River Bend Healthcare
1339 Eastwood Dr, Seguin, TX 78155 · Government - Hospital district · 115 certified beds · (830) 379-3900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,225 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 98.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 46.5% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.95 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.87 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 36.8–61.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 5.9–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.2–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 69.6 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for drug administration. Resident #1 was administered 5 tablets of Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100mg on 10/21/2025 at noon. The physician order was Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100mg give 1.5 tablets at 11 a.m. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for altered mental status. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving a therapeutic effect or being over-medicated.The findings included:Record review of an undated admission record revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the nervous system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed who required having leg rests and foot pedals on their wheel chairs for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had her leg rests and foot pedals on her wheelchair when she went to an appointment on 04/17/2024 and her unsupported right foot slid off from her other foot which was supporting it and was caught under the moving wheelchair pushed by the Maintenance Director and resulted in a fractured femur (thigh and upper hind limb bone, longest strongest bone in the body) . This deficient practice affects residents in wheelchairs who required assistive devices to support their legs and feet such as leg rests and foot pedals and could result in falls and fractures. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 04/27/2024 reflected she was originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 24 residents ( residents #7, #13 and #21) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #7's oxygen therapy. 2.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #13's anticoagulant. 3. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #21's need to have her apical pulse checked. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the type of care required and result in unmet needs.Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #7's electronic face sheet dated 02/11/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed and documented any substitutions made to the menus for 1 of 1 menus reviewed for accuracy. The facility failed to follow the recipe requirements to make enough food to be served on the menu. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate nutritional needs.Findings included: During an observation on 2/11/2026 at 12:40 p.m., the menu posted in the dining room was Dijon pork loin, sweet potato casserole, dinner roll, and cream pie. During an observation and interview on 2/11/2026 at 1:13 p.m. the surveyor requested policies from the DM. The RD and the DM were observed walking from the freezer with bags of frozen chicken strips to cook for the lunch meal. The DM said they ran out of the food cooked for lunch and needed to fix the chicken strips for the rest of the residents that did not get the meal on the menu. During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 1:15 p.m., the [NAME] said some of the food was made for pureed and the mechanical soft and it wasn't enough for the regular diets. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 of 15 staff (LVN I) reviewed for Administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN I's nursing license was current since [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their care from a licensed nurse when required.The findings were: Review of the licensure and training for the facility staff revealed LVN I's hire date was [DATE]. The background and EMR checks were completed on [DATE]. TB screening was completed on [DATE], and new hire competency checklist was completed on [DATE]. Review of the Texas BON website for nursing verification on [DATE] at 5:10 p.m. athttps://txbn.boardsofnursing.org/licenselookup/Home/Index revealed LVN I's nursing license was in delinquent status and had expired on [DATE]. Further review at https://www.nursys.com/LQC/LQCSearch.aspx revealed LVN I had been an LVN in Tennessee from [DATE] to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain, an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #3, #33, and #69) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was on contact precautions per CDC guidelines and facility policy. 2. The facility failed to ensure the DON put on a gown when he performed wound care for Resident #33 who was on EBP. 3. The facility failed to change gloves during incontinent care for Resident #69. 4. The facility failed to ensure the residents clean clothing was covered when delivering to the residents on 2/11/26. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infections.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 2/11/26, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and received in the facility with a reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was in reach.This failure could place residents at risk for falls, delay of care, and decreased the ability of independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 2/13/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder with persistent sadness, a loss of interest that impacts daily functioning), pseudobulbar affect (a neurological condition that causes sudden uncontrollable or inappropriate laughing or crying), and vascular dementia (progressive decline in thinking skills caused by blockage or reduction of blood flow to the brain).Record review of Resident #6's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed within seven days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment and were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 resident of 24 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #62's comprehensive person-centered care plan was revised after the quarterly MDS assessment to reflect she was incontinent of bowel and bladder. This failure could place residents at risk of a lack of assistance with care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #62's electronic face sheet dated 02/11/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE], diagnoses included: acute cystitis without hematuria (a sudden, localized bacterial infection of the bladder, causing inflammation without visible blood in the urine), sepsis (a life-threatening emergency response…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: A box in the freezer with a bag of bread sticks were open to air.Four plastic seasoning bottles on a shelf in the kitchen area were opened, and seasoning was on the holes that dispense the seasoning, preventing them from closing.A sugar container had a scoop on the inside of the container. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.Findings included:Observation and interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:30 a.m. the walk-in freezer had a box with a bag of opened breadsticks. The DM said the last time the breadsticks were used was last Monday (2/2/2026). Observation and interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:33 a.m. the dry food storage had a container of sugar with the scoop left inside of the container. The DM said the scoop should not be left inside the container and he removed the container from the dry storage area.Observation on 2/10/2026 at 9:36 a.m. the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for garbage disposal.The facility failed to close the door on the dumpster.This failure could place the residents at risk of pest and rodents that could cause contamination of foods stored in the kitchen, infection and illness.Findings included:Observation on 2/10/2026 at 9:40 a.m. there was only one dumpster for the facility with doors on the top only, and the door to the dumpster was opened.During an interview on 2/12/2026 at 8:59 a.m. the DM said the dumpsters should be closed after use to prevent rodents and pests from invading the dumpsters and the facility's food to prevent causing food borne illness for the residents. Record review of the facility policy titled Garbage Receptacles dated 6/1/2019 stated: The facility will maintain garbage receptacles in a clean and sanitary manner to minimize the risk of food hazards. Under Outdoor receptacles stated: lids, doors or covers and stored in a manner that is inaccessible to insect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care were developed and implemented within 48 hours of a resident's admission and included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for residents, for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #2), reviewed for comprehensive resident centered care plan. The facility failed to develop interventions for Resident #2's intravenous access when he was admitted on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not having interventions in place to support their healthcare needs.The findings included: A record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 11/25/2025 revealed an admission date of 9/13/2025 and a discharge date of 10/11/2025 with diagnoses which included sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency where the body has an overwhelming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for providing care without a physician's orders. The facility failed to recognize Resident #2 had received medications and fluids through an intravenous access without orders for the intravenous access. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by receiving care without physician's orders. The findings included:[ A record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 11/25/2025 revealed an admission date of 9/13/2025 and a discharge date of 10/11/2025 with diagnoses which included sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency where the body has an overwhelming and damaging immune response to an infection). A record review of Resident #2's nursing progress notes revealed LVN A documented on 9/13/2025 at 3:31 PM, Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's responsible party, consistent with his or her authority, when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's responsible party when Resident #1 had a medication error, change in condition, and was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life or hospitalization resulting in a decline in psychosocial or physical health.The findings included:Record review of an undated admission record revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), fracture of the lower end of right femur (hip fracture), type 2 diabetes (a condition in which the body cannot use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure 4 pitchers of beverages were covered and dated when prepared. 2. The facility failed to ensure box of powder sugar was dated with open date. 3. The facility failed to ensure opened bag of spaghetti was properly sealed with an opened date. 4. The facility failed to ensure opened bag of elbow noodles was dated with an opened date. 5. The facility failed to ensure food temperatures were taken in a sanitary fashion. 6. The facility failed to ensure staff with facial hair was covered by a hair restraint. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 12/01/2024 at 9:24 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed in the standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 11 residents (Resident #6, Resident #22 and Resident #62) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's care plan reflected his receiving hospice services and did not have an active care plan. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's care plan reflected his pain management. 3. The facility filed to ensure Resident #62's care plan reflected his full code status, need for assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living), and only communicating in Spanish. These deficient practices place residents at risk for not receiving proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 4 of 19 residents (Resident #4, Resident #25, Resident #30 and Resident #39) reviewed for care plan revisions. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan was revised quarterly. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 care plan was revised after Significant Change in condition and when resident returned from the hospital. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's care plan was revised or reviewed after the quarterly MDS was completed on 09/25/2024. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's care plan was revised after revised after re-entry to facility and Significant Change in condition. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident received food prepared in a from designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 2 meals, reviewed for nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the breakfast meal served on 12/03/2024 had the appropriate consistency for the meat serving for the puree textured diet. This deficient practice could affect residents who received pureed meals from the kitchen by contributing to choking, poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Observation on 12/03/2024 at 8:40 a.m. revealed [NAME] D preparing breakfast plates for puree residents with meat (sausage) that appeared grainy, closer to a fine ground meat consistency than a pudding consistency. [NAME] D put gravy over the meat as he served the plates. [NAME] D placed a scoop of the puree meat on a plate when asked about the texture of the meat. The DM then took a plastic spoon and mashed the puree meat. The DM after mashing the meat with a plastic spoon then removed from the serving line and pureed the meat. [NAME] D only had 2 tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 10 of 19 staff (CNA-K, CMA-L, CMA-M, CMA-N, CNA-O, Hospitality-P, CNA-Q, Hospitality-R, Dietary Manger, and Activity Director) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that CNA-K, CMA-L, CMA-M, CMA-N, CNA-O, Hospitality-P, CNA-Q, Hospitality-R, Dietary Manger, and Activity Director had completed their mandatory QAPI annual training. This failure could place residents at risk for care by staff who had been insufficiently trained while working in the facility. The findings included: Record review of the annual staff training information revealed the following staff had not completed their mandatory QAPI annual training requirement: *CNA-K (hired 11/02/2023), *CMA-L (hired 05/09/2023), *CMA-M (hired 11/14/2019), *CMA-N (hired 01/18/2021), *CNA-O (hired01/13/2021), *Hospitality-P (hired09/23/2023), *CNA-Q (hired08/07/2023), *Hospitality-R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was completed for 10 of 19 employees (CNA-K, CMA-L, CMA-M, CMA-N, CNA-O, Hospitality-P, CNA-Q, Hospitality-R, Dietary Manger, and Activity Director) reviewed for orientation training. The facility failed to ensure that CNA-K, CMA-L, CMA-M, CMA-N, CNA-O, Hospitality-P, CNA-Q, Hospitality-R, Dietary Manger, and Activity Director had completed their mandatory ethics training. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the annual staff training information revealed the following staff had not completed their mandatory ethics annual training requirement t: *CNA-K (hired 11/02/2023), *CMA-L (hired 05/09/2023), *CMA-M (hired 11/14/2019), *CMA-N (hired 01/18/2021), *CNA-O (hired01/13/2021), *Hospitality-P (hired09/23/2023), *CNA-Q (hired08/07/2023), *Hospitality-R (hired11/22/2022), *Dietary Manger (02/26/2024), and *Activity Director (hired 11/12/2024). Interview on 12/04/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 19 residents (Residents #34) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's call light was within reach while he was positioned in her wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk for delay in care and services, and increased risk of falls and injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and an original admission date of 07/19/2019 and re-admission date of 11/29/2021 with diagnoses that included: Dementia (loss of cognitive function), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and loss of strength on one side of the body), muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 19 residents (Residents #34) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], correctly assessed the resident's functional limitation in range of motion status as evidence by coding No impairment to upper extremity. However, Resident #34 had impairment regarding function limitation in range of motion to his left arm. These failures could place residents at-risk for inadequate care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and an original admission date of 07/19/2019 and re-admission date of 11/29/2021 with diagnoses that included: Dementia (loss of cognitive function), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and loss of strength on one side of the body), muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 (Resident #30) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #30's physician order indicated the resident had oxygen via nasal cannular on 2 liter per minute, but the resident was observed on 12/01/2024 at 3:10 p.m. receiving oxygen 2.5 liter per minutes and on 12/03/2024 at 11:30 p.m. receiving 3.5 liter per minutes. This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and could lead to care as ordered by the physician. The findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and an original admission date of 11/13/2022 and re-admission date of 04/29/2024 with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (restricted airflow and breathing problems). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 medication room (Recovery Medication Room) and 1 of 4 medication carts (Recovery Nursing Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. There was one bottle of medication (Ocular Vitamins for eye) expired on 09/2024 found inside the Recovery medication room on 12/04/2024. 2. There was one gel of medication (antimicrobial skin and wound gel hospital and professional use only) expired on 08/01/2024 found inside the Recovery nursing cart on 12/04/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: 1. Observation on 12/04/2024 at 10:14 a.m. revealed there was one bottle of medication (Ocular Vitamins for eye) expired on 09/2024 found inside the Recovery medication room. Interview on 12/04/2024 at 10:14 a.m. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen be free from unnecessary drugs without adequate indications for its use for 1 of 5 (Resident #30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to discontinue Resident #30's Melatonin 5 mg for sleep after the resident's primary care physician agreed on 09/18/2024 to the pharmacist's recommendation on 08/21/2024, which was for Resident #30, melatonin 5 mg due for gradual dose reduction, consider as needed for 14 days, then discontinue. This failure could lead to residents being prescribed medications without indication and place residents at risk of unnecessary side effects and a decline in overall health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and an original admission date of 11/13/2022 and re-admission date of 04/29/2024 a diagnosis of insomnia (difficulty of sleeping). Record review of Resident #30's quarterly MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 4 nursing carts (treatment cart) reviewed for storage, in that: The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Cart was locked when left unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed mediations. The findings were: During an observation on 12/02/2024 at 11:57 a.m. revealed the treatment cart was found unlocked and unattended on the 200 hall. This surveyor was able to open all drawers revealing multiple creams, scissors, and bottles of medications. Interview on 12/02/2024 at 11:58 p.m. with Wound care nurse RN-G stated the treatment cart was unlocked and unattended on the 200 hall. The wound care nurse RN-G stated he did not realize he left the treatment cart unlocked. The wound care nurse RN-G stated it was important the treatment cart was locked at all times due to resident, visitor, and staff safety. The wound care nurse RN-G stated by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the hospice services met professional standards and principles that apply to individuals providing services in the facility, and to the timeliness of the services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for administration: There were no hospice nursing notes, records of visits or care available for Resident #27 at the facility. This failure could place residents receiving hospice services at risk of not receiving their needed services and care, and a decreased continuity of care between facility staff and hospice staff. The findings were: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 12/4/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #27's diagnoses included heart failure (the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen.), age related cognitive decline (refers to the concern of or difficulty with a person's thinking, memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 2 residents (Residents #48 and #59) of 19 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to Resident #48's suction tube Yankauer (oral suction tool used in medical procedure) to be covered in a plastic bag when it was not used on 12/01/2024. The Yankauer was connected to the suction machine and hanging without a plastic bag. 2. When CNA-H was providing incontinence care to Resident #59, the CNA-H had multiple pass with one wipe and touched new and clean brief with old and dirty gloves on 12/03/2024 at 2:07 PM. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #48's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys (the Medication Cart) for 1 medication cart out of 3 medication cart's reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure medications were secured on medication cart # 2 The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The noncompliance began on 10/3/2024 and ended on 10/5/23. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 1 face sheet dated 11/13/24 , revealed an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Congestive heart failure,(is a long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs) , Osteoarthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for drug diversion. Resident #1's scheduled narcotic pain medication, 81 tablets (2 pharmacy cards) went missing from the medication cart and was never found. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation, and could result in increased pain, and poor quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 7/3/24 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia (form of dementia caused by long-term, excessive consumption of alcohol, resulting in neurological damage and impaired cognitive function.), Type 2 diabetes with other circulatory problems (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar and has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. Resident #1's narcotic pain medication was not counted as required, the keys to the medication cart left unsecured, and resulted in 81 tablets being drug diverted and the resident missed 4 doses of his scheduled pain medication . This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation by drug diversion, and could result in increased pain, and poor quality of life. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 7/3/24 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia (form of dementia caused by long-term,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Residents #1, #2, and #3) out of 3 residents reviewed who required wheelchair leg rests and foot pedals for comprehensive resident centered care plans. 1. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan (undated) did not reflect she partially depended on staff to wheel her in a wheelchair for locomotion and she needed the leg rests and foot pedals for support. 2. Resident #2's comprehensive care plan inaccurately reflected she was ambulatory and mobilized in her wheelchair. It did not address she was in a tall wheelchair dependent on staff to be mobile and needed leg rests with foot pedals for support. 3. Resident #3's comprehensive care plan did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or serious bodily injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 resident reviewed who required having their wheelchairs for transport for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure the Maintenance Director, who drove Resident #1 to an appointment, reported that Resident #1 had an incident with her right foot and leg dropping down under the moving wheelchair and getting caught as she was assisted out of the van, until the next morning. This deficient practice affects residents in wheelchairs who require leg rests and foot pedals and affects residents transported to appointments and placed residents at risk of pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assure that residents received a therapeutic diet as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed in that: Resident #4 was on a regular diet with no fried or high fat foods and was given fried okra during meal service which did not meet his dietary needs. This failure could affect residents who are prescribed a no fried or high fat foods diet and could result in heart disease or stroke. The findings include: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 2/15/2024 revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included colostomy status (an opening into the colon from the outside of the body, providing a new path for waste material to leave the body after bowel surgery or injury), vascular dementia (a form of dementia caused by an impaired supply of blood to the brain), bipolar disorder with psychotic features (a mental disorder that causes unusual shifts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide special eating equipment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assistive devices in that: Resident #1 was not provided with a plate guard (helps prevent food from accidently being pushed off the plate while eating) during meal service to minimize food spillage and help the resident remain as independent as possible. This deficient practice could affect residents who required assistive devices for meals and could result in poor nutritional intake. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 2/15/2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year old female admitted on to the facility on 8/29/2023 and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia is defined as paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, whereas hemiparesis is characterized by one-sided weakness, but without complete paralysis) following cerebral infarction (occurs due to disrupted blood flow to the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-06 · tag F0910 — patternEnsure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of residents' rooms revealed the facility failed to equip for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy of residents, 8 out of 8 Rooms (110, 212, 210, 209, 208, 408, 514, and 512) reviewed for equipped for adequate nursing care, in that: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], were used as storage rooms. Rooms 210, 209, 208, 408, and 514, AC blower was not working. room [ROOM NUMBER], the AC unit was not working. These failures could result in rooms not being available for an influx of new residents in the event of a local or national emergency. The findings were: Observation on 01/04/24 at 4:12 PM of room [ROOM NUMBER] (Hall 100) revealed: the room was used for storage of PPE boxes, about 50 ; 3 briefs boxes; 2 gauze bags; and 13 hand sanitizers. Observation on 01/04/24 at 4:15 PM revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER] was used for storage; no resident was present. Room temperature taken by Maintenance Director's laser reader revealed: average of 67 F and hot water in the sink was 98 F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. The top of the dish machine was soiled with a sand-like substance. 2. The door of the freezer near the dish room was soiled. 3. Three containers of ground meat wrapped in plastic were thawing on a countertop. 4. Powdered milk container in the pantry was labeled milk and also labeled rice. 5. The containers of loose sugar and flour had lids that were not secure. 6. The large walk-in refrigerator had debris in the floor and contained: -two thermometers with different temperature readings -a container of heads of lettuce with multiple brown spots. -a container of breadsticks labeled keep frozen -a container of heavy whipping cream with a best by date of 09/27/2023 -a container of individual servings of sour cream with a best by date of 09/18/2023 -a container of scrambled egg blend labeled keep frozen -an open container of teriyaki sauce with no date -a container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and protect and promoted the rights of the resident for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #7 and #64) reviewed for dignity, in that: Residents #7, and #64 urinary drainage bags were not covered or in a dignity bag for privacy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of embarrassment, lack of privacy, and loss of dignity. The findings were: Record review of resident #7's face sheet undated revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included [Parkinson's disease], a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement. [Benign prostatic hyperplasia] causes your prostate to increase in size, leading to decreased urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 (Hall 400) 8 halls reviewed for accident hazards, in that: A container of liquid disinfectant was stored in an unlocked room in Hall 400. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm by coming into contact with hazardous materials. The findings were: Observation on 10/24/2023 at 12:30 p.m. revealed a container of liquid disinfectant mixture in an unlocked room in Hall 400. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 10/27/2023 at 4:20 p.m., the Maintenance Director stated the disinfectant was made up of peroxide disinfectant or bleach disinfectant, of which both containers were labeled, Danger and Keep Out of Reach of Children. The Maintenance Director confirmed the disinfectant mixture had been stored in an unlocked room on Hall 400 following its use during an outbreak of Covid-19. The Maintenance Director confirmed a resident could be harmed if he or she came into contact with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #34, and #11, and #30) reviewed for respiratory care in that: 1. Resident #34's nebulizer tubing was outdated, and on the floor. The resident's nebulizer mask was disconnected from the tubing and on the floor on 4 of 4 days (10/24/23, 10/25/23, 10/26/23. and 10/27/23) of observations. 2. Resident #11's humidification water bottle was not connected. 3. Resident # 30 did not have physician orders for oxygen and oxygen was in use. This failure could place residents at risk of delays in receiving necessary respiratory care, and illness. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #34's profile dated 10/26/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - lung disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promote and facilitate the residents right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for self-determination in that: Resident #6 was taken to his room during a behavior and put in bed despite the resident protesting by yelling and hitting staff during transfer. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling like they have no rights, no choice, and no control, and could result in increased aggression, anger, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #6's profile dated 10/27/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral infarction (stroke), profound intellectual disabilities (profound limitations in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #16) of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives, in that: Resident #16 was able to make her wishes known and her OOH-DNR was executed by her daughter. This deficient practice put residents at risk of not having their rights honored and of receiving CPR against their will. The findings were: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, and Bilateral Primary Osteoporosis of Knee. Record review of Resident #16's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 11 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment within 14 days after the resident experienced a significant change in status for 1 (Resident #53) of 18 residents reviewed for resident assessment, in that: A feeding tube was placed for Resident #53 and the facility failed to re-assess the resident. This deficient practice could lead to improper care and diminished quality of life for residents whose needs are not fully assessed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet, dated 10/27/2023, revealed an admission date of 07/12/2023 with diagnoses including: Critical Illness Myopathy, Unspecified Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Adult Failure to Thrive. Record review of Resident #53's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #53's care plan, as of 10/27/2023, revealed [Resident #53] require tube feeding [related to] weight loss. Record review of Resident #53's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident for 1 (Resident #68) of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: Resident # 68's therapeutic diet was not listed on his care plan. This deficient practice could result in resident's receiving improper care and improper diets due to a lack of communication. The findings were: Record review of Resident #68's face sheet, dated 10/27/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident #68's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #68's care plan, as of 10/27/2023, revealed it did not include the resident's therapeutic diet order. Record review of Resident #68's clinical record revealed a physician order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for 1 (Resident #53) of 4 residents with pressure ulcers reviewed, in that: Resident #53 did not receive treatment for her pressure ulcer for 10 days and the pressure ulcer worsened. This deficient practice could place residents with pressure ulcers at risk of pain and diminished quality of life due to wounds. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet, dated 10/27/2023, revealed an admission date of 07/12/2023 with diagnoses including: Critical Illness Myopathy, Unspecified Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Adult Failure to Thrive. Record review of Resident #53's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #53's care plan, as of 10/27/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #7) who were reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care, in that; a. Residents # 7's Condom catheter was not removed on 10/25/23 and 10/26/23 as per physician orders These deficient practices could affect residents with indwelling urinary catheters and place them at risk of urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of resident #7's face sheet undated revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included [Parkinson's disease], a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement. [Benign prostatic hyperplasia] causes your prostate to increase in size, leading to decreased urine flow, and [Depression] is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 32%, based on 7 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #40, Resident # 13) and 1 of 4 staff (CMA D) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure CMA D administered medications according to the physician's orders and per professional standards which resulted in a 32% medication administration error rate. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings are: 1. Record Review of Resident # 40's face sheet dated 10/25/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 02/27/2023 with a diagnosis that included: [Dementia] loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life. [Anxiety] feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 7) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: Resident # 7's order to remove condom cathater in the [NAME] was not done and treatment record signed . This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included: Record review of resident #7's face sheet undated revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included [Parkinson's disease], a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement. [Benign prostatic hyperplasia] causes your prostate to increase in size, leading to decreased urine flow, and [Depression] is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. DA A had facial hair and did not wear a facial hair restraint in the kitchen while portioning food for the lunch meal. 2. DA B did not change gloves or wash her hands after touching a cellular phone while preparing food in the kitchen. 3. DA B wore jewelry on her arm while engaged in food preparation in the kitchen. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 10/05/2023 at 11:27 a.m. in the kitchen revealed DA A was standing in front of the steam table. DA A was portioning food from the steam table onto plates for the lunch meal. DA A had facial hair on his upper lip ¼ long and hair on his chin approximately ½ long. DA A did not wear a facial hair restraint. Interview on 10/05/2023 at 11:28 a.m. with DA A revealed he acknowledged he had facial hair and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 4 of five residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for food meeting residents' needs, in that: Cook E did not puree ground beef to a pudding or mashed potato consistency as required for food served to residents who received a pureed diet. This deficient practice could affect residents who received pureed meals from the kitchen by contributing to dissatisfaction, poor intake, choking, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Record review of menu for 10/05/2023 revealed the menu for the pureed meal for residents included pureed soft beef tacos, pureed refried beans, pureed Spanish rice, pureed melon cup and a beverage. Record review of the electronic health records revealed for Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4 revealed all the residents had the following diet order: Regular diet, Pureed texture, Thin/Regular consistency. The dates of the order for the residents are as follows: Resident #1: 06/14/2022; Resident #2: 09/21/2023;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,225 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $9,246 — penalty dated 2025-10-24
- $8,979 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676274. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.