Valley Grande Manor
1212 S Bridge, Weslaco, TX 78596 · For profit - Individual · 147 certified beds · (956) 968-2121 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $88,679 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-25)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.7% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 18.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 8.8–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 18.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 76.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 76.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.1–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.42 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.10 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.10 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from were verbal and physical abuse by a resident for 6 of 6 residents (Residents #5, #71, #82, #88, #95, #99) reviewed for abuse, in that: 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #71 was free abuse when Resident #88 hit Resident #71 on the head on 01/24/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71 was free from abuse when Resident #88 had a physical altercation with Resident #71 on 04/05/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #82, and Resident #99 were free from abuse when Resident #88 had a physical altercation with Resident #82 and Resident #99 on 06/04/25. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from abuse when Resident #88 entered Resident #5's room and attempted to pull Resident #5 from her wheelchair on 06/22/25. 5.The facility failed to ensure Resident #95 was free from abuse when Resident #88 went up to Resident #95 and attempted to remove her from her wheelchair.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1 ) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received supervision to prevent Resident #1 from eloping from the facility undetected on 04/29/2023. The non-compliance for Resident #1 was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/29/2023 and ended on 05/01/2023. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This failure could place the residents with exit seeking behaviors and repeated falls at risk for injury or death. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/24/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 04/29/2023 and a discharge date of 04/30/2023. The resident's diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological status for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of change of condition. The facility failed to notify the resident's physician when Resident #1 was noticed with discoloration to her outer lower leg on 11/29/2023. On 12/19/2023 at 3:40 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 12/21/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could affect residents with injuries by placing them at risk of delayed medical treatment, hospitalization, and decline in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/13/2023 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was accurately assessed after being discovered with abnormal discoloration to her lower outer left leg on 11/29/2023. Between 11/29/2023 to 12/08/2023, Resident #1 was observed crying and with facial grimacing. Resident #1 was diagnosed with a left ankle fracture. On 12/19/2023 at 3:40 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 12/21/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing unmanaged pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who required 2 or more staff per her care plan was provided with the appropriate number of staff while in the shower chair. As a result, the resident had a fall when she was left unattended and sustained a broken toe. This failure could place residents at risk of emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life, and further neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/13/21. Diagnoses included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, epilepsy (seizure disorder), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. 1.The facility failed to implement the care plan to ensure Resident #1's was a 2 person assist for shower/bath. 2. The facility failed to implement the care plan to ensure Resident #1's was a 2 person assist for transferring. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/13/21. Diagnoses included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident by failing to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of prescribed medications for 1 (Resident #3's) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to timely acquire and administer an ordered central nervous system (CNS) stimulant medication, Ritalin 20 mg twice daily for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), resulting in an unapproved treatment delay.This failure has the potential to leave residents without critical prescribed therapies to manage their clinical and behavioral symptoms. Record review of Resident #3's admission record, dated 06/30/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), End Stage Renal Disease (the final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease where the kidneys no longer function on their own),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-02 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy regarding storage of foods brought to the residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of the food and beverages for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for personal food storage. The facility did not have completed documentation of temperature checks for Resident #1's personal refrigerator from November 2025 through June 2026. This failure could place residents with personal refrigerators at risk of food borne illness.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/30/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/19/2020. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung condition that causes obstructed airflow and breathing difficulties), chronic respiratory failure (a long-term medical condition in which the lungs cannot properly oxygenate the blood or remove carbon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be informed of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for consent for antipsychotic medications in that: Resident #3 was prescribed and administered Risperidone (an antipsychotic) without prior consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available. This failure could affect the right to self-determination of all facility residents who receive medication by allowing them to receive medication without their prior knowledge or consent, or that of their responsible party or emergency contacts. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 07/01/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 06/25/2026. Resident #3's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a lifelong mental health condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for baseline care plan completion.The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #3 within 48 hours of his admission.This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving effective, person-centered care.Findings included:Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 06/30/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 06/25/26. Resident #3 had a diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar levels in body) without complications, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis (filtering waste and excess fluid from blood).Record review on 06/30/26 at 8:45am of Resident #3's electronic medical record under assessment tabs revealed no baseline care plan was initiated.During an interview on 06/30/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 2 liters per minute on 06/30/2026 and at 4 liters on 07/01/2026 as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/30/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/19/2020. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung condition that causes obstructed airflow and breathing difficulties),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #1 and #3) of 5 residents observed for infection control issues in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN E performed hand hygiene before and after medication administration for Resident #1. 2. There was no signage observed outside of Resident #3's room indicating enhanced barrier precautions prior to entering room. These failure could place residents, employees, and visitors at risk of communicable diseases. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 06/30/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/19/2020. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung condition that causes obstructed airflow and breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely for 1 of 4 resident rooms in the secured unit (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized.2. The facility failed to properly cover a shattered window in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER].This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary environment and a diminished quality of life due to an unclean and unfunctional environment. Findings include:1. An observation on 6/9/26 at 9:01am of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed scraps of torn paper on the floor along the floorboards of two walls. The room also revealed a bedside table next to the bed. The bedside table had spilled milk, pieces of scrambled eggs, and a dirty napkin on it. Under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for consent for secured unit placement.Resident #1 was placed in the secured unit (a unit that is designed to provide specialized, dementia-specific skilled nursing care to adults with Alzheimer's disease or related disorders) without prior consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available.This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not being informed of treatment options.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/20/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female, having had an original admission date of 12/06/22 and readmission date of 08/01/25 with diagnoses of liver cirrhosis (late stage of chronic liver disease), history of Transient Ischemic Attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain AKA a mini stroke), dementia, schizoaffective disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for involuntary seclusion.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 met criteria to be placed in the secured unit per secured unit criteria on 03/11/26.This failure could place residents at risk of isolation, decreased quality of life, and psychosocial harm.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/20/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female, having had an original admission date of 12/06/22 and readmission date of 08/01/25 with diagnoses of liver cirrhosis (late stage of chronic liver disease), history of Transient Ischemic Attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain AKA a mini stroke), dementia, schizoaffective disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or delusions), depression, anxiety and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial need that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was care planned for the use of Lorazepam (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety).2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was care planned for the use of the Wander Guard (A discreet wearable device that tracks movement and triggers automated security responses when a resident nears a restricted area).3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was care planned for being placed in the secured unit (a unit that is designed to provide specialized, dementia-specific skilled nursing care to adults with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a written, signed and dated order from the attending physician for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for physician services.The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for Resident #1 to be in the secured unit.This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information records.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/20/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female, having had an original admission date of 12/06/22 and readmission date of 08/01/25 with diagnoses of liver cirrhosis (late stage of chronic liver disease), history of Transient Ischemic Attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain AKA a mini stroke), dementia, schizoaffective disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records.The facility failed to document a change in condition or progress note to reflect the placement of the Wander Guard (A discreet wearable device that tracks movement and triggers automated security responses when a resident nears a restricted area) on Resident #1. The facility failed to document a change in condition or progress note to reflect the placement of Resident #1 in the secured unit (a unit that is designed to provide specialized, dementia-specific skilled nursing care to adults with Alzheimer's disease or related disorders).These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation and exploitation of property for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #2) The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from misappropriation/exploitation by allowing housekeeping to take money from Resident #2 for housekeeping's own well-being and personal expenses, exact date unknown. This failure could place residents who resided in this facility at risk of misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 1/30/26 reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning skills caused by reduced blood flow to the brain, which damages or kills brain cells), and muscle wasting and atrophy (when muscles waste away). Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 4 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints that were not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to have an adequate indication for the use of the medication Zyprexa (Olanzapine- atypical antipsychotic) for Resident #1. This failure could put residents at risks of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 01/29/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform simple tasks), vascular dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning skills caused by reduced blood flow to the brain, which damages or kills brain cells).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (wound care cart) of 7 medication carts. The facility failed to ensure that the wound care cart was secured and lock when it was left unattended by LVN A. These failures could place residents at risk of injury to other residents if medication left unsecured were consumed. Findings included: During an observation on 01/29/2026 at 02:20 PM revealed the wound care medication cart was left unlocked outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. During the observation LVN A came out of the room and surveyor informed her wound care medication cart was unlocked and LVN A secured the cart by locking it. During an interview on 01/29/2026 at 02:25 PM with LVN A revealed she was responsible for the wound care medication cart that was left unlocked. She stated she was expected to lock the wound care medication cart when she walked away from it. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (Resident #4, Resident #11, and Resident #13) of 10 residents reviewed for MDS assessment.Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate Resident #4 had falls on 07/28/25 that resulted in major injury, on 09/09/25 that resulted in minor injury, and on 10/02/25 that resulted with no injury.Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate Resident #11's behavior of physical aggression that occurred on 09/23/25.Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate Resident #13's behaviors of delusions and refusal of care that occurred on 09/16/25.Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] failed to indicate Resident #13 had a fall that resulted in minor injury that occurred on 10/13/25.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for inadequate care and services to meet their needs based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #4 to address the use of a fall mat.This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their current needs.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 10/21/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), generalized muscle weakness, other lack of coordination, mood disorder (impacts emotional state), type 2 diabetes (high levels of sugar in blood), and chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident #4's fall risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #13) of 10 residents reviewed for accuracy of records.LVN E failed to document Resident #4's change of condition for a fall on 09/05/25.LVN F failed to document Resident #13's change of condition for aggressive behavior on 10/10/25.LVN D failed to document Resident #13's vital signs correctly on the change of condition form on 10/14/25 for a fall that occurred on 10/13/25.The DON failed to document Resident #13's vital signs correctly on the change of condition form on 10/21/25 for an incident of aggressive behavior that occurred on 10/10/25.These failures could place residents at risk for errors in care due to inaccurate or incomplete documentation and records. 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 10/21/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: CNA A used cleansing wipe multiple times when performing incontinent care for Resident #1.This failure place residents who use cleansing wipes during incontinent care at-risk for urinary tract infections due to cross contamination. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 11/20/25 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnosis included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease in which glucose levels in the blood were higher than normal because the body does not make enough insulin or use it the way it should), muscle weakness, muscle wasting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that described the services to be provided to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, for 1 (Resident #88) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement individualized interventions to address Resident #88's behaviors of aggression toward other residents from 01/24/25 through 06/28/25. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries and their medical, physical and psychosocial needs not being met. Record review of Resident #88 Face Sheet dated 07/24/25 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 10/24/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, unspecified psychosis and major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. Record review of Resident #88's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was usually understood by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Resident #6, Resident #96, and Resident #66) of 7 residents reviewed for infection control, in that:1) The facility failed to ensure that LVN D performed hand hygiene for at least 20 seconds prior to and after medication administration for resident #6. 2) The facility failed to ensure that CNA H and CNA I followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when they did not wear a gown while providing perineal/foley care to Resident #96.3) The facility failed to ensure that LVN G and LVN J put on PPE when they entered Resident #66's room who was on isolation precautions. These failures could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preference for 1 (Resident #6) of 9 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had the call light within reach in the morning while in bed.This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance or help when needed and in the event of an emergency. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 07/23/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old-female with an initial admission date of 12/06/22. Diagnoses included Encephalopathy (damage or disease that affect the brain), dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), muscle wasting and atrophy (a decrease in muscle size and strength, often resulting from disuse, nerve damage, or certain diseases), history of falling, and lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #100) of 8 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #100's OOH-DNR was completed. The OOH-DNR form did not have the physician's signature. This failure could affect all residents who have implemented Advance Directives and established their choice not to be resuscitated at risk of receiving CPR against their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #100's electronic face sheet dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Respiratory Failure, Metabolic Encephalopathy (any disease or disorder of the brain, characterized by changes in brain function or structure), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension (high blood pressure), Acute Kidney Failure. Resident #100's electronic face sheet reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for misappropriation of property in that: The facility failed to report when Resident #1 gave CNA T money to buy gift cards. This failure could place residents at risk for potential abuse/misappropriation of property/exploitation due to not having allegations reported as required. Findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 07/24/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the residents' discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of the residents' transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move for 1 of 4 (Resident #105) reviewed for notifying the LTC Ombudsman of the residents' discharge, in that: Resident #105 was discharged to family member who was traveling to [NAME] and was planning to admit to another LTC facility on 05/15/2025 without a notice to the LTC state ombudsman. This failure could place residents at risk of not knowing their rights and receiving the services of the state LTC Ombudsman. Record review of Resident #105's electronic face sheet dated 07/24/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a discharge date of 05/15/2025. His diagnoses included Osteoarthritis (a condition that causes joint pain and stiffness due to the breakdown of cartilage), Major Depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was given medications by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #90) reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in that: LVN C did not check for residual of Resident #90's gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) prior to administering medications. This failure could place residents with G-tube at risk of medical complications, or a decline in health due to inappropriate G-tube management and not following appropriate procedures. Record review of Resident #90's face sheet dated 07/23/25 revealed the resident had an original admission date to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by an underlying condition that affects your metabolism), anemia (when your blood doesn't carry enough oxygen to the rest of your body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (serious health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Resident#100 and Resident#52) reviewed for oxygen in that: 1. Resident #100 received oxygen at 2.5 LPM via nasal cannula without a physician's order. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #52 received oxygen as prescribed. These deficient practices could affect the residents who received oxygen continuously and could result in residents receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and could result in a decline in health. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #100's face sheet, dated 8/15/18, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and hypoxia. Review of Resident #100's electronic chart and paper chart revealed there was no physician order for oxygen. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #48 and Resident #93) reviewed for resident records. 1. The facility failed to ensure a physician order was written for isolation precautions for Resident #48 on 07/15/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure a physician order was written for dietary diet for Resident #93 on 07/19/2025. 1. Record review of Resident #48's electronic face sheet dated 07/22/2025 reflected the resident was a 77 -year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 11/27/2020. Resident #48 had diagnoses which included the following: COVID-19, Unspecified Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar levels), Immunodeficiency due Conditions Classified Elsewhere (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#1) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility failed to implement their Abuse Neglect Exploitation (ANE) policy when the facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who required 2 or more staff per her care plan was provided with the appropriate number of staff while in the shower chair. As a result, the resident had a fall when she was left unattended and sustained a broken toe. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/13/21. Diagnoses included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #1's fall with injury on 02/05/25, where Resident #1 sustained a fractured right great toe. State Survey Agency was not notified of the fall with injury within 2 hours. The incident occurred on 02/05/25 at 10:42 am and was not reported. The facility failed to report Resident #1's FM's allegation of resident neglect related to the Resident #1's fall with injury on 02/05/25, where Resident #1 sustained a fractured right great toe. FM alleged resident neglect. The incident occurred on 02/05/25 at 10:43 am and was not reported. These failures could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to not having…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: LVN C failed to verify Resident #1's morphine was accounted for when completing a narcotic count on 12/06/24. Resident #1's Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 20mg/5ml was missing and not found. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medication as ordered. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/22/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Poly osteoarthritis (when 5 or more joints have arthritis),unspecified, adult osteomalacia (softening of bones), unspecified, osteophyte (bony lumps that grow on the bones in the spine or around joints),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. Dietary Aide A failed to effectively restrain her hair while getting snacks in the kitchen. This failure placed the 92 residents, who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 5/20/25 at 4:10 p.m. revealed Dietary Aide A was getting snacks from the kitchen and was not wearing a hairnet. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 4:20 p.m. Dietary Aide A stated that she was late, and she entered the kitchen through the back door and forgot to use a hair net. Dietary Aide A stated that she knew she had to use a hair net when entering the kitchen. Dietary Aide A stated that by not using the hair net the food could get infected or a hair could fall into the food. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 4:30 p.m. the DM stated that all staff knew that a hair net was required when entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and nasal pharyngeal ulcers for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for gastrostomy feedings in that: The facility did not transcribe and initiate Resident #2's enteral feeding order of 65ml for 22 hours, leading to 6 pound weight loss between 10/11/24 and 12/09/24. This failure placed resident at risk for not receiving their required daily nutritional intake placing the resident at risk for weight loss. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 02/18/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old- female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included the following: cerebral infarction (decreased blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility did not include Resident #1's rash on her care plan. 2. The facility did not include Resident #3's rash on her care plan. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/21/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease (memory loss, cognitive decline, language problems, behavioral changes and difficulty with daily tasks), unspecified, Anxiety disorder, unspecified (intense,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's skin observation tool documentation accurately reflected Resident #1's rash. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/21/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease (memory loss, cognitive decline, language problems, behavioral changes and difficulty with daily tasks), unspecified, Anxiety disorder, unspecified (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for three (Residents #30, #3, and #57) of 24 reviewed for advanced directives, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's OOH-DNR was completed correctly. The OOH-DNR form did not have the physician's signature in the appropriate place. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3''s OOH-DNR was completed correctly. The OOH-DNR form did not hat the physician's signature in the appropriate place. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's OOH-DNR was completed correctly. The OOH-DNR form did not have the signature for witness 2 in section E. These failures could affect all residents who have implemented Advance Directives and established their choice not to be resuscitated at risk of receiving CPR against their wishes. The findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #30's admission Record dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 25 residents who receive insulin services. The facility failed to keep an updated calibration log documenting the control solution testing results for the facility's blood glucose meters. This failure could result in not determining if the glucometers were functioning properly and/or obtaining false glucometer readings. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Resident Matrix dated 5/13/24 revealed the facility had 25 residents who were insulin dependent. Record review of the facility's Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide for Control Solution Testing revealed that the intended use for the control solution is as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results. Use Control Solution: Before testing with the system for the first time. When you open a new bottle of test strips.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0922 — failed to maintain the building's systems — patternHave enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to establish procedures to ensure that water was available to essential areas when there is loss of normal water supply. The facility failed to ensure the emergency water supply was readily available and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility's emergency water supply was stored two blocks from the facility in a warehouse. This failure could place residents at risk of serious risk for complications from water that might be contaminated due to poor sanitary conditions. In an interview on 05/14/24 at 3:00 PM, The DM said the emergency water supply was across the street in the laundry department. The kitchen has a 7-day supply of food and once hurricane season starts she would order extra supplies of foam plates, cups, utensils and would order extra food supplies. On 05/16/24 at 9:21 AM, Surveyor conducted an observation of the laundry department located 0.2 miles from the facility. The water supply was in a warehouse type building. The laundry was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, for 1 Resident (Resident #97) of 24 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to send a written notice of a transfer to Resident #97's RP and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman as soon as practicable after Resident #97 was transferred to the hospital. These failures could place residents at risk of not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's physician's orders revealed R#97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R#97's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide to the resident and the RP a written a notice of bed-hold policy before, or at the time of transfer for 1 Resident (Resident #97) of four residents reviewed for transfers. The facility did not provide written information on the facility's bed-hold policies to Resident #97 or to his RP when resident was sent to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving a notice of the facility's bed hold policy before/upon transfer and not having the necessary information to decide on whether to incur bed hold payments and have the opportunity for the resident to return to the facility. The findings were: Record review of Resident #97's physician's orders revealed R#97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R#97's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and describes the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #40), reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's comprehensive care plan dated 04/17/2024 reflected she had an order for O2 at 2 Lpm via N/C continuously. These deficient practices could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and no having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet dated 05/15/2024 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/06/2024. Resident #40's relevant diagnoses included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #40, and Resident #3) reviewed for oxygen in that: 1. Resident #40's oxygen was administered at 2.5 Lpm instead of 2.0 Lpm via nasal cannula as ordered by physician. 2. Resident #3's oxygen was administered at 4 Lpm instead of 2 Lpm via nasal cannula as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents who received oxygen at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased qualify of care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet dated 05/15/2024 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/06/2024. Resident #40's relevant diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), transient ischemic attack (a short period of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 2 of 2 Residents (Resident #17, and Resident #11) that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA K performed proper pericare (incontinent care) for Resident #17 and #11. The facility failed to ensure CNA K performed hand hygiene during incontinent care on Resident #17. The facility failed to ensure CNA L performed hand hygiene during incontinent care on Resident #11. These deficient practices could place residents in the facility at risk for infections due to improper incontinent care and lead to the spread of infection to residents, resident illness, and/or resident distress. Findings included: 1.Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure consent forms were properly completed or signed by a responsible party prior to administration of an antipsychotic medication (Nuplazid) for Resident #4. This failure could place residents who received psychoactive medications without informed consents and placed additional 27 residents who received psychoactive medications at risk of receiving treatments without informed consent. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's admission Record dated 04/25/24, revealed a [AGE] year old female, admitted to facility on 01/11/24. Her diagnoses included: Dementia (a general term for a group of diseases that cause a loss of cognitive functioning, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to the point that it interferes with daily life) with other behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for one resident (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to conduct an investigation of Resident # 3's transfer by a mechanical life when the straps tore, and Resident #3 was placed at potential of injury. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and not having their needs met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 04/25 /2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility 03/19/20 with a most recent admission date of 02/16/24. Resident #3's diagnosis included benign neoplasm of the brain ( non-cancerous tumor ), diabetes, hyperaldosteronism (endocrine disorder that causes high blood pressure), morbid obesity (body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall on 09/03/23. Resident #4 sustained a laceration to right eyebrow and acute fifth metacarpal neck fracture (little finger fracture). The facility failed to report Resident #4 was observed on 09/28/23 with redness to right forehead and right eyelid with no mention of how the redness occurred. The facility failed to report Intake #477220 to State Survey Agency within 24 hours for Resident #4's injury of unknown origin. Incident occured on 01/10/2024 at 7:30 p.m. Facility emailed report on 01/16/2024. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse to unreported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and neglect for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility did not have evidence a thorough investigation was completed for Resident #3 who had an incident during a transfer with the use of a mechanical lift. This failure could place residents at risk of incidents not being thoroughly investigated. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 04/25 /2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility 03/19/20 with a most recent admission date of 02/16/24. Resident #3's diagnosis included benign neoplasm of the brain ( non-cancerous tumor ), diabetes, hyperaldosteronism (endocrine disorder that causes high blood pressure), morbid obesity (body mass index of 40 or higher ), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, drug induced polyneuropathy (damage or disease affecting peripheral nerves), and lymphedema (condition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) being reviewed for pharmacy services. The Facility did not ensure that Resident #1 and Resident #2's narcotics were reconciled as being given from the resident's eMAR to the resident's narcotic reconciliation form on the medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their narcotic medications and drug diversion. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/13/2023 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis were right ankle contracture, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, speech and language deficits, vascular dementia (brain damaged caused by multiple strokes), tube feeding, and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented, for one Resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to document Resident #1's discoloration to her outer lower left leg in the Progress Notes. This failure could place all residents with discoloration of not receiving adequate care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/13/2023 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis were right ankle contracture, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, speech and language deficits, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected her: Hearing was moderate difficulty Speech clarity was unclear Sometimes understood/understand Vision was moderately impaired BIMS score of 00 (severely impaired) Functional limitation in range of motion:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY Medication Storage and Labeling Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used within the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, which included the appropriate cautionary instructions with the expiration date, for 4 of 6 medication storage locations (nurse medication cart D wing, nurse medication cart A wing, nurse medication cart C wing, and back station medication storage room). 1. The facility failed to prevent nurse medication cart D wing from containing 3 (three) expired dicyclomine (used to treat certain types of intestinal problems such as irritable bowel syndrome) capsules 10 milligrams (mg) in an opened bag with an expiration date of 09/2022. 2. The facility failed to prevent nurse medication cart A wing from containing 1(one) bottle of opened clonidine (used to treat high blood pressure) 0.1 milligram (mg) tablets with expiration date 06/30/22. 3. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$88,679 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $14,744 — penalty dated 2025-07-25
- $10,513 — penalty dated 2025-06-05
- $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-04-30
- $55,401 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOOKER HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2021 |
| HOOVER, SHAWN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| VGM VALLEY GRANDE MANOR WESLACO OPS INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| ASUAJE, JUAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SCHINDELE, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| BILLY SCHINDELE 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| SHERRY SCHINDELE IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| TRIDENT LTC, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| TRIDENT ONE LEASING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| VGL VALLEY GRANDE LEASING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| TREVINO, JERRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455621. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.