San Antonio West Nursing and Rehabilitation
636 Cupples Rd, San Antonio, TX 78237 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (210) 434-0611 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $364,695 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.2% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.54 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.59 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.9–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 102.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.75 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.52 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pest control program. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not found with maggots in his right stage 3 heel wound on 10/16/25. Resident #1 refused an ER referral when the maggots were found and was sent to the emergency room a day after the maggots were discovered. An IJ was identified on 10/23/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:25 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 10/25/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility's need to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of its Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing a diminished quality of life, infections and/or death. The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #83 and #55, for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #55, #61, and #83) reviewed for physical abuse and neglect. 1. On 1/11/2025 on or about 11:00 AM Resident #61 was physically battered by Resident #83, to include a face punch, his hair pulled, and drug by his foot across the floor. 2. On 4/9/2024 Resident #61 entered Resident #55 room and began to use the restroom when Residents #55 and #61 began forcing each other's hands away from one another. 3. On 4/22/2024 Resident #61 was punched in the nose by Resident #55. 4. On 8/12/2024 Resident #61 was punched in the face by Resident #55 when he entered Resident #55's room. An IJ was identified on 1/29/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 1/29/2025 at 3:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 1/30/2025 at 9:00 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 out of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: 1. Resident #1 was an elopement risk and provided interventions to include a wander guard and checks to ensure proper placement. On 5/25/24 Resident #1 removed his wander guard and eloped from the facility. 2. Resident #2 was an elopement risk with interventions to include structured activity to distract from wandering. On 6/6/24, Resident #2 eloped from the facility. The noncompliance was identified as a PNC. The PNC IJ began on 5/25/2024 and ended on 6/6/2024. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious harm, disability, or death. The findings included: Observations 1/8/2024 at 9 AM revealed a staff member was placed at the front door to monitor people coming in and out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for one of six residents (Resident #5) reviewed had a change of condition. The facility failed to notify the wound care physician, primary care physician, and Resident #5's resident representative of changes observed with Resident #5's wound, which resulted in the wound becoming an unstageable pressure ulcer (a wound that is covered by slough(debris that appears tan, yellow, green or brown in color) and eschar (hard plaque that is tan, brown or black in color). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/17/2024 at 4:57 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/19/2024 at 6:05 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of six residents reviewed (Resident #5) for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received services and treatment orders to prevent sacral and left heel pressure ulcers from developing. 2. The facility failed to notify the wound care physician or primary care physician of changes observed with Resident #5's wound, which resulted in the wound becoming an unstageable pressure ulcer (a wound that is covered by slough [debris that appears tan, yellow, green or brown in color] and eschar [hard plaque that is tan, brown or black in color]). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/17/2024 at 4:57 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/19/2024 at 6:05 p.m., the facility remained out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to implement treatment orders for Resident #1's wounds for 5 of 9 wounds for 12 to 13 days; did not document on the TAR if treatment was provided to 5 of 9 wounds for 13 days; and did not complete a weekly wound assessment on 10/09/2025 for 5 of 9 wounds. This failure could hinder the healing of the residents' existing pressure ulcers or lead to the development of additional skin injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record (face sheet), dated 10/24/2025, revealed he was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (infection of the bone marrow), pressure ulcers (bed sores),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free from flies. These failures could lead to cross contamination and/or decreased quality of life. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free from flies. These failures could lead to cross-contamination and/or decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility's pest control invoice, dated 1/2/26, revealed that single bulb for fly light was replaced. During observation and interview on 6/17/26 beginning at 11:24 am, seven flies were observed in the kitchen, flying over the hot table where the lunch meal was being prepared. The DM said pest control went to the facility every couple of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards of practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #6, Resident #7, and resident #8) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to accurately document on 28 medication administrations for Resident #6, Resident #7 and Resident #8 the holding of a blood pressure medication due to residents' blood pressure being out of parameters. The documentation shows the medication was administered despite parameter orders stated to hold the medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services needed or alteration to medication dosing by physicians due to inaccurate information being documented.The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 04/28/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male that admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and record reviews the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representatives when there was an incident involving the resident and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; a need to alter treatment for 2 of 17 Residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for incident reporting. 1. The facility failed to report to Resident #1's Representative and Resident #2's Representative an incident of Resident #1 found partially disrobed in Resident #2's room on 4/14/26.2. The facility failed to report to Resident #1's Physician and Resident #2's Physician an incident of Resident #1 was found partially disrobed in Resident #2's room on 4/14/26. