Fairfield Village Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 416 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 226 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.11 to 1.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not have menus that were prepared in advance and were followed. Specifically, the menu had 4 ounces of Asian noodles and two small egg rolls for lunch and residents were served unmeasured Asian noodles and one small egg roll. Findings included:Review of the facility lunch menu for a regular diet on 5/27/26 documented the meal options and serving size of each food item were Egg Drop Soup (6 ounces), General Tso's Chicken (3 ounces), Asian Noodles (4 ounces), Oriental Blend Vegetables (4 ounces), and Mini Egg Rolls (2 each).On 5/27/26 at 11:53 AM, an observation was made of the lunch meal service. An observation was made of the Chef during plating of the lunch meal. The Chef was observed to serve the Asian Noodles with tongs and the amount was not measured and varied from plate to plate. The Chef was observed to place one egg roll onto each regular diet plate. On 5/27/26 at 11:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Chef 1. Chef 1 stated that she was serving 3 ounces of fries and noodles with the serving tongs. Chef 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator and freezer were undated, and sanitation buckets did not meet the required sanitation testing levels.Findings included:1. On 5/26/26 at 8:12 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:a. A male kitchen staff member was observed to be serving food onthe tray line and was not wearing a hair net.b. Celery chunks were not dated in the refrigerator.c. A bag of mozzarella cheese was opened and undated in the refrigerator.d. A bag of cheese slices was opened and undated in the refrigerator.e. Sliced roast beef in a metal container was undated in the refrigerator.f. A bag of garlic bread was opened and undated in the freezer.g. A bag of frozen carrots was opened and undated in the freezer.h. A bag of frozen meat patties was open to air and undated in the freezeri. A bag of meatballs was opened and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS); and the results of the investigation were reported to the SSA within 5 working days of the incident. Specifically, for 3 of 42 sampled residents, the facility did not report to the SSA alleged violations involving abuse or neglect no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made or submit the results of the investigation to the SSA within 5 working days; and the facility did not report alleged violations to APS. Resident identifiers: 48, 66, and 67. Findings included:1. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis, adult failure to thrive,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. Specifically, for 11 of 42 sampled residents, medications were stored at temperatures below the manufacturer's instructions. Furthermore, the facility's Purified Protein Derivative (PPD), the testing solution used in the Tuberculosis (TB) screening process for new admits, was stored at temperatures below the manufacturer's instructions. Resident identifiers: 9, 10, 19, 30, 37, 59, 76, 77, 78, 79, and 80.Findings Included: On 5/27/26 at 10:10 AM, an observation was made of the facility's medication storage refrigerator with Registered Nurse (RN) 3, who confirmed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 32.5 degrees Fahrenheit. RN 3 confirmed that the facility's TB testing solution and residents' overstocked medications were stored in the refrigeratorOn 5/27/26 at 10:18 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide at least three meals daily with no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, except when a nourishing snack was served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may lapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day if a resident group agreed to this meal span. Specifically, the dinner and breakfast were served 15 hours apart and there was no substantial evening snack being offered. Findings included:Scheduled meal times for the facility were posted. Breakfast was served at 7:30 AM-8:30 AM, lunch was served at 12:00 PM-1:00 PM, and dinner was served at 5:15 PM-6:30 PM. On 5/27/26 an observation was made of the breakfast service. The following was observed:a. The first breakfast meal was served at 7:47 AM.b. At 8:51 AM, a resident in the dining room asked if she was going to be served breakfast sometime this morning.c. At 9:08 AM, the last breakfast meal was served to a resident in the 100 hallway. The resident stated it was about time. On 5/27/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 3 of 42 sampled residents, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP] were not being implemented as ordered. Additionally, staff were not following hand hygiene procedures while serving meals. Furthermore, the facility's Tuberculosis (TB) screening process for new admits was inaccurate due to the testing solution (Purified Protein Derivative, or PPD) being compromised. Resident identifiers: 4, 38, and 28.Findings included:1. HAND HYGIENE On 5/27/26 at 11:45 AM, an observation of lunch service was conducted. The following was observed:a. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was assisting residents in the dining room while wearing gloves. CNA 3 was observed to touch multiple surfaces and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure the residents were free from misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, for 2 of 42 sampled residents, a staff member diverted narcotic medications. Resident identifiers: 68 and 73.Findings included:1. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included fracture of upper end of right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, pneumonia, and dementia. Resident 68 was discharged from the facility on 1/14/26. On 1/11/26, a physician order was started for Pregabalin Oral Capsule 100 milligram (MG) Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for nerve pain.On 1/11/26, a physician order was started for oxycODONE HCl (hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 15 MG (Oxycodone HCl) Give 1 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed forpain 90mg Max [maximum] daily amount.On 1/13/26, a physician order was started for oxyCODONE HCl Oral Tablet 15 MG (Oxycodone HCl) Give 1 mg by mouth every 4 hours as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was given a psychotropic drug had adequate monitoring of that drug. Specifically, for 1 out of 42 sampled residents, a resident receiving an antidepressant for insomnia did not have hours of sleep monitored. Resident identifier: 60.Findings included:Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety disorder, and insomnia.A physician's order started on 5/21/26, documented, trazodone HCl [hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 50 MG [milligrams] (Trazodone HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for sleep/anxiety. A physician's order started on 5/24/26, documented, Trazodone: Document # [number] of hours of sleep per shift two times a day.The May 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was reviewed. The number of hours of sleep were not documented on 5/24/26 and 5/25/26.On 5/28/26 at 7:59 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse and neglect the facility must have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, for 1 of 42 residents sampled, the facility did not have evidence that an alleged violation of neglect was investigated. Resident identifier: 66.Findings included:Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included periprosthetic fracture of left hip joint, difficulty in walking, and muscle wasting and atrophy On 7/23/25 at 3:12 PM, the facility reported that on 7/22/25 at 10:30 AM, resident 66 was found on the floor after sustaining a fall. Resident 66's spouse had just left the room when a crash was heard by her and the staff. Resident 66 was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for sutures to a bleeding laceration. Resident 66's medical records were reviewed.On 7/22/25 at 7:29 PM, resident 66's Nurses Note documented, At approximately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information that was provided to the receiving provider which must include a minimum of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; the resident representative contact information; advanced directive information; comprehensive care plan; a copy of the resident discharge summary; and all necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 1 of 42 sampled residents, the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information conveyed to the receiving provider when the resident was transferred to the Emergency Room. Resident identifier: 48.Findings included:Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis, adult failure to thrive, cataracts, vertigo, hypertension, and supraventricular tachycardia.Resident 48's medical records were reviewed.On 3/25/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT