Spjst Rest Home 1
1810 Old Granger Road, Taylor, TX 76574 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (512) 352-6337 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $122,722 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-27)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.92 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.74 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.9%CMS range 33.9–56.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 6.7–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.1–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 83.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for three (Resident #1, and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Hospitality Aide A and CNA C observed the sling prior to entering Resident #1 room and determined at this time the sling was not safe to use. Hospitality Aide A and CNA C did not report this to anyone and used the unsafe sling on the Mechanical lift during transfer of Resident #1. Hospitality Aide A and CNA C observed the loops on the sling to be frayed. There were four green loops on the sling and three of the four green loops broke during the transfer. The bottom four blue loops were already torn and unable to use prior to hooking the sling to Mechanical lift. There were three of four purple loops frayed and was beginning to tear and these loops were used on the Mechanical lift during transfer of Resident #1. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of three residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2 .reviewed for Mechanical lift transfers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transferred with qualified staff. Hospitality Aide A knew the sling was not safe to use by observing the bottom loops were broken and three of the four top purple loops was frayed and beginning to tear. Hospitality Aide A did not report the unsafe sling to nurse prior to using the sling. Hospitality Aides were allowed to assist with resident transfers outside of the scope of their job description. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 6:27 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 7:50 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm that is not immediate and a scope of isolated. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury, serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in a safe operating condition for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for safe requirements. The facility failed to provide a safe sling to be used for Resident #1 on [DATE]. On [DATE], Resident #1 was being transferred by Mechanical lift and the sling broke while Resident #1 was in the air, and she fell and hit her face on the legs of the Mechanical lift. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury, serious impairment, or death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in cerebellum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not use physical abuse or corporal punishment on a resident for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. CNA C pulled Resident #1's hands and refused to stop when Resident #1 repeatedly stated to stop and there was a bruise on Resident #1's right hand after CNA C pulled on her hand. Resident #1 stated CNA C was hurting her while attempted to transfer her from lying position in bed to sitting position on the side of bed. Resident #1 was afraid of CNA C and isolated self in room after the incident. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 06/03/2024 at 8:19 PM. While the IJ was removed on 06/06/2024 at 6:50 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm that is not immediate and a scope of isolated. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, harm, psychosocial harm, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent the abuse of residents for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility did not implement the Abuse and Neglect Policy when CNA C abused Resident #1 and CNA C was not immediately relieved of duty. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 06/03/2024 at 8:19 PM. While the IJ was removed on 06/06/2024 at 6:50 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. Findings included: Record review of the Facility Policy of Resident Abuse/ Neglect, (not dated), reflected This facility will not tolerate resident abuse and neglect. Any reported of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #7) of seven residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess Resident #7 for emotional and physical distress after he was exposed to smoke inhalation after the air conditioning/heating unit began to smoke in his room and subsequently began not feeling well and had pain in his chest form smoke exposure. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] and diagnoses included: malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancerous tumor that forms in the prostate gland), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease that limits airflow and causes ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, for one of three residents (Resident #49) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 was assessed, monitored, and received pain medication prior to wound care provided for a cancerous open lesion on the left side of her face. This failure could place all residents at risk for unnecessary pain and discomfort. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #49 reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) exacerbation, Vascular Dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes, causes memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen.1. The facility failed to properly thaw raw chicken in the sink, not under running water, in its kitchen on 01/13/2026.2. The facility failed to properly store, label, and date all food items located in the facility refrigerators, freezers and in the dry food pantry area on 01/13/2026 and 01/14/2026. 3. The facility failed to discard outdated food items located in the refrigerators on 01/13/2026 and 01/14/2026. 4. The facility failed to properly seal food product bags in the dry storage area to prevent exposure to air on 01/13/2026 and 01/14/2026. 5. The facility failed to properly store, label, and date all food items located in the satellite refrigerators on halls 100/200,400, and 500/600 on 01/13/2026.These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/13/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 9 of 20 residents (Resident #3, Resident #19, Resident #27, Resident #34, Resident #38, Resident #43, Resident #63, Resident #64, and Resident #88) reviewed for misappropriation.The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Residents #3, 34, 38, 64, and 88's tramadol (a schedule IV controlled opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), Residents #19, 27, and 63's lorazepam (a schedule IV controlled benzodiazepine medication used to treat anxiety), Residents #27 and #63's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a schedule II controlled opioid medication used to treat severe pain), Resident # 43's acetaminophen-codeine (a schedule III opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), and Resident #88's oxycodone (a schedule II opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) taken from 01/03/2026 through 01/15/2026.This failure placed residents at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 5 medication carts (200-Hall Treatment Cart and 500-Hall Medication Cart). 1. The facility failed to ensure the 200-hall treatment cart was locked, medications and/or treatments secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, and/or visitors.2. The facility failed to ensure Latanoprost (a medicated eye drop used to lower the pressure inside the eye) was stored at the proper temperature per manufacturer's recommendations. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications, missing medications, and access of others to residents' medications.Findings included:During an observation on 01/14/2026 at 11:30 AM, LVN C was observed pulling supplies to perform wound care from the 200-hall treatment cart. She shut the drawer to the cart and entered a resident's room, leaving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor for 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services.The facility failed to ensure DM B refrained from adding an unmeasured amount of liquid to Salisbury steak with gravy, seas white beans, and sauteed cabbage pureed meals during lunch service on 01/14/2026.This failure could place residents who received a pureed diet at risk for diminished or altered nutritional status and potential weight loss.Observation and interview of the pureed diet process, on 01/14/2025, at 11:09 AM, revealed DM B poured an unmeasured amount of chicken broth into the sea beans without measuring after mixing one time, she poured the beans into a serving pan, the beans were runny in appearance. DM B proceeded to puree the sauteed cabbage which appeared to be over boiled instead of sauteed. DM B poured another unmeasured amount of chicken broth from a plastic container into the blender with the cabbage. After mixing the first time, she added another unmeasured amount…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 8 (Resident #3, Resident #15, Resident #26, Resident #29, Resident #41, Resident #58, Resident #69 and Resident #87) of 23 residents reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to:1. Ensure LVN C practiced proper hand hygiene while serving and assisting Residents #15, # 29, #58, # 69, and #87 during the lunch meal on 01/13/2026.2. Ensure LVN C and CNA I practiced proper enhanced barrier precautions by wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment when performing wound care for Resident #3 on 1/14/2026.3. Ensure LVN C practiced proper hand hygiene while assisting Resident #58 during the lunch meal on 01/14/2026.4. Ensure LVN D and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and failed to provide care for each resident in a manner and environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 2 (Resident #26, Resident #41) of 12 residents reviewed for dignity.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #26 and Resident # 41 were provided dignified and individualized feeding assistance during the lunch meal on 01/15/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of diminished dignity and negatively affect their quality of life.Record review of Resident #26's Face sheet dated 01/15/2026, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to facility on 03/09/2021 with diagnoses of Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (high blood pressure damaged the heart), Neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (brain condition that cause problems with memory), Unspecified dementia (memory loss), Major depressive disorder (feel sad,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitization. 1. The facility failed to ensure food in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage room were properly stored, dated and labeled. 2. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff performed hand hygiene while preparing food. 3. The facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in clean operating condition. 4. The facility failed to ensure refrigerators in satellite kitchens maintained appropriate temperatures. 5. The facility failed to ensure clean dishes were stored away from food preparation area and cleaning cloths were stored away from food preparation areas. These failures could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Observation of the freezer on 10/15/2024 at 7:06 AM revealed an undated package of molded raspberries . Observation of the dry storage on 10/15/2024 at 7:07 AM revealed jalapenos with a label that revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for all the residents reviewed for infection control, as indicated by: 1. LVN F, LVN I, and CMA N did not clean and disinfect the blood pressure monitor while using it on Resident #11, Resident #1, Resident #54, Resident #50, Resident #5, Resident #25, and Resident #46. 2. LVN F did not perform hand sanitizing before preparing medications and handling blood pressure monitor. 3. IP M handled clean items with soiled gloves while providing peri care to Resident #230 These failures could place the residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #230's face sheet on 10/16/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were, constipation, nausea with vomiting, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #38, Resident #48, Resident #58 , and Resident #73) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #38 and Resident #58 included ADLs. 2. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #48 and Resident #73 included diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate physical and psychosocial care. Findings included: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's Face Sheet , not dated, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of vascular dementia, unspecified, without behavioral disturbance, and Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of eight residents (Resident # 31, Resident #38, Resident #43, and Resident #58) reviewed quality of life. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's facial hair was removed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 38's, Resident #43's and Resident #58's nails were cleaned and smooth around the edges. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #31 Record review of Resident # 31's Face Sheet, undated, reflected a 75 -year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, unspecified ( a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest task), unspecified lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 12 of 12 residents on the secure unit. The facility failed to provide activities on the secured unit as scheduled on 10/05/24, 10/06/24, 10/12/24, and 10/13/24, These failures placed residents at risk of boredom, depression, increased behaviors, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of the Activity Calendar for the month of October 2024 revealed the following scheduled activities: *10/05/24 10:00 AM: Coffee Social, 11:00 AM Sensory Station, 2:00 PM: TV TIME, 3:00 PM: Coffee Social, 4:00 PM: Resident Activity Choice. *10/06/24 10:00 AM: Coffee Social, 11:00 AM: Sensory Station, 2:00 PM: Grandbaby Love, 2:30 PM Corn Hole/Basket toss, 4:00: PM Resident Activity Choice.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F695 Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for respiratory care were followed. For all residents reviewed for respiratory care as indicated by: 1. The nasal cannula of Resident #34 and the CPAP of Resident #32 were not in a bag when unused. 2. The oxygen concentrator filters of Resident #32 and Resident #24 were covered in dust. These failures could place the residents at risk of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #34's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes memory loss), venous insufficiency (the veins have trouble sending blood from arms and legs to the heart), congestive heart failure (the heart is unable to pump blood well enough to meet the body's need). Record review of Resident #34's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 3 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts. A) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies were removed from the medication storage room for Halls 100 and 200 including 1 box of Colostomy (a surgical opening for the colon in the abdomen) supplies that expired 2/5/2018, 3 bisacodyl suppositories that expired 8/2024, and chlorhexidine wipes that expired 7/2/2023. B) The facility failed to ensure expired supplies were removed from the medication storage room for halls 300 and 400 including a foley catheter insertion tray with expiration date of 5/31/2023 and Normal Saline IV flush with expiration date 4/30/2023. C) The facility failed to ensure that all medication were secured in the medication cart when it was unattended by CMA N. These failures could place residents at risk of contamination causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity by contracted staff for 1 (Resident # 69) of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure contracted staff did not check vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature) while at the dining room table during meal service. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of a decline in their sense of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #69's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, dementia (memory, thinking, difficulty), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and anxiety. Review of Resident #69's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had a BIMS score that was not completed but, indicated the resident could not understand and could not make self-understood. An observation of the 100-hall dining room lunch service on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #230) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure IP M provided privacy during peri care for Resident #230, by closing the door and fully drawing the privacy curtain. This failure could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #230's face sheet on 10/16/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were, constipation, nausea with vomiting, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (acid reflex), and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review on 10/16/24 of Resident #230's care plan dated 10/01/24 reflected the resident had alteration in his bowel elimination and constipation. The relevant intervention was monitoring bowel movements every shift and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that proper care practices related to catheterization were maintained for one of one resident(s) reviewed for catheter care, as indicated by: 1. The foley catheter bag of Resident #70 was laying on the floor. These failures can place the resident at risk for infection, urethral (the tube that carries urine from the bladder exit the body) tears or dislodging the catheter. Record review of Resident #70's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to retention of urine (inability to urinate), hypertension (high blood pressure), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #70's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #70's Care Plan dated 9/13/2024 reflected the resident was at risk for impaired urinary elimination related to recent urinary tract infection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #14, Resident #18, Resident #24, Resident #63, Resident #70, and Resident #75) reviewed for pureed diets. Cook K failed to ensure food prepared for residents receiving a pureed diet was in the proper consistency for this diet. This failure could place residents who received pureed diets at risk of not having nutritional needs met by consuming foods that could cause poor intake, choking and decreased meal intakes. Findings included: Observation on 10/15/2024 at 12:59 PM revealed pureed peas were served on plate and appeared to have a watery consistency. The pureed peas appeared to easily pour out of the serving spoon. During an interview on 10/15/2024 at12:59 PM, DA T stated that she thought the texture of the peas should be a little thicker. Observation on 10/16/2024 at 10:50 AM revealed the chicken base contained included instruaction revealed to add 1 teaspoon to 1 cup of boiling water. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption in personal refrigerators for 1 of 1 residents. 1. The facility failed to conduct and/or document the temperature and contents of Resident #22's personal refrigerator. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: Review of undated face sheet for Resident #22 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses include acquired absence of right leg below knee (below knee amputation), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength), and major depressive disorder (a serious mental disorder that affects how a person feels, thinks, and acts). Review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 14 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for one of one facility reviewed for environment. The facility failed to conduct and/or document the servicing of residents in room air-conditioning/heating units which resulted in the smoking of Resident #7's unit. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] and diagnoses included: malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancerous tumor that forms in the prostate gland), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease that limits airflow and causes ongoing respiratory symptoms), unspecified asthma (chronic disease in which the bronchial airways in the lungs become narrowed and swollen and make it difficult to breathe), atherosclerotic heart disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure the safe transfer of residents when hospitality aides were allowed to assist with resident transfers outside of the scope of their job description. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. Findings included: Record review of Hospitality Aide J personnel record on 02/28/2024 reflected form titled Hospitality Aide was signed by Hospitality Aide J on 08/31/2024. The hospitality Aide form reflected the following: - Answer call lights in a timely manner; determine if request does not involve direct care and then carry out request. - Examples of non-direct care: a. Helping with TV b. Getting a personal item for a resident. c. Giving them a blanket or pillow. - Be Alert to resident's comfort and needs. Answer their request promptly and report to nurse any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Tag: F 689 S/S= Surveyor Name(s): [NAME] Investigator VI Immediate Supervisor: [NAME] Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure staff properly transferred Resident #1 from her wheelchair to the shower chair. This failure could result in residents experiencing accidents, injuries, unrelieved pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/29/2024, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee (when cartilage- connective tissue- in the knee joint breaks down - pain, stiffness, swelling, and decreased mobility), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy unspecified (disorders that interfere with normal nerve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) whose care was reviewed in that: CNA A told Resident #1 she was going to go to bed even though Resident #1 did not want to go to bed. This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 01/11/2024 with diagnoses of Cerebral infarction, pain, generalized anxiety disorder, disorders of the circulatory and respiratory systems, abnormalities of gait and mobility, unspecified lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the annual MDS for Resident #1, date unknown, reflected a BIMS score of 8, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Review of the employee disciplinary form dated 11/01/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, when the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury for one of eight residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. The facility did not report a fracture of unknown origin to Resident #1's tibia until the fourth day after it was identified. This failure placed residents at risk of not having abuse or neglect identified swiftly and thus being subjected to further abuse or neglect. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects central nervous system), trigeminal neuralgia (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and 1 of 1 nurse treatment carts. A) The facility failed to ensure 4 boxes containing 2 bottles each of expired glucose control solutions were removed from the medication storage room for Halls 5 and 6. B) The facility failed to ensure the wound treatment cart was locked while unattended by LVN A. C) The facility failed to ensure a container of disinfectant wipes was not left unattended on top of the nurse wound treatment cart in the memory care unit. These failures could place residents at risk of inaccurate blood glucose readings resulting in adverse health consequences, risk of injury from access to disinfectant wipes and medications. Findings included: A. Observation on [DATE] at 3:35 PM of the medication storage room for Halls 5 and 6 with the DON in attendance revealed 4 boxes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for 3 of 3 residents (Resident's #45, #138 and #49) reviewed for infection control measures. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed standard precautions during wound care. This failure could place residents who receive wound care at risk for the development of infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #45's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and Pressure Ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident #49) The facility failed to provide Resident #49 pain medication, Morphine Concentrate Schedule Solution II; 100mg/5ml (20 mg/mL); amt 1ml oral, 15 minutes prior to wound care as ordered. This failure placed the resident at risk of increased pain, poor sleep patterns, increased anxiety and depression, and decreased sense of wellbeing. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #49 reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) exacerbation, Vascular Dementia (brain damage caused by multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$122,722 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $94,403 — penalty dated 2024-07-27
- $20,418 — penalty dated 2024-06-06
- $7,901 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2021 |
| SPJST REST HOME | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| GHEEWALA, RAEEDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| LESHIKAR, HOWARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2025 |
| TEPLICEK, BEVERLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2025 |
| VARTA, VALERIE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2025 |
| VICTORICK, DONNIE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676290. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.