Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 66.4 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 106 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 1.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the walk-in refrigerator temperature was above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and food was stored in the danger zone. The food temperatures were above 41 degrees. This was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). In addition, there were opened and undated food items in the walk-in refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage. Dietary staff were observed during lunch tray line service to touch food and other surfaces. NOTICE: Notice of the Immediate Jeopardy was given verbally to the Administrator (ADM), Dietary Manager (DM), and Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/6/26 at 10:31 AM. At that time, the ADM, DM, and DON were informed of findings of Immediate Jeopardy pertaining to F812 and were asked to develop an immediate plan to ensure that residents of the facility were free from food that had been stored, prepared,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice. Specifically, for 3 out of 32 residents, the facility did not provide a resident additional treatment for constipation which resulted in hospitalization for a bowel obstruction; a resident with Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) did not have their wound evaluated by a wound care provider and received wound care without a physician order; and a resident with open wounds on their buttocks did not have wound prevention or skin assessments completed weekly as ordered. Resident identifiers: 3, 28, and 63. Findings included: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, pseudobulbar affect, epilepsy, chronic pain, Parkinsonism, type II diabetes mellitus,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that each resident who was given a psychotropic drug had an adequate indication for use of the medication; that psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated; as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless the practitioner documented a clinical rationale to extend beyond 14 days with a duration of use for the order; and PRN orders for anti-psychotics were limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of the medication. Specifically, for 5 out of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not document an adequate indication of use for Seroquel and Haldol; did not have monitoring for episodes of behavior with non-pharmacological behavioral interventions; did not have monitoring for adverse side effects (ASE) of psychotropic medications; did not have a gradual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure that allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and other agencies. Specifically, for 4 of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not report allegations of abuse to Adult Protective Services (APS) and the facility did not report when a resident eloped from the facility to the SSA. Resident Identifier: 3, 41, 47 and 58. Findings included: 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, chronic venous hypertension, and dementia. An incident report form submitted to the SSA revealed on 2/17/26 at 10:00 AM, The resident was assessed promptly by the attending nurse following identification of the contusion. The report documented multiple that possible causes were being evaluated. The resident will continue to be closely monitored and a follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the diagnostic work up and further investigation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence of a thorough investigation in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Specifically, for 4 of 32 sampled residents, there were no thorough investigations into bruising on residents with dementia, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)'s being rough during a brief change and a resident eloping from the facility. Resident identifiers: 3, 41, 58, 72 Findings included: 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's, chronic venous hypertension, and dementia. An incident report form submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA) revealed on 2/17/26 at 10:00 AM, The resident was assessed promptly by the attending nurse following identification of the contusion. The report documented multiple that multiple possible causes were being evaluated. The resident will continue to be closely monitored and a follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the diagnostic work up and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that when they transferred a resident that it was documented in the resident's medical record and that the information contained the contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions for ongoing care; comprehensive care plan goals; and all other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 3 of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not document in the residents' medical record the information that was given to the receiving provider, notify the Ombudsman, and provide the bedhold policy when residents were transferred to a hospital. Resident identifier: 3, 6, and 50. Findings included: 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted after a hospital stay on 1/24/26 with diagnoses, which included but were not limited to, fluid overload. On 1/21/26 at 7:04 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident eloped from the facility after being identified as wandering prior and the same resident sustained falls with no new interventions. In addition, another resident eloped from the facility. Resident identifiers: 47 and 72. Findings included: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, arthritis, pain, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, major depressive disorder, and dementia with psychotic disturbance. FALLS On 4/8/26 at 10:19 AM, a concurrent observation and interview were made of resident 47. Resident 47's door was shut , and the resident was observed to be laying in bed with his walker about 2 steps away from his bed. Resident 47 stated if he needed help he used the button. Resident 47's call light was wrapped around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically for 3 out of 32 sampled residents, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) was not implemented for a resident with an indwelling medical device. Additionally, hand hygiene was not performed during wound care for a resident and there was cross-contamination during dining when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) touched a chair and then a resident's food. Resident identifiers: 6, 17, and 28. Findings Included: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 4/6/26 through 4/13/26. On 4/6/26 at 12:23 PM, a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically for 2 out of 32 sampled residents, residents were observed to have medications in their rooms and were not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications. Resident identifiers: 6 and 28. Findings included: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, constipation, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 4/6/26 through 4/13/26. On 4/6/26 at 12:19 PM, an observation was made of an opened bottle of Pepto-Bismol on resident 6's dresser. On 4/7/26 at 9:04 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that he had administered Pepto-Bismol to himself for an upset stomach. Resident 6 stated that he last had Pepto Bismol about one week ago. It should be noted that no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances for a period of no less than three years from the issuance of the grievance decision. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident's family member reported a missing purse, wallet, and glasses, but the facility did not document a prompt resolution or follow-up. Resident identifier: 5. Findings included: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, Sjogren's syndrome, and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.On 4/6/26 at 12:19 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 5's family member. The family member stated that resident 5 lost her purse, driver's license, and credit cards when she was first admitted to the facility. The family member stated that facility staff never located the purse. On 4/6/26 at 8:46 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated that if a resident notified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 1 of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident. Specifically, a resident's care plan was not updated with interventions after each fall. Resident identifier: 47. Findings included: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, arthritis, pain, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, major depressive disorder, and dementia with psychotic disturbance. On 4/8/26 at 10:19 AM, a concurrent interview and observation were made of resident 47. Resident 47's door was shut. Resident 47 was observed to be laying in bed with his walker about 2 steps away from his bed. Resident 47 stated if he needed help he used the button. Resident 47's call light was wrapped around the head board and not within reach. Resident 47 was observed to try and find the call light but he was unable to find the call light. At 10:43 AM, the call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not address a resident's pain when Semi-Effective pain control was reported by the resident. Resident identifier: 63. Findings included: Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic pain, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. On 4/07/26 at 9:17 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 63. Resident 63 stated she had pain in the right leg and her back. Resident 63 stated that they gave her pain medications and it somewhat helped. It calms down the pain, so it's not as intense, but doesn't take it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-15 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT