Park Place Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 84.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to follow up with a cardiologist appointment on 2/25/25 for Resident #1 for 36 days, from 2/25/25 to 4/1/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received a vascular surgeon referral when the order was given on 02/12/25, which resulted in the development of gas gangrene (rare but highly lethal and potentially life-threatening bacterial infection that destroys muscle tissue, blood cells, and blood vessels producing a gas that causes tissue death and a foul smell) and an above-the-knee amputation (surgical removal) of his right leg on 04/02/25. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/04/25 at 11:00 AM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:15 AM. While the IJ was removed on 05/05/25 at 5:32 PM, the facility remained out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-04-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain necessary emergency dental services for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident #1).The facility failed to timely complete and follow up on a dental referral after becoming aware of Resident #1's dental concerns on 3/3/26. The referral was not submitted until 3/12/26, resulting in the resident developing right-sided facial swelling, pain, and infection, requiring transfer to the emergency room on 3/12/26.This failure placed residents at risk for delayed dental treatment, increased pain, infection, and decline in condition.Findings included:Record review of an admission record dated 04/03/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a cellulitis and abscess of mouth (serious, often interconnected dental emergencies resulting from bacterial infections, typically arising from untreated tooth decay or gum disease. Dental Abscess: A pocket…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents #1)The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse when on 05/02/25 Resident #2 grabbed Resident #1's shirt around the neck, stretching the fabric, and bit her hand. Resident #1 had a visible bite mark to the back of the left hand and redness to the chest. This failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life, and further abuse.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 11/20/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), depression (mental illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegations were made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin until 6 hours after the incident occurred. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving timely investigation into allegations of injury of unknown origin. The findings included: A record review of TULIP case details on 04/20/2026 at 3:32 PM indicated the report of injury of unknown origin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNAs A and C wore PPE when providing ADL care to Residents #1 and 3 both were labeled for EBP with Blue name tagThe facility failed to ensure LVN D wore PPE when providing enteral feeding to Resident #2 had a blue name tag indicating EBP.These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, spread of infection and sepsis, in violation of infection prevention and control requirementsFindings included:In an observation on 1/21/2026 at approximately 9:35 AM, Residents #1, #2, and #3 had EBP signage in place which was indicated by a blue name tag on the resident's door with their name and PPE (Personal protective equipment) was noted at the entrance to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services and interventions to be used to attain and maintain the residents' practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement person-centered care plans for areas triggered on the CAA (Care Area Assessment) with interventions within 21 days of admission for Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 to meet medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services.Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of rheumatic mitral stenosis (the narrowing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with professional standards of practices, the medical records on each resident were accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure as of 10/20/25 Resident #1's WAR had been completed to reflect she had been receiving wound care to her BLE as ordered in October 2025. The facility failed to be able to identify the staff member who's initial in the EMR system were MP1 on Resident #1's WAR after it had been filled out for October 2025. These failures could place residents receiving wound care at risk for wound care to be done more often than ordered by the physician, for staff not being able to question or collaborate with the unidentified staff member, or for receiving inaccurate care or diagnoses due to lack of documentation.Findings included:Record review of the face sheet dated 10/20/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 staff (LVN B) viewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN B performed hand hygiene between glove changes while performing wound care on 10/22/25. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination, spread of infection and could potentially affect all others in the building. These failures could place residents receiving wound care at risk for wound care to be done more often than ordered by the physician, for staff not being able to question or collaborate with the unidentified staff member, or for receiving inaccurate care or diagnoses due to lack of documentation.Findings Include:1. During an observation on 10/22/25 at 10:35 am LVN B performed wound care on Resident #1. Prior to starting wound care LVN B washed her hands, disinfected her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care within 48 hours of a resident's admission and provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for 4 of 21 residents (Resident #4, #5, #12 and #15) reviewed for new admissions. 1. The facility did not provide a copy of the baseline care plan to Resident #4 or their representative. 2. The facility to develop and accurately complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #5, #12, and #15. This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary care and decreased quality of life.1. Record review of a face sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers based on the comprehensive assessment for 7 of 21 residents (Resident #s 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 14) reviewed for skin assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, and #14 received a weekly skin assessment to identify risk of pressure injuries or existing pressure injuries.This failure could place residents at risk for developing unidentified pressure ulcers, could contribute to developing avoidable pressure ulcers and of not receiving adequate care and medical treatments to maintain skin integrity.Findings include:Record review of a face sheet dated 11/20/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 3 of 3 medication carts (1st Floor North/East Medication Aide Cart, 1st Floor North (even)/East Nurse Cart, and 1st Floor North (odd)/West Nurse Cart) and 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for controlled medications.* LVN C did not sign out on Resident #3's narcotic count sheet for the hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5mg/325mg (narcotic pain medication) when she administered the medication on 11/19/25 or 11/20/25 during the night shift.* LVN C, RN B, and LVN D did not count the narcotics on the 1st Floor North/East Medication Aide Cart with during the shift change on 11/20/25 to ensure the count was correct.* LVN C and RN B did not count the narcotics on the 1st Floor North (even)/East Nurse Cart during the shift change on 11/20/25 to ensure the count…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency, for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours to the State Agency when Resident #6 reported to PTA J he was left on the bedpan too long and felt like he was abused. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/20/2025 indicated Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat), cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump), muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. Resident #2's MDS admission assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate Resident #2 had a pressure wound. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 6/17/25 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: spinal stenosis (the narrowing of one or more spaces within the spinal canal), atherosclerotic heart disease (gradual buildup of plaque in the walls of the arteries), hypertension (high blood pressure), spondylosis (degeneration in the spine), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), diabetes mellitus (condition that happens when blood sugar is too high), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$287,159 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-04-04
• $272,779 — penalty dated 2025-05-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX