No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stonehenge of American Fork

538 South 500 East, American Fork, UT 84003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (801) 642-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (801) 642-2000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Nov 2021Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$21,590 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $21,590 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-10)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
947 S 500 E · (801) 921-6530 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
475 E State Rd · (801) 756-1501 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
675 S 500 E · (801) 319-9111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(801) 687-9012 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%11.3%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%3.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%16.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened35.7%15.1%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%25.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%21.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%0.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%91.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%16.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.2%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.301.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.851.431.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 239 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.61U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.9%CMS range 57.2–68.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.1–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.6–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.90
RN hoursweekends
62.0%
Total nursing turnover
61.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2023-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoporosis with pathological fracture, sarcoidosis, repeated falls, patellofemoral disorders of left knee, weakness, myelopathy, anxiety disorder, and depression. On 10/2/23 at 10:46 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 73. Resident 73 was observed to be sitting in a wheelchair in her room at the time of the interview. Resident 73 stated that shortly after she was admitted , a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a trainee wanted to do a brief change before the end of the shift. Resident 73 stated she tried to tell the CNA that she did not need a brief change, but the CNA insisted. Resident 73 stated the CNA was unable to do a brief change while she was in her recliner so the CNA attempted to change her brief while standing and her right knee began to hurt. Resident 73 stated she heard a pop and she experienced significant pain. Resident 73 stated the nurse assessed her and she was sent to the hospital for care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, for 2 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident with a change of condition had a delay in treatment. In addition, a resident that was transferred improperly sustained a fracture. Resident identifiers: 10 and 55. Findings include: 1. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, acute kidney failure, hypotension, essential hypertension. anxiety disorder, and insomnia. On 11/15/21 at 2:29 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 55. Resident 55 stated that her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the staff wore hairnets incorrectly, cell phones were in the food preparation area, a dirty rag was used to clean a plate that was used for a resident's lunch, a spoon was repeatedly touched with dirty gloves then placed on the food. Findings included:On 7/23/25 at 12:18 PM, the following were observed during lunch service: At 12:03 PM, an observation was made of the Cook. The cook wore a hat with a hairnet over the top of it that was not covering her hair. The cook's hair had fallen out of the hat and was not covered by the hairnet.At 12:05 PM, an observation was made of a kitchen aide who had her hair clipped up in the back. The hair net was observed to only be covering the hair in the hair clip not on her scalp.At 12:07 PM, the cook was observed to touch the face of the plates with gloved hands that had touched her face and hair. At 12:08 PM, the dietary manager was observed to enter the cooking area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. Specifically, 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident was not administered medications timely. Findings included:Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, weakness, acquired absence of left leg above knee, and essential hypertension.On 7/21/25 at 11:14 AM, an interview was completed with resident 18. Resident 18 stated that she did not receive her nighttime medications until around 11:00 PM, and that was just too late to get them. Resident 18 stated the staff had woken her up last night to administer the medications and it was close to or after midnight. Resident 18 stated that it did not happen with every nurse but it did happen quite a bit. Resident 18 stated she did not want to be woken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform each resident periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate. Specifically, for 1 out of 3 sampled residents, a resident did not receive a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) when the beneficiary intended to continue services that might not have been covered under Medicare. Resident identifier: 14.Findings included:A SNF Beneficiary Notification Review, completed by the Social Services Director (SSD) for resident 14, dated 7/23/25, indicated, Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date: 01/31/25. Last covered day of Part A Service: 04/19/25. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. It further indicated, 1. Was a SNF ABN, Form CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] 10055 provided to the resident? . No . Discussed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident's heels were observed to not be floated while in bed when it was indicated as needed on the care plan. Resident identifier: 88.Findings included:Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a second degree atrioventricular block, dementia, weakness, and hypertension.On 7/22/25 at 1:45 PM, an observation was made of resident 88 laying in bed on his back, his heels were not floated.Resident 88's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and would not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. Specifically, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, a resident who had blanchable redness on the left heel was observed to not have their heels floated when in bed. Resident identifier: 88.Findings included:Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a second degree atrioventricular block, dementia, weakness, and hypertension.On 7/22/25 at 1:45 PM, an observation was made of resident 88 laying in bed on his back, his heels were not floated.Resident 88's medical record was reviewed on 7/21/25 through 7/23/25.A physician's order dated 7/9/25 at 12:18 PM, indicated, Float Heels for protection of skin integrity .An admission Nursing Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. Specifically, food items in the walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, reach-in freezer, and dry food storage were open to air. Findings include: On 10/2/23 at 8:05 AM, an initial walkthrough of the kitchen was conducted. a. The reach-in freezer was observed to have a box of beef patties open to air, a box of country fried steak was open to air, and a box of egg rolls was open to air. b. The dry storage room was observed to have a box of buttermilk biscuit mix that was open to air. c. The walk-in refrigerator was observed to have a box of [brand name] sausage links was open to air. d. The walk-in freezer was observed to have a box of pre-cut carrots was open to air, a box of cookie dough was open to air, a box of puff pastry was open to air, a box of egg omelets was open to air, and a box of frozen waffles was open to air. On 10/10/23 at 11:47 AM, a second walkthrough of the kitchen was conducted. a. The dry storage room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 2 out of 31 sampled residents, the tube feeding did not have the bag labeled with the formula type, rate of infusion, resident identification information, date and time of administration, or the nurse initials who initiated the infusion. Resident identifier: 16 and 26. Findings Include: 1. Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 6/24/23 with diagnoses which included pneumonia, metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, sepsis, acute kidney failure, multiple sclerosis, weakness, left hand contracture, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, unspecified convulsions, and mood disorder. On 10/3/23 resident 16's care plan was reviewed. Resident had a care plan with a Focus that stated, I require tube feeding related to: Weight loss. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, staff were observed without eye protection during an outbreak, staff did not sanitize their hands while passing food trays to residents, used meal trays were taken from resident rooms and placed back on the food cart next meal trays that had not been delivered, staff did not sanitize hands between passing medications to different residents, and staff entered a resident's room while a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine was in use without the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Resident identifier: 5 Findings included: 1. On 11/17/21 at 9:25 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. LPN 2 did not use hand sanitizer or wash her hands before gathering medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, an incident where a resident was improperly transferred by staff that resulted in a fracture was not reported to the State Survey Agency or adult protective services. Resident identifier: 55. Findings included: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. Specifically, for 2 out of 23 sampled residents, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments did not accurately reflect the resident's status. One resident was not accurately assessed to receive tube feedings and one resident was not accurately assessed to have a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II in place. Resident identifiers: 14 and 45. Findings included: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included but not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbances, schizoaffective disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, manic episodes, major depressive disorder, pyoderma gangrenosum, hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease. A review of resident 14's medical record was completed on 11/17/21. On 12/13/18, a PASRR Level I was completed which read, Level I screen indicates referral for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, for 2 out of 23 sampled residents, the facility did not hold hypertensive medications when the blood pressure (BP) and/or pulse measurements were outside of the physician ordered parameters. Resident identifiers: 9 and 13. Findings include: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to polyneuropathy, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, convulsions, cerebral aneurysm, protein-calorie malnutrition, essential hypertension (HTN), hypokalemia, dehydration, metabolic encephalopathy, and retention of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents who have not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident was prescribed an antipsychotic medication without a diagnosis to support the use of an antipsychotic medication. Resident identifier: 13. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to polyneuropathy, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, convulsions, cerebral aneurysm, protein-calorie malnutrition, essential hypertension, hypokalemia, dehydration, metabolic encephalopathy, and retention of urine. Resident 13's medical record was reviewed on 11/17/21. Physician's orders were reviewed and the following were documented: a. On 7/13/21, Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime (QHS) for hallucinations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not promptly notify the ordering physician; physician assistant; nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, notification was not made when a resident had critical lab values. Resident identifiers: 10. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, fracture of head and neck of right femur, orthopedic aftercare, encephalopathy, essential hypertension, anxiety, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. On 11/15/21, resident 10's medical record was reviewed. On 10/13/21, a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) was ordered. The CMP was not collected until 10/14/21. The results were available on 10/15/21. The lab report revealed the following: a. Sodium level was High at 154 [Note: Normal sodium values were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurate, and readily accessible. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a residents Neurology Clinical notes were not readily accessible. Resident identifier: 13. Findings included: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to polyneuropathy, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, convulsions, cerebral aneurysm, protein-calorie malnutrition, essential hypertension, hypokalemia, dehydration, metabolic encephalopathy, and retention of urine. Resident 13's medical record was reviewed on 11/17/21. Physician's orders were reviewed and the following were documented: a. On 7/13/21, Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime (QHS) for hallucinations and insomnia. Order discontinued on 9/16/21. b. On 9/16/21, Seroquel 25 mg QHS for adjunct to antidepressant therapy. On 7/13/21 at 3:28 PM, a Nurses Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$21,590 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $21,590 — penalty dated 2023-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEHENGE OF UTAH — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CURSUS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
KANE COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2025
CARRERA, RORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2022
GILLESPIE, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/25/2021
HOWELLS, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/25/2021
LOVELESS, KURTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/25/2021
WOOD, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$288K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 19%Other / private 26%

This home reported $288K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$369per resident / day
operating cost
$11,209per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Utah
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,475/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465178. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next