No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Memorial Health Care Center

212 NW 10th St, Seminole, TX 79360 · Government - County · 40 certified beds · (432) 758-4877 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (432) 758-4877 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
207 NW 8th St · (432) 758-4777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
701 Hobbs Hwy · (432) 758-3656 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1306 Hobbs Hwy · (432) 955-6061 · Call to confirm hours
Park
NW 5th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-12 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.9%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.4%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.7%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%9.6%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.252.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.522.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 10 of 42 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 10 confidential residents were provided, the Grievance Procedure, information in regards to who the facility grievance officer was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Interviews during Resident Council with 10 confidential residents, stated they did not have access to a Grievance form, they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. Record Review of the facility Grievance policy updated April 2017 reflected a copy of the Grievance/complaint procedure should be posted on the resident bulletin board. Observed prominent postings in the lobby of the facility on 8/20/2025 at 11:45am. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 16 residents (Resident #29, Resident #36, Resident #39, and Resident #42) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #29's, Resident #36's, Resident #39's and Resident #42's advanced directives. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their individualized needs. Findings included: Resident #29 Record review of the resident face sheet for Resident #29, dated 08/20/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), acute pulmonary edema (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the personal food policy was followed to maintain safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 4 of 16 residents rooms reviewed for food safety (room [ROOM NUMBER]A, #16B, #19B, and #21B) in that: The refrigerators located in room [ROOM NUMBER]A, #16B, #19B, and #21B were not being monitored for internal temperature and expiration/used by dates. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: During an observation on 08/19/2025 at 11:34 AM, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B contained a personal refrigerator. The refrigerator contained perishable food items such as a personal Ziplock package of summer sausage (expiration date 8/20/2025), 3 individual containers of Jello pudding, one bag of Doritos chips, two bags of Cheese It crackers, and a Ziplock bag of an unknown, unlabeled/undated food item. The refrigerator also contained numerous cans of unopened soda. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #39 and #29) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA A failed to utilize proper hand hygiene between glove changes and failed to change gloves when going from dirty to clean when providing incontinence care and catheter care for Resident #39. 2. CNA A and RN B failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and wear a gown when providing incontinence care and catheter care for Resident #39. 3. CNA C failed to change her gloves when going from dirty to clean when providing incontinence care for Resident #29.These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. The findings include: Resident #39 Record review of the resident face sheet for Resident #39,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles for 6 out of 6 employees (RN F, CNA A, LVN H, CNA G, CNA I, and CNA J) reviewed for required training. The facility failed to ensure staff were properly trained in Fall Prevention, HIV, Restraints, Emergency Procedures and Dementia for 6 of 6 employees (RN F, CNA A, LVN H, CNA G, CNA I, and CNA J) reviewed for training at hire and annually. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care from individuals who did not have the knowledge and skills to properly provide safety from adverse events or other resident life and health complications.Findings include: Record review of employee records for RN F reflected RN F was hired at the facility on 07/28/2025, and the facility was unable to provide documentation indicating RN F received training, through the facility, on Fall Prevention, HIV, Restraints,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #27 and #28) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: Residents #27 and #28 was listed as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) but had Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) forms that were incorrectly filled out or had missing required information. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their end of life wishes honored and their records being incomplete/inaccurate.Findings included: Resident #27 Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, undated, revealed an [AGE] year-old-female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (impairments of at least two brain functions), Hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones), and Hypertension (force of the blood against the artery walls is too high). The face sheet also revealed under the advance directive section - DNR-Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 10 out of 90 days (01/11/25, 01/12/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 02/08/25, 02/09/25, 02/15/25, 02/16/25, 02/22/25, and 02/23/25) reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had RN coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week for the following weekend days: 01/11/25, 01/12/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 02/08/25, 02/09/25, 02/15/25, 02/16/25, 02/22/25, and 02/23/25 This failure could place residents at risk for inconsistency in care and services.Findings include: Record review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for the Fiscal Year Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) dated 08/15/25 revealed there were no RN hours for the dates 01/11/25, 01/12/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 02/08/25, 02/09/25, 02/15/25, 02/16/25, 02/22/25, and 02/23/25. During an interview on 08/21/25 at 12:11 PM, the Admin stated the DON was hired at the end of 2024 and has worked Monday through Friday 8 am to 5 pm and sometimes more than that. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet individual needs in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services in that: The facility failed to ensure puree meat, puree vegetables, and puree pasta were prepared to a smooth uniform texture. This failure could place residents at risk for choking. Findings include:During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 12:10 PM, the test tray sampled revealed the pureed broccoli had small chunks of broccoli and strings in it and was not a smooth uniform texture. The puree pasta had chunks of dough and was not a smooth uniform texture. During an observation on 08/21/2025 at 11:55 AM, the test tray sampled revealed the pureed pork had small grains of pork and was not a smooth uniform texture. The puree carrots had chunks of carrots and were not a smooth uniform texture. The puree potatoes had chunks of potatoes and were not a smooth uniform texture. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 12:05 PM, the DM stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for administration (Fiscal year 2024 for the second quarter January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024). The facility failed to submit PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) staffing information to CMS for the 2nd quarter of the fiscal year 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met due to staffing. Findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report (payroll-based staffing), CASPER Report (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report)1705 D FY Quarter 2 2024 (January 1- March 31), dated 07/18/24, indicated the following entry: Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter Triggered .Triggered=No Data Submitted for the Quarter. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 11:15 AM, the DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 2 of 3 common resident baths (Tan and Mauve Halls) in that: The facility failed to ensure chemicals were not stored with resident toiletries and personal items in 2 of 3 common resident baths (Tan and Mauve Halls). These failures could place residents at risk for accident hazards resulting in injuries. The findings include: On 7/24/24 at 9:02 AM an observation was made of the central bath on the Mauve Hall which included rooms 32 through 43. The door to the bath was not locked. There was a spray bottle of Disinfectant Cleaner and Deodorizer on an open shelf next to washcloths and towels. The Virex Plus One Step Disinfectant Cleaner and Deodorizer was labeled, Causes moderate eye irritation. Avoid contact with eyes or clothing. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling . The upper cabinets in the bath were locked. One of 2 cabinets had spray bottles of Virex Plus, a spray bottle of pink liquid, and an aerosol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer, based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem, and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #18, 72 and 73) reviewed for nutrition status. The facility failed to provide Residents #18, 72 and 73 with their physician ordered therapeutic diets that included fortified foods for the noon meals on 7/23/24, 7/24/24 and 7/25/24. This failure could place residents at risk for hunger, weight loss and chemical imbalances. The findings included: Resident #18 Record review of the current undated face sheet for male Resident #18 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The resident was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses of moderate protein calorie malnutrition (nutritional deficiency), urinary tract infection, site not specified, (history of) (infection of urinary tract), Constipation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #3) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA A failed to utilize proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident # 3. 2. CNA C failed to utilize proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #172 3. The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #18. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination. The findings include: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had medical history of congestive heart failure (compromised blood supply to the body), hypertension (high blood pressure), and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #8, #72, #222) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available for: Residents #8 prior to the administration of Lorazepam and Trazodone; Resident #72 prior to the administration of Trazodone; Resident #222 prior to the administration of Seroquel and Lorazepam. Lorazepam, Trazodone, and Seroquel are psychotropic medications (a psychoactive drug taken to exert an effect on the chemical make-up of the brain and nervous system); This failure could place residents at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #72) reviewed for unnecessary medications. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a stop date or duration for PRN alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety). - The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 had a stop date or duration for PRN Trazadone (a medication use to treat insomnia). These failures could put residents at risk of possible psychotropic medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had a medical history of congestive heart failure (compromised blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next