The Sarah Roberts French Home
1315 Texas Ave, San Antonio, TX 78201 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (210) 736-4238 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.2% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 38.2 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-24 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were permitted to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility and failed to ensure a resident was not transferred or discharged while the appeal was pending for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharges, in that: The facility failed to have a valid reason to discharge Resident #1 and failed to permit Resident #1 to remain in the facility while her discharge appeal was pending. This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/22/23 at 5:01 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 9/24/23 at 7:06 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a level of actual harm with a scope identified as isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure residents were discharged safely. This failure could result in residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-24 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a safe and orderly discharge to a home environment on 9/19/23. During or after the discharge, Resident #1 broke her leg and was hospitalized . This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/22/23 at 5:01 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 9/24/23 at 7:06 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a level of actual harm with a scope identified as isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure residents were discharged safely. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without preparation, causing a disruption in their care and services and denying them a voice regarding their treatment plan. The findings were: Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review the facility failed to at the time each resident is admitted , the facility must have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 8 (2) residents in that:Resident #2 did not have an order to be admitted to the facility.This could affect all new resident admission and could delay care.The Findings were: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record dated 11/1/2025 with diagnoses of diabetes II, anxiety disorder, hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, and urinary tract infection. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders dated 11/1/2025 at 2:27 PM revealed on I hereby certify that this resident requires/continues to require nursing facility care for 180 days. Ordered by physician. This does not say Resident #2 will be admitted to the facility. Record review of Resident #2's nurse practitioner visit dated 11/18/2025.Record review of Resident #2's psychiatry initial evaluation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter for 1 of 8 (Resident #2) residents that required physician visits in that: Resident #2 was not seen by a physician within the first 90 days after admission. This could affect all new admissions and could result in a delay in care. The findings were:Record review of Resident #2's admission Record dated 11/1/2025 reflected with diagnoses of diabetes type II, anxiety disorder, hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, and urinary tract infection. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders dated 11/1/2025 at 2:27 PM revealed on I hereby certify that this resident requires/continues to require nursing facility care for 180 days. Ordered by physician. This does not say Resident #2 will be admitted to the facility. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #7) reviewed for medication administration. LVN C administered a whole pill medication to Resident #7 who required her medications to be crushed. This Failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.The findings included: A record review of Resident #7's admission record dated 2/4/2026 revealed an admission date of 4/29/2024 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia. It affects memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform daily activities), anxiety, hypertension (high blood pressure). A record review of Resident #7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B utilized proper PPE while providing care for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of infection or illness. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/18/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (skin break down resulting from the body's inability to self-regulate glucose levels).Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition.Record review of Resident #1's care plan report, dated 11/18/2025, revealed the following:I have actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 4 of 5 Residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) whose records were reviewed. 1. The facility failed to report a fracture of Resident #1's coccyx/geal on 12/28/24, the date they received report from Hospice of the X-ray results. The facility made the report to HHSC on 12/30/24. 2. The facility failed to report Resident #2 sustained a gash on the back of her head requiring five (5) staples after a fall on 1/10/25. The facility reported the incident on 1/11/25. 3. The facility failed to report a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-06 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 17 (Cook A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, Admin, DON, ADON) of 17 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to [NAME] A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, Admin, DON, ADON annually. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to the Admin upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-06 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 17 (Cook A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, Admin, DON, ADON) of 17 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to [NAME] A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, Admin, DON, ADON annually. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for Maintenance revealed a hire date of 02/24/2022. Further review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-06 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on behavioral health for 16 of 17 employees (Cook A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, DON, ADON) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided [NAME] A, Maintenance, Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide C, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, DD, AD, LVN G, RN H, LVN I, LVN J, DON, ADON annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for Maintenance revealed a hire date of 02/24/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on communications training for 8 of 17 employees (Cook A, Maintenance, CNA E, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, LVN G, LVN I) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to [NAME] A, Maintenance, CNA E, Med Aide D, CNA F, [NAME] B, LVN G, LVN I annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for Maintenance revealed a hire date of 02/24/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, QAPI, Intention Control, Behavioral Health, HIV, Falls being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on rights of the resident training for 3 of 17 employees (Cook A, Admissions, DON) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective rights of the resident training was provided to [NAME] A, Admissions, DON annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for Admissions revealed a hire date of 05/31/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Residents Rights, Abuse, Dementia, QAPI, Behavioral Health, HIV, Falls, Restraints, being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training for 5 of 17 employees (Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide D, LVN G, ADON) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to Admissions, CNA E, Med Aide D, LVN G, ADON annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for Admissions revealed a hire date of 05/31/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Residents Rights, Abuse, Dementia, QAPI, Behavioral Health, HIV, Falls, Restraints, being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for CNA E revealed a hire date of 05/18/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Abuse, Dementia, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethics, Behavioral Health, HIV,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program training for 4 of 17 employees (Cook A, Maintenance, CNA E, Med Aide D) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program training was provided [NAME] A, Maintenance, CNA E, Med Aide D annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for Maintenance revealed a hire date of 02/24/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on ethics training for 4 of 17 employees (Cook A, CNA E, Med Aide D, DON) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective ethics training was provided [NAME] A, CNA E, Med Aide D, DON annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for [NAME] A revealed a hire date of 01/04/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Residents Rights, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethic, Behavioral Health HIV, Falls, or Restraints being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for CNA E revealed a hire date of 05/18/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of Communication, Abuse, Dementia, QAPI, Intention Control, Ethics, Behavioral Health, HIV, Falls, Restraints, Emergency Preparedness being provided annually. Record review of personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's RP desire to formulate an advanced directive OOH DNR was completed and part of the medical record. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings included: Record review of Resident of #16's face sheet, dated 8/30/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic health condition that affects how body turns food into energy), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of serious lung diseases that make it hard to breathe. It's caused by damage to the lungs that narrows the airways, or bronchi, and reduces airflow). Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #32) whose records were reviewed for abuse and neglect: The facility failed to report to the state reporting agency (HHSC) an injury of unknown origin when Resident #32 suffered a nose fracture and was not able to say what happened. These deficient practices could affect residents by contributing to further abuse and neglect. The findings were: Record review of Resident #32's admission record revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes a gradual decline in memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily tasks) and white matter disease (is a general term for damage to the white matter in the brain, which can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for comprehensive care plans: The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's care plan contained a code status. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident of #16's face sheet, dated 8/30/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic health condition that affects how body turns food into energy), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications on 1 (central supply room) of 3 medication storage rooms and 1 (north hall crash cart) of 2 crash carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to discard and replace expired supplies. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: During an observation on 11/06/24 at 12:29 p.m., the central supply storage room on the north hallway contained a drawer of gastrostomy tubes (A tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach. It allows air and fluid to leave the stomach and can be used to give drugs and liquids, including liquid food, to the patient. Giving food through a gastrostomy tube is a type of enteral nutrition. Also called PEG tube and percutaneous endoscopic tube.) with an expiration date of 10/26/21 and a bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 3 meals observed, in that: Cook A did not ensure food prepared for residents receiving a mechanical soft diet was in the proper consistency for this diet. This deficient practice could affect residents who ate mechanical soft texture diets, and place them at-risk by contributing to choking, weight loss, and dissatisfaction. The findings were: Record review of the facility's list of resident's diets, dated 11/6/2024, revealed 23 of the 48 residents received mechanical soft diets. Observation on 11/05/2024 at 11:43 AM, revealed [NAME] A preparing mechanical soft porkchops. [NAME] A completed the process and placed the mechanical soft porkchops in a tray before placing it on the steamtable. Surveyor asked [NAME] A to stir mechanical soft porkchops. Four quarter sized pieces of porkchop was observed within the tray of mechanical soft porkchops. Interview with [NAME] A on 11/05/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's most recent Physician Certification of Terminal Illness was completed and part of the hospice documents at the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 11/06/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident #s 1 and 2). The facility failed to ensure Residents #s 1 and 2's call light was accessible and in reach. Resident #1's call light button was observed hanging behind her mattress on the floor. Resident #2's call light button was hanging over the side of her bed and touching the floor. These failures could affect residents who used their call light or desire to use the call light and place them at risk of not being able to notify staff of their needs. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's electronic faces sheet revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included the following: History of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who is responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident provided by the facility staff and hospice staff, and failed to maintain required hospice forms and documentation for 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #13) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice coordination of care, in that: The facility did not designate a member of the interdisciplinary team to act as liaison with the companies providing hospice services within the facility; the facility failed to procure current certification of terminal illness. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 10/13/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to refuse, and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #12) of 13 residents reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The resident and her responsible party executed an OOH-DNR, and the facility was unaware. This deficient practice could result in residents receiving CPR against their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, essential (primary) hypertension, and unspecified dementia. Further review revealed, Advanced Directive: Full Code. Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 01 which indicated severe cognitive deficit. Record review of Resident #12's care plan, revised [DATE], revealed Resident is a [sic] FULL CODE Staff will inform family member/ resident of the right to request…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change for 1 (Resident #12) of 13 residents reviewed for assessments, in that: The resident enrolled in hospice services on 06/24/2023 and as of 10/13/2023, a comprehensive assessment following a significant change had not been completed. This failure could place residents at risk of caregivers with inaccurate and/or out of date information. The findings were: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 10/13/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, essential (primary) hypertension, and unspecified dementia. Further review revealed, Advanced Directive: Full Code. Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 01 which indicated severe cognitive deficit. Further review revealed the resident was noted as receiving hospice services. Record review of Resident #12's care plan, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #9) whose MDS records were reviewed for accuracy. Resident #14's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] incorrectly documented the resident was rarely/never understood and did not complete a BIMS (brief interview for mental status). This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 10/13/2023 revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: anemia (a lack of red blood cells or dysfunctional red blood cells in the body. This leads to reduced oxygen flow to the body's organs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed for incontinence/perineal care, in that: CNA E did not provide complete catheter care to Resident #45. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 10/13/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), dependence on renal dialysis (a type of treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: CNA C and CNA E did not utilize appropriate hand hygiene during incontinent/catheter care to Resident #34. These failures could place residents who required incontinent/catheter care at risk for infection or a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 10/13/2023 revealed a 77- year- old female who initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited Alzheimer's disease with early onset, type 1 diabetes, overactive bladder, legal blindness and major depressive disorder. The face sheet also noted the resident was on hospice services. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform a resident, a resident's physician, and a resident's representative of the discharge for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of discharges in that: The facility did not notify Resident #1, CO E, CO F, or Resident #1' s physician of the plan to abruptly discharge Resident #1 on 9/19/23. This deficient practice could place residents, their family, and physician at risk of not being informed of discharge, resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's demographics page, dated 9/20/23, revealed CO F was Resident #1's POA and Emergency Contact #2 and CO E was Resident #1's Emergency Contact #1. Record review of Resident #1's diagnoses page, dated 9/20/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia [high sugar levels in the blood], hypothyroidism [when the thyroid does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services as outlined by the comprehensive care plan that meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#1) reviewed for care plans in that: Resident #1's care plan did not include a care plan for diabetes. This deficient practice could affect diabetic residents and placed them at risk for not receiving the care and services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's diagnoses page, dated 9/20/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia [high sugar levels in the blood], hypothyroidism [when the thyroid does not produce enough hormones], essential (primary) hypertension, and unspecified vision loss. Record review of Resident #1's BIMS assessment, dated 8/17/23, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, signifying no cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 1/19/23, revealed no care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to verify that professional staff is licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws in that: CNA A worked as a medication aid when her MA licensed was expired and had administered medications to 22 residents on [DATE]. This failure could place resident, who received medications, at risk of receiving the wrong medications or a medication error. The findings were: Record review showed CNA A's medication aid permit was issued on [DATE] and had expired [DATE]. Furthermore, according to the HHS website information, However, HHSC is extending a grace period for all NAs and MAs to allow users time to learn and understand the new credentialing system. Therefore, all NAs and MAs with certifications or permits active on [DATE], will be considered active until Oct. 31, 2023. Record review of the facility's Med Tech MAR records shows that on [DATE], CNA A electronically initialed medication administration indicating she had passed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain essential patient care equipment in safe operating condition for the facility's mechanical lift for 1(South Hall mechanical Lift) of 4 mechanical lifts reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to restore and repair the mechanical lift's remote mechanism located on the south hall. This failure could place residents at risk who required use of a mechanical lift that is not in operable condition by increasing the risk of injury to residents. Findings included: In an observation on 8/29/2023 at 1:50 PM, - revealed the mechanical lift had loose wires at the remote connection, making the mechanical lift inoperable. Record review of mechanical lifts service record revealed that all mechanical lifts had been serviced and calibrated on 7/24/2023. Records indicated, The scales are now in good calibration and working order. We performed inspection on the listed patient lifts. (The mechanical lift in question was part of the inspection.) In an interview on 8/29/2023 at 12:19 PM with CNA C stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745040. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.