No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

August Healthcare At Leewood

7120 Braddock Road, Annandale, VA 22003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 157 certified beds · (703) 256-9770 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0607) — cited Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$25,488 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0607), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,488 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7000 Braddock Rd · (703) 256-7200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6980 Braddock Road · (703) 333-6361 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6980 Braddock Rd · (703) 333-6360 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7245 Wilburdale Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6911 Braddock Rd · (703) 941-4124

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms68.4%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.2%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.1%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.3%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.7%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.0%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.2%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.2%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.311.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 254 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
17.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.8%CMS range 50.2–61.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF17.4%CMS range 13.8–21.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting63.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.5–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
44.7%
Total nursing turnover
47.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 141.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2022-03-17)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2018-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and ensure one resident (Resident (R) 94) of one reviewed for abuse was safe after R94 sustained an injury during activity of daily living (ADL) care by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), and the facility did not investigate to rule out that abuse occurred out of a total sample of 33 residents. The facility's failure to ensure residents were free from physical abuse caused or was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. Cross reference F609 and F610.An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 04/30/26 and was determined to exist on 03/10/25, in the area of S483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation at a Scope and Severity (S/S) of a J. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Services, and Regional Director of Operations were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 04/30/26 at 10:56 AM. Findings include: Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse after Resident (R)94 sustained an injury during activity of daily living (ADL) care by a certified nurse aide (CNA) timely to the state survey agency for (SSA) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 94) reviewed for abuse out of 33 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse. Cross reference F607 and F610.Findings Include: Review of R94's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included altered mental status. Review of facility provided Incident Report for Bruise, dated 03/20/25 at 9:45 PM and written by RN1, revealed, . Writer was informed by [CNA2] that resident developed discoloration of bilateral wrist during ADLS care when changing resident clothes [and the] resident was resisting care. Resident bumped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of potential abuse after one resident (Resident (R) 94) sustained an injury during activity of daily living (ADL) care by a certified nurse aide (CNA) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 94) reviewed for abuse out of 33 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse. Cross reference F607 and F609. Findings Include: Review of R94's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included altered mental status. Review of R94's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/18/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed her preferred language was Korean.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain one of three of the facility dumpsters in a sanitary manner. A trash bag approximately half full of trash was hanging on the outside of the dumpster and approximately twelve pairs of used plastic gloves and numerous pieces of debris were found lying on the ground around and behind the facility's dumpster. The findings include: On 03/15/22 at approximately 11:50 a.m., an observation of the facility's dumpsters was conducted with OSM (other staff member) # 1, dietary manager, OSM # 2, director of maintenance, OSM # 3, director of housekeeping and OSM # 4, housekeeper. The observation revealed that the facility had two trash dumpsters and one cardboard recycling dumpster and one dumpster for trash, next to each other located behind the facility. Observations of the area between and behind the two dumpsters revealed a broken mop handle between the two dumpsters, approximately 12 pairs of used plastic gloves, and numerous pieces of trash - behind the two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence that all required information was provided to the hospital staff when five out of 47 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital; Residents #101, #85, #71, #2 and #74. The findings include: Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence that all required information was provided to the hospital staff when five of 47 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital, Residents #101, #85, #71, #2 and #74. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide evidence that care plan goals were provided to the hospital staff when Resident #101 was transferred to the hospital on 2/19/22. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #101's diagnoses included but were not limited to: cerebral vascular accident, bladder neck…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence written documentation to the Resident or RP (responsible party) and ombudsman upon transfer for five of 47 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital; Residents #101, #85, #71, #2 and #74. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence written documentation to the Resident or RP and Ombudsman when Resident #101 was transferred to the hospital on 2/19/22. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #101's diagnoses included but were not limited to: cerebral vascular accident, bladder neck obstruction and urinary tract infection. Resident #101's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/2/22, coded the resident as scoring 7 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a notice of bed hold when the resident was transferred to the hospital for four of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #101, #85, #71 and #74. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence a bed hold was provided when Resident #101 was transferred to the hospital on 2/19/22. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #101's diagnoses included but were not limited to: cerebral vascular accident, bladder neck obstruction and urinary tract infection. Resident #101's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/2/22, coded the resident as scoring 7 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired Review of Resident #101's nursing progress note dated 2/19/22 at 3:02 PM revealed the following,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    5. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan for use of a hand splint for Resident #71. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/9/2022, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section G documented Resident #71 as being totally dependent on two or more staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. Section O documented Resident #71 using a splint or brace. On 3/15/2022 at approximately 12:45 p.m., an observation of Resident #71 was made in their room. Resident #71 was observed in bed wearing a hand splint on the right hand. The ADL (activities of daily living) documentation survey report for 3/1/2022-3/31/2022 documented in part, Restorative: Splint- Apply Bilateral upper hand resting splint x 2 hrs a day on at 11am, off at 1pm or as tolerated. The comprehensive care plan for Resident #71 failed to evidence use of a hand splint. On 3/16/2022 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #5. LPN #5 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for the use of compression stockings and a hand splint for Resident #86. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/9/22, Resident #86 was scored as having short term and long term memory problems and being moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident was coded as requiring supervision for eating and extensive assistance for all other areas of activities of daily living. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 7/26/21 for Apply compression stockings (1) in am (morning) and remove at night. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 12/30/21 for Apply right hand splint (2) every morning and remove at bedtime. On 3/16/22 at 12:06 PM, Resident #86 was observed up in her recliner, dressed. She did not have compression stockings or a hand splint on. 03/16/22 12:08 PM an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program by implementing non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a prn (as needed) pain medications for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 56. The findings include: The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of oxycodone-acetaminophen (1) to Resident #56. Resident # 56 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included by not limited to chronic pain. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/27/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J coded Resident # 56 as not having any pain in the past 5 (five) days. The physician's order sheet for Resident # 35 dated February 2022 documented in part:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #39. For Resident #39, the facility staff failed to document any notes related to a pressure injury from the end of January 2022 until March 2, 2022. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/6/2022, the resident was coded as having both short and long term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section M, the resident was coded as having no unhealed pressure injuries. The nurse's note dated 12/19/2021 at 3:39 p.m. documented in part, Resident has non ruptured blister noted to her rt (right) inner heel. Measured 4x4. Elevated heel on pillow. Apply skin prep bid (twice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report injuries of unknown origin to the state agency for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #107. On 3/9/22, the facility staff observed injuries of unknown origin (bruises) on Resident #107's face and left hand. The facility staff failed to report the injuries of unknown origin to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia and paralysis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/22/22, the resident scored 1 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Review of Resident #107's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 3/9/22 that documented, At exactly 0630 (6:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to investigate injuries of unknown origin for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #107. On 3/9/22, the facility staff observed injuries of unknown origin (bruises) on Resident #107's face and left hand. The facility staff failed to investigate these injuries of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107's diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia and paralysis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/22/22, the resident scored 1 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Review of Resident #107's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 3/9/22 that documented, At exactly 0630 (6:30 a.m.), CNA (certified nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate MDS assessment for 2 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #83 and #2. The findings include: 1. For Resident #83 the 2/7/22 quarterly MDS assessment was coded incorrectly for weight, weight loss, and weight gain. The resident was coded as having significant weight loss and significant weight gain, based on a weight obtained approximately one year prior to the MDS. The resident had no weights obtained in approximately a year. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of but not limited to cerebral vascular disease, high blood pressure and Alzheimer's disease. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/7/22, the resident scored a 0 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence completion of a level 1 PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) for 1 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #30. The facility staff failed to complete a level 1 PASRR for Resident #30 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included delusional disorders, hallucinations and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/26/2021, the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately impaired for making daily decisions. Review of Resident #30's clinical record failed to evidence a level 1 PASRR. On 3/16/2022 at approximately 9:26 a.m., a request was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a complete baseline care plan for 1 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #315. The facility staff failed to develop Resident #315's baseline care plan to include the use of an incentive spirometer. The findings include: Resident #315 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #315's diagnosis included but was not limited to a heart attack. Resident #315's admission minimum data set was not completed. An admission assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #315 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. A review of Resident #315's March 2022 physician's orders failed to reveal a physician's order for an incentive spirometer. A review of Resident #315's baseline care plan initiated on 3/7/22 failed to reveal documentation regarding an incentive spirometer. On 3/15/22 at 1:15 p.m. and 3/16/22 at 8:34 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet professional standards of practice in providing care and services to one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #71. The facility staff failed to completely transcribe a physician order for Resident #71 to include the type of enteral feeding to be administered. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/9/2022, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section K documented Resident #71 as having a feeding tube and receiving 51% or more of their total calories through tube feeding. On 3/15/2022 at approximately 12:45 p.m., an observation of Resident #71 was made in their room. Resident #71 was observed in bed receiving Glucerna tube feeding at 45 ml/hr (milliliters per hour) via pump. The physician orders for Resident #71 documented in part, Enteral Feed Order every shift for Nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a pressure injury for two of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #39 and #2. The findings included: 1. For Resident #39, the facility staff failed to assess and measure a pressure injury (1) from January 2022 through March 2, 2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/6/2022, Resident #39 was coded as having both short and long term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section M, the resident was coded as having no unhealed pressure injuries. The nurse's note dated 12/19/2021 at 3:39 p.m. documented in part, Resident has non ruptured blister noted to her rt (right) inner heel. Measured 4x4. Elevated heel on pillow. Apply skin prep bid (twice a day) and monitor any change. In house wound consult .No sign and symptoms of verbal or non verbal pain or discomfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent injury from a fall for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 28. The facility staff failed to place a fall mat on the floor next to Resident # 28's bed when they are were in bed. The findings include: Resident # 28 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to: muscle weakness and a history of falls. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/30/2021, the resident scored 4 (four) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On the following dates a times, Resident #28 was observed to bed, with no fall mat in place on the floor next to the bed: 03/15/22 at 12:40 p.m, 03/15/22 at 4:55 p.m., 03/16/22 at 8:05 a.m., and 03/16/22 at 12:00 p.m. At each observation, a fall mat was leaning against the wall at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services to two of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #2 and #315. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide oxygen at the prescribed rate for Resident #2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and heart failure. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/23/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O failed to evidence oxygen use. On 3/15/2022 at 12:19 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #2 in their room. Resident #2 was observed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to communicate consistently with the dialysis center for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #44. For Resident #44, the facility staff failed to evidence consistent communication via the dialysis communication book on multiple dates in 2022. The findings include: Resident #44 was admit to the facility on 4/5/2019 with a diagnosis of end stage renal failure requiring hemodialysis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/11/2022, the resident scored a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section O, Resident #74 was coded as receiving dialysis while a resident at the facility. The physician order dated 10/3/2020 documented, Dialysis Services [address of dialysis center] on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 11:00 a.m. An interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer medication in a sanitary manner for 1 of 6 residents in the Medication Administration observation, Resident #35. The facility nurse administered a medication which had been handled in an unsanitary manner to Resident #35. The findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including alcohol abuse and alcohol related hepatitis. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 3/7/22, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/1/20 for Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) (1) 50 mg (milligrams) . On 3/16/22 at 8:17 AM, LPN #9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed to prepare and administer medications for Resident #35. One of the medications prepared and administered was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for three Residents (Residents #43, #20, and #59) of the 34 residents in the survey sample. 1. Resident #43 did not have a comprehensive care plan for dementia care. 2. Resident #20 did not have a comprehensive care plan for dementia care. 3. Resident #59's care plan did not describe, nor address, his dementia needs, or behaviors. The findings included: 1. Resident #43 did not have a comprehensive care plan for dementia care. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Dementia, muscular dystrophy and high blood pressure. Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 9-7-18 coded Resident #43 with severe cognitive impairment. The MDS was completed as a significant change in status assessment as the resident had completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-11-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #43 did not receive care and services for treatment of her dementia and was placed on an antipsychotic. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, Dementia, muscular dystrophy and high blood pressure. Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 9-7-18 coded Resident #43 with severe cognitive impairment. The MDS was completed as a significant change in status assessment as the resident had completed Hospice. The resident required extensive care with all ADL's (activities of daily living such as bed mobility and toileting) of two staff members. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was coded with no behaviors during the seven day lookback. 11/07/18 01:35 PM, a clinical record review revealed Hospice was initiated 6-5-18 for senile degeneration and muscular dystrophy. On 11/08/18 at 10:00 AM, a review of the meal intakes for September, October and November, 2018 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family interviews, staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement policies and procedures regarding a choking incident and a bruise of unknown origin for 2 residents (Resident #82, #78) in a sample of 34 residents. 1. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to investigate a choking incident. 2. For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to investigate a bruise of unknown origin. The findings include: 1. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to investigate a choking incident. Resident #82, an [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia and dementia. Resident #82's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/09/2018. Resident #82 was not coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score but cognitive skills for daily decision making were coded as severely impaired. Functional status for eating was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family interviews, staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to investigate a choking incident and a bruise of unknown origin for 2 residents (Resident #82, #78) in a sample of 34 residents. 1. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to investigate a choking incident. 2. For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to investigate a bruise of unknown origin. The findings include: 1. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to investigate a choking incident. Resident #82, an [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia and dementia. Resident #82's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/09/2018. Resident #82 was not coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score but cognitive skills for daily decision making were coded as severely impaired. Functional status for eating was coded as requiring extensive assistance. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #82) of 34 residents in the survey sample to review and revise the comprehensive care plan. 1. For Resident #82, the facility did not discontinue the use of adaptive utensils on the comprehensive care plan. The findings included: Resident #23, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, dysphagia, paralytic syndrome, hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was significant change assessment with an assessment reference date of 8/14/18. The resident was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. On 11/7/18, Resident #23 was observed eating breakfast and lunch in her room. She was observed to use regular utensils during both meals. Resident #23's comprehensive care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed for 1 resident (Resident #29) in a survey sample of 34 Residents to provide medications as ordered by physician. For Resident #29 the facility failed to obtain medication ordered by physician or obtain substitute until the medication was available. The findings include: Resident #29, a [AGE] year old man, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Dysphagia, Muscular weakness, Aphasia (inability to talk), Parkinson's disease, and Hemiplegia. The most recent (Minimum Data Set) MDS with an (Assessment Reference Date) ARD of 02/19/2018 coded the Resident as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 11/7/2018 during clinical record review it was noted that Resident had order for Protonix Suspension 40 (milligrams) mg (by mouth) PO every day for (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease). The medication had been originally ordered on 10/13/2017.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 Residents (Resident #4 and #82) in a survey sample of 34 Residents were free from unnecessary medications. 1. For Resident #4, the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reduction of Psychotropic Drug Temazepam for a year. 2. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to ensure she was free from the psychotropic medication Seroquel which is not indicated for residents with a diagnosis of dementia. The findings included: Resident #4, a [AGE] year old man, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Diabetes, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, and Depressive Disorder. On 11/06/2018 during clinical record review it was noted that Resident #4 had orders for Temazepam 15 (milligram) mg 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime and that order started on 5/7/2017 he also had an order for Wellbutrin ER 75 mg. (an antidepressant) twice daily. On 11/08/2018 at 11:00 AM an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff Interview, and facility Record Review, the facility staff failed to ensure that medications were not in an unlocked area, and available to residents. A wall cabinet on the [NAME] unit was open, unlocked, and could be easily accessed by wandering Residents. The cabinet contained 2 open gallon sized zip lock bags of various medications, on the bottom shelf, closest to the counter top. The findings include: On 11-17-18 at 9:17 a.m., The wall cabinet directly over the nursing station counter top, was opened by surveyors from the hallway. The cabinet contained 2 large gallon size zip lock bags full of open, and unopened medications. No nursing staff were in the nursing station, and Residents were wandering the halls freely. Some residents were noted to be in wheel chairs, and some were ambulatory. On 11-17-18 at 9:30 a.m., A Licensed Practical Nurse returned to the nursing station (LPN F), and surveyors pointed to the medications from the cabinet at that time, and asked her why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-08 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 Resident (Resident #55) of 34 residents was provided the therapeutic diet as ordered by physician. For Resident #55 the facility failed to ensure Resident was given the correct amount of fluids on his fluid restricted Renal Diet. The findings included: Resident #55 a [AGE] year old man was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease, Dependent on Renal Dialysis, Dysphagia, (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aurous) MRSA to (Peripherally Inserted Central line Catheter) PICC line. On 11/7/2018 it was noted during clinical record review that Resident was on a fluid restricted renal diet due to his diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease. The order in the chart dated 10/23/2018 that read Fluid Restrictions: Day 150 (milliliters) ml. Evening 100 ml, Night 50 ml, Total 300. The Remaining Fluid to Be Provided By Dietary. The order did not specify how much the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-08-30 · tag F0240 — isolated
    Provide care for each resident in a way that maintains or improves their quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed, for one resident (Resident #6) in the survey sample of 24 residents, to provide a dignified living experience during medication administration. The facility staff applied a pain patch to Resident #6's back, asked her to lean forward, and then used a black marker to write the day, month and year on it. The Findings included: Resident #6 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnoses included a facial bruise from a fall, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular accident, and Asthma. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/5/17, coded Resident #6 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/29/17 at 8:30 A.M. an observation was conducted of the facilities' medication administration process. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN-A) placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-08-30 · tag F0279 — isolated
    Develop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to devise, and implement a comprehensive care plan for the use IV (intravenous) potassium and antibiotics for one Resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 24 Residents. For Resident #1, IV antibiotics, fluids, and Potassium were not appropriately care planned, and skin breakdown was care planned inappropriately. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's current diagnoses included; pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Dementia, congestive heart failure, and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set, (MDS) was a Significant change Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 7-21-17. the MDS coded Resident #1 as severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 was coded as being extensively dependent for all activities of daily living, and requiring a 1 person physical Assist. Resident #1 was first observed laying in bed, on her back, on 8-28-17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-08-30 · tag F0309 — isolated
    Provide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain the highest practicable well being for 1 Resident (Resident #1) in the survey sample of 24 residents. For Resident #1, the facility failed to ensure IV (intravenous) medications were administered per physician's orders, and standards of professional practice. The facility staff further failed to obtain an IV access timely, and provide care and services during an acute illness. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's current diagnoses included; pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Dementia, congestive heart failure, and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set, (MDS) was a Significant change Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 7-21-17. the MDS coded Resident #1 as severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 was coded as being extensively dependent for all activities of daily living, and requiring a 1 person physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-08-30 · tag F0328 — isolated
    Properly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide specialized intravenous antibiotic and potassium infusion nursing care for 1 Resident (Resident #1) in the survey sample of 24 residents. For Resident #1, the facility failed to ensure IV (intravenous) medications were administered per physician's orders, and standards of professional practice. The facility staff further failed to obtain an IV access timely, during an acute illness. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's current diagnoses included; pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Dementia, congestive heart failure, and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set, (MDS) was a Significant change Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 7-21-17. the MDS coded Resident #1 as severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 was coded as being extensively dependent for all activities of daily living, and requiring a 1 person physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-08-30 · tag F0518 — isolated
    Train all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure staff were trained in emergency procedures. Licensed Practical Nurse D (LPN D), and Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) could not describe fully what response should be made to fire, disaster, and elopement protocols. The findings included: LPN D, and CNA A were interviewed by phone on 8-29-17 at 11:30 p.m. They both identified themselves, and were asked to describe what to do if a fire alarm sounded. Neither could state Extinguish the fire and continued to say evacuate. When asked if they had emergency power, they stated yes at the nursing station, and seemed unaware of any other emergency power outlets for Resident use. When asked about elopement protocols both stated they would report to the supervisor, and the supervisor would report to the administrator, and the administrator would call the state. Neither could answer how long that would take, and could not describe that police would be called even with cueing from the surveyor about calling the police if a Resident could not be located. The issues were reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,488 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $25,488 — penalty dated 2026-04-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,581per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495337. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-03-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next