Pine Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing
876 West 700 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 · For profit - Corporation · 34 certified beds · (801) 355-9649 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,121 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.8% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 42.3% | 16.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.5% | 25.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 3.9% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.4% | 21.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 41.9% | 14.2% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 28.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.81 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.91 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diffuse traumatic brain injury, vascular dementia, traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, generalized muscle weakness, other lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, other toxic encephalopathy, unsteadiness on feet, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia, insomnia, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, other reduced mobility, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants. On 10/5/23 at 7:50 PM, a nursing progress note documented, CNA brought to nurses attention that patient had a fall from wheelchair. Head to toe assessment completed. Upon assessment, superficial laceration noted on top of scalp and abrasions on his back. Steri strips placed on laceration. Patient assisted back into wheel chair and brought to nurses station for more frequent checks. Neuro status at baseline. Patient alert and oriented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident had adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was not secured inside the facility vehicle during transport and fell out of her wheelchair. The fall resulted in the resident sustaining a Thoracic (T)11-T12 fracture and a contusion of the abdominal wall. Based on the facility's investigation and corresponding corrective measures, this was cited at past non-compliance with a correction date of 8/1/23. Resident identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epidural hemorrhage, stable burst fracture of Thoracic (T)11-T12 vertebra, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, contusion of abdominal wall, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Specifically, a resident with a history of suicidal ideations (SI) was hospitalized for a suicidal attempt and did not have behavioral health services provided for more than 2 months after the hospitalization. Resident identifier 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, major depressive disorder, dementia, insomnia, cervical disc degeneration, spondylosis with myelopathy, alcoholic polyneuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, radiculopathy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-10-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Specifically, the facility did not always have a registered nurse at least 8 consecutive hours on certain weekends.Findings Included: Findings Included:The facility's staffing schedules from September 2025 to October 2025 were reviewed.-There was no RN scheduled on 9/14/25.-There was no RN scheduled on 9/28/25.On 10/8/25 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that they did not need to have a registered nurse scheduled on every shift. The DON stated that they did not do admissions on the weekends and if the residents needed an assessment completed the nurse would call her. On 10/8/25 at 3:21 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (Admin). The Admin stated if the residents needed intravenous therapy or a wound vacuum then they would send them out. The Admin stated they were not sure if it was necessary to have a registered nurse on every shift based on the type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident's transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and the information was communicated to the receiving provider to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 3 out of 23 sampled residents, the resident's medical record did not contain documentation of what information was sent to the receiving provider and the transfer or discharge was not documented. In addition, a resident that was discharged to the hospital was not provided with a bed hold notice. Resident identifiers: 31, 33, and 38. Findings included: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed. A discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 31's discharge status was short-term general hospital. Resident 31's medical record revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 3 out of 23 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was defined as any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences. Specifically, blood pressure medications were administered outside of the physician's ordered parameters. Resident identifiers: 1, 4, and 6. Findings included: 1. Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, and pleural effusion. Resident 1's medical record was reviewed 10/6/25 through 10/8/25. A physician's order dated 9/25/24 indicated, Midodrine HCl [hydrochloride] Oral Tablet (Midodrine HCl) Give 5 mg [milligrams] by mouth three times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not prevent misappropriation of a resident's property. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident gave a Nursing Assistant (NA) money and the NA did not return the money when the resident asked for the money back. Resident identifier: 38. Findings included: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. Resident 38's medical record was reviewed. The facility Incident Report Form was reviewed. On 3/4/25 at 1:37 PM, resident 38 reported that she had learned that the (Nursing Assistant) NA was having some struggles financially and resident 38 offered to give the NA $100.00 to help. After multiple attempts resident 38 finally forced the funds in the NA's pocket and the NA accepted the funds. After a few days resident 38 texted the NA asking for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, including misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to Adult Protective Services (APS) and local law enforcement. Specifically, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, an allegation of misappropriation of resident property was not reported to law enforcement and the report to APS was reported 17 days after the allegation. Resident identifier: 38. Findings included: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. Resident 38's medical record was reviewed. The facility Incident Report Form was reviewed. On 3/4/25 at 1:37 PM, resident 38 reported that she had learned that the (Nursing Assistant) NA was having some struggles financially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not arrange outside resources in a timely manner for residents. Specifically, a resident with a referral to see a neurologist for evaluation was not completed. Resident identifier: 14.Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthropathies or the left and right hips, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral neuropathy, and spondylosis. Resident 14's medical record was reviewed. On 10/6/25 at 3:20 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 14 who stated he had asked to see a doctor about the numbness in his left hand but that had not happened yet. A physician order dated 7/11/25 documented, Neurology consult for left hand weakness for EMG [electromyography] A progress note dated 6/25/25 documented, Physical exam: Notable for mild degenerative changes in the right elbow and an olecranon spur in the left elbow. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for 3 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity. Specifically, staff at the facility were observed standing next to residents while assisting them with eating, staff were observed using labels instead of resident names when addressing residents, residents were not served meals at the same time, and residents did not receive necessary assistance during dining. Resident identifiers: 11, 18, and 19. Findings included: 1. On 9/22/24 at 12:32 PM, an observation was made of the lunch time dining service. Nursing Assistant (NA) 2 was observed to assist Resident 19 with eating her meal. NA 2 was standing next to Resident 19 while assisting her with eating. 2. On 9/23/24 at 8:09 AM, an observation was made of the breakfast time dining service. The facility had already started to serve meals by the time the observation had started. At 8:17 AM, all residents had been served their meals except for Resident 11. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident 91 was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE], and discharged [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness status unknown sequela, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Resident 92 was admitted [DATE], discharged [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, other psychotic disorder, mood disorder, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Resident 2 was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness status unknown sequela, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia. On 4/18/24, a facility reported incident was submitted to the state survey agency documenting an allegation of sexual abuse between Resident 91 and Resident 92. The report documented that Resident 91 had kissed Resident 92 on the lips. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 28 sampled resident, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, a resident had a newly identified bruise that was not reported to the SSA and an incident of verbal abuse by a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) towards a resident was not reported to APS. Resident identifiers 18 and 22. Findings included: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of asthma, dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, overactive bladder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypokalemia, malignant neoplasm, chronic pain, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Resident 18's medical records were reviewed. On 8/27/24, resident 18's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility in response to allegations of abuse did not prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. Specifically, the facility did not put effective measures in place to ensure that abuse did not occur and corrective measure that were identified were not implemented. Resident identifier, 14, 85, and 86. Findings included: 1. a. Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of atrial fibrillation, type I diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, hepatic failure, hypertensive heart disease, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia, hepatic encephalopathy, hyperlipidemia, essential tremor, pain, insomnia, major depressive disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, osteoarthritis, and age-related cognitive decline. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that when the facility transferred or discharged a resident that the transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and that all the information was communicated to the receiving provider. The information provided to the receiving provider should include contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care; comprehensive care plan goals; and all other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, residents were transferred to the hospital and no documentation could be found to demonstrate what information was communicated to the receiving provider. Resident identifiers 8, 9, 14, and 19. Findings included: 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not ensure safe and secure storage of drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional principles; or included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date on the medication. Specifically, in the medication refrigerator, one multi-dose vial was not labeled with an opened date, insulin pens did not have names or dates, one insulin pen was expired with an open date of [DATE], and a Prevnar 13 dose was expired and available to use. Findings included: On [DATE] at 7:35 AM, the medication refrigerator was inspected. A multi-dose vial of Tuberculin was observed open and available for use and an open date was not marked on the vial. A Prevnar 13 vaccine with an expiration date of [DATE] was available for use. A Tresiba insulin pen was observed to have been used with no opened date. A Lantus insulin pen was observed to be available for use with an open date of [DATE]. A Lantus insulin pen was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for 2 of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. Specifically, there were at least two instances where the facility did not obtain International Normalized Ratio (INR) labs for a resident despite there being physician orders for the labs to be obtained every 4 weeks and one instance where the facility did not obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) for another resident despite there being physician orders for the BMP to be drawn. Resident identifiers: 31 and 9. Findings Included: Resident 31 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other asthma, venous insufficiency, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 out of 28 sampled residents, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized and the facility kept confidential all information contained in the resident's records. Specifically, resident's information was left open on a computer screen unsecured on two different occasions while residents were in the vicinity and no documentation of a resident's hospital visit was found in the medical record. Resident identifier: 14. Findings included: On 9/22/24 at 09:40 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse [RN] 4 walk away from the medication cart. The computer on top of the medication cart was left open with resident information available to view. An observation was made of residents 10 and 18 around the medication cart. On 9/22/24 at 12:40 PM, an interview was conducted with RN 4. RN 4 stated that any time the medication cart was left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the resident or resident representative had the opportunity to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine, and that the resident's medical record included documentation that indicated that the resident was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the vaccine; documentation of each dose administered; and documentation of declinations or contraindications to the vaccine. Specifically, for 4 out of 5 sampled residents, the facility did not have evidence that each resident was provided education about the COVID-19 vaccine, was provided the COVID-19 vaccine, or declined the COVID-19 vaccine. Resident identifiers: 7, 18, 28, and 30. Findings included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of presence of right and left artificial shoulder joint, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease, pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify when there was an accident involving the resident which resulted in injury; a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; or a need to alter treatment, or a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility. Specifically, a resident had an injury of unknown origin identified and the physician was not notified. Additionally, the physician was not notified when a resident refused blood draws for laboratory orders. Resident identifiers: 14 and 18. Findings included: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of asthma, dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, overactive bladder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypokalemia, malignant neoplasm, chronic pain, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, and major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, resident restrooms were found to be dirty and there were strong odors of urine in facility restrooms Findings Included: On 10/02/24 at 11:42 AM, an observation was made of the restroom located in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a stain surrounding the base of the toilet. On 10/02/24 at 11:45 AM, an observation was made of the restroom located in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a strong odor of urine. On 10/02/24 at 11:58 AM, an interview was conducted with the Housekeeper. The Housekeeper stated that the restroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] always smells like mold and mildew. The Housekeeper stated that she tries to get rid of the odor in the restrooms by scrubbing the toilet and shower with disinfectant. The Housekeeper stated that the odor in the restrooms goes away after she cleans the restrooms. The Housekeeper stated that the odor in the restroom is absent for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 resident's sampled, that the facility did not implement written policies and procedures that ensure reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Survey Agency (SSA), and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, an allegation of verbal abuse by a facility Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) towards the resident was not reported to Adult Protective Services. Resident identifier 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, impulse disorder, insomnia, disinhibited attachment disorder, asthma, anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. The facility notification to the SSA, form 358, documented an allegation of verbal abuse by CNA 4 towards resident 22. The form documented the details of the incident as, [RA] observed the CNA [name omitted] yelling 'Goodbye' repeatedly in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that recommendations from the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination and evaluation were implemented and included in the resident assessment, care planning and transitions of care. Specifically, a residents PASRR level II recommendations for specialized services for mental illness was not implemented. Resident identifier 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, major depressive disorder, dementia, insomnia, cervical disc degeneration, spondylosis with myelopathy, alcoholic polyneuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, cirrhosis of liver, hyperlipidemia, nicotine dependence, alcohol abuse, cannabis abuse, suicide attempt,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biological to its residents. Specifically, a resident was not provided their psychotropic medications for multiple days due to unavailability from the pharmacy. Resident identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epidural hemorrhage, stable burst fracture of T11-T12, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, contusion of abdominal wall, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, spondylolisthesis, insomnia, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis cervical region, osteoarthritis, overactive bladder, history of suicidal behavior, and repeated falls. Resident 9's medical records were reviewed. Resident 9's progress notes revealed the following: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the blood sugars of a resident receiving insulin, did not administer a resident's thyroid medication, address a resident's continued pain, or use non-pharmacological pain interventions. Resident identifiers: 9, 32. Findings included: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use. Specifically, a resident's psychotropic medications were not monitored for behavioral episodes, non-pharmacological interventions, and adverse side effects of the medications. Resident identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epidural hemorrhage, stable burst fracture of