No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Estates At Shavano Park

4366 Lockhill Selma, Shavano Park, TX 78249 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (210) 761-9261 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (210) 761-9261 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Mar 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4360 Lockhill-Selma Rd. · (210) 949-3773 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4100 De Zavala Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Walmart0.5 mi
4226 De Zavala Rd · (210) 774-2734 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4600 Lockhill Selma Rd · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.9%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.6%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.3%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%13.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine27.7%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.0%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.472.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.002.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 202 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.2%CMS range 44.1–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.9–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 5.3–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.571.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
1.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
63.4%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that Residents were free of significant medication errors, for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #14, #23, and #27), reviewed for significant medication errors. Staff administered midodrine incorrectly per the physicians' orders, to Residents #14, #23, and #27. Midodrine is an oral medication that increases blood pressure by constricting blood vessels. It is used to treat severe drops in blood pressure upon standing. It is usually taken three times daily during waking hours. These failures could place residents at risk for injuries from low or high blood pressure.The findings include: 1. A record review of Resident #14's admission record, dated 3/11/2026, revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), hypotension (low blood pressure), and dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability-such as memory, reasoning, and behavior-severe enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable and in accordance with State and Federal laws, ensured all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #2 and #70) and 1 of 3 medication carts (300-hall even nursing cart) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's three bottles of normal saline, used for flushing the resident's indwelling urinary catheter, were not left unattended in the resident's room on 03/10/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70's moisture barrier ointment cream was not left unattended inside the resident's restroom, on 03/10/2026. 3. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The Dietary Manager failed to wear a beard restraint while working in the kitchen.2. Dietary Aide P and Dietary Aide R failed to wear hair restraints or beard restraints while working in the kitchen.3. The facility failed to store wet dishes to allow for air-drying.4. The facility failed to ensure all prepared items in the walk-in refrigerator were labeled and dated with the use by date. 5. The facility failed to store items off the floor in the kitchen's dry storage area.6. The facility failed to take the temperature of soup after heating it in the microwave and prior to it leaving the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings include: During an observation of the facility's kitchen on 03/10/2026 at 8:54 AM revealed Dietary Aide P at the dishwasher not wearing a hair restraint or facial hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 residents out of 20 residents (Resident #72, #3, #19, and #82) reviewed for infection prevention and control measures. 1. NP B and LVN A entered Residents #72 and #3's droplet precaution isolation room without wearing the appropriate PPE. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA-T performed hand hygiene after changing gloves during incontinent care for Resident #19. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA-M disinfected the blood pressure cuff after using it on another resident. These failures could place residents at risk for contracting infectious diseases. The findings include:A record review of Resident #72's admission record, dated 3/10/2026, revealed an admission date of 11/22/2024. Resident #72 had a diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined an individual may self-administer drugs in a safe practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for administration of medications. The facility did not follow the facility's policy regarding Self-Administration of Medications when Resident #41 administered his nasal spray for allergy by himself. This failure could affect residents who self-administer medications by placing them at risk of not receiving their physician ordered medication treatment to meet their individual needs.The findings included: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 03/12/2026, revealed the resident was a 77-years-old male, originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnosis of lack of coordination (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movement), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and allergy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for antipsychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication for 2 (Residents #6 and #54) of 5 residents reviewed for chemical restraint, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was prescribed Lorazepam for anxiety, no longer than 14 days PRN (as needed) and no duration. 2. Resident #54 were prescribed lorazepam (a class of prescription benzodiazepine [depressant] medications that slow down the central nervous system to treat anxiety, which are intended for short-term use due to risks of dependency and addiction) to be administered as needed, indefinitely without an end date. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. A record review of Resident #54's admission record dated 3/11/2026 revealed an admission date of 9/23/2025 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 20 Residents (Resident #82) whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #82's baseline care plan included the resident's dialysis status, wound care, and the use of oxygen. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents not having their needs met based on their assessment.The findings were:Record review of Resident #82's face sheet, dated 03/13/2026, revealed that the resident was a 74-years-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (sudden blockage in a lung artery), peripheral vascular disease (reduced circulation of blood to a body part other than the brain or heart), and dependence on renal dialysis (require dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident and identify the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 20 Residents (Residents #46 and #4) whose records were reviewed for resident needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's care plan reflected the care for the resident's bowel incontinence. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan was revised and updated after the resident's gastrostomy feeding tube status was changed from continuous feeding to bolus feeding (a way to send formular through feeding tube using a catheter syringe) only at bedtime. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care and services.The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated 03/13/2026, revealed the resident was a-91-years-old female, originally admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #37) of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care. When CNA-V was providing incontinent care to Resident #37 on 03/12/2026, CNA-V cleaned the perineal area with multiple passes of one wipe. The failure could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections.The findings included: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 03/13/2026, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of lack of coordination (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movement), urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #57 and #82) of 9 residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. Resident #57's nebulizer mask for breathing treatment was not covered in a plastic bag when it was not being used on 03/10/2026. 2. Resident #82 was receiving oxygen therapy without a physician's order. This failure could place residents at risk of illness, respiratory complications and accidents.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 03/13/2026, revealed the resident was a 100-years-old female, originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of lack of coordination (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movement), atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), and atherosclerotic heart disease (caused by plaque buildup in arterial walls). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 of 20 residents (Residents #41) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's personal refrigerator, located in his room, did not have a small plastic cup that was not dated or labeled. This failure could place the residents at risk for food borne illness.The findings include: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 03/12/2026, revealed a 77-years-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #41 had diagnoses which included lack of coordination (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movement), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and allergy rhinitis (when a reaction occurs that causes nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had physician orders that documented the could have liquid protein supplements by mouth instead of via gastrostomy tube. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect medication administrations due to misinformation by incomplete and inaccurate medical record. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 03/13/2026, revealed a 90-years-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problem with the blood vessels that supply it), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and gastrostomy status (surgical opening into stomach for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to indicate Resident #3 received oxygen on her Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. FindingsThe findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 09/28/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's Physician Progress Note, dated 09/24/25, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with a past medical history which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (difficulty breathing resulting in low levels of oxygen in the blood), high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to adequately pump blood in the body resulting in fluid around the heart and lungs) and pneumonia (a type of lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #3 received oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula without a physician order. This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and could lead them to a lack of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 09/28/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's Physician Progress Note, dated 09/24/25, revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female with a past medical history which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (difficulty breathing resulting in low levels of oxygen in the blood), high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to adequately pump blood in the body resulting in fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for two (2) residents' (Resident #1 and Resident #2) needs for one (1) of five (5) licensed nurses (the ADON) reviewed for staff competency. 1. While providing wound care for Resident #1 on 11/24/2025, the ADON did not fully cover the resident's wound bed with the calcium alginate dressing per physician order.2. While providing wound care for Resident #1 on 11/25/2025, the ADON did not date or initial the wound dressing.3. While providing wound care for Resident #2 on 11/25/2025, the ADON did not date or initial the wound dressing. These failures could place residents at risk for improper care and complications of residents' medical care.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 11/24/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female. She was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for two (2) of two (2) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to post signage on 11/24/2025 to indicate Resident #1 was ordered to be on contact isolation precautions prior to or immediately upon notification of the order. While providing wound care for Resident #1 on 11/24/2025 and 11/25/2025, the ADON did not wash her hands prior to or after providing wound care to a resident who was on contact precautions. The ADON did not sanitize her hands between glove changes. While providing wound care for Resident #1 on 11/25/2025, the ADON placed open wound care supplies directly on the resident's bed. 2. While providing wound care for Resident #2 on 11/25/2025, the ADON did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to indicate Resident #3 received oxygen on her Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 09/28/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's Physician Progress Note, dated 09/24/25, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with a past medical history which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (difficulty breathing resulting in low levels of oxygen in the blood), high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to adequately pump blood in the body resulting in fluid around the heart and lungs) and pneumonia (a type of lung infection) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #3 received oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula without a physician order. This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and could lead them to a lack of care.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 09/28/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's Physician Progress Note, dated 09/24/25, revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female with a past medical history which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (difficulty breathing resulting in low levels of oxygen in the blood), high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to adequately pump blood in the body resulting in fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 (Residents #27, #38, #9, #2, and #49) of 8 residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's Foley catheter bag was not touching the floor twice on 12/03/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's Foley catheter bag was not touching the floor on 12/03/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's Foley catheter bag was not touching the floor on 12/03/2024 and on 12/05/2024. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Foley catheter bag was not touching the floor on 12/03/2024 and on 12/05/2024. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's Foley catheter bag was not touching the floor on 12/06/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY §483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments. The assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 [Resident #33] residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in that Residen #33's diagnosis was not coded. 1. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #33 diagnosis status on the quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] and quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE]. These failures could place resident at risk for improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #33 admission Record dated 12/06/24 revealed resident was initially admitted [DATE], re-admitted [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. 2. Record review of Resident #33 Medication Review Report dated 12/05/24 revealed diagnoses to include Adjustment Disorder with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11.54%, based on 3 errors out of 26 opportunities which involved 2 of 2 residents (Resident #52 and #18) and 1 MA, reviewed for medication administration and medication errors. 1.) The facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely for Resident #52 on 12/5/2024. 2.) The facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely for Resident #18 on 12/5/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of incomplete therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and decline in health. The findings included: 1.) Record review of the Face Sheet printed 12/6/2024, reflected Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the Diagnosis Report printed on 12/6/2024, reflected Resident #52 had the following diagnoses: chronic kidney disease [long term condition that affects the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for medication administration. Resident #31 was provided medications, Amlodipine Besylate and Carvedilol, outside of physician parameters. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet, dated 12/5/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old resident with an initial admission date of 4/8/2023 and diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (condition that affects one side of the body usually caused by a stroke that can cause paralysis), unspecified atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often rapid heartbeat), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #31's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/12/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide special eating equipment for residents who needed them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident could use the assistive devices when consuming meals for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for special eating equipment and assistance when consuming meals. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided with a divided plate to meet Resident #2's need for assistance while eating. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/6/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (condition that affects one side of the body usually caused by a stroke that can cause paralysis), a traumatic brain injury, and a cerebral infarction (stroke).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 15 of 26 staff (ADMN, ADON, DM, AD, RN J, RN K, LVN D, LVN L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA O, RA P, Hskg Q, Recept R, MR S) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility failed to implement their abuse policy when the ADMN, ADON, DM, AD, RN J, RN K, LVN D, LVN L, CNA M, CNA N, CNA O, RA P, Hskg Q, Recept R, MR S's annual EMR was not completed in the past year. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. The findings were: Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment of Resident, or Misappropriation of Resident Property, reviewed 08/2017 which read 5. [ .] Screening: Potential employees will be screened, per federal &/or state regulation, [ .] Screening will consist of: [a] Inquiries into the State licensing authorities [b] Inquires into State nurse aide registry [ .]. 1. Record review of the Staff Roster, undated, revealed the ADMN was hired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 3 of 25 residents (Resident #28, #29, and #37) for care plan revisions, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's care plan was revised to indicate the residents change in code status. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's and Resident #37's care plan was revised to include tube feedings. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care. The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 10/24/2023 revealed an initial admission date of 09/11/2023 with a most recent admission of 10/03/2023 and diagnoses which included: acute posthemorrhagic anemia (acute blood loss anemia), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract) and adult failure to thrive (insufficient weight gain, loss of appetite). Further review of Resident #28's face sheet, revealed under the section DNR. Record review of Resident #28's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, failed to provide a therapeutic diet which was prescribed by the attending physician for two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #7) out of 8 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets, in that: 1. The facility did not serve Resident #4 a minced & moist diet and a magic cup for lunch as prescribed by the attending physician. 2. The facility did not serve Resident #7 soft & bite sized potatoes & onions as was reflected in his 10/24/2023 lunch meal tray ticket and the recipe. The facility did not change Resident #7's diet on for 10/24/2023 lunch from a soft & bite sized diet to a minced & moist diet as was revealed as a doctor's order on 10/23/2023. These failures could place residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for decreased meal satisfaction, potential weight loss due to poor meal intake, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decline in health status. The findings were: 1. A record review of Resident #4's face sheet on 10/25/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There were 3 storage containers of prepared food in two separate refrigerators that were not properly sealed. 2. DA K wore jewelry with dangling charms on her wrist while engaged in food preparation in the kitchen. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 10/23/2023 at 9:52 AM in one of the refrigerators revealed an opened clear bag (the manufacturer's bag that would be inside of the product's box) of French fries. In the next refrigerator there was an opened clear, plastic bag of sausage patties. This exposed the contents of the bags to the ambient air in the cooler and potential contamination by pathogens and bacteria. The DM then went to get a Ziploc bag to put the French fries in, to seal it. Observation on 10/25/2023 at 11:31 AM, revealed an opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and protect and promote the rights of the Resident, for 3 of 25 (Resident #215, Resident #42, Resident #214) residents reviewed for dignity, in that; 1. The facility failed to ask Resident #215 and Resident #42 if they wanted to wear a clothing protector around their neck to protect their clothes from getting dirty, while they had their meal. Resident #215 did not want to wear the clothing protector on 10/23/2023 and 10/25/2023 lunch. Resident #42 did not want to wear a clothing protector around her neck for 10/25/2023 lunch. 2. The facility failed to give Resident #214 an egg roll that she ordered and was looking forward to, for 10/25/2023 lunch. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for resident assessments, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was coded as a hospital discharge instead of a community discharge. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their individually assessed needs met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 10/26/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #57's Quarterly MDS, 09/12/2023, revealed on A2100. Discharge status entered as 01. Community instead of 03. Acute Hospital. Record review of Resident #57's Progress Notes, dated 10/26/2023, note entered 09/12/2023 at 2:18 p.m., revealed As per family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one resident (Residents #43) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #43 received Acetylcysteine [a medication to help thin and loosen mucus in the airways due to certain lung diseases], and Baclofen [a medication for the treatment of muscle spasms] on 10/25/2023 as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and result in a diminished quality of life. The findings include: Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43's primary reason for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys in 1 medication carts of 6 medication carts (Treatment Cart 300-hallway) reviewed for medication storage, in that; The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Cart 300-hallway was locked when left unattended in the hallway. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings were: In an observation on 10/25/2023 at 8:50 AM, the Treatment Cart on the 300-hallway was unlocked and unattended. The Treatment Cart contained prescription and over the counter medications related to skin and wound care. There were ambulatory residents and visitors in the immediate vicinity. Staff were seated at the 300-hallway nurses' station but could not see the Treatment Cart from their position. In an interview on 10/25/2023 at 8:54 AM, LVN D stated the Treatment Cart was her responsibility. LVN D stated she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. Resident #2's meal ticket referred to an assistive cup as a sippy cup to be used during meal service. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/6/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (condition that affects one side of the body usually caused by a stroke that can cause paralysis), a traumatic brain injury, and a cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 9/28/2024, reflected a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DKP INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF67%since 06/01/2023
SLM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF33%since 07/16/2021
GOLDEN, LAURENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF17%since 07/16/2021
GOLDEN, SHAWNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF17%since 07/16/2021
PRINCE, DANNYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF67%since 07/16/2021
GO PROPERTIES 3, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2021
PRINCE & LUFFEY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
AZIZ, WESAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2021
WIEDERHOLT, BRANDONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 50%Other / private 29%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$389per resident / day
operating cost
$11,830per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$422per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next