No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

MSM Brigham City LLC

1010 South Medical Drive, Brigham City, UT 84302 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 41 certified beds · (435) 310-5800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 20232 immediate-jeopardy citations$67,436 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $67,436 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1050 S 500 W · (435) 695-2777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1017 S 500 W · (435) 723-5211 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
156 S Main St · (435) 734-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rees Park0.3 mi
950 S Medical Dr · (435) 734-9471 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%3.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%16.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%15.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.8%25.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%3.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%21.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%0.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%91.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.9%16.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%11.6%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

69.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF69.1%CMS range 62.7–75.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.0–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.7–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.19
RN hours/ resident / day
0.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.90
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-15)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-18)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Screening of staff and visitors prior to entering the facility: On 2/24/22 at 4:41 PM, a interview was conducted with the facility Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated that the Administrator in Training (AIT) was filling in as the Business Office Manager (BOM) and then they hired another staff for the BOM position. The ADM stated that the AIT stayed on for a week afterwards, but she was not getting paid the week of January 18th, 2022, but she was at the facility. The ADM stated that the AIT was signing in for screening and she would come and go as needed. The ADM stated that she did not track the AIT's hours at the facility. On 2/24/22 at 5:12 PM, an interview was conducted with the Corporate Resource Nurse (CRN) 2. CRN 2 stated that the AIT did just come and go because she was an AIT. CRN 2 stated that the AIT should still be screening when she came into the facility. Review of the COVID-19 Screening of Staff for January 2022 revealed the following: a. On 1/3/22, the Resident Advocate (RA) marked yes to signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. On 2/22/22 at 12:13 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that there were two residents who said mean things to her, naming resident 4 and resident 14. Resident 6 stated that the other residents told her to shut up and go to her room when they were at activities. Resident 6 stated that she had fought with her family member (FM 2) who was a resident in another area of the facility, who could visit resident 6 as desired. Resident 6 stated that she was kept in another room overnight, away from her own room. Resident 6 stated that FM 2 had asked her for money. On 2/23/22 at 2:10 PM, resident 6's family member (FM) 1 stated that resident 6 had fought with FM 2 for years. FM 1 stated that FM 2 had pinched and hit resident 6 while in the facility in November, 2021. FM 1 stated that the administration team was aware that when FM 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident who was incontinent of bladder received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). Specifically, a resident developed a UTI following the use of a PureWick, which had been implemented without a physician's order or usage instructions. In addition, a resident had no follow-up after a urine culture was contaminated. This resulted in harm for resident 56. Resident identifiers: 3 and 56.Findings included: 1. Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, fracture of left femur, fracture of right femur, repeated falls, and overactive bladder.Resident 56's medical record was reviewed on 12/9/25 through 12/15/25.A review of resident 56's progress notes revealed: a. On 9/8/25 at 12:30 PM, a nurse's note documented, Resident reviewed in IDT [interdisciplinary team] meeting. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents remained free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, a dependent resident was left unattended in the shower for hours while the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) left their scheduled shift early. Resident identifier: 16. Findings included: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, early onset cerebellar ataxia, muscle spasms, insomnia, depression, dysphagia, and dorsalgia. On 12/11/23 through 12/18/23, resident 16's medical record was reviewed. On 8/6/23, the annual Minimum Data Set assessment documented that resident 16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which would indicate that resident 16 was cognitively intact. The assessment documented that resident 16 was a one-person extensive physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-03-02 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 25 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that all residents were free from involuntary seclusion. Involuntary seclusion was defined as separation of a resident from other residents or from her/his room or confinement to her/his room (with or without roommates) against the resident's will, or the will of the resident representative. Specifically, a resident was taken away from a group of residents to her room, and then placed in an unfamiliar room overnight against her will and without the knowledge of the resident's Power of Attorney. The deficient practice identified was found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 6. Findings included: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. On 2/22/22 at 12:13 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that her voice was hoarse because she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the dishmachine was not at the required temperature for sanitation, there were soiled areas in the kitchen, and domes over food were tarnished with a white substance. Findings included: A. On 12/8/25 at 10:16 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed: 1. There was a substance on the floor in the freezer. 2. The ice machine had dust on the vent in the front. The Cleaning Schedule revealed Tuesday night the ice machine was to be cleaned inside and out. There was no signature on the schedule. 3. There were food particles and dried substances under the shelf that was above the steam table. 4. The warming drawer was soiled on the outside and the wall by the grill had a dried white substance on it.B. On 12/8/25 at 10:39 AM, an observation was made of the refrigerator in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined for 3 of 25 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, insulin pens were not dated with an open date or had expired past 28 days. Resident identifiers: 1, 3, and 15.Findings included: On [DATE] at 8:40 AM, an observation of medication cart 2 was conducted. Inside the cart resident 1 had an opened Lispro insulin pen that did not have an opened date. Resident 3 had a Lispro insulin pen with an opened date of [DATE].On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, an observation of medication cart 1 was conducted. Inside the cart resident 15 had a Lispro insulin pen with an opened date of [DATE].On [DATE] at 8:45 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that opened insulin pens were good for 28 days once opened and then should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0775 — pattern
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 5 out of 25 sampled residents that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports. Specifically, urine culture and blood laboratory results were missing from the medical records for three residents, and the result for one resident's clotted laboratory sample was not located from the medical record. Resident identifiers: 3, 7, 8, 33, and 56.Findings included:1. Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, fracture of left femur, fracture of right femur, repeated falls, and overactive bladder.Resident 56's medical record was reviewed 12/9/25 through 12/15/25.On 9/5/25 at 4:28 PM, an infection prevention/control note documented, Urine dipped, MD [medical doctor] notified for possible UTI [urinary tract infection] , MD ordered Septra and urine C&S [culture and sensitivity].An order for resident 56 dated 9/5/25 documented, Send urine for c &s one time only for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not employ a full-time, designated person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not have a qualified food service director. Findings included: On 12/8/25 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated she worked at a sister facility and helped in the kitchen since there was no full-time DM. The DM stated she was a Certified Food Manager (CFM). An observation was made of the CFM which expired on 8/1/26. On 12/11/25 at 2:14 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated that the previous DM had been terminated and they had hired a new DM. The ADM stated the new DM was unable to start till 12/18/25, so the facility did not have a full-time DM but a DM from another facility was helping in the kitchen along with the Maintenance Director. The ADM stated the Maintenance Director was off this week. On 12/11/25 at 2:22 PM, a follow-up phone interview was conducted with the DM. The DM stated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 of 25 sampled residents, each resident did not receive food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained about the food temperatures and palatability, the test tray was not palatable, and resident council minutes revealed concerns regarding food. Resident identifiers: 11, 21, 35 and 39. Findings included: On 12/8/25 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated that the food was sometimes cold. On 12/8/25 at 10:37 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 21, who stated that the taste of the food had good days and bad days. Additionally, resident 21 stated that the food was often cold and doesn't look appetizing.On 12/8/25 at 1:50 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 35. Resident 35 stated that the food items were not served at the correct temperature and sometimes the food was cold. Resident 35 stated the taste of the food and the way it was cooked was not appealing. Resident 35 stated the food could be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined for 3 out of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented. Specifically, a resident had conflicting Metoprolol Tartrate and Metoprolol Succinate documentation, a resident had conflicting International Normal Ratio (INR) laboratory orders, and a resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus for the use of intravenous antibiotics. Resident identifiers: 6, 14, and 34.Findings included: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, repeated falls, and unspecified tremor.Resident 14's medical record was reviewed 12/9/25 through 12/15/25.A review of resident 14's orders revealed: a. On 8/13/25 an order to Check PT( Prothrombin Time)/INR in the morning every Tue [Tuesday] b. On 8/15/25 an order for INR-notify provider of results every day shift for INR for 2 days c. On 8/15/25 and order for INR one time only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment. Specifically, the physician was not notified when a resident's Donepezil and Levothyroxine was held for multiple days due to unavailability. Resident identifier: 8.Findings included:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and hypothyroidism.On 12/8/25 through 12/11/25 resident 8's medical records were reviewed.On 9/23/25, resident 8's physician ordered Levothyroxine Sodium Tablet 25 micrograms, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypothyroidism.On 10/16/25, resident 8's physician ordered Donepezil Hydrochloride Tablet 5 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth in the evening. Resident 8's November 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: a. On 11/3/25 and 11/4/25 the Levothyroxine was documented with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that when a resident was transferred that the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider, and a copy of the notice of transfer was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Specifically, the resident's medical records did not have documentation of what information was provided to the receiving health care provider when they were transferred to the emergency room (ER) and no documentation could be found to indicate that the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer. Resident identifier: 8.Findings included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cutaneous abscess of chest wall, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, dementia, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, asthma,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide each resident adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident sustained multiple injuries while operating his power wheelchair after therapy evaluated the resident as needing supervision while operating the wheelchair. In addition, another resident was not provided two person assistance during repositioning for a brief change and sustained a fall. Resident identifiers: 4 and 33. Findings included: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myopathy, sepsis, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. On 12/8/25 at 10:59 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 33. Resident 33 stated he had a power wheelchair that was taken away. Resident 33 stated he had some accidents with his power wheelchair, cut his leg wide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, the resident's Levothyroxine and Donepezil were not available from the pharmacy for administration. Resident identifier: 8.Findings included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cutaneous abscess of chest wall, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, dementia, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, asthma, hypothyroidism, and insomnia.On 12/8/25 through 12/11/25 resident 8's medical records were reviewed.On 9/23/25, resident 8's physician ordered Levothyroxine Sodium Tablet 25 micrograms, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypothyroidism.On 10/16/25, resident 8's physician ordered Donepezil Hydrochloride Tablet 5 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth in the evening for Psychotropic.Resident 8's November 2025 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25, the facility did not promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges. Specifically, the physician was not notified after a laboratory specimen was clotted and not completed as ordered. Resident identifier: 33.Findings included: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included myopathy, sepsis, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. A physician's order dated 5/31/25 revealed to complete a CBC (complete blood count) and CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel). A nursing progress note dated 5/31/25 at 1:29 PM revealed CBP and CMP drawn per nurse. Sent to the local hospital lab on STAT order for suspected pneumonia. The CBC was not located in resident 33's medical record. There was a CMP that was located. There were no nursing progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0779 — isolated
    Keep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 out of 25 sampled residents the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record radiologic reports. Specifically, a resident's head Computed Tomography (CT) results were not in the medical record. Resident identifier: 14.Findings included:Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, repeated falls, and unspecified tremor.Resident 14's medical record was reviewed 12/9/25 through 12/15/25.On 8/18/25 at 5:27 PM, a nurse's note documented, Provider ordered a head CT scan due to increased confusion and high INR [International Normal Ratio]. Resident transported to and from appointment at [local hospital] by staff around 1500 [3:00 PM]. Resident now in room with husband.It should be noted that resident 14's head CT results could not be located in the medical record.On 12/11/25 at 9:06 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing. (DON). The DON stated that she had to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). In addition, the facility did not ensure that all investigations were reported to the SSA within 5 working days of the incident. Specifically, for 4 out of 21 sampled residents, notification to the SSA and APS was not within 2 hours after allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin were identified and an investigation was reported to the SSA 7 working days of the incident. Resident identifiers: 16, 23, 89, and 90. Findings included: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, early onset cerebellar ataxia, muscle spasms, insomnia, depression, dysphagia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. In addition, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature controls. Specifically, opened insulin injector pens were not labeled with open dates and the insulin injector pens were in the medication cart available for resident use. In addition, the medication refrigerator was found to have low temperatures not compatible with medication storage. Findings included: On 12/18/23 at 8:41 AM, an observation was conducted of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 preparing resident medications. RN 1 prepared an insulin Aspart injection pen. The insulin Aspart injection pen was observed and was open for administration and was not labeled with an open date. RN 1 was immediately interviewed. RN 1 stated that the insulin injection pens were to be dated with the open date. RN 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were numerous undated and unlabelled items in both the walk-in refrigerator and freezer, items stored on the floor in both the walk-in refrigerator and freezer, and there was a significant layer of dust on vents located above food preparation and plating areas. Findings included: 1. On 12/11/23 at 8:25 AM, an initial kitchen walkthrough was conducted. In the walk-in fridge, there were boxes of cheese, liquid eggs, tomatoes, strawberries, zucchini, bell peppers, and honeydew stored on the floor. On a sheet pan rack in the walk-in fridge, there were several sheet pans with undated bowls of salad, undated fruit cups, undated cake slices, undated pasta cups, and undated bags of carrots. On the third shelf up from the floor, there was a Ziploc bag of cubed chicken with no date or label. In the walk-in freezer, there was a box of nutritional shakes, frozen rolls, and frozen vegetables stored on the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Specifically, for 2 out of 21 sampled residents, during a COVID-19 outbreak the facility staff did not dispose of their used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) correctly, Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and quarantine was discontinued for a COVID-19 positive resident after only six days of isolation, and staff face masks were observed worn down below the nose and mouth. Resident identifiers: 17 and 133. Findings included: 1. On 12/11/23 at 8:49 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 4 at the nurse's medication cart near room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN 4 had their facemask down below their nose. RN 4 was observed to assist resident 1 in the hallway with their surgical facemask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the resident's right to self administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, the Registered Nurse (RN) was observed to leave a residents medications at the bedside in a medication cup and the resident had not been evaluated to determine if they were safe to self administer medications. Resident identifier: 19. Findings included: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, encephalopathy, alcohol abuse with unspecified alcohol induced disorder, and ataxia. On 12/18/23 at 8:58 AM, an observation was conducted of RN 1 preparing medications for resident 19. The medication cup that RN 1 prepared included pregabalin 50 milligrams (mg), Keppra 500 mg, metformin 1000 mg, aspirin 81 mg, Creon 24,000-76,000 units, omeprazole delayed release 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment that they prevented further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, an allegation of neglect was made and the alleged perpetrator was not suspended pending the investigation and was allowed access to the resident/victim. Resident identifier: 16. Findings included: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, early onset cerebellar ataxia, muscle spasms, insomnia, depression, dysphagia, and dorsalgia. On 12/11/23 through 12/18/23, resident 16's medical record was reviewed. Review of the facility initial investigation, form 358, documented an allegation of neglect by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 2. On 8/9/23 at 1:00 AM, the report documented that CNA 3 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, facility staff attempted to transfer a resident from her bed to her wheelchair using a Hoyer lift without properly securing the Hoyer straps. Resident identifier: 17 Findings included: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, autonomic dysreflexia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, atherosclerosis of aorta, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, major depressive disorder, contracture of muscle, and dependence on wheelchair. On 10/3/23, the State Survey Agency received a facility reported incident that documented that resident 17 had fallen during a staff assisted transfer from her bed to her wheelchair using a Hoyer lift. Forms 358 and 359 were reviewed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, a residents medications were not administered as ordered by the physician due to the medications not being available by the pharmacy. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, acute kidney failure, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, generalized anxiety, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 12/11/23. On 11/30/23 at 10:19 PM, an Orders - Administration Note documented Note Text: Latuda Oral Tablet 20 MG [milligrams] Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to SCHIZOPHRENIA, UNSPECIFIED . Medication was not delivered with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address the irregularity. If there was to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record. Specifically, for 2 out of 21 sampled residents, pharmacy recommendations including the physician's documentation was not included in the resident's medical record. Resident identifier: 1 and 4. Findings included: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, acute kidney failure, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, generalized anxiety, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Resident 4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, the provider was not notified per the physician's order when a resident's blood glucose (BG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were outside of the physician's ordered parameters. In addition, a resident's long acting insulin was held when it should have been administered per the sliding scale physician's order. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, acute kidney failure, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain a specimen for a lab that was ordered by the provider. Resident identifier: 1. Findings included: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, epilepsy, Crohn's disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. On 12/11/23 through 12/18/23, resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1's laboratory orders revealed the following: a. On 2/3/23, a Complete Blood Count (CBC), lipid panel, and Keppra serum concentration level was ordered. b. On 2/24/23, a Levetiracetam (Keppra) serum level was ordered. Resident 1's laboratory results revealed no documentation of the above mentioned lab orders. On 2/23/23 at 11:01 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor the antibiotic use were implemented. Specifically, for 1 out of 21 sampled residents, a resident was prescribed and completed an antibiotic for a suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) even after the urine culture determined no bacterial growth. Resident identifier: 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, dementia, delirium, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. On 12/18/23, resident 22's medical record was reviewed. Resident 22's progress notes revealed the following: a. On 8/12/23 at 12:14 AM, the nurse note documented, Resident's blood pressure was low at 88/50, CNA [Certified Nurse Assistant] told nurse at shift change and his medical POA [Power of Attorney] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility did not store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the dish machine wash temperature was not meeting the manufacture requirements and there were soiled areas in the kitchen. Findings include: 1. On 2/22/22 at 9:09 AM, an initial kitchen tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed: a. There was whipped topping with no open date in the walk in refrigerator. b. There was debris on the floor in the walk in freezer. c. The inside of the microwave was soiled. e. The shelf above the steam table was soiled under the shelf which was above the prepared foods. f. There was food splatter on the wall behind the oven, fryer, griddle and stove. 2. On 2/22/22 at 9:15 AM, an observation was made of the facility dish machine. The wash temperature was 110 degrees Fahrenheit and the rinse temperature was 200 degrees Fahrenheit. The dishes were observed to be removed from the dish machine and placed in the clean dish area. A poster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision. Specifically, facility grievance records could not be located prior to November 2021. Findings included: On 2/23/22 the facility grievance binder was reviewed. The Grievance Log documented complaints from 11/9/2021 to 2/10/2022. The log provided the date of the incident, name of person filing the report, name of person investigating, the dates the parties were informed of the findings and the disposition of the complaint. Additional documentation included a Grievance Tracking Report that documented the issue/concern, how the concern was corrected, the date the concern was corrected, and the responsible person. On 2/23/22 at 1:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the Corporate Resource Nurse (CRN) 1. The grievance log from May 2021 to November 2021 was also requested. CRN 1 stated that the previous Administrator had all the grievance forms in his office and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the abuse policies and procedures were implemented to prevent abuse for 3 of 25 sample residents. Specifically, one resident experienced physical, verbal, financial, and emotional abuse and was involuntarily secluded. Resident identifiers: 4, 6, and 14. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. On 2/22/22 at 12:13 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that there were two residents who said mean to her, naming resident 4 and resident 14. Resident 6 stated that the other residents told her to shut up and go to her room when they were at activities. Resident 6 stated that she had fought with her family member (FM 2) who was a resident in another area of the facility, who can visit resident 6 as desired. Resident 6 stated that she was kept in another room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. Observations of 34 medication opportunities, on [DATE], revealed 5 medication errors which resulted in a 14.71% medication error rate. Specifically, two residents received Levothyroxine with meals, a full dose of Miralax was not administered, Fiber capsules were administered without verification of dosage, and a Symbicort inhaler was administered without verification of the medication expiration. Resident identifiers: 9, 12, and 125. Findings included: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, atherosclerosis of aorta, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, polyneuropathy, sleep apnea, and dementia. On [DATE] at 8:36 AM, an observation was made of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F880, which was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy, scope and severity of L. In addition, one resident was abused and involuntarily secluded with the permission of management, which was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy, scope and severity of H. Resident identifiers: 4,6, 14, 125, and 127. Findings included: 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a symptomatic staff members, who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19, were screened accurately and notification and evaluation was completed per the facility protocol, that negative antigen tests…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of correction to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F880, which was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy, scope and severity of L. In addition, F600, abuse was cited at an Immediate Jeopard, scope and severity of H. Resident identifiers: 6, 125, and 127. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a symptomatic staff members, who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19, were screened accurately and notification and evaluation was completed per the facility protocol, that negative antigen tests were completed, and that symptomatic staff members were provided appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The failure resulted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0888 — pattern
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility did not follow policy and procedures for residents with COVID-19 vaccination exemptions. Specifically, staff with COVID-19 vaccination exemptions were not wearing personal protective equipment according to the facility's policy and procedures. Findings include: On 2/23/22, the Administrator provided a list of staff who were fully vaccinated for COVID-19 or had an exemption. Registered Nurse (RN) 2 was listed to have a medical exemption. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 had a religious exemption. On 2/23/22, an observation was made of RN 2. RN 2 was observed to be wearing a surgical mask with eye protection. On 2/24/22 at 2:45 PM, an observation was made of RN 2. RN 2 was observed to be wearing a surgical mask with eye protection. On 2/24/22 at 5:45 AM, an observation was made of CNA 3. CNA 3 was observed to be wearing a surgical mask with eye protection. The facility COVID-19 Vaccine Policies and Procedures with no date revealed, .The purpose of this policy and procedure is to outline the community…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 or 25 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) had determined that the resident's right to self administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, two residents were not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self administer medications. Resident identifiers: 4 and 125. Findings included: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atherosclerosis of aorta, hypertension, insomnia, low vision right eye, and mild cognitive impairment. On 2/22/22 at 10:21 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 4. An observation was made of 4 medications at the bedside located in a medication cup. Resident 4 stated that they were her morning pills and she had not taken them yet. Resident 4 stated she had her own routine. Resident 4 was observed to swallow one pill and then set the remaining pills down. Resident 4 stated that she loved the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that the facility did not promote and facilitate the resident's self-determination through support of the resident's choice. Specifically, the resident requested that their breakfast meal tray be left at the bedside with the lid left on and the kitchen staff told the resident no, that it would be returned to the kitchen if not eaten within an hour. Resident identifier: 125. Findings included: Resident 125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, depression, hypertension, asthma, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 2/22/22 at 12:52 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 125. Resident 125 stated that the day before yesterday when the dietary staff delivered the breakfast tray she asked him to leave the tray with the lid on so she could get up in a minute and he said no. Resident 125 stated that the dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status or when a decision to transfer the resident from the facility was made. Specifically, the resident was transferred to the local hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment of back pain and the physician was not notified. Resident identifier: 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Friedreich ataxia, mood disorder, cardiomyopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and muscle weakness. On 2/22/22 at 10:57 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 22. Resident 22 stated that she requested to go to the hospital for back pain and that she thought the rods in her back had been dislocated. Resident 22 stated that she had her family member take her to the ER. Resident 22 stated that it was determined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records. Specifically, a licensed nurse was observed to provide a visitor with a resident's personal health information without determining who the visitor was first and if they had access to that information. Resident identifier: 127. Findings included: Resident 127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of congestive heart failure, acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hyperlipidemia. On 2/23/22 at 4:02 PM, an observation was made of a visitor attempting to enter resident 127's room. Resident 127's room had a sign posted on the door that stated isolation precautions, COVID isolation. Droplet precautions were check marked as indicated and the following instructions were listed: Patient to have private room; Surgical mask to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that in response to allegation of abuse the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the event that caused the allegation involved abuse. This involved reporting to other officials in accordance with State law. Specifically, the facility did not report when a resident was involuntarily secluded. In addition, the facility did not report within 2 hours to the State Survey Agency when same resident was physically and verbally abused by a family member. Other officials were not contacted regarding both incidents. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. Resident 6's electronic medical record review was completed on 3/2/22. 1. Seclusion: On 2/22/22 at 1:13 PM, resident 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that in response to allegations of abuse the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated to prevent further potential abuse. In addition if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective action was not taken. Specifically, a resident that was involuntarily secluded in a room that was unfamiliar to her and an investigated was not conducted regarding potential abuse. In addition, the same resident was verbally and physically abused by a family member and a thorough investigated was not conducted to prevent possible further abuse. Resident identifier: 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. 1. On 2/22/22 at 12:13 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that her voice was hoarse because she was screaming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 25 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record and included the basis for the transfer, that the services were attempted and could not be provided in the facility, that the transfer was made by the resident's physician, and that the receiving provider was provided all the necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, the resident was transferred to the local hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment of back pain without a physician order for the transfer and no documentation could be found of a transfer assessment or documentation that was provided to the receiving provider. Resident identifier: 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Friedreich ataxia, mood disorder, cardiomyopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and muscle weakness. On 2/22/22 at 10:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 25 sample residents, consistent with the resident right that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, activities of daily living function/rehabilitation potential, urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter, nutritional status, and dehydration/fluid maintenance were not developed as required. Resident identifier: 6. Findings included: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. On 3/2/22, resident 6's medical record review was completed. On 5/10/21, a Pre-admission Screening Applicant/Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for resident 6. Resident 6 had functional limitations in the areas of self-care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not receive registry verification for a nurse aide prior to allowing the staff member to serve as a nurse aide. Findings include: On 2/22/22, an observation was made of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 18. CNA 18 was observed to be working with residents as a CNA. CNA 18 was interviewed. CNA 18 stated her job title was a CNA. On 2/24/22, the Administrator provided a list of staff hired in the last 6 months. On 3/2/22 at 12:00 PM, CNA 18's employee file was reviewed. CNA 18 was hired on 3/12/21 for the nursing department. An Employment Authorization Form for the Direct Access Clearance System (DACS) did not reveal information regarding certification or License information. Review of the February 2022 CNA schedule for the facility revealed that CNA 18 worked on 2/7/22, 2/8/22, 2/10/22, 2/14/22, 2/15/22, 2/21/22, 2/24/22, and 2/28/22. A Nursing Assistant Registry form was provided by Corporate Resource Nurse (CRN) 1. The form was dated 3/2/22 at 12:37 PM. On 3/2/22 at 12:54 PM, CRN 1 was interviewed. CRN 1 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined for 1 of 25 sample residents that the facility did not provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, a resident with intellectual and behavior issues was not evaluated by or treated by a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW). Resident identifier 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. Resident 6's electronic medical record review was completed on 3/2/22. An MDS was completed on 12/17/21 that revealed that resident 6 had a mood interview, a Patient Health Qustionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Resident 6 scored 19/27, indicating moderately severe depression. A care plan with the focus of resident 6 exhibits/at risk for behaviors; yelling out, arguing with other residents/staff, grunting, rubbing legs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide, for 1 of 25 sample residents, specialized rehabilitative services such as physical therapy and occupational therapy that were required in the resident's comprehensive plan of care. Specifically, a resident was not provided assessed specialized rehabilitation. Resident identifier 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, encephalopathy, respiratory failure, obesity, and depression. Resident 6's electronic medical record review was completed on 3/2/22. Resident 6's Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II, created on 7/31/21 revealed that resident 6 had a diability that limited her in learning, self-direction, and capacity for independent living. The functional assessment revealed that reident 6 showed an inability to learn new skills without aggressive and consistent training. The summary of Specialized Rehabilitative Services (SRS) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$67,436 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $26,871 — penalty dated 2025-12-15
  • $40,565 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-06 for 32 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH SERVICES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LARSEN, RYANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
RAWLS, DANIELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
ANDERSEN, JEANETTEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
ANDERSON, STEVEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
BARTHOLOMEW, LAMARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2014
BLACKHAM, BRADYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2020
DYRENG, CASEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
PICKETT, KIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
SORENSON, MERRI LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/31/2018
BARTHOLOMEW, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
MURRAY, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2014
MSM BRIGHAM CITYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/27/2026
DUNN, MARCIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
LARSEN, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
PATH ACCOUNTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 17%Other / private 36%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$370per resident / day
operating cost
$11,251per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$373per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Utah
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,475/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465165. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next