No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Paradigm At Stevens

204 Walter St, Yoakum, TX 77995 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (361) 293-3544 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (361) 293-3544 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Dec 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
210 Nelson St · (361) 293-7061 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
602 US Highway 77A S · (361) 293-2181 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
416 Lott St · (361) 407-1355 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1001 W Grand Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.2%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.0%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.7%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.052.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.992.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 38.0 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 resident (resident #11) of 8 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility failed to reflect Resident #11 was administered opioid medication on her quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]/2026. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of missed or inaccurate care.The findings included: Record review of Resident #11's electronic face sheet dated 05/13/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (chronically high blood sugar causes nerve damage that can lead to pain, numbness and functional impairments), fibromyalgia (chronic disorder that causes widespread pain throughout the body) and joint pain (discomfort, soreness, or aching in one or more joints of the body). Record review of Resident #11's Active Orders as of: 04/13/2026 reflected she was ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to replace or clean dirty and dusty oxygen filters in Resident #1's oxygen concentrator. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of respiratory infection and difficulty breathing.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 05/13/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive group of lung diseases, primarily consisting of emphysema), emphysema (irreversible lung disease where the tiny air sacs in the lungs are damaged), and dependence on supplemental oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for accurate records.1.The facility failed to obtain signed consents for Valproic Acid (anti-seizure medication) to be used as an antipsychotic for Resident #33.This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate documentation of clinical records and misuse of medication used as an antipsychotic that could result in diminished quality of care.The findings included:Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 5/14/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; delusional disorders (a serious mental illness characterized by the presence of one or more fixed, false beliefs), dementia ( a decline in mental ability, including memory, language, reasoning, and problem solving, severe enough to interfere with daily life), and depressive disorders (a persistent feeling of sadness, emptiness, or a loss of interest in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #43) of 2 residents observed for incontinent and catheter care.LVN A failed to change Resident #1's soiled incontinent brief after she completed catheter care.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #43's electronic face sheet dated 05/13/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: nontraumatic subacute subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and tissues that cover the brain), respiratory failure (condition in which blood does not have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide) and persistent vegetative state (condition resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources, are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect and exploitation.The facility administrator failed to report to a law enforcement entity or the State Agency of an allegation of misappropriation when a former employee used the [store] account containing Resident #1's debit card information for personal use. This failure had the potential to affect the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperature levels for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the temperature in the room shared by Residents #1 and #2 was cooled to a comfortable level in September 2025. This failure could lead to decreased quality of life for residents. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/6/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental health disorder in which a person has difficulty distinguishing their own thoughts/delusions from reality), depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, submitted 8/14/2025, reflected a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 9/6/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-06 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional food standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for food storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's personal refrigerator was maintained at proper temperature and the food was dated and labeled appropriately for September 2025. This failure could lead to food-borne illness and decreased quality life of residents. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/6/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental health disorder in which a person has difficulty distinguishing their own thoughts/delusions from reality), depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, submitted 8/14/2025, reflected a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. In an observation and interview on 9/6/2025 at 9:55 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety from 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #2) reviewed for food sanitation and preparation. 1. [NAME] H failed to remove her gloves, wash her hands and put on clean gloves, after opening a drawer of utensils (dirty surface) and continuing with preparing beef tacos with the same gloved hands (she went from dirty to clean). 2. DA I left 2 pans of cake on the prep table to cool off. She did not cover them. 3. CNA used her bare right hand to give Resident #2 two slices of bread during a lunch meal. These deficient practices could affect any resident and could contribute to the spread of food-borne illnesses. The findings were: 1. Observation on 03/06/25 at 4:59 PM revealed [NAME] H plating flour beef tacos, rice and refried beans for the dinner meal. She plated about 18 meals. [NAME] H would take a flour tortilla with her hands, put a scoop of beef on it, put a scoop of lettuce/tomatoes mix and then a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 3 of 7 Residents (Resident #16, Resident #35 and Resident #19 ) whose records were reviewed. 1. Resident #16's Care Plan did not reflect he used one 1/4 bed rail for mobility and transfers. 2. Resident #35's Care Plan did not reflect she had impaired vision and needed optometry care. 3. Resident #19's Care Plan did not reflect she was receiving Depakote Sprinkles Delayed Release as a mood stabilizer. These deficient practices could affect any resident and could result in the inaccuracy of assessments and contribute to residents not receiving care for identified care needs. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 3/4/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting non-dominant side and Dementia in other Diseases classified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional to provide activities for 42 of 42 residents. The facility did not have a qualified Activities Professional to direct their activities program. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents not receiving approaches that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. The findings were: Review of the facility contract binder revealed they did not have a qualified Activity Director. Interview on 03/05/25 at 02:20 PM with the MDS Coordinator revealed the facility did not have a qualified Activity Director since she started working during April 2024. She stated the facility had an activities assistant but was not qualified to lead specialized activities. As a result, the resident's might not receive activities centered to meet their individual needs. Interview on 03/05/25 at 02:50 PM with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment to maintain vision; the facility must, if necessary, assist the resident in making appointments, and by arranging for transportation to and from the office of a practitioner specializing in the treatment of vision for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #35) whose records were reviewed for optometry care. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #35 received transportation in order to obtain optometry care as needed for more than 2 months. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to the decline of the resident's vision. The findings were: Review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 3/5/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #35's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/24/24, revealed her BIMS score was 15 of 15 which was reflective of no cognitive impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 3 of 6 nursing staff(CNA C, CNA-E and CNA K) reviewed for competencies. 1. a. CNA C and CNA K failed to use safe technique when transferring Resident #19 from the bed to the wheelchair using a mechanical lift. 2. When CNA D and E mechanically transferred Resident #28 from the bed to the wheelchair on 03/05/2025, CNA E did not hold the spreader bar to prevent the spread bar from hitting the resident's head that was swinging while CNA D was lowering the spread bar to connect it to the sling. These failures could place the residents at risk for avoidable falls and injuries as a result of a fall. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 3/6/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left non-dominant side.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 medication rooms (3-side medication room) reviewed for pharmacy services. There were total eighteen (18) syringes of 0.9 % sodium chloride injection for flush 10 milliliters expired on 02/28/2025 found inside 3-side medication room on 03/05/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: Observation on 03/05/2025 at 11:28 a.m. revealed a total of eighteen (18) syringes of 0.9 % sodium chloride injection for flush 10 milliliters expired on 02/28/2025 found inside the 3-side medication room. Interview on 03/05/2025 at 11:46 a.m. with DON acknowledged there were total of eighteen (18) syringes of 0.9 % sodium chloride injection for flush 10 milliliters expired on 02/28/2025 found inside the 3-side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 14 residents (Residents #6) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was within reach while she was positioned on her bed in her room. This failure could place residents at risk for delay in care and services, and increased risk of falls and injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 03/07/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female and an original admission date of 10/16/2023 with diagnoses that included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration (a pool of blood between the brain and it outermost covering), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including a clean bed in good condition for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #14) whose bed was observed for sanitation. The facility failed to replace Resident #14's mattress which was heavily soiled with urine and the urine stains covered at least 50% of the mattress. This deficient practice could affect any resident and result in dissatisfaction and poor self-esteem. The findings were: Review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 3/7/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizoaffective Disorder (according to Mayo clinic: mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, mania and a milder form of mania called hypomania), Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic, Anxiety Disorder, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and misappropriation for 1 of 5 staff (housekeeper-F) reviewed for criminal backround checks. The facility administrator and human resources completed checking housekeeper-F's criminal background on 03/06/2025, but the housekeeper was hired to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place all residents at risk of abuse from facility staff. Findings included: Record review of housekeeper-F's employee's profile revealed the housekeeper was hired and started working to the facility on [DATE], but the housekeeper's criminal background was checked on 03/06/2025. Interview on 03/07/2025 at 3:12 p.m. with the administrator stated housekeeper-F was hired and started working at the facility on 02/05/2025, but the housekeeper's criminal background was checked on 03/06/2025. The facility did not have staff for human resources, so the staff from the ssociated facility came to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 7 Residents (Resident #16 and Resident #35) whose records were reviewed. 1. Resident #16's quarterly MDS did not reflect he used one 1/4 bed rail for mobility and transfers. 2. Resident #35's quarterly MDS did not reflect she had impaired vision. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in the inaccuracy of assessments and contribute to residents not receiving care for identified care needs. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 3/4/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting non-dominant side and Dementia in other Diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with psychotic disturbance. Review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 1/22/25, revealed his BIMS score was 14 of 15 reflective of minimal cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, and described services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #143) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #143's care plan reflected her bowel incontinence and included a care plan regarding how to take care of the resident's bowel incontinence. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings included: Record review of Resident #143's face sheet, dated 03/07/2025, revealed Resident #143 was [AGE] years old, female, and originally admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #28) reviewed for mechanical transfers. 1. a. CNA K and CNA C failed to use safe technique when transferring Resident #19 from the bed to the wheelchair using a mechanical lift. b. Nursing staff failed to ensure a floor mat was at Resident #19's bedside while she was in bed. 2. When CNA-D and CNA E mechanically transferred Resident #28 from the bed to the wheelchair on 03/05/2025, CNA-E did not hold the spreader bar to prevent the spread bar from hitting the resident's head that was swinging while CNA-D was lowering the spread bar to connect it to the sling. These failures could place the residents at risk for avoidable falls and injuries as a result of a fall. The findings included: 1. a. Review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #11 and #143) reviewed for incontinence care. 1. When CNA-C was providing incontinent care to Resident #11 on 03/05/2025, CNA-F did not clean the resident's suprapubic area (the area of the abdomen located below the umbilical region). 2. When CNA-B was providing incontinent care to Resident #143 on 03/06/2025, CNA-G did not separate and clean the resident's labia area. These failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 03/07/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 2 Resident (Resident #16, Resident # 13) whose records were reviewed for oxygen therapy. 1. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen concentrator filter was clean while he was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. 2. Resident #13's nebulizer mask was observed on the resident's dresser on 03/04/2025, and it was not covered in a plastic bag when it was not used. This deficient practice could affect any resident receiving oxygen therapy and could cause the resident to develop an upper respiratory infection. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 3/4/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction (paralysis after having a stroke) affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation; to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #16) who were reviewed for bed rail use. Nursing staff failed to take the necessary steps prior to allowing Resident #16 to use a bed rail; complete an assessment; attempt the use of alternatives; review risks vs benefits; and to obtain a consent. These deficient practices could affect the residents who used a bed rail and could contribute to avoidable accidents. The findings were: Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 3/4/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (paralysis) following Cerebral Infarction (stroke) affecting non-dominant side and Dementia in other Diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with psychotic disturbance. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 2 medication rooms (the 4-side medication room) and 1 of 3 medication carts (the medication aide cart) review for storage and medication carts. 1. The narcotic box located inside a refrigerator in the 4-side medication room was not affixed permanently to the refrigerator, and there were total 12 capsules of Resident #144's Dronabinol 5 mg inside the narcotic box. 2. There were brand new and unopened two eye drop bottles of Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution stored inside medication aide cart at the room temperature, but the label of the two eye drop bottles said Keep refrigerator unopened. Store opened at room temperature. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #144's face sheet, dated 03/07/2025, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #7) of 14 residents reviewed for clinical records, in that: Resident #7's psychiatric provider indicated the resident had Depakote one tablet 125 mg two times a day for mood disorder, but the facility made an entry in the order incorrectly by Depakote one tablet 125 mg two times a day for dementia. These deficient practices could result in in errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 03/06/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of heart failure (hear not pumping enough), muscle weakness, mood disorder (disturbance in the person's mood), dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), type 2 diabetes mellitus (not control blood sugar), and hypoxemia (low level of oxygen in the blood). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 1 of 14 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for environmental concerns. There was a hole sized width 20 cm and length 3 cm on Resident #31's bathroom door in the resident's room. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. The findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet, dated 03/07/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of adjustment disorder with anxiety (feeling worked, anxious, and overwhelmed), schizophrenia (mental illness that affects how a person think), muscle weakness, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the membrane that covers it), and Parkinsonism…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and handle, store, process, and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 47 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an outbreak of scabies infection. These failures could place residents at risk of a delay of identification infectious outbreaks and lack of timely follow-up on recommended interventions to prevent harm, or impairment. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/17/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #1's oxygen tubing, humidifier and nasal canula were not replaced within the facility's time frame for replacement (every Wednesday during the night shift (10:00 pm to 6:00 am). This failure could affect residents administered oxygen and could lead to infections if the tubing, humidifier and canula are not cleaned/ or replaced as common practice in the facility and per facility policy. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/30/24 revealed, the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: depression, dementia, COPD (respiratory disease) and anemia. The Resident was a Male; age [AGE]. The RP was listed as: the resident. Record review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services, in that: The facility failed designate a registered nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing on a full time basis on [DATE]th and 13th 2024. This failure affected residents who resided in the facility by putting them at risk of poor nursing care. The findings were: Record review of employee time sheet revealed during the month of [DATE] the facility employed two registered nurses: RN A and RN B. RN A and RN B did not clocked hours on [DATE]th and 13th, 2024. At the time of exit on [DATE], the Administrator had not provided a policy or procedure for the Director of Nurses. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 5:40 pm, RN A was physically present and stated that she usually provided RN coverage on weekends. RN A stated that an RN was required 8 hours per day so as to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which are complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for completeness and accuracy: Resident #1 was prescribed PRN (as needed) O2 and the April and May 2024 MARs did not capture or document the resident's nebulizer, humidifier, and 02 tubing needed to be changed every seven days per facility's procedure. This failure could result in the facility not documenting in the medical record residents on oxygen therapy not having their O2 nebulizer, humidifier and tubing changed which could cause infections and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/30/24 revealed, the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: depression, dementia, COPD (respiratory disease) and anemia. The Resident was a Male; age [AGE]. The RP was listed as: the resident. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-25 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility failed to ensure sufficient resident education was provided to Resident #1, who had a recent AKA, osteomyelitis (serious infection of the bone), midline (venous access device inserted in a deep vein of the arm) and an order for IV antibiotics/wound care, and his RP when discharged home from the facility on 5/13/24. 1. Facility did not arrange home health services for Resident #1's wound care, ordered 5/10/24, and IV medication administration, ordered 5/11/24, when the resident was discharged on 5/13/24. 2. Facility staff did not provide Resident #1's RP with proper education related to IV antibiotic administration. 3. Facility staff did not provide Resident #1's RP with proper education related to midline catheter care. 4. Facility staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, in that; The facility failed to develop and implement a written abuse policy for reporting abuse within 2 hours to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) which resulted in a failure to report an allegation of abuse made by Resident #1 until surveyor intervention. This failure could place all residents at risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prevention Policy and Procedure last revised 9/10/2020 revealed: The facility Administrator, or his/her designee, will be designated as the facility's ANE Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the ANE Prevention program and directing any such investigation. Investigation of ANE: 13. Administrator, or his/her designee,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) allegations of abuse made by Resident #1 immediately or within 2 hours. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/26/2024 revealed an admission date of 1/05/2024 with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke with resulting paralysis and weakness on one side of the body), major depressive disorder, recurrent mild and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff with facilal hair, were wearing beard restraints. These failures could place resident who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: Observations on 01/25/24 11:28 a.m. revealed DA not wearing beard restraint/beard guard with approximately 1/2 inch to inch beard to his chin. DA was further observed taking dishware from the dish room area throughout the kitchen and hanging cooking utensils above the food prep table near the steam table. Observations on 01/25/24 at 11:39 a.m. revealed DA washing cooking utensils and pans in the 3 compartment sink without a beard restraint/beard guard. During an interview on 01/25/24 at 11:41 a.m. the DM stated DA should have been wearing a beard guard and that hair restraints should be worn anytime someone was in the kitchen. DM further stated by not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident and or other residents for 2 (Resident #16 and #44) of 8 residents observed for accommodation of needs. 1. Resident #16's call light was not placed within reach. 2. Resident #44's call light was not placed within reach. This deficient practice could affect residents who require assistance with care and could result in an emergent need not being addressed. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's electronic face sheet dated 01/23/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: hemiplegia (symptom that involves one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to brain causes parts of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #12) whose MDS records were reviewed for accuracy. Resident #12's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] incorrectly documented the resident had received tube feedings while a resident at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 01/25/2024 revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) lower respiratory infection, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, aphasia, cerebellar stroke syndrome, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, cerebral aneurysm, and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. Record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/18/2023, documented the resident while a resident had received tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #18) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #18's care plan did not reflect that she required supervision when she smoked. This deficient practice could affect residents who required supervision and could result in an accident or harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #18's electronic face sheet dated 01/26/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: altered mental status (change in mental function), depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how one feels, thinks and acts), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), affecting right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #20) reviewed for incontinent care. While providing incontinent care for Resident #98, CNA E did not return Resident #1's foreskin to the normal position. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection, paraphimosis (urologic emergency in uncircumcised males) and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #98's electronic face sheet dated 01/24/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #16) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. LVN B turned off Resident #16's oxygen concentrator and did not return to turn it back on. This deficient practice could affect residents on oxygen therapy and could result in low or high oxygen levels in the blood and cause respiratory distress. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's electronic face sheet dated 01/23/2023 reflected he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: hemiplegia (symptom that involves one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FREUDENBERGER, JOSEPHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
DEWITT NURSING & REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
SHKOP, AHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 6%Other / private 7%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,312per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$244per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455544. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next