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed responsible party and physician's intervention.The findings included: Resident #1:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 4/22/2026 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 2 of 17 (Residents #1 and #2) residents reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report to the state agency alleged incident of Resident #1 found partially disrobed in Resident #2's room. This failure could place residents at risk for not having allegations of ANE reported.The findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress, report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, for 2 of 17 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for facility investigations. The facility failed to investigate allegations of incident of Resident #1 found partially disrobed in Resident #2's room. This failure could place residents at risk for not having allegations of ANE investigated and summary reported.The findings included: Resident #1:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 4/22/2026 revealed an admission date of 11/15/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the following; the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and the services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, must be culturally-competent and trauma-informed, for 2 of 17 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to have interventions care planned in regard to Resident #2's unwanted focused attention towards Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their highest practicable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services that meet the needs of its residents, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for laboratory services, in that: LVN G failed to obtain a urinary analysis for resident #4 as prescribed by NP H. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed treatment.Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services that meet the needs of its residents, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for laboratory services, in that;. LVN G failed to obtain a urinary analysis for resident #4 as prescribed by NP H. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed treatment. The findings included: A record review of Resident #4's admission record dated 4/24/2026 revealed an admission date of 1/8/2025 and a discharge date of 4/18/2026 with diagnoses which included history of falling, hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left side (left side paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives, or treatment options and to choose the alternative or options he or she preferred, for four (4) of seven (7) residents (Resident #5, Resident #11, Resident #57, and Resident #86) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to obtain signed consent for psychotropic (a medication that affects brain function and used to treat psychiatric conditions) mood stabilizer medication, Divalproex Sodium (Depakote) which was administered to Resident #5. 2. The facility failed to obtain signed consent for psychotropic antidepressant medication, Sertraline HCl (Zoloft) prior to initial administration on 01/06/2026, to Resident #57. 3. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior by housekeeping and maintenance services, which were necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 4 of 8 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 6, 11, and 13) and 1 of 1 hallway of the secured unit reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in the secured unit had repaired the door frame with dents, cracks, black scuff marks, wall with peeled paint, worn out paint, torn furniture, chipped baseboard trim lifting from the wall, light fixture with plastic border loose and hanging, windowsill cracked, peeling paint, missing caulking.The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER], resident room [ROOM NUMBER], and resident room [ROOM NUMBER] located in the secured unit, repaired the door frame with dents, cracks, black scuff marks, with peeled pain, baseboard trim lifting from the wall.The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #10, Resident #15, Resident #82) reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's comprehensive care plan included safety interventions related to the use of an electronic cigarette (vape).The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's comprehensive care plan included elopement risk and safety interventions related to placement in a secure unit.The facility failed to ensure Resident #82's comprehensive care plan included elopement risk and safety interventions related to placement in a secure unit. This failure could place residents at risk of inappropriate use of the device resulting in injury or not receiving appropriate care and services.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #10's admission Record dated 4/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included paraplegia (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #95 and #89) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #95 received his anti-seizure medication as ordered by the physician on 4/9/2026. The facility failed to ensure Resident #89 received the correct dose of insulin on 4/10/2026. These failures could result in residents not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of medications, including seizures or low blood sugar levels.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #95's admission Record reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus [a chronic neurological disorder characterized by unprovoked seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain; the seizures are able to be treated with medication and are not continuous].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (1) of one (1) kitchen (Kitchen 1) reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. Food service staff failed to ensure an internal thermometer was present in the reach-in refrigerator #1. 2. Food service staff failed to ensure a facility contracted food supplier representative wore hair restraints while in the kitchen during meal preparation. 3. The facility failed to ensure a package of pork ribs was labeled and dated in the walk-in freezer. 4. [NAME] P failed to ensure the walk-in freezer temperature log was filled out for the morning of 04/07/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of infections, food contaminations, food-borne illnesses, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/07/2026 at 10:47 a.m., an internal thermometer for the reach-in refrigerator #1 could not be located. [NAME] P and Dietary Svr were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the secured unit in the facility was free of pests and rodents. The facility failed to ensure the building was free of insects. This failure could lead to contamination and/or decreased quality of life. Findings include:In an observation on 4/7/2026 at 12:35 PM, approximately 10 small flying insects that resembled gnats were observed flying in the dining area and hallway adjacent to the dining area during lunch. In an observation on 4/9/2026 at 12:14 PM, revealed Resident #44 received lunch during an interview in the dining room. Approximately 5 small flying insects that resembled gnats were flying above his food. He was observed swatting the flies away from his food as he ate lunch. In an observation and interview on 4/10/2026 at 11:21 AM, LVN E stated the flying insects observed in the secured units nursing station were gnats. She stated that issues with gnats have been ongoing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for one (1) of seven (7) residents (Resident #77) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #77's room was in a position accessible to the resident on 04/07/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.The findings included: Record review of Resident #77's admission Record, dated 12/30/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #77's Diagnosis Report, dated 04/08/2026, revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a disruption in the brain's blood flow), legal blindness, and repeated falls. Record review of Resident #77's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #77 was rarely/never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid incorporating the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's care planning for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for PASARR services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's PASRR Level 1 Screening was completed accurately with mental illness diagnosis to secure a Level 2 Evaluation by the Local Authority. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving services identified by the local authority.The findings included: Record review of Resident #16's admission Record, dated 04/10/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #16 was not listed as her own responsible party with her [friend] listed as Emergency Contact #1.Record review of Resident #16's Medical Diagnoses, undated and accessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 medication carts (A- hall medication cart) reviewed for medication storage.The facility failed to ensure a vial of insulin was labeled with the expiration date. This failure could result in residents receiving expired medications.Findings included: In an observation and interview on 4/10/2026 at 7:46 AM, a vial of insulin (a medication used to treat elevated blood sugar levels) was observed in the top drawer of the A-hall medication cart without an expiration date. LVN C was unsure when the vial had been opened. She said all insulin vials and pens should be labeled with the date they are opened and the date they expire to ensure residents do not receive expired medications. In an interview with the DON on 4/10/2026 at 10:00 AM, she said the facility policy is to label all insulins with the date they are opened and the date they expire, and the nursing staff was primarily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets that were prescribed by the attending physician for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for therapeutic diets.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received large protein portions instead of large portions at every meal per RD recommendations, which were approved by Dr. Q.This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, unmet nutritional needs, and a loss of dignity.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record, dated 04/07/2026, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar levels due to the body's inability to self-regulate levels), onset date 01/29/2026. When Resident #2 was first admitted on [DATE], Type 1 Diabetes (a condition in which the body no longer produces the enzyme to reduce blood sugar levels) was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for one (1) of one (1) residents (Resident #14) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to maintain the current hospice plan of care to ensure Resident #14 received adequate end-of-life care. This failure could place residents at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #14's admission Record, dated 04/09/2026, revealed Resident #14 was initially admitted the facility on 01/12/2024 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #14 was noted to be [AGE] years old and received hospice services.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN C utilized proper PPE when administering insulin to Resident #89. This failure could result in the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident# 89's admission Record dated 4/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia [when the body develops resistance to insulin, leading to elevated levels of blood sugar]. Record review of Resident #89's significant change MDS submitted 3/17/2026 reflected a BIMS score of 08, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #89's Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide personal privacy during personal care for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for care. CNA A failed to ensure Resident #1 was not exposed to anyone passing his room when she opened Resident #1's door during care. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for feeling embarrassed and compromise the resident's dignity. The findings were:Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 1/23/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malnutrition, cerebral infarction (stroke) due to occlusion or stenosis (blockage/narrowing) of small artery, dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following cerebral infarction, encounter with attention to gastrostomy (enteral feeding) and cognitive communication deficit (condition where cognitive impairments, rather than language or speech problems, disrupt a person's ability to communicate effectively). Further review revealed Resident #1's BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition(s) and If necessary, assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person, and arranging for transportation to and from such appointments for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #2) who was reviewed podiatry care. Nursing staff failed to ensure they cut Resident #2's toenails and/or that they referred Resident #2 to a podiatrist for care as needed. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing pain when wearing footwear or poor hygiene. The findings were: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 2/13/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking and behavior) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1) who was reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to wear a mask and gown while providing Resident #1, who was on EBP, with peri-care. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for contracting infectious diseases. The findings were:Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 1/23/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malnutrition, cerebral infarction (stroke) due to occlusion or stenosis (blockage/narrowing) of small artery, dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following cerebral infarction, encounter with attention to gastrostomy (enteral feeding) and cognitive communication deficit (condition where cognitive impairments, rather than language or speech…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #3) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 smoked in the facility designated smoking area. Resident #3 was smoking in the front patio area of the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of avoidable accidents. The findings were:Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bi-polar disorder, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder. Further review revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 15 of 15 reflective she did not have cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's initial smoking evaluation, dated 3/21/25, revealed she did not have any deficits preventing her from smoking independently and unsupervised. Further review revealed staff had reviewed the smoking policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 9 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan included his having exhibited physical aggression toward another resident. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan included his having experienced physical aggression from another resident. 3. The facility did not have Resident #3's care plan after the resident had a resident-to-resident physical altercation on 08/17/2025. 4. The facility did not have Resident #4's care plan after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #5) of 9 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's electronic medical diagnosis list accurately indicated the resident had dementia with anxiety on the list, but the physician note indicated, the resident had dementia with anxiety. This failure could place residents at risk for missed treatment and medications which could result in a decline in health and well-being.Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 01/08/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male, admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (too many lipid or fats such as cholesterol), cerebral infarction (blood flow to the brain is blocked), encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of medical records.Resident #2 did not have foley catheter orders in Resident #2's November 2025 administration orders when he readmitted from the hospital with a foley catheter on 11/03/2025. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included retention of urine (inability to empty the bladder completely), schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking) and profound intellectual disabilities (a severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for room change. The facility did not provide Resident #1's guardian with a written notice prior to a room change or the right to refuse on 06/16/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being displaced without notice and/or reason to accommodate other individuals.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/07/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a listed guardian as his only contact. Resident #1's room assignment noted as 012-B. Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report, dated 10/07/2025, revealed diagnoses including vascular dementia (a change in thinking and memory that occurs when the brain experiences a disruption in blood flow), chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician and notify the representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for one of eleven residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's resident representatives of Resident #2's increase of exit seeking behavior with refusal for redirection resulting in police intervention observed on 10/03/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of unmet physical and psychosocial needs, physical harm and a decrease in quality of life and could result in the family or representative not being aware of conditions that may require them to make medical decisions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 10/07/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for two of eleven residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to update or add interventions to Resident #1's care plan regarding behaviors that impact his safety, stripping the bed and the suspected behavior of repeatedly pulling on the privacy curtain resulting in pulling the curtain track down from the ceiling. 2. The facility failed to update or add interventions to Resident #3's care plan regarding reported suicidal ideation that occurred on 10/05/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary services or having the appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/07/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assist in offering nutrition and hydration based on the residents comprehensive assessment. The facility failed to ensure the resident was offered a therapeutic diet and prepare and serve food in a form to meet individual resident's needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dietary requirements.The facility failed to ensure residents received their prescribed therapeutic diet.This deficient practice could result in residents losing weight, feeling abnormally hungry or weak and a reduced quality of life.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/01/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia (Parkinson's Disease without involuntary, erratic body movements), without mention of fluctuations, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, without Esophagitis (stomach contents flow back into the esophagus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were compete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed during the complaint investigation. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's treatment administration record noted treatments on 8.13.2025, 8.18.2025, and 8.24.2025 as required by the orders noted on the electronic medical record. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services or receiving care and services more often than ordered.Findings include: During an observation and interview on 09022025 at 1:00 PM, Resident #1 was observed with bandages on her right leg covering a below the knee amputation. She stated, they are supposed to change her amputation wound daily but they don't always do it daily. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 09.02.2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted to the facility on 07.21.2025 with diagnoses of other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and #2), reviewed for functional environment. The facility failed to provide Resident #1's room with a functional overhead light fixture and an unbroken window blind. This failure could lead to residents experiencing a diminished quality of life.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/15/25, reflected resident was a male age [AGE] re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: CVA (stroke), COPD (chronic lung disease), DM (diabetes), and dementia (decline in mental ability). The RP (responsible party) was listed as: self.Record review of resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1's BIMS score was 15 which indicated no impairment in cognition.Observation and interview on 8/15/25 at 2:50 PM, Resident #1 was in his room, in bed watching TV, alert and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide each resident that receives food from the kitchen, food that is palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe and appetizing temperatures: The breakfast meal served on 8/15/25 did not have the required holding temperatures for the last meal trayed served from the kitchen. This failure could lead to a diminished quality of life and expose residents to food borne pathogens and illness. The findings included: Observation on 8/15/25 from 8:05 AM to 8:40 AM of kitchen reflected that the steam table did not operate. The staff attempted to heat the food by adding hot water to the steam table or keeping food items longer in the oven. Observation of food temperatures of food items on the steam table reflected the following readings[breakfast meal]: readings were taken by [NAME] A with temperatures taken at 8:07 AM (initial) and test tray temperature at 8:50 AM: Oatmeal 110 F to (not taken; no more oatmeal) Eggs 159 F (initial) to 92 F (test tray) Sausage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service safety. The food temperature logs were incomplete. This failure could place residents who ate meals from the kitchen at risk for spread of infections, food contamination, and food borne illness. The findings included: Record review of facility's July Food Temperature log dated July 2025 reflected the lunch meal's temperatures not documented from 7/9/25 to 7/21/25 and 7/23/25 to 7/31/25. Further record review reflected the breakfast meal from 7/24/25 to 7/31/25 and the dinner meal from 7/30/25 to 7/31/25 were not documented. During an interview on 8/15/25 at 8:25 AM, The FSS stated that the July Food Temperature Log for the lunch meal from 7/9/25 to 7/21/25 and 7/23/25 to 7/31/25 were not documented. The FSS stated that the breakfast meal from 7/24/25 to 7/31/25 and the dinner meal from 7/30/25 to 7/31/25 were not documented. The FSS did not have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain dietary equipment that was in safe operation condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for steam table operation. The steam table was not operating. This failure could place residents who ate meals from the kitchen at risk for spread of infections, food contamination, and food borne illnessThe findings included: Observation on 8/15/25 from 8:05 AM to 8:40 AM of kitchen reflected that the steam table did operate. The staff attempted to heat the food by adding hot water to the steam table or keeping food items longer in the oven. Observation of food temperatures of food items on the steam table reflected hot foods were in the danger zone. During an interview on 8/15/25 at 8:15 AM, [NAME] A stated the steam table was not operating since Tuesday 8/12/25. [NAME] A stated that the food was cold on the steam table and served cold to the residents. [NAME] A stated efforts that were made to keep the food hot by regulation, 165 F at steam table and 135F when served by keeping the food on the stove until transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for clinical records.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's output was documented in his medical record on 6/9/25 and 6/19/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's output was documented in his medical record on 6/9/25 and 6/19/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's complete VS were documented in his medical record on 6/29/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 7/1/25, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acute Kidney Failure (condition in which kidneys suddenly are unable to filter waste from blood) , Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service safety. The facility failed to have two overhead ceiling light covers in the cooking area free from numerous dead brown insects. The facility failed to ensure the ceiling vent in the dishwashing area was free from a black substance throughout the vent. These failures could place residents who eat meals from the kitchen at risk for spread of infections, food contamination, and food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation on 4/30/25 at 10:30 AM of the kitchen reflected: two overhead ceiling lights with brown dead insects. Further observation of the kitchen reflected the overhead vent in the washing area had a black substance on the vent. During a joint interview on 4/30/25 at 10:42 AM, the Administrator stated, she saw the vent had a black substance and she saw brown spots on two light ceiling fixtures. The Administrator stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 16 rooms, reviewed for functional environment. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with functional bedside and overhead lights for a minimum of 30 days. This failure could lead to residents experiencing a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 4/29/25, reflected the resident was a 75 -year-old male who was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: peripheral vascular disease (heart disease), chronic kidney disease, amputation of left BKA (below the knee amputation), and diabetes. The RP was listed as: the resident. Record review of Resident#1's admissions MDS, dated [DATE], reflected: BIMS score was 9, which indicated moderate cognitive deficits. Resident #1's ADLs included: catheter care, services for incontinence of bowel, and total assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #18 and Resident #56) observed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure all residents were served at one table before serving the other tables, allowing all residents to eat at the same time at their respective tables. 2. Residents were served a fried chicken patty instead of fried chicken for 01/26/25 lunch meal. 3. Residents struggled to cut their fried chicken patty with a fork. These failures could place residents at risk of not being treated with dignity and respect. Findings included: Resident # 18 Record review of Resident #18's admission Record, dated 01/26/25, reflected Resident #18 was an [AGE] year-old initially admitted on [DATE]. It reflected Resident #18 had diagnoses to include dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia (group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure and provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 5 of 8 (Residents #5, #22, #45, #67, #79) residents in that: 1.Resident #5 stayed in bed and had not observed activities program and activity assessment was not up to date. 2.Resident #22 she called bingo/loteria (Mexican bingo) and tried to get some activities for the other residents, since we don't have a full time Activity Director, since November 2024. The Activity Assessment was not up to date. 3. Resident #45 was bed bound resident with no in room activities. Activity assessment was blank.