Westminster Canterbury Blue Ri

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

73.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.33 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.44 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, staff, and family interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure safe transfer from bed to wheelchair for one (1) of 24 residents (Resident #7) in the survey sample, which resulted in harm, sustaining a right hip fracture. The findings included: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently transferred to the local hospital on 4/10/26, diagnosed with a hip fracture and readmitted to the nursing facility on 4/15/26. The current diagnoses included: incomplete paraplegia and relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/02/26, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. [NAME] BlvdIn section GG (Functional Abilities), the resident was coded as dependent in personal hygiene, upper-body dressing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to accurately assess and classify an open wound for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #30) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included a stroke with left hemiplegia. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/03/2026, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 11 out of 15. This indicated that Resident #30's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were moderately impaired. The resident's person-centered care plan with a revision date of 3/27/26 stated that the resident had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to an activity intolerance, Disease Process, and limited mobility. The goal stated that the resident would maintain the current level of function through the review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0837 — pattern
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility's Governing Body failed to ensure facility policies were implemented regarding management and operation of the facility to ensure effective systems were in place to assure the quality of life for the residents in the area of foot care and treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers.The findings included:During the recertification survey completed on 4/15/26 the facility failed to provide podiatry services for Resident #11 and provide treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers for Resident #30. On 4/15/26 at 4:12 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding podiatry services and treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers. The Administrator stated that she is not sure if the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee discussed foot care and podiatry services. The Administrator also stated that the facility identified issues regarding podiatry services but no action plan was put in place. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to adequately identify, keep systems functioning properly, and implement necessary action plans to assure the quality of life for the residents using the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to identify deficiencies if the area of foot care and treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers.The findings included:During the recertification survey completed on 4/15/26 the facility failed to provide podiatry services for Resident #11 and provide treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers for Resident #30. On 4/15/26 at 4:12 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding podiatry services and treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers. The Administrator stated that she is not sure if the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee discussed foot care and podiatry services. The Administrator also stated that the facility identified issues regarding podiatry services but no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to treat 1 of 24 residents (Resident 20) in the survey sample with respect and dignity. The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included dementia and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/26, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 3 out of 15. This indicated that Resident # 20's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section GG0130 (Functional Abilities), the resident was coded as requiring setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance with eating, substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self and upper body dressing, dependent with Lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on/taking off footwear.On 4/13/26 at approximately 12:50 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that resident care equipment was kept clean for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 31) in the survey sample.The findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included dementia and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/2/26, coded the resident as unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long-term and short-term memory problems, as well as severe impairment for daily decision making.In section GG0130 (Functional Abilities), the resident was coded as requiring setup or clean-up assistance with eating; being dependent with shower/bathe; and with upper body dressing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on/taking off footwear. The resident was also coded at section GG0170. (Mobility) dependent on the use of a wheelchair operated by staff.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 24 residents (Resident 49) in the survey sample was free from a physical restraint. The findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included dementia and Parkinson's disease. The resident had not been admitted to the facility long enough for the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to be completed; therefore, the following information was obtained from the Nurses' admission Functional assessment with a lock date of 4/11/26. The admission assessment revealed the resident was oriented to person only, and his cognitive status was severely impaired. The assessment also indicated that the resident was dependent in all activities of daily living (ADL). On 4/14/26 at approximately 10:59 AM, Resident #49 was observed in a reclined chair in the living room area. An interview with the Clinical Care Coordinator (CCC) was conducted at 12:48 PM. The CCC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner to the appropriate state agencies for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #11) in the survey sample. Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility 6/10/24 after an acute care hospital stay and re-admitted on [DATE] from an acute care facility. The current diagnoses included; Foot Drop, Peripheral Vascular Disease.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/02/26 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #11 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goals) the resident was coded as dependent with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self. Requires set-up or clean-up assistance with eating.The person-centered care plan dated 03/06/26 read the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #11), in the survey sample of 24 Residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain podiatry services.The findings included: Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility 6/10/24 after an acute care hospital stay and re-admitted on [DATE] from an acute care facility. The current diagnoses included; Foot Drop, Peripheral Vascular Disease. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/02/26 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #11 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goals) the resident was coded as dependent with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self. Requires set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to provide necessary incontinence care for 1 of 24 residents (Resident 20) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, and a history of recurrent urinary tract infections secondary to hydronephrosis related to obstruction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/26, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 3 out of 15. This indicated that Resident # 20's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section GG0130 (Functional Abilities), the resident was coded as requiring setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance with eating, substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self and upper body dressing, dependent with lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to serve 1 of 24 residents (Resident 20) in the survey sample the food necessary to support nutritional needs. The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' current diagnoses included dementia and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/11/26, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 3 out of 15. This indicated that Resident # 20's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In section GG0130 (Functional Abilities), the resident was coded as requiring setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance with eating, substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self and upper body dressing, dependent with Lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on/taking off footwear.On 4/13/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA