27.8 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care, in that: 1. The facility failed to monitor Resident #1 to ensure she was connected to continuous oxygen in accordance with her physician's order. 2. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's oxygen saturation levels when they were discovered to be in the 60s as a result of not being connected to continuous oxygen in accordance with her physician's order. 3. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's change of condition in her progress notes upon discovering Resident #1 was not connected to continuous oxygen in accordance with her physician's order. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was connected to an oxygen concentrator with a functioning humidifier upon being transferred to a different location within the facility. These failures resulted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the 1 of 1 kitchen failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. 1-The facility failed to have four kitchen staff complete their food handler certificates (Cook-I, DA-J, DA-K, DA-L) These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an interview on 1/8/26 at 1:10pm with the Executive Chef she stated not having the four identified staff (Cook-I, DA-J,DAK,DA-L) completed their Food Handlers Certificates was an oversight. Record review of the Dietary Staff's Food Handler Certificates revealed four kitchen staff had not completed their Food Handler Certificates (Cook-I, DA-J, DA-K, and DA-L) Review of the Texas Food Code revealed the following: The Texas Department of State Health Services (TXDSHS) requires that all food employees must successfully complete an accredited food handler training course within 60 days of employment The training courses teach employees about food safety, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the 1 of 1 kitchen failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. 1. The facility failed to clean two wall vents which measured approximately 4x2 ft which were located across from the kitchen's freezer. 2. The facility failed to clean a 3x3 ft ceiling vent in the dry storage room. 3. The facility failed to clean a 3x3 ft ceiling vent located at the entrance to the dish room. 4. The facility failed to maintain proper hair restraints on two kitchen employees (Cook-G and DA-H) 5. The facility failed to maintain the required dish machine rinse temperature, and only reached 110 degrees Fahrenheit. 6.-The facility failed to clean the top surface of the dish machine in the kitchen's pantry room. 7.-The facility failed to repair the brown stained ceiling markings around the sprinkler head in the kitchen's pantry room. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1-Observation on 1/6/26 from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain, an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 4 of 29 residents (Residents #38, #39, #8 and #3) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. facility failed to ensure LVN C sanitized the blood pressure cuff when she used it between two residents (Residents #38 and #39) during medication pass. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D discarded her soiled gloves, sanitized her hands and put clean gloves on when she placed Resident #8's soiled brief in the trash can and continued to place clean items onto the resident. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA D retracted Resident #3's foreskin on his penis and to clean his buttock and anal area completely. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infections.The findings included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 2 of 27 resident rooms on (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) and the beauty salon and laundry room reviewed for environmental concerns.1-The facility failed to replace an overhead bathroom sink light cover in room [ROOM NUMBER].2-The facility failed to replace an overhead bathroom sink light cover in room [ROOM NUMBER].3-The facility failed to clean an 18 x 18 ceiling air vent in the beauty salon.4-The facility failed to clean an 18 x 18 ceiling air vent in the laundry room. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe.The findings included: Observations during rounds on 1/8/26 from 12:15pm to 12:25pm with the Administrator and Environmental Services Director revealed the following:a-In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a missing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for accurate MDS assessments.The Facility failed to ensure Resident #8's fall status was accurately reflected on her quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/14/2025.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of missed or inaccurate care. The findings include: Record review of Resident #8's electronic face sheet, dated 01/06/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (long term condition that develops due to unmanaged high blood pressure and can lead to heart failure, thickening of the heart muscle and other serious health issues), anxiety disorders (a group of mental disorders characterized by significant and uncontrollable feelings of nervousness and fear that interferes with daily life), and pain (physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #8 as a fall risk and include interventions to prevent falls. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for falls and could result in injury. The findings include: Record review of Resident #8's electronic face sheet dated 01/06/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (long term condition that develops due to unmanaged high blood pressure and could lead to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 resident of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for incontinent care. CNA D failed to pull back Resident #3's foreskin to clean his penis during incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents risk of urinary tract infections (bacteria in the urine) or skin breakdown. The findings include: Record review of Resident #3's electronic face sheet, dated 01/07/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (severe impairment of gas exchange in the lungs, leading to low oxygen levels in the blood), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), anemia (not having enough health red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), atrial fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #14 and #15) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to replace a dirty and worn oxygen filter in Resident #14's oxygen concentrator, humidifier bottle was not changed and NC tubing was not bagged when not in use. 2. The facility failed to replace a dirty and dusty oxygen filter in Resident #15's oxygen concentrator, nebulizer mask was not bagged when not in use. These deficient practices could places residents at risk of respiratory infection and difficulty breathing.The findings included: Record review of Resident #14's electronic face sheet, dated 01/07/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Medication Cart B and C Halls) of 2 medication carts reviewed for expired medications.The facility failed to ensure the Medication Cart for B and C Halls did not contain an expired bottle of Atropine 1% drops.This deficient practice could place residents at risk to receive expired medication with less effective results.Observation on 01/08/2026 at 08:20 am accompanied by LVN F when checking the Medication Cart for B and C Halls, revealed a plastic bottle of Atropine 1%, with an expiration date of 08/29/2025 was found on the cart.During an interview on 01/08/2026 at 3:05 pm, LVN F stated she would usually check the medication cart for expired medications when she worked. She did not know how the expired bottle of Atropine was not removed from the cart sooner. She stated the effectiveness of the medication could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable and in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for and 1 of 1 treatment cart (Treatment Cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure RN A and the ADON did not leave the treatment cart unlocked when they went to perform a treatment on a resident. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of misappropriation of treatment medications and supplies. The findings were: Observation on 01/07/2026 at 3:20 pm, revealed RN A and the ADON performed wound care for Resident #3 revealed RN A took the wound care treatment and supplies into the residents room without securing the treatment cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$121,976 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $121,976 — penalty dated 2024-05-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX