The Culpeper

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.33 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.04 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.37 to 1.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2021-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure injury for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #16. Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a stage two pressure injury on the sacrum/buttocks. The facility staff failed to complete ongoing thorough wound assessments including measurements and staging of the pressure injury from 10/30/20 thorough 11/19/20, and from 11/27/20 through 12/10/20, and failed to provide treatment to the pressure injury from 11/7/20 through 11/17/20, with the exception of 11/14/20. On 11/19/20 an assessment of the area, revealed the pressure injury had deteriorated from a stage two to an unstageable pressure injury, resulting in harm. 2. The facility staff failed to administer treatment per physician order for Resident #16's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessments in a timely manner for four of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #48, #36 and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to complete the resident's quarterly MDS with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/7/23 within 14 days. A review of R1's clinical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 9/7/23. Further review of R1's clinical record revealed the MDS was not completed until 9/30/23 (23 days). On 10/17/23 at 2:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1 (the MDS coordinator). RN #1 stated MDS assessments should be completed within 14 days from the ARD. RN #1 stated she references the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual when completing MDS assessments. On 10/18/23 at 12:27 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1,the executive director and ASM #2, the director of nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner in one of two nourishment refrigerators, the rehab to home unit refrigerator, and in one of two facility kitchens, the main kitchen. The findings include: The facility staff failed to maintain a clean main kitchen, and failed to store food safely in the main kitchen and in the rehab to home unit refrigerator. On 10/16/23 at 10:15 a.m., observation was made of the main facility kitchen. The upper oven contained a large amount of baked-on grease and dark particles on the doors, sides, bottom and back. The areas around the burners on the stove contained cooked-on grease, and a large amount of crumbs and dark black debris. OSM (other staff member) #1, the director of dining services, stated: It all could use a good cleaning. She stated the oven and stove get a deep cleaning weekly, but should also be spot cleaned after each use. In the walk in freezer, a 10 by 10 plastic container of red frozen material rested on a shelf. There was no label on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #34, #12, and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #34 (R34), the facility staff failed to implement the care plan which instructed the staff to use a slow sip cup for fluid intake. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/19/23, R34 was coded as being as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. He was coded as coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications. On 10/16/23 at 3:40 p.m., R34 was observed sitting up in bed. He was drinking a liquid from a regular cup with a standard plastic straw. A two-handled slow sip cup was observed on R34's overbed table adjacent to his bed. RN (registered nurse) #2 was observed walking out of the resident's room as he was finishing sipping the liquid through the straw. A review of R34's clinical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47. The findings include: For Resident #47 (R47), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan for the use of floor mats. A review of R47's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/16/22 for floor mats next to the bed while the resident is in the bed. R47's comprehensive care plan dated 2/3/22 failed to reveal documentation regarding floor mats. On 10/16/23 at 11:34 a.m. and 10/17/23 at 8:54 a.m., R47 was observed lying in bed. A mat was observed on the right side of the bed, but a mat was not on the left side of the bed. On 10/17/23 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2. LPN #2 stated the purpose of the care plan is that It tells about how to meet their [residents'] needs the best. LPN #2 stated residents' care plans should be reviewed and revised to include the use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote a resident's highest level of well-being for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The findings include: For Resident #51 (R51), the facility staff failed to administer a bisacodyl suppository per the physician's order. A review of R51's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 4/4/23 for a bisacodyl suppository, ten milligrams- administer one suppository rectally one time a day as needed for no bowel movement in three days. A review of R51's bowel movement records revealed the resident did not have a bowel movement from 7/3/23 until 7/9/23. Further review of R51's clinical record and review of a 24-hour report sheet dated 7/7/23 revealed a suppository was not administered to R51 until 7/7/23 (five days after the resident had not had a bowel movement). R51 did not have a bowel movement until 7/9/23. On 10/18/23 at 11:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. LPN #3 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a fall intervention for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47. The findings include: For Resident #47 (R47), the facility staff failed to implement physician ordered floor mats. A review of R47's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/16/22 for floor mats next to the bed while the resident is in the bed. Further review of R47's clinical record revealed the resident sustained a fall on 1/6/23, 3/4/23, 4/2/23, and 8/16/23. On 10/16/23 at 11:34 a.m. and 10/17/23 at 8:54 a.m., R47 was observed lying in bed. A mat was observed on the right side of the bed, but a mat was not on the left side of the bed. On 10/17/23 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2. LPN #2 stated the nurses are aware of the need for floor mats via physician's orders and then the nurses tell the certified nursing assistants who needs floor mats. LPN #2 reviewed R47's physician's order for floor mats and stated that if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to apply an adaptive device to prevent pain for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12. The findings include: For Resident #12 (R12), the facility staff failed to apply both right and left palm protectors to prevent pain. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/13/23, R12 was coded as requiring the extensive assistance of two staff members for dressing and personal hygiene, and as having impairment in range of motion on both sides of her upper extremities. On 10/16/23 at 11:22 a.m. and 3:36 p.m., R12 was observed in her wheelchair, and did not have palm protectors on either hand. On 10/17/23 at 8:34 a.m., R12 was observed in her wheelchair, and had a palm protector on her right hand, but not on her left. A review of R12's clinical record revealed the following physician order dated 1/11/23: Bilateral palm protector splints. Apply in morning. Remove at bedtime. Resident to wear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to use an adaptive feeding device for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #34. The findings include: For Resident #34 (R34), the facility failed to utilize a slow sip cup for fluids on 10/16/23. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/19/23, R34 was coded as being as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. He was coded as coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications. On 10/16/23 at 3:40 p.m., R34 was observed sitting up in bed, and was drinking a liquid from a regular cup with a standard plastic straw. A two-handled slow sip cup was observed on R34's overbed table adjacent to his bed. RN (registered nurse) #2 was observed walking out of the resident's room as he was finishing sipping the liquid through the straw. A review of R34's clinical record revealed the following physician's order dated 7/6/23: Regular Diet, Mechanical Soft,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. The findings include: For Resident #51, the facility staff failed to document the administration of a bisacodyl suppository on 7/7/23. A review of R51's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 4/4/23 for a bisacodyl suppository, ten milligrams- administer one suppository rectally one time a day as needed for no bowel movement in three days. R51's July 2023 MAR (medication administration record) documented the same order. A review of a 24-hour report sheet dated 7/7/23 revealed documentation that R51 was administered a suppository on that date. Further review of R51's clinical record, including the July 2023 MAR and nurses' notes for 7/7/23, failed to reveal documentation that R51 was administered a suppository. On 10/18/23 at 11:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. LPN #3 stated that if a nurse administers a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain clean kitchen equipment in one of two kitchens, the main kitchen. The findings include: Observation was made of the main kitchen on 4/5/2022 at 11:28 a.m. The oven racks appeared to be covered in a brown substance. When asked what the cleaning schedule was, OSM (other staff member) #3, the executive chef, stated they should be cleaned on a weekly basis, but may have been missed last week. When asked if they could provide documentation when the ovens were cleaned last, OSM #1, the certified dietary manager, stated it was unlikely that they could provide that. On 4/6/2022 at 10:41 a.m. OSM #1 was asked if they found the documentation of the oven having been cleaned, OSM #1 stated, she doubted [OSM #3] could find that documentation. The facility policy, Cleaning and Sanitizing of Work Surfaces. documented in part, When cleaning fixed equipment, (mixers, slicers, and other equipment that cannot be readily immersed in water), the removable parts are washed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA