Mountain View Health Services
5865 South Wasatch Drive, Ogden, UT 84403 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 155 certified beds · (801) 479-8480 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (101) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $150,781 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-08)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.7% | 16.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 48.3% | 25.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.6% | 3.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.4% | 21.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.05 | 1.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.43 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 37.3 residents a day — about 24% occupied, or roughly 118 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
101 citations, most serious first. The 32 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 13 of 24 sampled residents, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to sanitize the blood glucose meters according to manufacturer requirements. This was determined to have resulted at an immediate jeopardy level. In addition, the facility had not updated their COVID-19 policy and procedures according to the latest guideline. Resident identifier: 1, 3, 6, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 22, 24, 35, 36 and 43. NOTICE On 1/7/26 at 2:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified and notice was given verbally and in writing to the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the facility not sanitizing the blood glucose meters according to manufacturer requirements to prevent the transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 30 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, ongoing monitoring for changes in condition were not provided after one resident experienced ongoing emesis and abdmoninal pain, and a second resident had a deep vein thrombosis. The findings for resident 46 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy for resident 46. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. NOTICE On 8/7/24 at 3:00 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to provide residents quality of care to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This notice was given verbally and in writing to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-14 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary symptoms, acute kidney failure, weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 298 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 would suggest intact cognition. A review of resident 298's paper medical chart revealed an order dated 6/10/24, for a right lower extremity ultrasound to rule out a DVT [deep vein thrombosis]. A review of resident 298's progress notes revealed: a. On 6/11/24 at 3:22 PM, a health status noted documented, PT [patient] APPT [appointment] C [with] MDR [medical doctor] WAS CANCELLED PER ADMIN [administration] HIS RLE [right lower extremity] IS QUITE A BIT BIGGER THAN PRIOR TO RECENT HOSPITAL STAY. ,D [sic] WAS INT [sic] TO SEE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes mellitus, low back pain, essential hypertension, epilepsy, and hyperlipidemia. A review of resident 9's electronic medical record was conducted. Resident 9's MDS from 7/10/22 reported that physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others was not exhibited. Resident 9's care plan updated on 7/31/22 did not have a focus area related to physical aggression towards other residents. A form titled Behavioral Care Plan from 5/13/22 was found in resident 9's paper chart. The documented stated that the problem was Aggressive Behavior with Physically combative with resident, Verbally aggressive with resident, and Anxiety circled on the document. The interventions circled on the document included, Medication as ordered, Redirect and reorient as needed/able, Documentation (incident reports if indicated), Report injuries to Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 33 sampled residents, that in response to allegation of abuse, the facility did not have evidence that all all leeged violation were thoroughly investigated and reported to the State Survey Agency within 5 days of the incident, and if the alleged violations were verified appropriate corrective action was taken. Specifically, there were no thorough investigations when a severly impared cognitive resident was sexually abused by a resident that was cognitively intact and when two residents were not assessed for ablitiy to consent, engaged in oral sex. These example were cited at an Immediate Jeopary level. In addition, the facility did not thoroughly investigate when a resident eloped from the facility, a resident had a bruise of unknown source and residents had a physical altercation. These examples were cited at a potiential for harm. Resident identifiers: 9, 13, 14, 15, 26, 31, 36 and 39. Findings include: On 10/26/22 at 9:30 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, abuse occurred within the facility on multiple occasions,but was not identified, reported or investigated; the staffing was inadequate and resulted in falls, abuse, and activities of daily living not being completed; Quality Assurance (QA) was not completed as required for approximately one year; medically necessary appointments were not scheduled by facility staff or the administrator; wound reports and pharmacy reviews were only accessible to the Administrator, who did not provide them to nursing staff; and multiple staff reported to the Administrator their concerns about resident safety while a specific nurse was working, however no follow up by the Administrator was completed. The identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined for 8 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and sexual abuse by other residents. Specifically, one resident with severe cognitive impairment was sexually abused by a resident that was congitively intact. This identified deficient practice was found to have occurred at the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Level. Additionally, incidents of physical abuse between residents and a bruise with an unknown origin were identified at a potiential for harm level. Resident identifiers: 7, 9, 14, 15, 26, 31, 36 and 39. Findings include: On 10/17/22 at 4:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to prevent various forms of abuse. Notice of the IJ was given verbally to the facility Administrator (ADM). On 11/10/22 at 11:56 AM, the facility Consultant Group provided the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility must permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility. Specifically, for 1 out of 3 sampled residents, a resident was not readmitted after being transferred to the hospital. Resident identifier: 1.Findings included:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with state 5 chronic kidney disease, or end state renal disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.Resident 1's medical record was reviewed.On 4/11/25 at 5:18 PM, a General Note documented . Resident was transported by a transport service around 1500 [3:00 PM], family was not present. Resident seems to know where she is at but not why she is alert and oriented x3 [person, place, and time]. Resident needs assistance with ADLs [activities of daily living] and transfers due to the risk for falls. Physician was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that policies were established and implemented to ensure that identified quality deficiencies were corrected. Specifically, multiple areas of immediate jeopardy and harm were identified. In addition, multiple areas of non compliance were cited on the previous survey and again during the current recertification survey. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 30 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, ongoing monitoring for changes in condition were not provided after one resident experienced ongoing emesis and abdominal pain, and a second resident had a deep vein thrombosis. The findings for resident 46 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy for resident 46. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. [Cross refer to F684] 2. Based on observation, interview, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents and the resident environment did not remain as free of accident hazards as was possible. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident was not provided adequate supervision and interventions to reduce hazards and risks that resulted in an acute complete femoral neck fracture with partial displacement. Resident identifiers: 298. Findings included: 1. Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. A Baseline Care Plan signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/28/24, documented that resident 298 did not have a history of falls and a Fall Management Care Plan was not implemented. On 3/29/24, a Morse Fall Scale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident was not provided their ordered nutritional supplement shake and the resident had weight loss. Resident identifier: 298. Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary symptoms, acute kidney failure, weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment date 4/10/24, documented that resident 298 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 would suggest intact cognition. A care plan Focus addressing nutrition initiated on 4/12/24, documented New resident with potential nutrition defects r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident with an acute complete femoral neck fracture was not provided pain management prior to being discharged to the hospital. Resident identifiers: 298. Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. A care plan Focus initiate on 3/29/24, documented Resident has pain related to general body aches. The Goal included Resident will suffer no unrelieved episodes of pain during facility stay. The interventions initiated on 3/29/24, included: a. Assess intensity of pain using pain scale. b. Assess type, duration, and frequency of pain. c. Discuss with resident effective and ineffective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2022-10-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, residents, resident family members, and staff voiced concerns with the staffing levels. However, observations were made of the Memory Care Unit left unattended, there were not enough activity staff members, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were not completed, and at least one resident experienced a fall. Resident identifiers: 7, 9, 22, 26, 30, 31, 36, and 93. Findings Include: RESIDENT FALLS 1. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (MS), neuropathy, insomnia, obesity, chronic pain, and depression. On 10/11/22 at 9:40 AM, resident 30 was observed to be sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 30 stated that she had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and interview, the facility did not develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identfied quality deficiencies. Specifically, multiple instances of harm or immediate jeopardy were identified during the annual recertification survey. In addition, during this survey mutliple deficiences cited on the previous annual recertification survey were not corrected, and were cited again during this survey. Resident identifiers: 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 22, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 93, and 94. Findings include: 1. Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined for 8 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and sexual abuse by other residents. Specifically, one resident with severe cognitive impairment was sexually abused by a resident that was congitively intact. This identified deficient practice was found to have occurred at the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Level. Additionally, incidents of physical abuse between residents and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2022-10-31 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and interview, the facility did not maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting of the Director of Nursing, Medical Director, and and least three other members of the facility's staff. In addition the committee did not meet quarterly. Findings include: On 10/11/22 the sign in sheets for the last 12 months of the Quality Assurance (QA) meetings were requested verbally to the Administrator (ADM). On 10/12/22 at 9:50 AM, the sign in sheets for the last 12 months of the QA meetings were requested from the ADM via email. On 10/24/22 at 6:08 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility ADM. The ADM stated that QA meetings were conducted at least quarterly, but could not provide any sign in sheets to demonstrate who had attended and the dates the meetings were held. As of 10/31/22 at the time of exit, no sign in sheets for QA meetings was provided. On 10/24/22 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she thought there might have been a QA meeting in July 2022, but she wasn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-31 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide residents with the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This included but was not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Specifically, residents were placed in the locked unit without assessments to determine if the residents met the criteria for the unit and were not provided with access codes or other information for independent egress. Resident identifiers: 7 and 9. Findings Include: Harm 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes mellitus, low back pain, essential hypertension, epilepsy, and hyperlipidemia. On 10/11/22 at 6:17 AM, an interview with resident 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, a resident was not provided diabetic management, antibiotics as ordered, or wound care which resulted in an amputation. Another resident was not provided treatment for a rash and the resident was unable to move in bed. These were cited at a harm level. In addition, a resident was not treated for her psoriasis. Resident identifiers: 29, 31 and 32. Findings include: Harm 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, schizoaffective disorder, neuropathy, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, hyperlipidemia, and hypomagnesemia. On 10/12/22, resident 29 was observed with a dressing on her right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that 7 of 33 sample residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, residents with weight loss did not receive timely and appropriate interventions. One resident will be cited at a harm level due to continued weight loss with no new interventions. Resident identifiers: 4, 7, 13, 31, 32, 36, and 37. Findings include: Harm 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, severe sepsis, aspiration pneumonitus, supraventricular tachycardia, acute kidney failure, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, thyrotoxicosis and osteoarthritis. Resident 32's medical records were reviewed between 10/11/22 and 10/31/22. A 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that resident 32's weight was 190 pounds (lbs) and there was no significant weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or more that 10% in the last 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatments and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers. Specifically, physician orders to prevent a clogged feeding tube were not followed for a resident who was receiving enteral feeding. Resident identifier: 4. Findings Include 1. Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, conversion disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, psychosis, difficulty in walking and hyperlipidemia. On 10/13/22 at 9:23 AM, an observation of resident 4 was made. Resident 4 was in bed and observed to have a feeding tube which entered through resident 4's nose. An interview with resident 4 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services. Specifically, a resident screamed out in pain when he was repositioned. Another resident went to the hospital and his scheduled pain medication was discontinued when he returned. The resident complained of uncontrolled pain. These examples will be cited at a harm level. Resident identifiers: 14 and 32. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, severe sepsis, aspiration pneumonitus, supraventricular tachycardia, acute kidney failure, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, thyrotoxicosis and osteoarthritis. Resident 32's medical records were reviewed between 10/11/22 and 10/31/22. Resident 32's care plan dated 7/10/17 indicated that the resident was at risk for pain due to his osteoarthritis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 4 of 33 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, a resident was not administered the correct dose of insulin per physician orders resulting in uncontrolled diabetes. This example will be cited at a harm level. In addition, two residents' antibiotics were not administered according to physician orders, and another resident's coumadin was not administered according to physician orders. Resident identifiers: 22, 29, 32 and 94. Findings include: Harm 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, schizoaffective disorder, neuropathy, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, hyperlipidemia and hypomagnesemia. On 10/12/22, resident 29 was observed with a dressing on her right foot. Resident 29 stated that she recently had surgery. On 10/12/22 at 10:17 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not arrange outside resources in a timely manner for residents. Specifically, a resident was not scheduled for a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and had multiple problems with the Nasojejunal (NJ) tube which was cited at a harm level. In addition, residents were not scheduled for a neurologist appointment and a cardiologist appointment. Resident identifiers: 4, 30 and 34. Findings include: Harm 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, conversion disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, psychosis, difficulty in walking, and hyperlipidemia. On 10/13/22 at 9:23 AM, an observation of resident 4 was made. Resident 4 was in bed and observed to have a feeding tube which entered through resident 4's nose. An interview with resident 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 24 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, residents' care plans did not include hospice services, did not address inappropriate sexual behaviors in a timely manner, and were not updated with new interventions after falls. Resident identifiers: 6 and 25. Findings included: 1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, dementia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Resident 25's medical record was reviewed on 1/5/26 through 1/8/26. Resident 25's care plan did not include hospice services:On 12/18/25, Resident 25 was admitted to hospice. No reference to hospice services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months on a full time basis had completed a training and competency evaluation program approved by the State. Specifically, three nurse aides were found to have worked at the facility for more than 4 months without completing a training and competency evaluation program approved by the state. Staff identifiers: 1, 2 and 3.Findings Include: On 1/8/26, five employee files were reviewed. The files of staff members 1, 2, and 3 indicated that those three staff members had been working at the facility for more than 4 months without completing a state-approved nurse aide training and competency evaluation program. On 1/8/26, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that nurse aides working at the facility have 120 days to become certified nursing assistants. The administrator stated that new hires at the facility must prove that they were enrolled in a training program. To verify this, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their written policies and procedures for feedback, data collection systems, monitoring to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified deficiencies. Specifically, there were repeat deficiencies and infection control was not identified during the Quality Assurance and Performance improvement (QAPI). Resident identifier: 3. Findings included: On 1/7/26, it was identified that the facility was not sanitizing their blood glucose meters according to manufacturer requirements. This finding was identified at an Immediate Jeopardy level because a resident had a known blood borne pathogen. Deficiencies cited on the previous survey on 8/14/24 and recited during the current survey included F656, F689, F770 and F880. On 1/8/26 at 2:54 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the facility had quarterly QAPI meetings with the physician, Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, Business Office Manager, Dietary Manager and Activities Director. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 5 of 5 sampled residents and 5 out of 5 sampled staff members, the facility did not develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure each resident and staff member were offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident or staff member had already been immunized. In addition, residents and staff were not educated regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects of the vaccine prior to being offered. The resident's medical record and staff records did not include documentation education was provided regarding benefits and potential risk associated with the COVID-19 vaccine or if the residents refused or if the vaccine was medically contraindicated. Specifically, there was no documentation that residents and staff were educated and offered the COVID-19 vaccine. Resident identifiers: 1, 3, 6, 11 and 43. Staff identifiers: 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Findings included: Resident COVID-19 Immunizations 1. Resident 11 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 24 sampled residents, the facility did not provide supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident sustained falls with no interventions developed and interventions were not implemented per the care plan. Resident 6. Findings included:Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 1 diabetes mellitus, dementia, mood disorder and psychotic disturbance. On 1/7/26 at 9:37 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated she had fallen 3 or 4 times and had not gotten hurt. Resident 6 stated someone did some exercises with her to help her get stronger after she had a fall. Resident 6 was not able to make full sentences during the interview. On 1/7/26 at 9:13 AM, an observation was made of resident 6. Resident 6 was observed in bed with her bed not in the lowest position to the ground. Resident 6's wheelchair was not next to her bed and was out of her reach. Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 24 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Specifically, one resident did not receive laboratory (lab) services for A1C (glycohemoglobin) and lipid panel as ordered. Resident identifiers: 25. Findings included: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident 25's medical record was reviewed on 1/5/26 through 1/8/26. An order for resident 25 was started on 7/12/25 for A1C and lipid panel annually. The results for the A1C and lipid panel could not be located in resident 25's medical record. On 1/8/26 at 9:35 AM an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, who stated that she was unable to locate the results for the A1C and lipid panel that were ordered on 7/12/25. RN 1 stated that after a provider ordered a nonurgent lab a copy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 24 sampled residents that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports. Specifically, residents' laboratory (lab) results were not filed in their medical record. Resident identifiers: 25 and 43. Findings included: 1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident 25's medical record was reviewed on 1/5/26 through 1/8/26. A physician's order dated 6/18/25 at 4:00 PM revealed CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), Depakote, and TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone) Q6 months (every six months). A physician's order dated 11/25/25 at 4:00 PM revealed CBC, CMP, TSH with reflex T4 (thyroxine), ammonia, B12 (vitamin B12) and UA with micro and reflex to culture (urinalysis with microscopic examination and reflex to culture). get urine sample today and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 24 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain the required information from hospice representatives and the facility did not communicate with the hospice representatives to coordinate hospice care. Specifically, the facility did not obtain the most recent hospice plan of care and the hospice election form for one resident. Additionally, that resident's plan of care did not include both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the Long Term Care facility. Resident identifiers: 25. Findings Included:1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident 25's medical record was reviewed on 1/5/26 through 1/8/26. A physician order dated 12/18/25, revealed resident 25 was admitted to hospice. It should be noted that the hospice hospice plan of care and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. Specifically, the DON did not work 40 hours a week. Findings included: On 7/31/24 at 7:20 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she worked 12 hours on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The DON stated she was assigned to resident care on her shifts. On 7/31/24 at 2:54 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated the DON worked a 12 hour shift on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays. The Nurse's July 2024 schedule indicated, DON Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled as follows: D [day shift] Monday, July 1; D Wednesday, July 3; N [night shift] Sunday, July 7; D Monday, July 8; 0.5 [half shift] Tuesday, July 9; D Thursday, July 11; * [not available] Friday, July 12; * Saturday, July 13; * Sunday, July 14; D Monday, July 15; D Tuesday, July 16; D Wednesday, July 17; D Friday, July 19; D Monday, July 22; D Wednesday, July 24; D Friday, July 26; D Monday, July 29; and D Wednesday, July 31.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the low temperature dish washing machine did not reach a minimum temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, a whole ham was stored above premade peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, bagged fruit, and strawberry dessert cups in the walk in refrigerator, there were onions stored on the floor of the walk in refrigerator, yogurt cups were not stored on ice on a snack cart located in a hallway, and meals were stored uncovered at the central nurse's station. Findings included: On 7/28/24 at 8:52 AM, an initial observation was made of the facility kitchen. The dish machine was noted to be a low temperature dish machine. The dish machine temperature log for the month of July 2024 was reviewed. It was noted that none of the logged temperatures were at or above 120 degrees Fahrenheit. On 7/30/24 at 11:49 AM, an observation was made of the kitchen walk in refrigerator. There was noted to be a box of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. In addition, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, a nurse dropped a pill on the medication cart, picked up the pill with bare hands, and administered the medication to a resident. In addition, hand hygiene was not performed when the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were passing resident meal trays, medical supplies were stored in a bathroom that was in use by staff, there was no tracking and trending for the IPCP, staff were not using the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and the licensed nurse cross contaminated during a wound care dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility did not ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Specifically, the Director of Nursing (DON) who was the designated IP had not completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings included: On 7/29/24 at 10:47 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that she was the designated IP for the facility and she had completed the specialized training for the IP certification. The DON stated she took the training and was supposed to take the test. The DON stated she had until November 2024 to take the test. The DON stated she thought she did the training in May 2024. The DON stated regarding infection control she had been so busy. The DON stated she learned about the enhanced barrier precautions, multidrug resistant organisms, and how she could do charts. The DON stated she was still working on those things to get them in place. The DON stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents have a right to a dignified existence. Specifically, for 3 out of 30 sampled residents, the facility served resident meals on disposable dishware, there were long call lights, there was a resident with socks with holes, and there were observations of staff talking down to residents in the facility. Resident identifiers: 12, 15, and 22. Findings Included: 1. On 7/28/24 at 11:46 AM, an observation was conducted of the lunch meal tray service. The mobile hot buffet was observed in the 300 hallway. Staff were observed preparing the lunch meal for residents eating in their rooms. The lunch meal was served on Styrofoam plates, disposable plastic cups, Styrofoam cups, and disposable cutlery. On 7/30/24 at 12:18 PM, an observation was made of the lunchtime hallway meal tray service. It was noted that residents that chose to eat in their bedroom received their meal on a Styrofoam plate with disposable cutlery. On 8/10/24 at 1:56 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, there were several brown carpet stains found in multiple residents' rooms, there was a television antenna hanging from the ceiling of a resident room, there were damaged blinds in a resident's room, and a resident had dirty wheelchair tires from being pushed through a brown substance found on the floor of the facility. Findings Included: On 7/28/24 at 10:26 AM, an observation was made of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a large discolored area under the air conditioner near the window. There was a brownish stain on the carpet to the right side of the bed. On 7/28/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation was made of a brown substance on the floor of the bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] which had been run over by the wheelchair. The brown substance was observed to be on the wheelchair tires. On 7/28/24 at 12:30 PM, an observation was made of the floors throughout the 100 hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that for 3 of 30 sample residents, the facility did not appropriately document the basis for the transfer or the discharge summary. In addition, appropriate documentation was not completed in order to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Resident identifiers: 25, 47, and 298. Findings include: 1. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, acute respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, pneumonia, pressure ulcer of left heal, metabolic encephalopathy, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Resident 25's medical record was reviewed from 7/28/24 through 8/14/24. A Health Status Note dated 12/28/23 at 10:33 PM indicated, Res [resident] lungs assessed this shift, resident c/o [complained of] pain with inhalation, lower lobes junky to auscultation, wheezing heard from chest, resident unable to maintain 02 [oxygen] sats [saturation] above 90 w/o…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, for 6 out of 30 sampled residents, care plans were not created when there was a specified need and therefore were not reflective of the services required for the residents to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Resident identifiers: 7, 17, 24, 26, 32, and 35. Findings included: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, fluid overload, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. Resident 32's medical record was reviewed from 7/28/24 through 8/14/24. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team reviewed and revised the comprehensive care plan after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Specifically, or 6 out of 30 sampled residents, care plans were not updated after a change in the resident's condition or in response to implemented interventions. Resident identifiers: 3, 17, 26, 32, 35, and 298. Findings included: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, fluid overload, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. On 7/28/24 at 10:14 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 32. Resident 32 stated he had pain in his legs, feet, and arm. Resident 32 stated he was on pain medication, but they were administered late. Resident 32's medical record was reviewed from 7/28/24 through 8/14/24. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 5 out of 30 sampled residents, the facility did not have orders for multiple residents' nasal cannulas, oxygen concentrator humidifier or oxygen concentrator to be changed nor was there any documentation that they were being changed, and a resident with an order for a mustache cannula instead received a standard nasal cannula. Resident identifiers: 7, 17, 24, 26, and 32. Findings Included: 1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis without septic shock, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, malignant neoplasm of esophagus, acute respiratory failure unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, asthma uncomplicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 5 of ^^ sample residents were seen by the physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter. Resident identifiers: 7, 24, 28, 29, and 44. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, obsessive-compulsive disorder, essential hypertension, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, adult failure to thrive, and encephalopathy. A review of resident 7's medical record of physician visits revealed that the last facility MD [medical doctor] visit was 2/27/24, indicating that the resident had not been seen by the physician in approximately 5.5 months. 2. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic viral Hepatitis C,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services that included the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, for 4 out of 30 sampled residents, licensed nursing staff were not signing out controlled substances and reconciling at the time of administration. Resident identifiers: 1, 3, 4, and 38. Findings included: 1. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia with agitation, essential hypertension, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies. Resident 38's medical record was reviewed on 8/12/24. The August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed on 8/12/24 at 12:21 PM. Resident 38's ARISE medications had not been administered. (Note: According to the medication pass times provided by the facility the ARISE medications were to be administered between 7:00 AM to 11:00 AM.) The ARISE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, for 4 out of 30 sampled residents, one resident had multiple missed doses of two medications, a second resident was not administered pregabalin a time sensitive medication at the scheduled times as ordered by the physician, a third resident received a double dose of their pain and anxiety medications, and a fourth resident received a double dose of warfarin. Resident identifiers: 4, 32, 38, and 298. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, fluid overload, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. On 7/29/24 at 10:11 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with resident 32. Resident 32 was awake, in bed, and wore a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator running at 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory (lab) services to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, for 3 out of 30 sampled residents, residents that had a urinalysis (UA) collected did not have the UA completed in a timely manner. Resident identifiers: 8, 18, and 44. Findings included: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, other stimulant abuse with stimulant-induced psychotic disorder, and unspecified mycosis. On 8/10/24 at 2:17 PM, an observation was made of the physician's phone. There was a text message at 2:03 PM, from Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 to the physician which revealed resident 18 had redness to his groin area and had urgency and burning upon urination. LN 3 text messaged resident 18's urine was positive for leukocytes and nitrates. LN 3 asked the Medical Director (MD) if it was okay to have a UA with Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) completed. On 8/10/24 at 2:52 PM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, multiple areas of immediate jeopardy and harm were identified. In addition, multiple areas of non compliance were cited on the previous survey and again during the current recertification survey. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 30 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, ongoing monitoring for changes in condition were not provided after one resident experienced ongoing emesis and abdominal pain, and a second resident had a deep vein thrombosis. The findings for resident 46 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0841 — patternDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure the the medical director was effective in their role of implementing resident care policies and coordinating medical care in the facility. Specifically, multiple areas of immediate jeopardy and harm were identified. In addition, multiple areas of non compliance were cited on the previous survey and again during the current recertification survey. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 30 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, ongoing monitoring for changes in condition were not provided after one resident experienced ongoing emesis and abdominal pain, and a second resident had a deep vein thrombosis. The findings for resident 46 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy for resident 46. Resident identifiers: 46 and 298. [Cross refer to F684] 2. Based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible. Specifically, for 6 out of 30 sampled residents, progress notes, an appointment referral, and Occupational Therapy orders were located in the wrong resident medical records. In addition, resident medical records were unsecured in the Director of Nursing (DON) office. Resident identifiers: 1, 3, 7, 24, 35, and 148. Findings included: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute myocardial infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, age-related cognitive decline, type 2 diabetes mellitus, non-pressure chronic ulcer of foot, rheumatoid arthritis, acquired deformity of lower leg, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, and difficulty in walking. On 7/29/24, resident 1's paper medical record was reviewed. Progress Notes for resident 3 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0843 — patternHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility did not have in effect a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Specifically, the facility never provided the State Survey Agency (SSA) their hospital transfer agreement. Findings included: On 8/7/24 at 1:03 PM, the hospital transfer agreement was requested from the Administrator. On 8/7/24 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that he was having trouble finding the hospital transfer agreement. On 8/12/24 at 9:53 AM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that the hospital transfer agreement that he had was outdated. The Administrator stated that he reached out to the two local hospitals to get the hospital transfer agreement updated. The Administrator stated that one of the hospitals he contacted was by email only. The Administrator stated that he would provide the SSA the hospital transfer agreement when he received it. A hospital transfer agreement was never provided to the SSA.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor the antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility infection control tracking and trending was not done and the facility had not established an antibiotic stewardship program. Findings included: On 7/31/24 at 7:23 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she could not locate her infection control binder, but would look for the binder and bring it to the State surveyor. The DON stated that she was not currently tracking or trending infections in the facility. The DON stated that she did not have the policy for antibiotic stewardship. The DON stated to prevent infections from being spread, all staff should be hand sanitizing in between contact with residents and then washing their hands after they entered a resident's room. On 8/14/24 at 12:00 PM, it should be noted that the infection control binder was never brought to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not have adequate outside ventilation. Specifically, the facility was found to have numerous odors throughout the survey. Findings included: On 7/28/24 at 10:05 AM, an observation was made of the 100 hall locked unit. There was a strong urine odor near rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 7/28/24 at 10:22 AM, an observation was made of the 300 hall at the facility. There was noted to be a strong urine odor through out the hallway. On 7/28/24 at 10:43 AM, an observation was made of the 200 hall at the facility. there was noted to be a strong urine odor around rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 7/28/24 at 12:18 PM, an observation was made of the 300 hall at the facility. There was noted to be a strong urine odor near the entrance to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 7/28/24 at 12:28 PM, an observation was made of the 100 hall locked unit. There was a strong urine odor near room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 7/29/24 at 7:36 AM, an observation was made of the 100 hall locked unit. There was a strong urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not inform the resident representative for 2 of 30 sample residents when there was a significant change in the residents' physical, mental or psychosocial status; or when there was a need to alter treatment significantly. Specifically, two residents had a change in condition, but the facility did not attempt to contact the representative when the change of condition occurred. Resident identifiers: 25 and 46. Findings include: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, severe sepsis without shock, aspiration pneumonitis, acute kidney failure, supraventricular tachycardia, and bipolar disorder. Resident 46's medical record was reviewed from [DATE] through [DATE]. Progress notes for resident 46 indicated that on [DATE] at 9:24 AM, resident 46 was .having black tarry vomit, constant diarrhea, respirations 40, hunched over more than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, an entity report of a physical abuse allegation was not submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA) until three days after the incident and an entity report of a neglect allegation was not reported to the SSA until 14 days after the incident. Resident Identifiers: 29 and 41. Findings Included: 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of left lower limb, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection unspecified site, malaise, venous insufficiency, localized edema, morbid severe obesity due to excess calories,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, in response to allegations of neglect the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident that had multiple falls and sustained an acute complete femoral neck fracture with partial displacement did not have the fracture investigated for neglect. Resident identifiers: 298. Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. A Baseline Care Plan signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/28/24, documented that resident 298 did not have a history of falls and a Fall Management Care Plan was not implemented. On 3/29/24, a Morse Fall Scale documented that resident 298 was a High Risk for Falling with a score of 50. A resident was considered a High…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not accurately assess residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, range of motion impairment was not documented on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Resident identifier: 3. Findings included: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which include, paranoid schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic viral Hepatitis C, major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, chronic pain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder, low back pain, and hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia. On 7/29/24 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 3. Resident 3 stated that she could not get out of bed without extensive assistance from facility staff due to a stroke that she had which left her with weakness on the left side of her body. Resident 3 stated that she was unable to walk or use her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that for 2 of 30 sample residents, a discharge summary was included in the residents' medical records. Resident identifiers: 47 and 248. Findings include: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, edema, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, pain in right hip, spinal stenosis, hypertension, low back pain, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, and and genetic related intellectual disability. Resident 47's medical record was reviewed on 7/31/24. Resident 47's medical record that the resident discharged from the facility on 5/15/24. No discharge summary or basis for the discharge could be located in resident 47's medical record. On 7/31/24 at 3:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing. (DON). The DON stated that the Administrator and Social Services Worker worker had a handy [NAME] discharge summary they would provide to the nurse and the nurse would complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, recommended treatments of daily prolonged stretching were not followed up on, occupational therapy orders were not implemented, and splints were not being provided. Resident identifiers: 1 and 35. Findings included: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included artherosclerotic heart disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, gout, memory deficit following cerebral infarction, repeated falls, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, Charcot's Arthropathy, and acquired absence of other right toe. On 7/28/24 at 1:05 PM, an observation and interview were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently received one was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that catheterization was necessary. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident continued to have an indwelling catheter without having a diagnosis for keeping it in place. Resident identifiers: 298. Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary symptoms, acute kidney failure, weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment date 4/10/24, documented that resident 298 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 would suggest intact cognition. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of five percent or greater. Observations of 35 medication opportunities on 7/29/2024, revealed two medication errors which resulted in a 5.71% medication error rate. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident was administered a medication after they had consumed their meal and the physician's order documented to administer the medication before meals. In addition, the resident was administered a medication two hours after the time specified on the physician's order. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Huntington's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, bipolar II disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, migraine, chronic pain, essential hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date as possible. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 residents, a resident's narcotic medication was being cut in half and then one-half was being placed back in the bubble pack and sealed with tape. Resident identifier: 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, low back pain, asthma, and cirrhosis of liver. Resident 22's medical record was reviewed on 8/8/24. A physician order with a start date of 6/25/21, documented oxyCODONE HCl [hydrochloride] Tablet 5 mg [milligrams] Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory (lab) services only when ordered by a physician; physician assistant; nurse practitioner (NP), or clinical nurse specialist. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident had a urinalysis (UA) collected without a physician's order and a resident had a Complete Blood Count (CBC) blood lab collected without a physician's order. Resident identifiers: 8 and 18. Findings included: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, cannabis abuse, essential hypertension, polycystic kidney, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, mental disorders, stimulant dependence, and urinary tract infection. Resident 8's medical record was reviewed on 8/11/24. On 8/10/24 at 2:16 PM, a Health Status Note documented Note Text: Resident assisted with her shower before lunch. I obtained a UA sample from resident d/t [due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner (NP), or clinical nurse specialist of results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, the Medical Director (MD) was not notified timely when the x-ray results documented that the resident had an acute complete femoral neck fracture with partial displacement. Resident identifier: 298. Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. On 5/20/24 at 11:00 PM, an encounter documented Date of Service: 05/21/2024 Visit Type: Acute Transition of Care: No transition occurred. Progress Note . Chief Complaint / Nature of Presenting Problem: Right hip pain History Of Present Illness: [Resident 298] is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record the signed and dated reports of radiological and other diagnostic services. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident's ultrasound and x-ray reports were not filed in the medical record. Resident identifier: 298 Findings included: Resident 298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, essential hypertension, acute kidney failure, and anxiety disorder. Resident 298's medical record was reviewed on 8/7/24. A. On 6/20/24 at 11:08 AM, a health status note documented, [Name redacted] came in to do an US [ultrasound] to residents RLE [right lower extremity]. RESULTS: Thrombus in common femoral. Femoral vein pros and dist, popliteal and posterior tibial veins with minimal flow. Veins non compressible. IMPRESSION: RLE DVT [deep vein thrombosis] MD [Medical Doctor] notified immediately. A review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, the facility was found to have stored uncovered, used aluminum soda cans outdoors directly outside of the kitchen. Findings included: On 7/30/24 at 11:49 AM, an observation was made of the facility kitchen. There was a large black plastic garbage bag stored outdoors directly outside the entrance to the kitchen. The garbage bag was torn open and empty aluminum soda cans were spilling out of the bag and onto the concrete ground. On 7/30/24 at 1:52 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated that she was aware of the empty soda cans being stored outside the kitchen. The DM stated that a resident of the facility was collecting the cans to be recycled. The DM stated that the bags of soda cans had been torn open by a recent windstorm.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not arrange services with an outside agency. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, residents had physician's orders to follow up with a specialist and the facility staff had not made the appointments. Resident identifiers: 25 and 35. Findings included: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included artherosclerotic heart disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, gout, memory deficit following cerebral infarction, repeated falls, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, Charcot's Arthropathy, and acquired absence of other right toe. Resident 35's medical record was reviewed from 7/28/24 through 8/14/24. A Minimum Data Sheet assessment Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals dated 6/13/24, indicated, Functional Limitation in Range of Motion to the Lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical record included documentation that indicated that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal immunization; and that the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. Specifically, for 2 out of 30 sampled residents, residents were not provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal immunization. In addition, the medical record did not include the administration or refusal of the pneumococcal immunization. Resident identifiers: 7 and 24. Findings included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 10 of 33 sampled residents, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community were not provided. Specifically, residents in the memory care unit did not receive activities in the unit and activities were not provided during the day. Resident identifiers: 5, 7, 9, 13, 26, 31, 32, 35, 36, and 37. Findings include: The facility activity calendar was reviewed for October 2022. The calendar revealed the following activities: a. On 10/11/22: 5:15 PM Travel Bug, 5:45 PM Reminiscing, and 6:15 PM Sensory b. On 10/12/22: 10:00 AM Relief Society, 5:15 PM Banking, 5:45 PM, Current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-31 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not have an activities program that was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist. Specifically, the facility did not employ a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist. Findings include: The facility Administrator (ADM) was asked to provide the most recent notes from the Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (CTRS). Review of the notes revealed that the CTRS provided feedback to the facility in October and November 2021. There were no notes for December 2021. The notes also revealed that the CTRS provided feedback to the facility from January 2022 through April 2022, but not in May 2022. The CTRS also provided feedback in June and July of 2022. On 10/25/22 at 1:35 PM, an interview was conducted with the ADM. The ADM confirmed that the last time the CTRS provided feedback to the facility was in July of 2022 because the Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (TRT) had been sick. On 10/26/22 at 3:30 PM, a phone interview was conducted with the TRT. When asked about her work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-31 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, the facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility must review and update that assessment, as necessary, and at least annually. The facility must also review and update this assessment whenever there was, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment. Specifically, the facility did not accurately assess the residents' needs. Findings include: The Facility Assessment (FA) was requested from the facility Administrator (ADM) on 10/11/22. The FA provided by the ADM was reviewed. 1. The FA did not address the care required by the resident population with regard to the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. Areas of the FA entitled Common diagnoses, Major RUG-IV Categories, Assistance with Activities of Daily Living, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were afforded the right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility. Specifically, no resident council had been formed and held since June of 2022. Findings include: On 10/12/22, the facility Administrator (ADM) was asked to provide the resident council minutes for the previous six months. The ADM provided the resident council minutes the same day they were requested, however the last resident council notes were from June 2022. On 10/11/22 at 8:22 AM, Ombudsman (OM) 2 sent an email to the surveyors stating that she was concerned about the lack of resident council meetings at the facilty. OM 2 stated that she had brought this to the Administrator's (ADM) attention multiple times. On 10/18/22 at 1:48 PM, an interview was conducted with the ADM. The ADM confirmed that the resident council had not been conducted since June 2022. On 10/12/22 at 10:17 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated she did not know if there was a resident council and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not act as a fiduciary of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the personal funds of the residents deposited with the facility. In addition, the facility did not deposit resident funds into an interest bearing account. Resident identifiers: 2, 10, 28, and 30. Findings include: On 10/11/22 at 10:23 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 2. Resident 2 stated that the facility was not providing him with the $45 he was entitled to every month, because they say I owe them $20,000. On 10/18/22 at 11:55 AM, the Administrator (ADM) was asked to provide the transactions from resident 2's personal funds account with the facility. The ADM did not provide these transactions until 10/27/22 at 9:16 AM. Review of resident 2's personal funds account transactions from 1/1/22 to current, indicated that no transactions had been listed since 7/6/22. In addition, the account did not list any interest paid to the resident, and no evidence that his funds had been deposited into an interest bearing account. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain a system that assures a full and complete and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf. In addition, the facility did not ensure that the individual financial record was available to the residents and surveyors upon request. Resident identifiers: 2, 10, 28, and 30. Findings include: On 10/11/22 at 10:23 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 2. Resident 2 stated that the facility was not providing him with the $45 he was entitled to every month, because they say I owe them $20,000. On 10/18/22 at 11:55 AM, the Administrator (ADM) was asked to provide the transactions from resident 2's personal funds account with the facility. The ADM did not provide these transactions until 10/27/22 at 9:16 AM. Review of resident 2's personal funds account transactions from 1/1/22 to current, indicated that no transactions had been listed since 7/6/22. In addition, the account did not list any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not consult with 1 of 33 sample resident's physician when there was a change in the resident's status. Specifically, a resident had an ongoing rash that the physician was not notified about. Resident identifier: 32. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, severe sepsis, aspiration pneumonitus, supraventricular tachycardia, acute kidney failure, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, thyrotoxicosis and osteoarthritis. Resident 32's medical records were reviewed between 10/11/22 and 10/31/22. Resident 32's nurses notes included the following entries: a. On 8/19/22, . scrotum is red and excoriated with new order for Zinc oxide 40% to be applied TID (three times a day). b. On 9/14/22, Nystatin Powder Apply to neck [and] L (left) armpit topically two times a day for rash use until resolved. c. On 9/18/22, . Resident has a rash on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not provide each resident the right to have secured and confidential personal and medical records. Specifically, resident charts were on a rolling cart that was placed in front of the memory care unit open door. Findings include: On 10/23/22 at 12:04 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 5. RN 5 was observed to open the locked door to the memory care unit. RN 5 moved a cart with residents medical records from the memory care unit in front of the open door. On 10/17/22 at 11:13 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated when she was the only CNA for the facility, the staff opened the door to the memory care unit and placed the medical record cart in front of the open door. CNA 1 stated staff were able to see what was going on in the memory care hallway with the door open. CNA 1 stated she glanced down the memory care unit hallway and then obtained vital signs from residents outside of the locked unit. CNA 1 stated the nurse sometimes watched the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 11. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, dementia with behavioral and major depressive disorder. On 10/12/22 at 10:37 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 31's family member. The family member stated resident 31 had dentures but the dentures were lost during the COVID-19 lock down when family could not visit. The family member stated resident 31 would wear dentures if she had them. On 10/11/22 at 7:50 AM, an observation was made of resident 31 in the memory care dining room. Resident 31 was observed to not have teeth or dentures. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 31 had no broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture. Resident 31 had natural teeth or tooth fragments. A care plan dated 8/25/16 revealed The resident has oral/dental health problems r/t (related to) Poor oral hygiene. The goal developed was The resident will comply with mouth care at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not implement their written policies and procedures to prevent abuse and investigate any allegations. Specifically, allegations of sexual, physical abuse and a bruise of unknown origin were not reported and investigated according to facility policy and procedures. Resident identifiers: 9, 13, 14, 5, 26, 36, 31 and 39. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and depression. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 31 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because she rarely/never understood. The MDS further revealed resident 31 had short and long term memory problems. The MDS revealed her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The MDS revealed resident 31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not send a copy of resident 30-day discharge notices or hospitalizations to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: On 10/11/22 at 8:22 AM, Ombudsman (OM) 2 sent an email to the surveyors stating that there has been no monthly transfer logs sent to the state ombudsman notifying of resident transfers since May 2022. OM 2 stated that she had brought this to the Administrator's (ADM) attention multiple times. On 10/25/22 at 1:35 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility ADM. The ADM was asked if she was completing the monthly transfer logs for the state ombudsman. The ADM stated I did not know we were supposed to do that. I guess I missed a memo or something. The ADM confirmed however, that OM 2 had talked to her about filling out the logs prior.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 10 of 33 sample resident, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Specifically, residents that had care areas trigger on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary did not have care plans developed and implemented in a timely manner. In addition, residents care plans were not updated regarding specific needs. Resident identifiers: 5, 12, 13, 14, 24, 26, 32, 35, 36 and 37. Findings include: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, and non-pressure chronic ulcer. On 10/11/22 at 7:59 AM, resident 35 was observed in the dining room. Resident 35 was observed to wear blue plaid pajama pants. Resident 35 was observed with greasy hair and beard. On 10/20/22 at 12:05 PM, resident 35 was observed in blue plaid pajama pants. Resident 35's hair and beard were observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 5 of 33 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, a nurse did not sign out narcotics when they were administered, one resident who had not been administered their narcotic was recorded as having received the narcotic, and expired Tuberculin solution was used when determining if residents had tuberculosis. Resident identifiers: 8, 10, 11, 29 and 30. Findings include: On 10/11/22 at 4:10 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 was observed to have greasy hair that was knotted in the back. RN 1 was also observed to have restless movements of her hands. At 4:58 AM, RN 1 was observed to perform the narcotic reconciliation with RN 3. RN 1 stated that she forgot to sign out narcotics that she had administered overnight. RN 1 was observed to sign out narcotics for residents 8, 10, 11, 29, and three unsampled residents. RN 1 stated that she did not administer any narcotics to resident 10, but one narcotic was missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 7 of 33 sampled residents, based on the resident comprehensive assessments that each resident was not given appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, residents were not bathed, residents were not provided personal hygiene, residents were not provided assistance with eating, and a resident was not changed for 44 minutes after having a bowel movement. Resident identifiers: 10, 12, 13, 14, 31, 35 and 37. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, dementia, anxiety disorder, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. On 10/11/22 at 7:35 AM, an observation was made of resident 12 in the dining room. Resident 12 was observed to have greasy and stringy chin length hair. Resident 12 was observed with a gray cardigan with stains on the front of it. On 10/24/22 at 5:22 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure a resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident with a history of elopements, eloped from the facility. In addition, resident's experienced repeated falls with no interventions. Another resident experienced a fall during a transfer. Resident identifiers: 24, 36, 30, 31 and 96. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Resident 26's medical record was reviewed. Resident 26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed resident 26 walked in corridor, walked in room, locomotion on the unit and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 5 of 33 sample residents, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. The facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident, and did not obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist who consults on all aspects of the provision of pharmacy services in the facility. The facility did not establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. Specifically, multiple narcotic medications were not documented at the time they were administered. In addition, narcotic medications were not signed as administered in the Medication Administration Record and on the Controlled Drug Record. In addition, a third party did not reconciled narcotic medications monthly. Resident identifiers: 8, 10, 11, 14 and 29. Findings include: 1. On 10/11/22 at 4:58 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed performing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0775 — patternKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not file, in the resident's clinical record, laboratory results that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, residents did not have laboratory results available to the nursing staff and results were not filed in the medical record. Resident identifiers: 2, 28, 36, and 94. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a cerebral infarction, convulsions and seizures, paranoid schizophrenia, substance use, chronic peptic ulcer, respiratory failure with hypoxia, kidney failure, coagulation deficit, Wernicke's encephalopathy, hypomagnesemia, and hemiplegia. On 10/13/22 at approximately 9:30 AM, resident 2 was observed to have a seizure. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 stated that resident 2 had increased seizure activity when his magnesium was low. On 10/24/22 at approximately 2:00 PM, a pile of papers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs. Specifically, residents on mechanically altered diets were provided grapes and lettuce. Resident identifiers: 9, 22, 31, 37 and 39. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. On 10/11/22 at 7:45 AM, an observation was made of the breakfast meal. Resident 31 was served ground meat, pancake, hot cereal and grapes. On 10/20/22 at 11:49 AM, an observation was made of the lunch meal. Resident 31 was observed to be served shredded lettuce. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed. A diet order dated 9/22/21 revealed regular with minced texture. Resident 31's meal ticket revealed a minced diet texture. 2. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, frozen Mighty Shakes were observed to be thawing at room temperature. Findings include: On 10/27/22 at 2:30 PM, an observation was made of the facility medication room. There were 25 Mighty Shakes on a tray, on the counter, in the medication room. An immediate interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated she had received the Mighty Shakes that morning and had administered a few with the lunch medication pass. The ADON stated the Mighty Shakes were frozen for the morning medication pass. The ADON stated that residents cannot drink the Mighty Shakes when they're frozen, so they were not administered in the morning. The ADON stated that she was thawing the Mighty Shakes on the counter, but they needed to be refrigerated during the thawing process. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, there are three safe ways to thaw food: in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. Specifically, resident's medical records were used to block an open door from the memory care unit, preventing egress. Findings include: On 10/23/22 at 12:04 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 5. RN 5 was observed to open the locked door to the memory care unit. RN 5 moved a cart with residents medical records from the memory care unit in front of the open door. On 10/17/22 at 11:13 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated when she was the only CNA for the facility, the staff opened the door to the memory care unit and placed the medical record cart in front of the open door. CNA 1 stated staff were able to see what was going on in the memory care hallway with the door open. CNA 1 stated she glanced down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized. Additionally, the facility must safeguard medical record information against loss. Specifically, narcotic medications were not reconciled monthly, nursing staff did not sign out narcotic medications, and nursing staff did not document behaviors according to physician's orders. Resident identifiers: 4, 8, 9, and 10. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, neuropathy, asthma, spinal stenosis, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and dysthymic disorder. On 10/31/22, resident 8's medical record review was completed. On 10/25/22, a nursing note revealed that resident 8 was taking antibiotics and was very shaky, some weakness and confusion . and had a fever. Resident 8 was transported to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility did not document the corrective actions taken by the facility after it identified incidents under the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP), or establish and maintain an IPCP designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, a nurse did not sanitize the glucometer between residents, antibiotics for wounds did not have a corresponding culture, tuberculosis testing was not completed, TB testing was completed with expired tuberculin and staff were observed without a mask. Resident identifiers: 4, 10, 8, 11, 14, 15, 20, 29, 24, 31 and 39. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 4:35 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed obtaining blood glucose readings. RN 1 was observed to not clean the glucometer between residents. Readings were obtained from the following residents: a. resident 39 b. a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist who are responsible for the facility's infection control program. Findings include: On 10/17/22 at 12:33 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that he talked to the Director of Nursing (DON) who would log infections, but there was no infection preventionist in the building. On 10/18/22, the DON was asked for the IP certificate. On 10/18/22 at 1:48 PM, an email was provided by the Administrator. The Administrator wrote I do not think that [DON name] finished her certification. On 10/21/22 at 11:44 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated that she did not have time to do all the responsibilities of the DON because when she was working, she was the nurse on shift (the floor nurse). The DON stated that she had a second nursing job outside the facility, and did not have specific days when she was able to work as the DON at the facility. The DON stated that she found a few minutes during her shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to test facility staff who were not fully vaccinated based on the current parameters. Specifically, there was no documentation that COVID-19 testing was completed and the results of the testing were available. Findings include: In September, 2022, staff who were not fully vaccinated were required to complete COVID-19 testing twice weekly. A list of eleven staff members who were not fully vaccinated was provided. The following testing forms were observed: a. Speech Therapist (ST) 1 tested on [DATE], 9/7/22, 9/15/22, 9/19/22, and 9/29/22 b. [NAME] 2 worked on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays. [NAME] 2 tested on [DATE] and 9/30/22. c. [NAME] 3 worked on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays, and tested on [DATE] and 9/22/22. d. [NAME] 4 worked on Sundays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays. [NAME] 4 tested on [DATE], 9/9/22, 9/14/22, and 9/18/22. e. Registered Nurse (RN) 6 tested on [DATE]. f. RN 7 worked part time and did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not have adequate ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. Specifically, there were observations of urine and bowel movement odor throughout the facilty throughout the survey. Findings include: 1. On 10/11/22 at 4:22 AM, an observation was made in the memory care unit. There was a strong urine odor in the hallway. At 5:52 AM, the strong urine odor continued to linger in the hallway. 2. On 10/11/22 at 4:25 AM, an observation was made in the 200 hall. There were strong urine and bowel movement odors in the hallway outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 3. On 10/11/22 at 4:51 AM, an observation was made of the 200 hall. There was a strong bowel movement and urine odor. A follow-up observation was conducted, and the strong bowel movement and urine odor was lingering at 7:21 AM. 4. On 10/11/22 at 4:54 AM, a strong urine smell was observed in the 300 hall. 5. On 10/12/22 at 9:53 AM, an observation was made in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents. Specifically, a resident had a swollen eye from a bug bite, another resident collected pests in a small cup, and residents were observed with flies around them. Resident identifiers: 9, 14 and 39. Findings include: 1. On 10/11/22 at 7:00 AM, an observation was made of resident 39. Resident 39 was observed to have a swollen right eye. CNA 2 stated it was reported to her by another CNA that resident 39 had a bug bite on her eye. 2. On 10/11/22 at 6:23 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 9. Resident 9 stated he was being bitten by bugs and had scabs on his head and arms from the bites. Resident 9 showed a small cup with black spots in it. Resident 9 stated they were in his bed. On 10/20/22 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 9. Resident 9 stated he was waiting for his skin test results. Resident 9 stated he had bug bites…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not treat 4 of 33 sample residents with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, staff were observed to yell down the hallway during the early morning hours, staff were observed to converse in a language that was not known to a resident, a staff member was observed to speak with a resident in the locked area of the facility through the locked doors instead of face to face, residents were served on Styrofoam plates, and a resident was seated by staff facing the doors of the locked unit. Resident identifiers: 9, 25, 35 and 37. Findings include: 1. On 10/11/22 at 4:50 AM, while many of the residents were sleeping, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed to be in the 300 hall, approximately one quarter of the way down the hall. RN 1 started yelling from this location down to the 100 hall, saying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not convey 1 of 33 sample residents funds to his estate within 30 days of the resident's death. Resident identifier: 92. Findings include: Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and schizophrenia. Resident 92's medical record indicated that resident 92 passed away at the facility on 7/12/21. On 10/18/22 at 11:55 AM and 10/25/22, the Administrator (ADM) was asked to provide the transactions from resident 92's personal funds account with the facility. The ADM did not provide these transactions until 10/27/22 at 9:16 AM. Review of resident 92's personal funds account transactions indicated that although the resident passed away on 7/12/21, his personal funds were not conveyed to resident 92's estate until 4/27/22, nearly nine months later. On 10/27/22 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility ADM. The ADM stated that there was no good reason that resident 92's estate did not receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not allow a resident's representative to access personal and medical records within 24 hours of the request. Specifically, a resident family member, a hospice representative, and the county ombudsman all requested medical records for a resident, however the records were not provided at all, or not provided within 24 hours. Resident identifier: 93. Findings include: Resident 93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. The resident was discharged from the facility on 6/22/22. On 6/10/22, a quarterly Minimum Data Set indicated that resident 93 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 10/18/22 at 10:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 93's family member (FM). The FM stated that she was the resident's power of attorney, because resident 93 had severe dementia. The FM stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not include provisions to inform and provide written information to 1 of 33 sampled residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the residents' option formulate an advance directive. Resident identifiers: 35. Findings include: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness and non-pressure chronic ulcer. Resident 35's medical record was reviewed. There was no advanced directive or Physicians Order of Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form completed and signed by the physician located in resident 35's medical record. On 10/26/22 at 5:46 PM, an interview was conducted with the Social Service Worker (SSW). The SSW stated she was at the facility Monday through Friday from 5:30 PM until 9:30 PM. The SSW stated she socialized with the residents in the dining room while they had coffee and dinner. The SSW stated she did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, residents dental status, dietary orders, and discharge plans were not assessed accurately. Resident identifiers: 31 and 34. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, dementia with behavioral and major depressive disorder. On 10/12/22 at 10:37 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 31's family member. The family member stated resident 31 had dentures but were lost during the COVID-19 lock down when family could not visit. The family member stated resident 31 would wear dentures if she had them. On 10/11/22 at 7:50 AM, an observation was made of resident 31 in the memory care dining room. Resident 31 was observed to not have teeth or dentures. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed. a. An annual MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 2 of 33 sampled residents. In addition, the facility did not involve the resident or the interdisciplinary team in the development of a discharge plan. Resident identifiers: 20 and 34. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, osteomyelitis, hypertension, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, lymphedema, and atherosclerotic heart disease. On 10/11/22 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 20. Resident 20 stated that he wanted to go back to the assisted living facility (ALF) that he was previously living at prior to being hospitalized , but that no one was helping him with the process. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used without adequate monitoring. Specifically, residents blood pressure medications were administered when their blood pressure was outside the physician ordered parameters. Resident identifiers: 13 and 14. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis and abscess of mouth, osteoarthritis in left hip, chronic pain, metabolic encephalopathy, Wernicke's encephalopathy, dementia and psychosis. Resident 14's medical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated 3/3/18 revealed Propranolol HCL the instructions were give 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times daily for prophylaxis of esophageal varices hold for heart rate less than 60. Another physician's order dated 3/30/18 revealed Blood pressure parameters -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure safe and secure storage of drugs and biological's in accordance with accepted professional principles; or include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date on the medication. Specifically, tuberculin solution was expired, and narcotics were missing. Resident identifiers: 8, 10, 11 and 29 Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 4:58 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed performing the narcotic reconciliation with RN 3. RN 1 stated that she forgot to sign out narcotics that she had administered overnight. RN 1 was observed to sign out narcotics for residents 8, 10, 11, 29, and three unsampled residents. RN 1 stated that she did not administer any narcotics to resident 10, but one narcotic was missing from resident 10's narcotic medications. RN 1 was observed to sign out the narcotic as having been administered to resident 10. [Note: The missing medication was not located. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory services only when ordered by a physician for 1 of 33 sample residents. Specifically a resident had laboratory services completed without a physician's order. Resident identifier: 94. Findings include: Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation, aortic regurgitation and stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with both diabetic nephropathy and peripheral angiopathy. Resident 94 was discharged from the facility on 9/6/22. Resident 94's medical record was reviewed from 10/11/22 through 10/31/22. A lab results sheet for resident 94 revealed that on 6/28/22, resident 94 had a Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) drawn. A physician's order for this lab to be drawn could not be located. On 10/24/22 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked about the process for labs, the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not post nursing staff information each day for public access. Specifically, there was no nurse staff positing from 1/5/26 through 1/7/26. Findings included: On 1/5/26, 1/6/26 and 1/7/26 there was no nurse staffing information observed to be posted for the public to access. On 1/7/26 at 8:38 AM, an interview was conducted with the Business Office Manager (BOM). The BOM stated the Director of Nursing (DON) posted the nurse staffing daily at the nurses station. The BOM was unable to find the posting. On 1/7/26 at 8:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she did not post the nurse staffing for the public. The DON stated she had the postings in a binder in her office so she could audit them. The DON stated she had stopped posting the nursing information about 2 weeks ago. The DON stated it had been posted at the nurses station on a clip board before she took it down 2 weeks ago.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$150,781 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $21,684 — penalty dated 2026-01-08
- $28,106 — penalty dated 2025-11-12
- $100,991 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-11 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-24 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTRY MEADOW SNF LC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2004 |
| BODEN, EVANGELINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/31/2009 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465086. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.