T11-T12, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, contusion of abdominal wall, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, spondylolisthesis, insomnia, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 2 out of 28 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of five percent or greater. Observations of 27 medication opportunities, on 9/24/24, revealed two medication errors which resulted in a 7.41% medication error rate. Specifically, wrong doses of medications were given. Resident identifiers: 12, 31. Findings included: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, temporal sclerosis, dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. On 9/24/24 at 7:15 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed to spill the medication cup across the medication cart that contained resident 12's medications. One tablet of Haloperidol remained in the medication cup. RN 1 replaced two tablets of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges, and only obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician. Specifically, a resident's Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) and lipid panel had results out of range and the provider was not notified and a BMP and lipid panel were obtained without a physician order. Resident identifier 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, major depressive disorder, dementia, insomnia, cervical disc degeneration, spondylosis with myelopathy, alcoholic polyneuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, cirrhosis of liver, hyperlipidemia, nicotine dependence, alcohol abuse, cannabis abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 28 sampled residents that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, there were two instances where a resident had physicians orders for a residents lithium levels to be checked, but the results of these lithium level checks were not filed or uploaded in the resident's electronic medical record. Resident Identifier: 31. Findings Included: Resident 31 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, venous insufficiency, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiologic and other diagnostic services. Specifically, a resident's 12 lead electrocardiogram (EKG) was not in the medical records. Resident identifier 14. Findings included: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, major depressive disorder, dementia, insomnia, cervical disc degeneration, spondylosis with myelopathy, alcoholic polyneuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, cirrhosis of liver, hyperlipidemia, nicotine dependence, alcohol abuse, cannabis abuse, suicide attempt, suicidal ideations, ventral hernia, trochanteric bursitis of left hip, and lesion of ulnar nerve. Resident 14's medical records were reviewed. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 2 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received and the facility provided food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance; food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, there were resident complaints about the food served at the facility, a test tray was pulled and found to be unappetizing, and there were resident council complaints regarding the food served at the facility. Resident Identifiers: 17 and 30. Findings Included: On 9/22/24 at 12:43 PM, Resident 17 was observed to complain that the lunchtime meal served was too cold during a lunchtime meal observation. At 12:46 PM, Resident 17 further complained that the food served would be good if it was warm. A resident council note dated 9/6/24 documented a resident complaint of pork that was served undercooked and too tough to chew. A resident council note dated 7/17/24 documented a resident complaint of burnt eggs that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the quality assessment and assurance committee met at least quarterly to coordinate and evaluate activities under the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee must be composed of, at a minimum: The Director of Nursing (DON); the Medical Director or his/her designee; at least three other members of the facility staff and one must be the Administrator; and the infection preventionist. Specifically, there was no evidence that the Medical Director participated in the quarterly QAPI meetings. Findings included: Review of the QAPI team revealed that the QAA committee members were the Administrator, the DON, Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (TRS), the Resident Advocate (RA), the Maintenance Director, the Business Office Manager, and the Dietary Manager. The QAA committee did not have the Medical Director listed as a participating member. The facility 2024 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, medications were not administered in a sanitary manner. Resident Identifiers: 12 and 25. Findings included: On 9/24/24 at 7:12 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 during the morning medication pass. RN 1 was observed preparing medications for resident 12. RN 1 did not perform hand hygiene prior to removing the medication from the medication packs. RN 1 was observed to drop medications out of the medication cup onto the medication cart and the floor. RN 1 was observed to scoop up a medication that was half in the medication cup and half on the medication cart. RN 1 was observed to put more medication into the same medication cup and give the medications to resident 12. On 9/24/24 at 7:23 AM, an observation was made of RN 1 during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, a resident was receiving an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection and the facility did not follow up with the hospital for the culture and sensitivity results. Resident identifier: 19. Findings included: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, hyperkalemia, peripheral vascular disease, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Resident 19's medical record was reviewed on 9/22/24. Resident 19's progress notes were reviewed and revealed the following: a. On 9/4/24 at 3:21 AM, Orders - General…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0948 — isolatedEnsure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that any individual working in this facility working as a paid feeding assistant had completed a State-approved training program for feeding assistants. Specifically, a staff member who was not a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), a Licensed Nurse, or a paid feeding assistant assisted a resident with a feeding. Resident Identifier: 28. Findings Included: Resident 28 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia following cerebrovascular disease, other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia unspecified, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere moderate with agitation. Resident 28's medical record was reviewed. Resident 28's CNA documentation in the Point of Care Response History section was reviewed for the dates of 9/4/24 through 10/2/24. There were 4 occurrences where resident 28 was able to eat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable homelike environment. Specifically, a continuous high pitched alarm in the dining area, dirt and debris was observed on the resident room doors and bed rails, area of flooring and seating pads of chairs in the dining room were in disrepair, trash and debris blocked the air duct in the facility day room, a set of broken closet doors, and paint peeling from the walls in resident rooms. Residents identifiers: 4, 5, 16, 17, 20, 25, 29, and 30. Findings include: ALARM On 2/27/23 at 10:20 AM, an observation was made of a high pitched alarm going off in the dining room. An immediate interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM), Chief Operating Officer (COO) and the Activities Coordinator (AC). The ADM stated he was unsure what the sound was but would find out. The AC stated the alarm was from the call lights down the hallway, but it only made noise and did not light up. The ADM, COO and AC were then observed to walk down the hallway and the alarm stopped. The alarm was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined for 1 of 18 sample residents that the facility did not include provisions to inform and provide written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the residents' option formulate an advance directive. Specifically, one resident was not provided the opportunity to document his life-saving preferences. Resident identifier: 2. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sequelae of cardiovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, acute hepatitis c, dysphagia, hypertension, pain and psoriasis. On 2/28/23 resident 2's electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed. A physician order dated 12/6/21, revealed resident 2 had an order to be a Full Code. There was no advanced directive or physician order for life sustaining treatment (POLST) located in resident 2's EMR. On 3/1/23 at 11:05 AM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 18 sample residents, that the facility did not coordinate assessments with the pre-admission. Including referring all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. Specifically, after a resident was diagnosed with a mental illness there was no referral for a level II. Resident identifier: 4. Findings include: Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type II diabetes, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety, major depressive disorder, obesity and dementia. On 2/28/23 the electronic medical record for resident 4 was reviewed. A review of resident 4's Pre-admission Screening Application/Resident Review (PASRR) dated 4/11/2019 revealed there was no serious mental illness diagnoses. The form revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident with multiple falls was not provided an adequate walker, and a resident on supervised smoking was observed smoking outside without staff supervision. Resident identifiers: 29 and 31. Findings include: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, neuropathy, hypertension, protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, muscle weakness, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, nicotine dependence, and toxic encephalopathy. On 2/27/23 at 10:39 AM an interview with resident 29 was conducted. Resident 29 stated that she had multiple falls at the facility due to being unsteady on her feet. Resident 29 stated that she did not have any serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was revealed that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, two residents were receiving blood pressure medications outside of the ordered parameters and a resident had a medication held without orders to hold the medication. Resident identifiers: 19 and 30. Findings include: 1. Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 12/16/22 with diagnoses of pneumonia, respiratory syncytial virus, protein calorie malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, pain, unspecified dementia, bariatric surgery status, cystitis. On 2/27/22 resident 30's medical records were reviewed. Resident 30 had an order for Furosemide that stated, Give 20 mg [milligrams] by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension Hold for BP [Blood pressure] less than 120. The start date for the order was 1/3/23. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents medical records included documentation that indicated that the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. Specifically, two residents did not have documentation in their electronic medical record indicating if they had or had not received the pneumococcal vaccine. Resident identifiers: 2 and 29 Findings include: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, neuropathy, hypertension, protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, muscle weakness, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, nicotine dependence, and toxic encephalopathy. A review of resident 29's medical record was conducted. Resident 29's vaccination records did not show documentation regarding the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents medical records included documentation that indicated that the resident either received the COVID-19 immunization or did not receive the COVID-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. Specifically, one resident did not have documentation in their electronic medical record indicating if the facility offered a resident the COVID-19 vaccination. Resident identifier: 31 Findings Include: 1. Resident 31 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 1/30/23 with diagnoses which included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, sepsis, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive communication, hypothyroidism, insomnia, chronic pain, major depressive disorder, nicotine dependence, and personal history of suicidal behavior. Resident 31's electric medical record was reviewed. Resident 31's immunization history, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,121 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $56,121 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-21 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in UT
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 46A064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.