Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing
455 South 900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 · Government - City/county · 36 certified beds · (801) 355-6891 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,887 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 83.1% | 16.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.8% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 3.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.9% | 21.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 37.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 33.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.34 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 19 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and supervision required to maintain a safe environment for a resident with known impulsivity and severe cognitive impairment. This failure occurred when a Registered Nurse (RN) left a medication cart unlocked and unattended, in direct violation of facility policy and the resident's specific care plan interventions dated 9/17/25. This breach in safety protocols allowed the resident to access the unsecured cart and ingest multiple medications not prescribed to him. This resulted in a significant change in the resident's condition, including an altered mental status and life-threatening electrolyte imbalances, which required emergency medical transfer and admission to a Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). This will be cited at a harm level. Resident Identifier: 32.Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store all medications in a locked compartment and limit access only to authorized staff. Specifically, for 1 of 19 sampled residents, a resident was able to access the medication cart that was unlocked and unattended in a public hallway, allowing the resident to obtain multiple medications blister packs, and possibly ingest of unauthorized medication. This resulted in a finding of harm. Resident Identifier: 32.Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included human immunodeficiency virus, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of resident 32's medical record was completed on 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.On 3/13/25 at 12:10 PM, an Event Note Template revealed the following: Event Date/Time: 3/4/25 @ [at] 1130 [11:30 AM] Event Description: Staff found medication cards in residents [sic] room, staff immediately notified nursing and management. A medication error…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record the review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 18 sampled residents, a resident that was observed and verbally expressed their pain was not provided pain medication. In addition, there was a delay in the facility Medical Doctor (MD) responding to the nurses message regarding resident 33's pain. Resident identifier: 33. Findings included: On 9/10/23 at 11:43 AM, an observation of resident 33 was conducted. Resident 33 was observed in a wheelchair at the nurses station and stated to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that something needed to happen with his pain because he could not stand it anymore and he was not getting any sleep. Resident 33 also stated that he had ascites. The LPN was observed to palpate resident 33's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY B. Sexual Abuse 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included of cirrhosis of liver, disorder of urea cycle metabolism, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, alcohol dependence, stimulant dependence, viral hepatitis C and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the facility final abuse investigation report documented that an incident occurred on 8/18/21 at 7:45 AM. The description of the incident was Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 walked into resident 11's room and saw resident 20 touching resident 11's bare buttocks. Resident 11 had his underwear around his knees. Resident 11 reported that before the CNA walked into his room, resident 20 was touching himself and pressed himself against resident 11. The two residents were immediately separated and monitored by staff. The report documented the pertinent resident history for resident 11 was that resident 11 was a [AGE] year-old male resident with diagnoses including, but not limited to:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, insomnia, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. On 11/8/21 at 12:18 PM, resident 4 was observed outside smoking independently. Resident 4 stated that he did not want to be around anyone. On 11/8/21 at 1:11 PM, resident 4 was observed resting in bed in one of the two upstairs rooms in the facility. On 11/10/21, resident 4's electronic medical record review was completed. Nursing notes revealed the following: a. On 8/24/21 at 3:07 AM, revealed that at 2:18 AM, resident 4 was coming down the stairs then crash. He is collapsed on the stairs, not responsive or aware, half way up. Protect head, assist him to the floor pillow for head. He's breathing fast and steady and loud, not responsive . Seizure He's awake now, sits, up, states no pain when asked, responding normal . walks up the stairs, closely followed by aide in case he collapses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the transfer and discharge process was properly documented and that the required notifications were sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Specifically, for 3 of 19 residents who were reviewed, the facility failed to maintain evidence that a copy of the written transfer notice was sent to the Ombudsman at the time of the transfer. Resident Identifiers: 2, 20, and 40.1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, schizophrenia, and acquired absence of lung. A review of resident 20's progress notes revealed the following hospital transfers:4/24/26 at 5:13 AM, a health status note documented, Resident was c/o [complaining of] 10/10 burning stomach pain. He started vomiting. He notified me that yesterday he had dark red stool. He stated he wanted to go to the hospital. He left via EMS [emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, 4 out of 19 residents, resident 32 obtained medications independently from an unsecured, unlocked medication cart. This will be cited at a harm level. In addition, the facility failed to implement new or revised interventions after consecutive falls. Resident 40 will also be cited at a harm level. Resident Identifiers: 2, 26, 32, and 40.HARM1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included human immunodeficiency virus, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of resident 32's medical record was completed on 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that resident 32 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist's monthly drug regimen review recommendations were documented and acted upon. Specifically, for 1 out of 19 residents reviewed the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist's March 2026 recommendation to update order from as needed to a scheduled medication was addressed. This resulted in a three-month delay until June 2026 without any medication update. Resident Identifier: 13.Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included radiculopathy, lumbosacral region and major depressive disorder.Review of resident 13's medical record was completed on 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.On 3/16/26, a physician recommendation provided by the pharmacist revealed the following, [Resident 13] has an order for sodium fluoride toothpaste to be used as needed. This toothpaste is recommended to be used daily. Recommend changing the order to scheduled daily instead of as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically for 2 out of 19 sampled residents a resident did not have his Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), Lipid Panel and a Valproic Acid level drawn every 6 months and another resident did not have their monthly CBC lab drawn. Resident Identifiers: 12 and 27.1. Resident 12 was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to schizophrenia, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and unspecified intracranial injury. Resident 12's medical record was reviewed from 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.A physician's order dated 9/29/25 stated, Draw CBC [complete blood count] monthly r/t [related to] clozaril use. This order was discontinued 3/6/26.A physician's order dated 3/6/26, stated, Draw CBC monthly r/t clozaril use. This order was still active during the dates the resident's medical record was reviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory (lab) services only when ordered by a physician; physician assistant; nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist. Specifically for 2 out of 19 sampled residents, a resident had a complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), valproic acid level, and lipid level collected without a physician's order. Additionally, a resident had a glycated hemoglobin (HgbA1C), CMP, CBC with differential, prolactin, valproic acid, and lipid panel collected without a physician's order. Resident identifiers: 19 and 27.1. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and insomnia.On 5/28/26 at 5:32 PM, a health status note documented, Late Entry: CBC w/Diff [differential] and CMP results received and reviewed by provider.It should be noted that an order for lab tests was not located in resident 27's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 19 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that laboratory results were filed in the resident's clinical record. Specifically, the facility did not include 6 monthly physician ordered complete blood counts in a resident's medical record. Resident Identifier: 12Resident 12 was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to schizophrenia, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and unspecified intracranial injury. Resident 12's medical record was reviewed from 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.A physician's order dated 9/29/25 stated, Draw CBC [completed blood count] monthly r/t [related to] clozaril use. This order was discontinued 3/6/26.A physician's order dated 3/6/26, stated, Draw CBC monthly r/t clozaril use. This order was still active during the dates the resident's medical record was reviewed. There were no monthly CBC laboratory results in the resident's medical record for the months of June 2025, July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized. Specifically, for 2 out of 19 sampled residents a resident had an incorrect medical diagnosis and another resident had an incorrect diagnosis for a medication given. Resident identifiers: 6 and 27.1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease, adult failure to thrive, mild cognitive impairment, and major depressive disorder.A review of resident 6's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that resident 6 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. A review of resident 6's medical record revealed that resident 6 did not have a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 2 with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia.On 6/3/26 at 1:29 PM, an interview was conducted with the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS). The RDCS stated that resident 6 was screened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 2 of 19 sampled residents, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP] were not being implemented as ordered. Resident identifiers: 2 and 27.1. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, non-pressure chronic ulcer of foot, sepsis, and acquired absence of right foot.On 6/1/26 at 9:02 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with resident 2. There was no observed EBP signage or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available for use in the resident's room. Resident 2 was observed to have her right foot wrapped in a bandage. Resident 2 stated that she required assistance from staff with showering and staff did not wear a gown when assisting her.A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-02 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility did not employ a clinically qualified full-time dietitian or another clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the director of nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not employ a full-time Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM) did not meet the requirements to serve as the director of nutrition services. Findings included: On 5/27/25 at 8:55 AM, an initial walk-through of the kitchen was completed. An interview was conducted with the DM who stated he had not completed the training required to serve as the DM. The DM stated that he had been working as the DM for two months. The DM stated that the RD did not work at the facility full-time. The DM stated that he was in the process of obtaining his certifications. On 6/2/25 at 8:53 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DM. The DM stated that he was taking his ServSafe test in two days and he would be taking the Certified Dietary Manager course in the next few weeks On 6/2/25 at 8:59 AM, an interview with the Administrator (ADM) was conducted. The ADM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0775 — patternKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of left side, dysphagia, aphasia, and hypertension. Resident 26's medical record was reviewed. On 12/26/24, resident 26 had a physician order initiated for a laboratory draw for a Prothrombin Time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR). The laboratory results were not located in resident 26's medical record. On 5/29/25, the facility emailed a copy of the PT/INR laboratory results for the 12/26/24, order. On 5/29/25 at 2:47 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated that the 12/26/24, INR was printed from the laboratory website and was not located in resident 26's medical record. On 6/2/25 at 7:40 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the ADM. The ADM stated that the laboratory process was that the DON created a calendar for the labs with the dates of the draws. The DON would then follow-up on the results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not allow the resident the right to formulate an advance directive. Specifically, for 1 out of 14 sampled residents, a resident that did not have a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) or Advance Directive was documented as full code in their medical record. Resident identifier: 32. Findings included: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chest pain, pleural effusion, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus with complications, secondary hypertension, and shortness of breath. Resident 32's medical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated 10/8/24, documented that resident 32 was a full code, full treatment, and a trial period of artificial nutrition. On 10/8/24 at 5:16 PM, an admission Progress Note documented . POLST status: . was blank. An Advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 out of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have or maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances. Specifically, a resident reported that his wallet and all personal documents were missing and requested assistance with obtaining new identification (ID) cards and the facility did not maintain evidence demonstrating the grievance investigation and decision. Resident identifier: 18. Findings included: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, tremor, stimulant abuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. On 5/27/25 at 8:54 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated that his wallet was missing with his identification and Medicaid card. Resident 18 stated that he informed the Resident Advocate (RA) and was told that she would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Specifically, a resident did not have an attempted GDR for Depakote and the Trazodone did not have a rationale for the clinical contraindication. Resident identifier: 26. Findings included: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of left side, dysphagia, aphasia, and hypertension. Resident 26's medical record was reviewed. Resident 26's physician orders revealed the following: a. On 2/6/24, an order was initiated for Trazodone Oral Tablet 50 milligram (mg), give 50 mg by mouth at bedtime related to insomnia. b. On 2/6/24, an order was initiated for Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the administrator, the State Survey Agency (SSA), and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, the facility investigations for a residents allegation of sexual abuse and an elopement did not have a documented date that APS was notified. Resident identifier: 1. Findings included: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage, unspecified convulsions, diabetes mellitus, asthma, hypothyroidism, restless leg syndrome, and dysphagia. Resident 1's facility abuse investigations were reviewed. On 5/2/24 at 2:47 PM, the facility Form 358 documented that the local Police Department (PD) notified the facility that they found resident 1 wandering one street north of the facility and he seemed confused. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 2 of 14 resident's sampled, the facility did not ensure that the resident's transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and the information was communicated to the receiving provider included contact information for the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative contact information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care; a comprehensive care plan goals; and all other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, the resident's medical record did not contain documentation of what information was sent to the receiving provider for a transition of care. Resident identifiers: 7 and 15. 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Human Immunodeficiency Virus, generalized anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and viral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, the resident's care plan did not address the resident's bowel elimination pattern. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of schizophrenia, Parkinsonism, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease. On 5/27/25 at 9:35 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 4. Resident 4 stated that within the last two months he had experienced some constipation and went a long time without a bowel movement (BM). Resident 4's medical record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that all residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice. Specifically, a resident had complaints of constipation that were not treated with the facility bowel protocol. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of schizophrenia, Parkinsonism, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease. On 5/27/25 at 9:35 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 4. Resident 4 stated that within the last two months he had experienced some constipation and went a long time without a bowel movement (BM). Resident 4 stated that he used to take Milk of Magnesia (MOM) for constipation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that the resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident elopement from the facility on two occasions. Resident identifier: 1. Findings included: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage, unspecified convulsions, diabetes mellitus, asthma, hypothyroidism, restless leg syndrome, and dysphagia. On 5/27/25 at 9:18 AM, an interview was conducted with the resident 1. Resident 1 stated that he tried to go outside once in a while but he was not supposed to go out by himself. Resident 1 stated that the doors to the facility were locked. Resident 1's facility abuse investigations were reviewed. On 5/2/24 at 2:47 PM, the facility Form 358 documented that the local Police Department (PD) notified the facility that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services. Specifically, for 1 out of 14 sampled residents, a resident complaining of pain and requesting to go to the hospital was not provided pain medications, an alternative pain reliever, or nonpharmaceutical pain interventions. Resident identifier: 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. On 5/27/25 at 11:14 AM, resident 14 was observed to tell a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that he was in a lot of pain right now. The CNA stated to resident 14 that she would talk to the nurse. The CNA was observed to tell the nurse that resident 14 was having pain. The nurse stated to the CNA that she would send a message to the Medical Director (MD). Resident 14 was observed to tell the nurse the pain was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, and included the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, for 1 out of 14 sampled residents, an opened multi use vial of Humalog had expired and a multi use vial of aplisol was not labeled with an open or a discard date. Resident identifier: 15 Findings included: On [DATE] at 10:33 AM, an observation was conducted of the medication fridge located at the nurses station with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. There was an open multi use vial of Humalog with a date on the box of [DATE]. LPN 1 stated that she was unsure if the date was an open date or a discard date. The Humalog was available for use and belonged to resident 15. The medication fridge also included an open multi use vial of aplisol that was available for use and did not include an open or discard date. On [DATE] at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that was complete and accurately documented. Specifically, a resident's medication order was entered incorrectly in the medical record. Resident identifier: 15. Findings included: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 1 diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, complete traumatic amputation of two or more left toes, bipolar disorder, and suicidal ideations. Review of resident 15's record was completed on 5/27/25 through 6/2/25. On 5/25/25 at 11:22 AM, a physician's order revealed Hydroxyurea Oral Tablet (Hydroxyurea Sickle Cell Disease) Give 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for Anti-anxiety. On 5/26/25 at 11:24 AM, a nursing progress note revealed that a verbal order was received from the in-house provider to restart hydroxyzine 25 mg by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 1 out of 14 sampled residents, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Specifically, a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line and open wounds did not have enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) initiated and a plate guard that dropped to the floor was used on the resident's lunch plate. Resident identifier: 22 Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intracranial injury without loss of consciousness, type 2 diabetes mellitus, mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, dementia with mood disturbance and agitation, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. Review of resident 22's record was completed on 5/27/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 4 of 6 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide the residents the right to participate in the development and implementation of a person-centered care plan, the right to attend meetings regarding the person-centered plan of care, the right to attend meetings regarding the person-centered plan of care, and the right to request revisions to the person-centered plan of care. Specifically, resident's representatives were not informed or included in care planning meetings in which concerns regarding the resident's plan of care could be discussed. Resident identifiers: 1, 2, 4 and 6. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizotypal disorder, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Resident 1's medical records were reviewed on 3/5/24. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident 1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 which suggested moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 6 sampled resident, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, a resident was administered another residents medications. In addition, there was no documented monitoring after the medications were administered. Resident Identifiers: 3 and 6. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dementia. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed 3/5/24. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, dementia, mood disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes and hypertension. Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 18 sampled residents, a resident that required a cigarette smoking extender was not provided one during observed smoking sessions. In addition, chemicals on the cleaning cart were unlocked and stored in the resident television (TV) room. Resident identifier: 25. Findings included: 1. On 9/10/23 at 10:06 AM, an observation of resident 25 was conducted. A staff member was observed to assist resident 25 with the lighter to light the cigarette. The staff member was observed to stay in the smoking area while the residents smoked. Resident 25 did not have a cigarette extender present. On 9/10/23 at 11:24 AM, an observation of resident 25 was conducted. Resident 25 was in the smoking area smoking a cigarette without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-15 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity. Specifically, annual Minimum Data Set's (MDS) was not completed timely. Resident identifier: 1, 15 and 24. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure, dementia with behavioral disturbances and anemia. Resident 24's medical record was reviewed on 11/15/21. Resident 24's annual MDS had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/22/21. The MDS was completed on 11/10/21. 2. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypotension, dementia with behavioral disturbances, mood disorder, anemia, hypertension, prebyopia, disorder of brain, and astigmatism and psychosis. Resident 1's medical record was reviewed on 11/15/21. Resident 1's annual MDS had an ARD of 9/27/21. The MDS was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-15 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 7 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not assess each resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Center for Medicare services not less frequently than once every 3 months. Specifically, residents quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) were not completed timely. Resident identifiers: 5, 6, 7, 10, 16, 17 and 18. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anemia, cerebrovascular disease, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, hemiplegia, and hepatitis C. Resident 6's medical record was reviewed on 11/10/21. A quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 9/9/21 was completed on 11/9/21. 2. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbance and hemiplegia. Resident 18's medical record was reviewed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-15 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, a resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were not completed on the admission and Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Resident identifiers 1, 11, and 30. Findings included: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cirrhosis of liver, disorder of urea cycle metabolism, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, alcohol dependence, stimulant dependence, viral hepatitis C, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, myopia, and anemia. On 11/9/21 resident 11's medical record was reviewed. Review of resident 11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment on 8/17/21 revealed that resident 11's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) under Section C for Cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Specifically, care plans were not developed or updated for resident's after sustaining falls, an elopement, new medical diagnosis and resident to resident altercations. Resident identifiers 4, 15 and 30. Findings included: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy, contracture, brachial plexus disorder, mood disorder, neuralgic amyotrophy, and dementia. Resident 15's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments revealed the following: a. On 11/22/20 the Annual MDS assessed resident 15's Functional Status for bed mobility as Supervision with set up help; Limited 1 person assist for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 28 sample residents, that the resident was not able to make choices about aspects of their life, in the facility, that were significant to the resident. Specifically, a resident requested to leave the facility and was not permitted to leave and two residents' televisions were not functioning. Resident identifiers: 13 and 22 . Findings include: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, mood disorder, unspecified abnormal involuntary movements, and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 11/8/21 at 10:20 AM, resident 13 was observed in his room, laying on his bed. Resident 13 had no pictures or other personal objects. Resident 13 was interviewed. Resident 13 stated that the only things he needed was a reading light and a working television. Resident 13 stated that his television was broken for months and he had reported it to staff but nothing had happened. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not notify the physician immediately when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, or the need to alter treatment. Specifically, a resident had several doses of insulin held without physician ordered parameters to hold and the physician was not notified. Resident identifier 20. Findings included: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, mental disorder, unspecified psychosis, hypertension, and mild intellectual disabilities. Resident 20's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed an order for Basaglar KwikPen Solution Pen-injector 100 units/milliliter (insulin glargine), inject 48 units subcutaneously one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of resident 20's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: a. In October 2021 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews it was determined, for 3 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Specifically, the door leading to the residents' smoking area was in disrepair and had a elevated threshold to get into the facility. Additionally, the sofa in the east television room was in disrepair. Resident identifier: 9, 10 and 28. Findings include: 1. On 11/8/21 at 12:57 PM, an observation was made of resident 10. Resident 10 was observed to have a four wheeled walker. Resident 10 was observed to walk into the facility from the smoking area. Resident 10 was observed to lift up her four wheeled walker onto the threshold. Resident 10 was immediately interviewed. Resident 10 stated stated that she had tripped over the threshold but had not fallen. The handle on the door was observed to be missing a rod and had duct tape on it. 2. On 11/9/2021 at 11:39 AM, an observation was made of resident 28, resident 10, and resident 9 exiting the facility through the east door leading to the resident smoking area. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency (SSA), Adult Protective Services (APS), and the results of all investigations were reported to the SSA within 5 working days of the incident. Specifically, an in incident of sexual abuse was not reported to the SSA or APS within 2 hours of the incident occurring and the final investigation report was not submitted to the SSA, and an incident of physical abuse was not reported to the SSA within 2 hours of the incident occurring. Resident identifiers: 1, 11, 15, and 20. Findings included: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cirrhosis of liver, disorder of urea cycle metabolism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure timely transmission and completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Within 14 days after a facility completed a resident's assessment, the facility must electronically transmit encoded, accurate and completed MDS data to the CMS system including reentry, discharge and death. Specifically, two resident's MDS data was not transmitted. Resident identifiers: 6 and 11. Findings included: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of cirrhosis of liver, disorder of urea cycle metabolism, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, alcohol dependence, stimulant dependence, viral hepatitis C, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, myopia, and anemia. On 6/6/21 at 4:45 AM, resident 11's progress note documented that resident 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident that had urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. Specifically, a resident was observed saturated with urine for 2 hours without incontinence cares. Resident identifier: 1. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypotension, dementia with behavioral disturbances, mood disorder, anemia, hypertension, prebyopia, disorder of brain, and astigmatism and psychosis. On 11/8/21 from 11:47 AM until 1:54 PM, a continual observation was conducted of resident 1. Resident 1 was observed to walk behind his wheelchair from the hallway. At 11:47 AM, resident 1 was observed to have a discolored area in his lap area and his brief was observed to be sagging. At 11:56 AM, resident 1 was observed to go to his room. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident had complaints of feeling depressed and no care and services were provided to address these complaints of depression. Resident identifier 30. Findings included: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of dementia, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, muscle wasting and atrophy, foot drop, low back pain, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. On 11/9/21 resident 30's medical records were reviewed. On 11/08/21 at 9:20 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 30. Resident 30 stated he was depressed, he was locked up, and he wanted to go home. Resident 30 stated he had not talked to anyone about his feelings of depression, and he did not take any medications for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combination of the reasons above. Specifically, a resident had their insulin held without any physician ordered parameters to hold the medication. Resident identifier 20. Findings included: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, mental disorder, unspecified psychosis, hypertension, mild intellectual disabilities, and pedophilia. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed the following: a. Basaglar KwikPen Solution Pen-injector 100 units/milliliters (Insulin Glargine), Inject 48 unit subcutaneously one time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 4 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. Specifically, the facility was observed to have 2 medication errors out of 25 observations for an error rate of 8 %. Resident identifiers: 5 and 19. Findings included: On 11/9/21 at 7:53 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 administering medication to resident 19. Resident 19 had just finished breakfast in the main dining room and was returning to his bedroom. RN 1 was observed to administer a Levothyroxine 75 micrograms (mcg) tablet to resident 19. Resident 19's physician orders were reviewed. The order for Levothyroxine 75 mcg by mouth one time a day related to hypothyroidism, stated to administer during morning medication pass per the resident's preference. The time ranges entered into the order were between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM. On 11/9/21 at 8:09 AM, an observation was made of RN 1 administering medication to resident 5. RN 1 was observed to administer Calcium-Vitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized. Specifically, the facility could not locate a resident's medication administration record (MAR) for a month. Resident identifier 11. Findings included: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included of cirrhosis of liver, disorder of urea cycle metabolism, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, alcohol dependence, stimulant dependence, viral hepatitis C and benign prostatic hyperplasia. On 11/9/21 resident 11's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 11's electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2021 revealed a blank form. On 11/10/21 resident 11's paper chart was reviewed. No documentation could be found of resident 11's June 2021 MAR. The record was requested from the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,887 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $8,391 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in UT
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 46A058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.