Trinity Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
314 E Caroline St, Trinity, TX 75862 · Government - Hospital district · 76 certified beds · (936) 744-1300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0604, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $275,584 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 43.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 34.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.66 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.19 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.6%CMS range 33.6–60.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 6.5–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.8–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.40 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consult with the physician when the resident experienced a change in condition for 3 of 4 residents (Resident's #11, #12, and #13) reviewed for a change of condition.1. The facility failed to notify the wound care physician to obtain and implement wound care orders for Resident #11 until 10/20/25, 2 days after identifying unstageable pressure injury (a full-thickness tissue loss where the base of the ulcer is covered by slough or eschar, making it impossible to determine the depth of the wound) to right heel on 10/18/25.The facility failed to contact surgeon or wound care physician to obtain wound care orders for Resident #11 on 11/3/25 after debridement of pressure ulcer (the medical process of removing necrotic (dead) tissue from a wound) in surgeon's office on 11/3/25. 2. The facility failed to obtain and implement wound care orders for Resident #12 until 10/19/25 after admission on [DATE]. Resident was admitted with bilateral stage 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatment and services, in accordance with comprehensive assessment and professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure injuries was provided for 4 of 4 Residents (Resident's #11, #12, #13, and #16) reviewed for pressure injuries.1. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments after 10/18/25 for Resident #11 who admitted on [DATE] after ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) for fracture to right foot. She was admitted with no pressure ulcers and developed an unstageable pressure injury to Right heel on 10/18/25.The facility failed to obtain and implement wound care orders for Resident #11 for 2 days after identifying unstageable pressure injury to right heel on 10/18/25. The facility failed to implement dietary recommendations from 10/28/25 from the dietician for Resident #11. The facility failed to perform wound care treatments for 5 days in October and November 2025 for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 11 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident #4 and Resident #2)1.The facility failed to administer Metoprolol (a medication to treat high blood pressure) and Entresto (a medication to treat high blood pressure and treat heart failure) to Resident #2 on 10/6/25 at 9:00 pm as ordered.2. The facility failed to ensure Entresto 24/26 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day was ordered for Resident #4 when she was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 9/18/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received Eliquis (a medication used to treat and prevent blood clots) 5 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day as ordered by missing 8 doses in October 2025 and she was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/28/2025 and diagnosed with atrial fibrillation with RVR (rapid ventricular response-rapid heart rate), acute on chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure along with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 (Resident #1) of 31 residents reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to inform Resident #1 or their representative of the risks associated with use of assist bars, care plan for risks associated with assist bars/bed rails, obtain consent for the use of assist bars, obtain physician orders for use of assist bars, and implement interventions following an incident of entrapment with the assist bar. Resident #1 was found by LVN A on the floor in his room with his left arm caught between the assist bar and air mattress on 09/24/2023 and had no interventions to address risk of entrapment following incident. Resident #1 was found by CNA A in his room with his left arm, head and neck between the assist bar and air mattress and his legs on the floor mat on 10/31/2023 and CPR was initiated. Resident #1 expired at the hospital on [DATE] following intubation and responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent physical restraints of residents for 1 (Resident #1) of 31 residents reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to inform Resident #1 or their representative of the risks associated with use of assist bars, care plan for risks associated with assist bars, obtain consent for the use of assist bars, and obtain physician orders for use of assist bars, and implement interventions following identified entrapment incident from assist bars. Resident #1 was found by LVN A on the floor in his room with his left arm caught between the assist bar and air mattress on 09/24/2023 and had no interventions to address risk of entrapment following incident. Resident #1 was found by CNA A in his room with his left arm, head and neck between the assist bar and air mattress and his legs on the floor mat on 10/31/2023 and CPR was initiated. Resident #1 expired at the hospital on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-05 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bedrails were assessed for the risk of entrapment of residents prior to installation, and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 9 of 31 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #9) reviewed for bed rails. 1. The facility failed to inform Resident #1, Resident#2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #9 or their representative of the risks associated with the use of assist bars. 2. The facility failed to care plan for risks associated with assist bars, obtain consent for the use of assist bars, and obtain physician orders for use of assist bars. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have his left arm caught between the assist bar and air mattress on [DATE]. 4. The facility failed to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident #10)The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 received timely incontinent care on 03/04/2026 which caused redness to inner thighs and excoriation to buttocks.This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment, discomfort, and skin breakdown.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record dated 3/4/2026 for Resident #10 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, colostomy status (opening into the abdomen for the collection of stool), and hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralyzed on right side).Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #10 indicated he had moderate impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 12. He was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's skin was appropriately assessed and treated resulting in skin breakdown. This failure could place all residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection, and hospitalization.Findings included: 1. Review of an admission Record dated 4/7/26 for Resident #1 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia (respiratory infection), type 2 diabetes, and acquired absence of right leg above the knee (amputation of right leg above the knee). Record review of an assessment MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 had intact cognition with a BIMS of 15. He required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 of 11 residents (Resident #1, # 7, #14, and #15) reviewed for quality of care.1.The facility failed to ensure RN A assessed, provided care, conducted and documented a neuro assessment, and notify the physician and family when Resident #1 fell and hit her head on 10/30/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure a head-to-toe skin assessment was completed by a nurse after CNA G identified possible ant bites to Resident #15 on 10/9/25, and Residents #7 and #14 on 10/10/25.These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment and or decline in their health.The findings included: 1.Record review of an admission Record for Resident #1 dated 11/5/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective communications mandatory training for 6 of 17 direct care staff (CNA K, CNA F, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M and the ADON) reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to CNA K, CNA F, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M and ADON.This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for CNA K revealed a hire date of 05/19/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for CNA F revealed a hire date of 05/22/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for LVN A revealed a hire date of 12/10/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on effective communication. Record review of the personnel file for LVN L revealed a hire date of 01/06/2026 and no evidence of initial hire training on effective communication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 9 of 17 direct care staff (CNA K, CNA F, CNA E, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M, the Dietary Manager, the Activity Director and the ADON) reviewed for training requirements.The facility failed to ensure mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program effectively was provided to CNA K, CNA F, CNA E, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M, Dietary Manager, Activity Director and the ADONThis failure could place residents at risk of illness or spread of infections due to lack of staff training.Findings included:Record review of the personnel file for CNA K revealed a hire date of 05/19/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on infection prevention and control.Record review of the personnel file for CNA F revealed a hire date of 05/22/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on infection prevention and control.Record review of the personnel file for CNA E revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory behavioral health training for 9 of 17 direct care staff (CNA K, CNA F, CNA E, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M, the Dietary Manager, the Activity Director and the ADON) reviewed for training requirements.The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to CNA K, CNA F, CNA E, LVN A, LVN L, LVN M, the Dietary Manager, the Activity Director and the ADONThis failure could place residents with behaviors at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. Findings included:Record review of the personnel file for CNA K revealed a hire date of 05/19/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on behavioral health.Record review of the personnel file for CNA F revealed a hire date of 05/22/2025 and no evidence of initial hire training on behavioral health.Record review of the personnel file for CNA E revealed a hire date of 06/29/2024 and no evidence of annual training on behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the option he or she prefers for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a signed medication consent form for Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) when ordered on 10/15/25.This failure could place residents at risk for treatment or services provided without their informed consent.Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 4/14/26 for Resident #1 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of pneumonia (infection in the lungs).Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 indicated a BIMS score of 13, which indicated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility coordinated with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #45) reviewed for resident assessments.The facility did not refer Resident #45 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder.This failure could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses at risk of not receiving beneficial and needed services and care.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #45 dated 4/14/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnosis of dementia, bipolar disorder (alternating mood swings with extreme highs and lows), depression (loss of interest in doing things that affect daily life) and anxiety disorder (fear, dread, or worry that interferes with daily life).Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and or the resident representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for the base line care plans.The facility did not provide a summary of the Baseline Care Plan to Resident #58 or their Responsible Party (RP).This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #58 dated 4/14/2026 reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (hip fracture), age related osteoporosis (brittle bones), and COPD (a group of lung disorders that affect breathing).Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had moderate impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 12. She was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make sure a comprehensive care plan was prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that included but not limited to the participation of the resident and the resident representative for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 has care plan conferences at least every 3 months, and her representative, were invited to the resident care plan conferences.This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to provide input on their care, and receiving the care and services to meet their needs.Findings include:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #16 dated 4/14/2026 reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest in doing things), and GERD (acid reflux disease).Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #16 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility did not ensure LVN A watched Resident #16 take administered medications, and they were not left in her room on 4/14/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for the unsafe administration of medications. Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #16 dated 4/14/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest), and GERD (acid reflux disease).Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #16 dated 2/27/2026 indicated she did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. She required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for food palatability. (noon meal 4/14/26).The facility did not provide palatable and appetizing food for the residents receiving pureed food for the 10/28/2025 noon meal.This failure could place residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for diminished meal satisfaction and potential weight loss due to poor meal intake.Findings included:During interview during the initial tour on 4/13/26 at 10:58 am, Resident #49 said she ate meals in her room and complained of cold food.During an observation on 4/14/26 at 1:05 pm, the test trays left the kitchen after the dining room had been served. The test trays were observed by the surveyor after leaving the dining room and at 1:18 pm, the test trays were delivered to the conference room. The test trays consisted of 1 regular tray which included chopped chicken, rice, peas/carrots, and a roll, and 1 puree tray which included chicken, carrots, green beans, and roll. The covers were removed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws standards of quality for 1 of 6 licensed staff (LVN B) reviewed for administration.The facility failed to ensure LVN B's nurse license did not expire as of [DATE].This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services from a licensed nurseThe findings include:Record review of a personnel file for LVN B indicated she was hired at the facility on [DATE].Record review of the Texas Board of Nursing verification for LVN B checked on [DATE] indicated her license expired [DATE].Record review of a daily staffing assignment/sign in log dated [DATE] revealed LVN B worked on this day as indicated by her initials.During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 am, the DON said she was not aware LVN B had an expired nurse license.During an interview on [DATE] at 9:32 am, the Administrator said she was unaware LVN B had an expired nurse license until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D washed or sanitized their hands during incontinent care provided to Resident #16 on 4/14/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #16 dated 4/14/2026 reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest in doing things), and GERD (acid reflux disease).Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for 2 of 17 employees (Dietary Manager and the Activity Director) new and existing staff reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure the Activity Director was trained in effective communication, HIV, dementia, infection control and restraint reduction on hire.The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager was trained in falls, dementia, infection control and behavioral health on hire This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. Findings included:Record review of the personnel file for the Activity Director indicated she was hired at the facility on 04/01/2026 and did not have evidence of on hire training in effective communication, HIV, dementia, infection control and restraint reduction on hire. Record review of the personnel file for the Dietary Manager indicated she was hired at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the residents and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents for 1 of 17 employees (CNA E) reviewed for training requirements, in that:The facility failed to ensure that annually required education was provided on the rights of the residents and responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents were conducted with CNA E.This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings were: Record review of the personnel file for CNA E revealed a hire date of 06/29/2024. There was no evidence of annual training since hire date on resident rights and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. Record review of electronic records of training for CNA E indicated she initiated training on 04/15/2026, after surveyor entrance on 04/13/2026, but training was not completed.During an interview on 04/15/26 at 9:22 AM, the Human Resource Coordinator said she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and dementia management training for 1 of 17 (CNA E) reviewed for required training.The facility did not ensure Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and dementia management training was completed by the CNA E during annual training for 2025. This failure could place residents with dementia at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation and poor quality of care by staff with inadequate training when caring for dementia residents. Findings included:Record review of the personnel files for CNA E indicated a hire date 06/29/2024. There was no evidence that CNA E had not completed the required annual training for Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and dementia management. Annual training was not completed by CNA E since her hire date 06/29/2024.Record review of electronic training for CNA indicated it was initiated by CNA E on 4/15/2026 but not fully completed, after entrance of the survey team on 04/13/2026.During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 10:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required minimum 12 hours annual in-service education was provided for 1 of 5 CNAs (CNA E) reviewed for training requirements.The facility did not provide the required 12 hours of annual in-service education to CNA F. This failure could place residents with dementia at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation and poor quality of care by staff with inadequate training when caring for residents. The findings included:Record Review of a personnel file for CNA E indicated a hire date of 06/29/2024 and did not include the required 12 hours of annual in-service. The personnel file revealed no training for the year 2025 for Resident Rights, Abuse, Dementia, Infection Control, Effective communication, Falls, Restraints and Behavioral Health.Record review of electronic training for CNA E indicated she initiated training on 04/15/2026 after surveyor entrance on 04/1/2026 but training was not completed.During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 10:00 AM, The ADON said annual CNA training with assigned in a computer program and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident # 4)The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B properly and safely transferred Resident #4 while using a mechanical lift on 3/3/2026.This failure could result in a loss of quality of life due to injuries.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #4 dated 3/5/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, expressive language disorder (a communication disorder that affects a person's ability to express thoughts, ideas, or emotions using language), and osteoporosis (brittle bones).Record review of a care plan for Resident #4 revised 2/13/2026 indicated she had an ADL self-care performance deficit and limitation in physical mobility. Interventions for transfers indicated she required the use of a Hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 staff (CNA B) reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to ensure CNA B properly and safely transferred Resident #4 while using a mechanical lift on 3/3/2026.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for injury and harm.The findings included: Record review of an admission Record for Resident #4 dated 3/5/2026 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, expressive language disorder (a communication disorder that affects a person's ability to express thoughts, ideas, or emotions using language), and osteoporosis (brittle bones).Record review of a care plan for Resident #4 revised 2/13/2026 indicated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed enhanced barrier precautions when she provided personal care that included dressing of Resident #5 on 3/3/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #5 dated 3/4/2026 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty speaking), hypertension, and cerebral infarction (stroke).Record review of an Annual MDS Assessment for Resident #5 dated 2/9/2026 indicated she had severe impairment in thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews review the facility failed to ensure the resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (CR #1) of eleven residents reviewed for falls in that: The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and develop and implement interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injury for CR#1. This failure could affect residents who were a fall risk which could result in injury and contribute to avoidable accidents.Findings include: Record review of CR#1's face sheet dated 1/23/26 identified a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] (initial admission 6/10/24) with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, lack of coordination, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, wedge compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, and history of falls. Review of CR #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 6, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and documented a history of falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes, but is not limited to, seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse for 1 (CR #1) of 11 residents reviewed.The facility failed to ensure that all staff were trained and knowledgeable in how to react and respond appropriately to resident behavior.The facility failed to protect the resident from physical abuse when staff used physical force during care that resulted in injury. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation and compromise their right to be free from harm.Record review of CR #1's face sheet dated 01/23/26 identified a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] (initial admission [DATE]) with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, bipolar disorder with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the facility administrator and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, as required by State law and established facility procedures. Federal and state regulations require all staff to recognize, report, and document any incident or allegation of abuse, regardless of intent or injury, to ensure timely investigation and protection for one (CR #1) of eleven residents reviewed related to abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an incident on 09/01/2025 involving CR #1, in which a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) admitted to physically grabbing the resident's arm during care, resulting in a 5 x 2.5 cm skin tear to the left forearm. This failure placed residents at risk for allegations of abuse not being promptly reported, lack of timely investigation, continued exposure to potential harm, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the resident's known and ongoing medical and nursing needs for 1 (CR #1) of 11 residents reviewed. The facility failed to identify and incorporate care plan interventions related to changes in condition and emergency response, including the use of Naloxone (Narcan), despite known risk factors.This failure resulted in staff responding to ongoing fall risk, behavioral escalation, and changes in condition without clear, individualized guidance.This failure could place residents at risk for unmet medical and nursing needs, delayed response to changes in condition, and inconsistent care. Record review of CR #1's face sheet dated 01/23/26 identified a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, impaired mobility, muscle weakness, and a history of repeated falls.Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) were provided to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for pharmacy services (CR#1). The facility failed to administer Naloxone (Narcan), as ordered for suspected opioid overdose, to CR #1 on 09/09/2025. Despite staff suspicion of possible drug use and the resident presenting with unresponsiveness, facility nursing staff did not provide the emergency medication before EMS arrival. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed emergency intervention, exacerbation of life-threatening conditions, and increased potential for physical harm.Findings include: Record review of CR#1's face sheet dated 1/23/26 identified a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] (initial admission 6/10/24) with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, lack of coordination,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs, for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed.The facility failed to include Resident #1's PICC line (intravenous access to deliver medications into the blood stream) on her care plan.This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.The findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #1 dated 12/17/2025 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of UTI (infection in the urinary tract), type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia (decreased blood flow to areas of the brain), hypertension, and hemiplegia (paralyzed on one side of the body). Record review of active physician orders for Resident #1 dated 12/17/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for parenteral fluids.The facility failed to manage Resident #1's PICC line (intravenous access to deliver medications into the blood stream) dressing per professional standards and per the physician's order.This failure placed residents at risk of developing an infection.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #1 dated 12/17/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of UTI (infection in the urinary tract), type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia (decreased blood flow to areas of the brain), hypertension, and hemiplegia (paralyzed on one side of the body). Record review of active physician orders for Resident #1 dated 12/17/2025 indicated an order to change PICC/Midline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLS. The facility failed to provide hair care to Resident #1 which resulted in a large hair mat at the back of her head that had to be cut out on 11/11/25. The facility failed to provide showers or baths to Resident #1 in compliance with their shower/bath schedule. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/25/25 indicated she was an [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication that arise from underlying cognitive impairments), muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of clinical records. Facility staff failed to document Resident #1's ADL for baths or showers and hair care or refusals. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/25/25 indicated she was an [AGE] year old female, admitted on [DATE], and her diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication that arise from underlying cognitive impairments), muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle mass), Parkinson's (movement disorder), diabetes (condition that affects blood sugar levels), dementia (decline in cognitive function), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of medications for 1 (Resident #2) of 16 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer ordered medications for Resident #2 on 9/3/25, 9/6/25, 9/9/25, 9/17/25, 9/30/25, 10/6/25, 10/7/25, 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/29/25, 10/30/25, and 11/1/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of a decline in health, and decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 11/5/25 for Resident #2 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), type 2 diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar), and hypothyroidism (Underactive thyroid - a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones, leading to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #2, Resident #17, and Resident #13) and 3 of 5 staff (CNA H, LVN F, and MDS Coordinator) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA H changed her gloves and washed/sanitized her hands during incontinent care provided to Resident #2 on 11/4/2025.The facility failed to ensure LVN F changed her gloves when she changed from dirty to clean during wound care provided to Resident #17 on 11/4/2025.The facility failed to ensure the MDS Coordinator wore appropriate PPE for enhanced barrier precautions when wound care was provided to Resident #13 on 11/20/2025.These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make sure a comprehensive care plan was prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that included but not limited to the participation of the resident and the resident representative for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, and her representative were invited and attended the resident care plan conferences.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs.Findings include:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #2 dated 11/5/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest in doing things), type 2 diabetes, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (high blood pressure that makes it difficult for the heart to pump blood through the body). Record review of a Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from bedside and toileting and bathing facilities for 2 (Hall 200 and 300) of 4 hallways and 9 of 9 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9) residents reviewed for call light response. The facility failed to ensure Hall 200 and 300's call lights were visible and audible to staff and failed to provide an alternate method for residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9) to call for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:1. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 7/30/2025 for Resident #2 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the temperature for the dish machine was at the appropriate temperature of 120 degrees according to the manufacturer's guidelines on 2/24/2025. The facility failed to remove 9 cups of yogurt from the refrigerator that were dated 2/23/2025 on 2/24/2025. The facility failed to ensure a box of white onions, a box of cucumbers and tomatoes were removed from the refrigerator when they had white, hairy, and black substances present on 2/24/2025. These failures could place residents who eat from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings included: During an initial observation on 2/24/2025 at 8:33 AM, the DM, DA B and [NAME] were present in the kitchen. The dish machine was checked by DA B who ran a cycle three times and the temperature would not reach 120 degrees as per manufacturer's guidelines. The temperature gauge at the top of the dish machine would not go past 108 degrees. DA B said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and ensure it was free of pests for 1 of 1 Kitchen reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep roaches out of the kitchen from 2/24/2025-2/25/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for injury due to an ineffective pest control program at the facility. Findings included: During an observation on 2/24/2025 at 3:47 PM, in the kitchen, 2 roaches crawled up the wall by the hand sink. The DM said pest control visited the facility monthly and sprayed the kitchen. During an observation on 2/24/2025 at 4:14 PM, 1 roach crawled on the floor by the 3-compartment skin and dish machine. During an observation on 2/24/2025 at 4:24 PM, 1 roach crawled on the recipe binder that was less than a foot from the robo coupe (blender) on the prep table. DM notified and took the binder and shook it out in the garbage disposal and turned it on and then brought back the binder and placed it back on the prep table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #167, #174, and #175). The facility failed to complete baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for Residents #167, #174, and #175. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 2/25/25 for Resident #167 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cellulitis (skin infection). Review of an electronic medical record for Resident #167 indicated that no baseline care plan was completed. Review of a Nursing Home PPS MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #167 indicated she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating that she was cognitively intact. She required partial/moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #9, Resident #117, and Resident #175) and 3 of 5 staff (CNA A, CNA D, and LVN G) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA D washed or sanitized her hands when passing out meal trays to residents on Hall 100 on 2/24/2025. CNA A did not wear appropriate PPE for enhanced barrier precautions when care was provided to Resident #117 on 2/24/2025. The facility failed to implement contact isolation per physician orders for Resident #175 from 2/13/25 until 2/25/25. CNA D and LVN G failed to wear appropriate PPE for enhanced barrier precautions when providing care to Resident #9 on 2/27/25. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees received the required training effective communications for 6 of 15 new employees (LVN M, LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure an effective communication training was completed on hire for LVN M, LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q. This failure could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated the following staff had not completed training during orientation on effective communication: * LVN M, hire date 3/16/24; * LVN N, hire date 12/03/24; * SW, hire date 11/21/24; * CNA O, hire date 12/02/24; * CNA P, hire date 10/01/24; and * CNA Q, hire date 02/12/2025. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 9:00 am the Administrator said she did not know all these trainings were required. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 1:38 pm the DON said the ADON had been responsible in the past for staff training, but she (DON) would now be responsible for it. The DON said staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 5 of 15 staff (LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control training was provided to LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q on hire. This failure could place residents at risk of the spread of illness due to lack of staff training. The findings were: Record review of employee files indicated the following staff had not completed training during orientation on infection control: * LVN N, hire date 12/03/24; * SW, hire date 11/21/24; * CNA O, hire date 12/02/24; * CNA P, hire date 10/01/24; and * CNA Q, hire date 02/12/2025. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 9:00 am Administrator said she did not know all these trainings were required. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 1:38 pm DON said the ADON had been responsible in the past for staff training, but she (DON) would now be responsible for it. DON said staff could be at risk of putting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure CNAs completed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and dementia management trainings for 3 of 5 CNAs (CNA O, CNA P, and CNA Q) reviewed for training. The facility did not ensure ANE, and dementia management trainings were completed by CNA O, CNA P, and CNA Q during orientation. This failure could place residents with dementia at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation and a poor quality of care by staff with inadequate training when caring for dementia residents. Findings included: Record review of employee files indicated: CNA O, hire date 12/02/24, had not completed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and dementia management trainings during orientation. CNA P, hire date 10/1/24, had not completed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and dementia management trainings during orientation. CNA Q, hire date 2/12/25, had not completed Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and dementia management trainings during orientation. During an interview on 2/27/25 at 9:00 am Administrator said she did not know all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 6 of 15 employees (LVN M, LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided to LVN M, LVN N, SW, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q S on hire. This failure could place residents with behaviors at risk of not receiving care to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of LVN M's personnel file revealed a hire date of 3/16/24 and she had not completed on hire behavioral health training as required by policy and regulation. Record review of LVN N's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/3/24 and she had not completed on hire behavioral health training as required by policy and regulation. Record review of SW's personnel file revealed a hire date of 11/21/24 and she had not completed on hire behavioral health training as required by policy and regulation. Record review of CNA O's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #29) observed for resident environment. The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtain and a wheelchair in the room of Resident #29 was clean and without odors on 2/24/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 2/25/2025 for Resident # 29 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, PBA (a medical condition that causes sudden and uncontrollable crying or laughing), age related osteoporosis (brittle bones), and expressive language disorder (a communication disorder that causes difficulty expressing spoken language). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #29 indicated she was rarely/never understood. She required the use of a wheelchair. She was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #17) The facility failed to prevent a diversion (misappropriation) of Resident #17's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325mg tablets (a combined hydrocodone/acetaminophen narcotic pain reliever) on December 31, 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, unrelieved pain, misappropriation of property, and dignity. Findings include: Record review of an undated face sheet for Resident #17 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Unspecified Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing, Urinary Tract Infection, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Repeated Falls. Record review of an Annual MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #17 indicated that he had a BIMS score of 09, indicating that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #4) reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a new level 1 PASARR completed with a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder added on 10/28/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASARR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decreased quality of life. The findings were: Record review of an admission Record dated 2/26/2025 for Resident #4 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of adjustment disorder with depressed mood (a condition where a person had depression as a result of a life change or stress), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene were provided for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and #173) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to follow care plan for Resident #1 and assist her with showers on 2/17/25, 2/21/25, and 2/25/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #173 had clean and trimmed nails on 2/24/25 and 2/25/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care/services, decreased quality of life, and loss of dignity. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 2/26/25 for Resident #1 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision with smoking materials to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 returned his lighter and cigarettes to the staff when returning from smoking. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record for Resident #27 dated 2/27/2025 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of dementia, pneumonia (lung infection), and bipolar (extreme mood swings). Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #27 dated 1/13/2025 indicated he did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. He was independent with all ADLs. Record review of a care plan for Resident #27 dated 11/11/2024 indicated he was a smoker. Interventions included he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and follow a policy to provide pharmacy services for 2 of 12 months (January 2025 and February 2025) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to document the required number of 2 witness signatures for drug destruction on 1/28/2025 and 2/20/2025. This failure could put residents at risk for misappropriation and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of facility drug destruction records for the last 12 months (3/2024 to 2/2025) reflected that on 1/28/2025 the cover page and the attached page were only signed by the DON and the Pharmacist and did not include any additional witness signatures. Record review of cover page dated 2/20/2025 was signed by the Pharmacist only with no witness signatures. During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 9:15 AM, the DON who said the drug destruction sheets were normally signed by the Pharmacist, ADON and herself. She said in January 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication storage. The facility did not ensure Nystatin powder was not stored at the bedside for Resident #5 on 2/24/25. This failure could place all residents at risk of misuse of medication and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review indicated that Resident #5 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis includes congestive heart failure, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, and cognitive decline. Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #5 had a BIMS score 13 indicating that the resident has cognitively intact. She required moderate to maximal assistance for all ADL's. Resident was continent of bowel and bladder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in safe operating condition with the pilot light staying lit and allowing gas to leak on 2/24/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals in a timely manner. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 2/24/2025 at 8:40 AM, the DM lit the burners on the stove. 1 of the 6 burners (front left burner) did not light using the pilot light and then would not light with a lighter. She said she would report this to the Maintenance Supervisor. During an interview on 2/25/2025 at 3:00 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor said she had been employed at the facility for 5 years and been in maintenance for 3 months. She said she kept a maintenance logbook in the past at the nurse station, but it always would come up missing, so the facility no longer had a book to log in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the DM and [NAME] wore a hairnet effectively to cover all of their hair on 8/27/2024. The failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination. Findings included: During an observation in the kitchen on 8/27/2024 at 9:20 AM, revealed the DM was wearing a hair net that did not completely cover her hair. The DM had a long ponytail that went down her back hair that was not covered by the hairnet. During an observation in the kitchen on 8/27/2024 at 9:30 AM, revealed the [NAME] was wearing a hair net that did not completely cover her hair. She had hair that was exposed on the sides of her head by her ears and at the back of her head. During an observation and interview on 8/27/2024 at 9:35 AM, the DM said all staff who worked in the kitchen should wear a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) and 1 of 8 staff (CNA A) reviewed for infection control. CNA A did not sanitize or wash her hands between glove changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #6 on 8/27/2024. The failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 8/28/2024 for Resident #6 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of other psychotic disorder (lose touch with reality), abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking) and hypertension. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for one of four quarters for 2023 (Quarter 2) reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. The facility did not have sufficient staff on weekends according to the PBJ report for Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 through March 31). This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life and quality of care. Findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ reports Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 through March 31) indicated: the facility had a 1-star staffing rating. Record review of CMS PBJ report for Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 through March 31) indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staffing. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 09:20 a.m., the Administrator said his start date at the facility was 04/03/23 so he had no knowledge regarding the prior quarterly PBJ report regarding staffing. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 12 of 12 months (October 2022 through October 2023) and failed to ensure a registered nurse served as DON on a full-time basis for 3 of 3 months (November 2023 through January 2024) reviewed for RN coverage. The facility did not have the required eight consecutive hours of RN coverage for 15 days in October 2022, 25 days in November 2022, 7 days in December 2022, 13 days in January 2023, 6 days in February 2023, 8 days in March 2023, 8 days in April 2023, 8 days in May 2023, 6 days in June 2023, 2 days in July 2023, 7 days in August 2023, and 5 days in September 2023. The facility did not have an RN serving as full-time DON in November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024. This failure could place residents at risk by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters. Findings included: Record review of PBJ Staffing Data Report for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 14 residents whose medications were reviewed. (Resident #25) Resident #25 received Humalog insulin when the resident's blood glucose was outside parameters set by the physician. This failure could place the residents who were prescribed insulin to lower blood glucose which included parameters at risk of adverse side effects from medications. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated January 2024 indicated Resident #25, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). The parameters set by the physician orders included Humalog insulin (used to lower blood glucose) - inject 3 units before meals, with parameters to give only if blood glucose level is above 400. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #25 had a BIMS score of 09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident #'s 5 and 25) LVN A did not don appropriate PPE before entering Resident #5's COVID-19 (a disease caused by a virus named SARS-COV-2 causing respiratory symptoms, which is very contagious and spreads quickly) isolation room. The facility did not ensure proper infection control procedures for the sanitizing the bed when Resident #25 was removed from isolation. These failures could place the residents at risk of contracting an infectious disease and a decline in health. Findings included: 1. Record review of physician orders dated 01/10/24 indicated Resident #5, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnosis of COVID-19. An order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, to meet professional standards of quality for consultation with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's condition or a need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #25) of 14 residents reviewed for following physician's orders. The facility failed to implement Resident #25's care plan for when her blood glucose was above 450 for 5 days and did not notify her physician in December 2023. (12/07/23, 12/11/23, 12/12/23, 12/17/23 and 12/20/23). The failure placed residents, who required blood glucose monitoring, at risk for diabetic complications due to delayed physician intervention. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], was 51- years- old with diagnoses which included diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident #8) The facility did not ensure Resident #8's fingernails were trimmed. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of the physician orders dated January 2024 indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) and contractures (a shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, and other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) of his right and left hands. Record review of the most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 had a BIMs score of 13 (score indicated resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for enteral feeds. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's enteral feed was properly labeled with the type of formula, date and time it was hung, and the rate of administration. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper nutritional requirements prescribed by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's admission record dated 01/08/24 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included a gastrostomy (an opening into the from the abdominal wall, surgically made for introduction of enteral feeding). Record review of Resident #12's significant change MDS assessment, dated 08/23/23, indicated his BIMS score was 02 indicating his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #'s 1 and 6) The facility did not ensure Resident #1's and #6's oxygen filters were clean and free of dust and debris. This failure could place residents who required respiratory care at risk of not receiving proper care and treatment and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of physician orders dated 01/10/24 indicated Resident #1, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). The resident was ordered oxygen 2 liters by nasal cannula continuously with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$275,584 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $19,115 — penalty dated 2026-01-28
- $19,115 — penalty dated 2026-01-28
- $68,640 — penalty dated 2025-11-12
- $168,714 — penalty dated 2023-11-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-02 for 8 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-11 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOPER, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/29/2024 |
| NEWTON, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/22/2024 |
| TRINITY RHC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| WHATLEY, DARCY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2021 |
| SCIARRINI, JOSEPH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| SMITH, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| SQUYRES, HULEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $95K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676439. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.