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who- Is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing; and has completed a training course approved by the State for 1 of 1 facility in that: Operations Manager stated no full time Activity Director. No full time Activity Director since November 2024. This failure could result residents not having activities while residing in the facility. The Findings were: Interview on 1/26/2025 at 5:30PM with prn Activity Director (prn Activity Director) stated she was prn (as needed) Activity Director an comes in and does activities with Residents when she can. The prn Activity Director stated she calls different vendors from her house and comes to facility to do some activities, when she can. Interviews with the Resident Council stated they did not have an Activity Director and they try to figure out what to do for the day. Resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection for 3 of 8 (Resident #67, #5 and #45 ) residents in that: 1. Resident #67 had a pressure ulcer on her heel and was not observed offloading her heels. 2. Resident #5 had a pressure ulcer on her heel and was not observed offloading her heels. 3. Resident #45 was not turned every 2 hours by staff. This could affect all residents with pressure ulcers and could result in wounds not healing. The Finding were: 1.Record review of Resident # 67's admission Record dated 1/27/2025 was documented she was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes II (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin.), and disorder of skin. Record review of Resident # 67's consolidated physician orders for January 2025 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each Resident, for 8 of 16 residents (Residents #5, 20, #27, #38, #68, #69, #81, and #85) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. On [DATE] Medication Aide E administered late medications to Resident #20 at 10:49 AM: a. Acetaminophen 325mg, (Tylenol) late by 1 hour and 49 minutes. b. Levetiracetam 500mg (a medication to treat seizures) late by 1 hour and 49 minutes. 2. On [DATE] Medication Aide E administered late medications to Resident #27 at 9:20 AM: a. Carvedilol 12.5mg (used to treat high blood pressure) late by 20 minutes. b. Divalproex 125mg (used to treat schizophrenia) late by 20 minutes. 3. On [DATE] Medication Aide E administered late medications to Resident #38 at 10:51 AM: a. Famotidine 20mg (used to reduce stomach acid) late by 1 hour and 51…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%, for 25 medication administration opportunities with 4 errors resulting in a 16% medication error rate, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for medication administration. 1. Medication Aide E administered Resident #62 his medication doxazosin (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 1 hour and 28 minutes late and his hydralazine (a medication to treat high blood pressure), carvedilol (used to treat heart failure with high blood pressure), and furosemide (used to treat swelling due to heart failure) late by 58 minutes. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: A record review of Resident #62's admission record dated 1/30/2025 revealed an admission date of 5/25/2022 with diagnoses which included hypertensive chronic kidney disease with end stage kidney disease (kidney disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have drugs and biologicals used in the facility labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable; and the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, for 1 of 1 nurse medication carts reviewed for security and supervision and for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #5, #81, and #85) reviewed for safe storage of insulins. 1. On [DATE] at 6:06 PM LVN J attended the nurse medication cart on the facility's D-hall and left the medication cart unsupervised and unlocked for 7 minutes while she left and provided care for a Resident. LVN J was out of line-of-sight with the nurse medication cart. 2. An inspection on [DATE] of the facility's treatment nurse medication cart revealed expired insulins for Residents #5, #81, and #85 as evidenced by the following: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. In a refrigerator, there were 2 bags of salad, 1 dated 01/25 and one not dated, and 1 bag of ham, dated 01/17, that did not reflect a discard date. 2. The facility's documents Three Compartment Sink Log and Milk Refrigerator Temperature Log for January 2025 reflected no entries were documented January 22-January 24. 3. Dietary Aide AG had a facial piercing and parts of her hair exposed while working in the kitchen. These failures could place residents who consumed meals and/or snacks prepared in the facility kitchen in danger of food-borne illness. The findings were: 1. During observation on 01/26/25 at 10:52 AM, there were 2 bags of salad, 1 dated 01/25 and one not dated, and 1 bag of ham, dated 01/17, that did not reflect a discard date. During an interview on 01/26/25 at 01:03 PM, the CDM revealed the salad bags and the bag of ham in the refrigerator did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections; Standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections; for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #45 and #69) and 3 of 3 staff (MA E, DON, LVN J) reviewed for infection prevention with Enhanced Barrier Precautions. 1. Resident #69 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI), assessed with the need for infection prevention enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and on 1/26/2025 at 11:52 AM the DON wore 1 glove for personal protective equipment (PPE) while attempting to administer an intravenous access for Resident #69. 2. Resident #69 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI), assessed with the need for infection prevention enhanced barrier precautions, and on 1/28/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 1 of 1 secured yard reviewed for safety. 1.Daily intermittent observations, from 1/26/2025 to 1/30/2025, revealed the facility's secured backyard and smoking patio yard had a section of chain link fence a section of the chain link fencing was detached from the top rail and leaning down. 2. Daily intermittent observations, from 1/26/2025 to 1/30/2025, revealed the facility's secured backyard and smoking patio yard had several red fire rated trash cans, designated for cigarette butts, filled with non-cigarette butt trash. These failures could place residents at risk for elopement and/or fire risks. The findings included: A record review of Resident #24's admission record dated 1/30/2025 revealed an admission date of 12/17/2024 with diagnoses which included tobacco use, lack of coordination, and muscle weakness. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 3 of 9 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #47 and resident #76) incidences of privacy concerns in that: 1. LVN J did not knock on rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] before entering rooms. 2. LVN Z left her computer open with resident#76's personal information. This could affect and result in resident privacy being violated. The Findings were: 1. Observation on 1/26/2025 at 10:33 AM LVN J went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and did not knock on the door before entering room. Observation on 1/26/25 at 10:00 AM LVN J went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and did not knock on the door before entering room. Interview on 1/26/25 at 10:38 AM with LVN J stated she did not knock on the 2 doors, and she should have knocked before she entered. 2. Observation on 1/26/2025 at 12:11 PM to 12:19 PM revealed LVN Z had her computer screen open revealing Resident #76's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, with adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas; for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #18 and #37) reviewed for adequate lighting in the dining room. On 1/26/2026 at noon and ongoing until 1/30/2025 the facility's dining rooms had malfunctioning fluorescent lamps and fixtures, which residents #18 and #37 had stated they wished for better lighting during their meals. These failures could negatively impact residents' morale and overall sense of self-esteem. The findings included: A record review of Resident #18's admission record dated 1/30/2025 revealed an admission date of 9/2/2021 with diagnosis which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), anxiety, and bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings.) A record review of Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the following -The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 (Resident #5) residents in that: Resident #5's code status in chart did not match the care plan. This failure could affect residents by not having their end of life met. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #5's admission Record dated 1/29/2025 was documented she was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes II (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin.), cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 resident wander guards (Resident #84) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision, in that: The facility did not ensure Resident #84's wander guard (a technology designed to prevent eloping from a facility) was working properly. This failure could place the residents at risk for elopement. Findings included: Record review of Resident #84's care plan, last reviewed 11/20/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted [DATE]. It reflected Resident #84 had diagnoses to include need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, history of falling, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, and difficulty walking. [Resident #84] is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by impaired safety awareness, wanders aimlessly with intervention Wandergaurd as ordered, dated 09/27/24. Record review of Resident #84's January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to follow Resident #71's care plan for weighing Resident #71 weekly and failed to follow the facility's policy for weight assessment and intervention when Resident #71 had a significant weight loss. These failures could place residents at risk for malnourishment, weight loss, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #71's admission Record, dated 01/26/25, reflected Resident #71 was a [AGE] year-old initially admitted on [DATE]. It reflected Resident #71 had diagnoses to include depression, vitamin D deficiency, dysphagia, deficiency of other vitamins, vitamin B12 deficiency, iron…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow menus for 1 of 2 resident meals (dinner meal on 01/28/25) reviewed for menus in that: The facility failed to follow the menu for residents on soft bite sized and minced moist diets for the dinner meal on 01/28/25. This failure could place residents who consume food prepared by the facility kitchen at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and/or weight loss. The findings included: Record review of Week 3 Menu reflected Tuesday (Day 17) Dinner included Tomato Basil Soup and Pimento Cheese Sandwich. Record review of the recipes for Pimento Cheese Sandwich, undated, for the textures minced and moist and soft bite sized reflected recipe directions to include Grind 2 slice of bread 4-6 seconds to mince. Place prepared bread crumbs in a bowl and spray with vegetable pan spray until a more cohesive texture is achieved. Divide the prepared bread crumbs placing half of the crumbs as the first layer. Top with the #8 dip pimento cheese. Top with the other half of the minced prepared bread crumbs. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility's governing body failed to designate a person to exercise the administrator's authority when the facility did not have an administrator and secure a licensed nursing home administrator within 30 days. The facility terminated Licensed Administrator A on 11/08/2024; hired Employee B, who was not a licensed administrator 24 days later and served in the capacity of the administrator for 39 days. This failure could result in a decrease in the quality of care provided to the residents that could result in potential minimal harm to the resident. The findings were: Record review of the All Staff Active Listing, dated 1/4/2025, revealed Employee B was listed as the Administrator with a hire date of 12/02/2024. Record review of an Application for Employment, signed digitally by Employee B on 12/13/24, revealed she applied for the Administrator position, had previously worked at another nursing home as an AIT, did not list the school she attended and did not indicate she was a Licensed Nursing Facility Administrator. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain documentation that an alleged violation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 8 PIRs reviewed that involved (Resident #1 and Resident #2) for facility compliance to prevent further abuse from resident to resident altercations. The former Administrator A failed to investigate a resident to resident altercation (Resident #1 threw a cup and hit Resident #2 in the back of the head) that occurred on 07/21/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse from altercations and could place the residents at risk of harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/6/2025 revealed a 56yr old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: epilepsy, encephalopathy, opioid abuse, bipolar disorder, etoh (alcohol) abuse, and blindness of left eye. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 11/16/2024 revealed he was PASRR+ for developmental disorder, behavioral complex -physically and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dialysis. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a complete set of vital signs assessed prior to leaving for dialysis on (8) occasions. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a complete set of vital signs and access site assessed upon returning to the facility after dialysis on (9) occasions. These deficient practices could affect residents who receive dialysis treatments at risk for inadequate care and/or decline in health. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 12/5/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Chronic Kidney Failure (condition in which kidneys are unable to filter waste from blood), Type 2 Diabetes (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 8 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #15) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to use proper infection control practices: 1. During skin assessment and wound care for Resident #2. 2. During skin assessments for Residents #5, #6, #8, #10, and #11. 3. During wound care for Resident #15. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and decline in health. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 12/2/24, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Cellulitis (common bacterial skin infection), Lesions (Right Shoulder), and Type 2 diabetes (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feeds, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's doctor's orders of administering water, before initiating feeding, were being followed. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper hydration requirements prescribed by the physician. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/31/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record Review of Resident #1's significant change in status MDS assessment, dated 07/22/24, reflected Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that nurses were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques to provide nursing and related services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) by 1 of 1 nurse (LPN F) reviewed for competent staff, in that: LPN F failed to provide water flushes for enteral nutrition before enteral formula was administered as ordered for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by adequately trained and licensed nurses and could result in a decline in health. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/31/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record Review of Resident #1's significant change in status MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician of her change of condition on 8/08/2024 when an injury of unknown origin developed into a hematoma [collection of blood outside of a blood vessel where it does not belong, may result in swelling, discoloration and warmth] at the back of her head. Resident #1 was subsequently sent out to the hospital on 8/09/2024 . This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical treatment, decline in health, and death. The findings included: Record review of the admission Record, printed 8/10/2023, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to administer Keppra (a medication used to treat seizures) to Resident #1 on 5/10/2024 in a timely manner and within the facility's medication window for administration. This deficient practice could result in a risk to the residents' health and complications which can lead to seizures. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/15/2024 revealed an admission date of 10/31/2018 with readmission date of 11/28/2021 with diagnoses which included: epilepsy, not intractable, without status epilepticus (a type of epilepsy that can be managed with medication), seizures and muscle spasms. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #1's care plan last revised on 10/09/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in a manner to prevent foodborne illnesses and food contamination for 1of 1 kitchen reviewed for: 1. Counters had an oily residue with a dark , oily substance on the edges and the crevices, and crumbs behind and underneath an appliance where food is prepared. 2. The stove had an oily black substance on and around the dials and black substance on the cooking surface, grill. 3. Desserts and cornbread were uncovered while waiting to be distributed, and while an insect was flying around the kitchen. 4. Two coffee carafes had dark brown substance inside the walls. 5. The floors had debris underneath the shelving units and underneath the sink there was a dead insect; and there was a very dark substance on areas of the floor and along the edges. 6. The bathroom off the kitchen area used by staff was cleaned by dietary staff. There was a black substance around the faucet and on the sink, there was a reddish- orange substance on the rim of the sink; the floor had debris and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for quality of care in that: Resident #61 did not receive a neurologist appointment as ordered after a standalone seizure event occurring on or about 5/13/2023. This failure could affect residents who receive care from the facility and place them at risk for worsening conditions. The findings were: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 12/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction [damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area], gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis [stomach acid repeatedly flowing back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach without inflaming the esophagus], and hyperlipidemia [high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for incontinent care in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #50, CNA D did not clean Resident #50's meatus (duct by which urine is conveyed) working outward. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection and skin breakdown due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 50's face sheet dated 12/14/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included: [Dementia] a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory. [Schizophrenia] is a severe mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, and [ Depressive disorder] is a mood disorder that causes a persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of residents needs and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accommodations of needs in that: Resident #4's call light was clipped out of reach onto his privacy curtain. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care or attention needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 10/27/23, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease [a progressive disease that affects memory and other important mental functions], unspecified, bullous disorder [a rare skin condition that causes large, fluid-filled blisters], unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), contracture [a fixed tightening of muscle or tendons], right hand, and stiffness of right hip, not elsewhere classified. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#4) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility did not follow Resident #4's comprehensive care plan to ensure Resident #4's call light was within reach. This deficient practice could affect all residents and place them at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services or activities. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 10/27/23, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease [a progressive disease that affects memory and other important mental functions], unspecified, bullous disorder [a rare skin condition that causes large, fluid-filled blisters], unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), contracture [a fixed tightening of muscle or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$364,695 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
- $162,019 — penalty dated 2025-01-30
- $15,556 — penalty dated 2025-01-10
- $170,971 — penalty dated 2024-09-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-11 for 16 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-19 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAVERICK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 08/01/2022 |
| MARTINEZ, ALMA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| BEWSEY, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675002. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.