The Wybe And Marietje Kroontje Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 195 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.41 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-04-13 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment and attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to the installation of a side rail and failed to ensure correct installation to assess for the seven zones of entrapment when side rails were added and/or bed components were changed for 6 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #41, Resident #5, Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #25, and Resident #57). At the time of the survey, the facility staff member responsible for the installation and maintenance of side rails did not have the knowledge to ensure appropriate safety measurements of the seven zones of entrapment risk. The facility failed to ensure side rails were assessed for entrapment risk when installed on a bed or bed components were replaced. At the time of the survey, of a census of 53 residents, 34 residents had at least one side rail attached to the bed. The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to revise and/or reassess the effectiveness of the interventions of the comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to meet the needs of facility residents. The findings included:A review of the clinical records for the current sampled facility residents did not disclose activity progress notes for resident quarterly care plan reviews. On 4/8/26 at 9:10 AM, the activity director (AD) was interviewed and asked if a quarterly activity progress note or activity assessment is completed for each resident. The AD stated they do a care plan note. The activity assistant (AA) agreed that a quarterly activity progress note is completed with review of the resident care plans. A review of the activity care plan progress notes for the current sampled facility residents disclosed the start date of the initial care plan, the last reviewed/revised date of the activity care plan, and the activity care plan focus, goal, and interventions. The note did not disclose information about revisions to the activity care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to address the resident's activity preferences, interests, and psychosocial needs for (5) five of (26) twenty-six current sampled residents, Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #19, Resident #25, and Resident #7. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to address the resident's activity preferences, interests, and psychosocial needs. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, sepsis, acute and subacute infective endocarditis, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system-pacemaker, type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and atrial fibrillation. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/3/26 assigned the resident a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure completion of monthly medication regimen reviews for 5 of 26 sampled resident, Resident #9, #39, #41, #8, and #2. The findings included: 1.For resident #9 the facility staff failed to ensure a monthly drug regimen review was completed by a pharmacist for May 2025. A facility policy entitled Drug Regimen Review (DRR) with an implementation date of 9/25/25 specified, A consultant pharmacist shall conduct a drug regimen review for each resident monthly in the Cove (long-term care center). Item 2. Under the heading Policy read in part, Purpose of the review: The review aims to ensure the safe and effective use of medications by: Identifying potential drug-drug or drug-food interactions. Verifying those medications are prescribed and administered as ordered by the attending physician. Confirming that medications are administered at the correct time, in the appropriate dose, and in the correct dosage form. Monitoring for signs and symptoms of adverse drug reactions or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0944 — pattern
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of staff training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for four of four sampled staff members, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Dining Server #1, and the facility Maintenance Director. The findings included: A facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), reviewed 1/29/26, specified All facility staff, contracted staff, and volunteers will be educated about the QAPI plan and their role in development and implementation of interventions.The facility staff were unable to provide evidence of staff training regarding the facility's QAPI program for CNA #3, RN #1, Dining Server #1, and the facility Maintenance Director. During an interview on 4/13/26 at 2:53 PM, the facility Compliance Director stated the facility provides QAPI training but does not have staff signature sheets as evidence of the trainings. On 4/13/26 at 4:38 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, employee record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property as evidence by failure to obtain a criminal background check on one (1) of 25 new hire employees, Dining Server #2.The findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy, implemented 4/25/24, specified, The facility will screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating residents by taking the following actions.Criminal background history checks will be conducted on every candidate through the Virginia State Police prior to employment. Any applicant found guilty of a barrier crime or guilty by a court of law of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or mistreatment shall be disqualified for employment.Dining Server #2's date of employment was documented as 2/02/26; however, the provided Virginia State Police background check was received on 7/06/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to report a resident allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency for one (1) of 26 current sampled residents, Resident #48. The findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy, implemented 4/25/24, specified, All staff shall ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. If the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide written notification of the reason(s) for transfer/discharge to the resident representative for (1) one of (26) twenty-six current sampled residents, Resident #19. The findings included:For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to provide written notification for the reason(s) of a transfer/discharge to the resident's representative for a transfer/discharge to a higher level of care that occurred on 2/24/26. Resident #19's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included but were not limited to vascular dementia-severe, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease-stage 3 (three), Alzheimer's Disease, and cerebral infarction. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/1/26, was coded in Section C (Cognitive Patterns), to reflect the resident as being rarely/never understood with short and long-term memory problems, and severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours for (1) one of (26) twenty-six current sampled residents, Resident #59. The findings included:For Resident #59, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan within (48) forty-eight hours of admission. Resident #59's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, neuropathy, scoliosis, depression, and history of chronic urinary tract infections. The most recent admission minimum data set (MDS) was not completed at time of survey. A review of a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE], assigned the resident a score of 6 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. A review of Resident #59's clinical record disclosed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A baseline care plan could not be located. Requested and received a baseline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow medical provider orders for 3 of 26 current sampled residents, Resident #50, #2, and #19. The findings included: 1. For resident #50 the facility staff failed to follow medical provider orders for a Dulcolax suppository to be administered to the resident after three days of having no bowel movement. An undated facility document entitled, Bowel Regimen read in part, Purpose: 1. To achieve control of bowel evacuation on a regular basis. 2. To avoid constipation. 3. To prevent decubiti (pressure ulcers) and skin irritation. 4. To improve morale of the resident. 5. To restore the resident's dignity and self-respect. 6. To restore the optimum level of bowel function. On page 2 of the document under the heading, Regimen item #3 read, After third day, if resident has not had a bowel movement, a laxative should be given as ordered by the physician. The Resident Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted resident #50 on 07/30/2024. According to the face sheet, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure two (2) of 26 current sampled residents (Resident #6 and Resident #5) received assistive devices to prevent accidents. The findings included:1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to ensure safety devices including Dycem (a non-slip material used to provide grip), a perimeter mattress (mattress with raised edges to prevent rolling out of bed), and a wheelchair anti-rollback device (a safety mechanism that automatically prevents a wheelchair from rolling backward when the user stands up) were in use to prevent falls. A Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 10/14/25. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included severe vascular dementia with anxiety, generalized muscle weakness, history of falling, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$80,880 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $80,880 — penalty dated 2026-04-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $930K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA