Bridgewater Home , Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 172 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 120.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.11 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans (CCPs) that included the residents current code status for all residents in the survey sample. The findings included:The facility staff failed to develop CCPs that included the residents current code status. During the clinical record review, the surveyors were unable to locate information on the resident's CCPs that referenced their current code status. On 01/21/26 at 5:00 p.m., during an end of the day meeting with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Infection Preventionist the issue with the code status not being on the resident's CCP was reviewed. On 01/22/26 at 10:00 a.m., the facility staff provided the survey team with a copy of their policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning. This policy read in part, .will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to recognize and respect the residents' right to exercise their rights as a resident/citizen of the United States to send/receive mail. The findings included:For the facility, the facility staff failed to recognize and respect the residents' right to exercise their rights as a resident/citizen of the United States to send/receive mail on Saturdays. On 1/21/2026 at 2:50 PM, this surveyor met with six members of the Resident Council, Resident #12, Resident #77, Resident #85, Resident #101, Resident #104, and Resident #117. The residents' concurred mail is not delivered to them on Saturdays at the facility. This concern was discussed at the end of day meeting on 1/21/26 at 5:08 PM with the administrator, director of nursing, and infection preventionist. On 1/22/26 at 8:41 AM, this surveyor interviewed other staff #4 (OS#4) and OS#4 informed surveyor the post office takes the mail to the main desk in the main lobby and the post office does not deliver mail on Saturdays because there is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #105.The findings included:A large area of drywall/sheetrock next to the resident's bed was visibly scuffed and damaged.Resident #105's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and dementia.Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #105's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/24/25 had been coded to indicate this resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making.On 01/20/26 during initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed a large area of drywall beside the resident's bed to be scuffed and damaged.A second observation was made of this area on 01/21/2026 at 4:39 p.m. On 01/21/2026 at 5:00 p.m., during an end of the day meeting with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Infection Preventionist the issue with Resident #105's drywall being damaged and in need of repair was reviewed. On 01/22/2026 at 8:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide written notification of the reason(s) for transfer/discharge to the resident's representative and/or failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer/discharge for (2) two of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #121 and Resident #2. The findings included:1.For Resident #121 the facility staff failed to provide written notification of the reason(s) for transfer/discharge to the resident's representative and failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer/discharge for a transfer/discharge that occurred on 12/8/25. Resident #121's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, neoplasm of the brain, hydrocephalus, hypertension, urinary retention, and hyponatremia. The most recent admission minimum data set (MDS) with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessments for two of twenty-eight residents in the survey sample (Residents #3 and #13).The findings include:1. Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] inaccurately documented the resident took anticoagulant medication and failed to indicate the resident took an antiplatelet medication.Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, psychotic disturbance, mood disorder, chronic kidney disease, atrioventricular block, heart failure and hypoxia. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed R3 with severely impaired cognitive skills.R3's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 6/22/22 for aspirin 81 milligrams each day for treatment of cerebral infarction. R3's clinical record documented no physician's order for any anticoagulant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a care plan for one of twenty-eight residents in a survey sample.The Findings Include:Resident #56 (R56) care plan was not updated to include hearing aids.R56 diagnoses included communication deficit related to hard of hearing, depression, and pulmonary embolism. The most current MDS (Minimal Data Set) was a quarterly with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/10/25. R56 was assessed with a cognitive score of 13 indicating cognitively intact. Review of R56's admission assessment dated [DATE] and section B (hearing and vision) of the MDS documented R56 used hearing aids.Review of R56's care plan for communication related to hearing deficit indicated how to speak with R56 (face to face without limited background noise) but did not indicate R56 wore hearing aids or any interventions regarding hearing aid usage and monitoring.On 1/22/2026 at 10:37a.m. registered nurse (RN # 1, MDS coordinator) was interviewed. RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 28 residents, Resident #11.The findings included:For Resident #11 the facility staff held the medication polyethylene glycol without a physician's order.Resident #11's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified and other chronic pain.Resident #11's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/23/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 4 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired.Resident #11's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for The resident uses antidepressant medication r/t (related to) Depression and insomnia. Interventions for this plan include Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) adverse reaction to ANTIDEPRESSANT therapy: . constipation, fecal impaction, diarrhea.Resident #11's clinical record contained a physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe room environment for one of twenty-eight residents in the survey sample (Resident #99).The findings include:A portable heater was in use in Resident #99's room. The heater, placed during a heat outage, was not removed from the room when emergency use was no longer required.Resident #99 (R99) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, anxiety, benign prostatic hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, cervical disc disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and osteoarthritis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R99 as cognitively intact and as requiring the assistance of one person for safe transfers.On 1/20/26 at 2:39 p.m., R99 was observed in a chair in the resident's room. Positioned near the center of the room was an electric heater plugged into a wall outlet.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 2 of 28 residents in the survey sample, Residents #10 and #84.The findings included:1. For Resident #10, the clinical record included provider orders for Acetaminophen and Milk of Magnesium by mouth. Resident #10 had a feeding tube and was NPO (nothing by mouth). Resident #10's diagnoses included, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and dysphagia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #10's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/28/25 was coded to indicate the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Section K (swallowing/nutritional status) was coded to indicate this resident had a feeding tube. Resident #10's comprehensive care plan (CCP) included the focus area all nutrition and fluids via feeding tube. Resident #10's clinical record included the following provider orders. NPO/Tube Feeding diet NPO texture, no liquids by mouth consistency for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during tracheostomy care for one of twenty-eight residents in the survey sample (Resident #13).The findings include:Infection control practices regarding hand hygiene and glove changes were not followed during Resident #13's tracheostomy care.Resident #13 (R13) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dysphagia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic respiratory failure, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, dysarthria, hypertension and depression. The MDS dated [DATE] assessed R13 as cognitively intact.R13's clinical record documented a physician order dated 7/1/25 for tracheostomy care each day that included cleaning around stoma with cotton swab wet with saline/hydrogen peroxide mix and an order dated 7/4/25 to insert new sterile inner cannula to tracheostomy (trach) daily.On 1/22/26 at 8:58 a.m., with R13's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA